SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) speaks during a press conference advocating for the passage of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act on February 5, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Progressive US Lawmakers Mark Black Friday With Calls to Pass the PRO Act
"The right to organize, fight for better working conditions, and fair pay must always be protected."
Nov 26, 2021
As workers worldwide took to the streets while shoppers flooded stores for Black Friday, progressive U.S. lawmakers used the event to pressure the Senate to pass sweeping, House-approved labor rights legislation.
"The Senate should celebrate Black Friday by passing the PRO Act to protect the hardworking folks who are being underpaid and overworked this holiday season."
The Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act is backed by economists, labor groups, and various progressive advocacy organizations. It would boost access to union elections, expand collective bargaining rights, and introduce penalties for exploitative companies.
Although the PRO Act (H.R. 842/S. 420) was opposed by 205 House Republicans and one Democrat--Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas, who faces a progressive primary challenger for 2022--it passed the lower chamber in March. Since then, the evenly split Senate has failed to vote on it.
"The Senate should celebrate Black Friday by passing the PRO Act to protect the hardworking folks who are being underpaid and overworked this holiday season," tweeted Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.). "Every worker deserves a union."
Congressman Jesus "Chuy" Garcia (D-Ill.) concurred, declaring that "the right to organize, fight for better working conditions, and fair pay must always be protected."
Garcia also shared a video from Amnesty International USA calling on Amazon to "respect workers' right to organize a union."
As Common Dreams reported Friday, a coalition of advocacy groups and unions planned #MakeAmazonPay protests and strikes in at least 20 countries to demand the e-commerce giant raise wages, improve workplace conditions, operate more sustainably, and pay its fair share of taxes.
In response to d of a mandatory anti-union meeting for Amazon warehouse workers in Staten Island, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also recently called for passing the PRO Act.
"If unions didn't help working people," he said, "then massive corporations like Amazon wouldn't fight so hard to stop their workers from unionizing."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, pointed out this week that the filibuster is blocking the PRO Act and other Democratic legislation--including voting rights bills and a measure that would protect the right to abortion nationwide.
Despite Senate Republicans' dedication to obstructing Democrats' agenda, a few Democratic senators still refuse to support abolishing or amending the filibuster. However, even if it were killed or changed, it's not clear the PRO Act--spearheaded by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.)--would pass the upper chamber.
Although reporting earlier this year suggested that Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) were planning to support the pro-union bill--which would leave Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who also opposes ending the filibuster, as the sole holdout in their party--they still haven't formally signed on as co-sponsors.
Without calling out any lawmakers by name, AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler in late August signaled there could be electoral consequences for right-wing Democrats like Sinema who won't support ending the filibuster or passing the PRO Act.
"Workers want to hold elected officials accountable on an agenda that they voted for. Right now that agenda is being blocked by arcane rules in the Senate. We believe that voters will take that into consideration for the next election," Shuler said. "Elected officials, if they're not listening, that's when elections end up having consequences."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As workers worldwide took to the streets while shoppers flooded stores for Black Friday, progressive U.S. lawmakers used the event to pressure the Senate to pass sweeping, House-approved labor rights legislation.
"The Senate should celebrate Black Friday by passing the PRO Act to protect the hardworking folks who are being underpaid and overworked this holiday season."
The Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act is backed by economists, labor groups, and various progressive advocacy organizations. It would boost access to union elections, expand collective bargaining rights, and introduce penalties for exploitative companies.
Although the PRO Act (H.R. 842/S. 420) was opposed by 205 House Republicans and one Democrat--Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas, who faces a progressive primary challenger for 2022--it passed the lower chamber in March. Since then, the evenly split Senate has failed to vote on it.
"The Senate should celebrate Black Friday by passing the PRO Act to protect the hardworking folks who are being underpaid and overworked this holiday season," tweeted Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.). "Every worker deserves a union."
Congressman Jesus "Chuy" Garcia (D-Ill.) concurred, declaring that "the right to organize, fight for better working conditions, and fair pay must always be protected."
Garcia also shared a video from Amnesty International USA calling on Amazon to "respect workers' right to organize a union."
As Common Dreams reported Friday, a coalition of advocacy groups and unions planned #MakeAmazonPay protests and strikes in at least 20 countries to demand the e-commerce giant raise wages, improve workplace conditions, operate more sustainably, and pay its fair share of taxes.
In response to d of a mandatory anti-union meeting for Amazon warehouse workers in Staten Island, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also recently called for passing the PRO Act.
"If unions didn't help working people," he said, "then massive corporations like Amazon wouldn't fight so hard to stop their workers from unionizing."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, pointed out this week that the filibuster is blocking the PRO Act and other Democratic legislation--including voting rights bills and a measure that would protect the right to abortion nationwide.
Despite Senate Republicans' dedication to obstructing Democrats' agenda, a few Democratic senators still refuse to support abolishing or amending the filibuster. However, even if it were killed or changed, it's not clear the PRO Act--spearheaded by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.)--would pass the upper chamber.
Although reporting earlier this year suggested that Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) were planning to support the pro-union bill--which would leave Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who also opposes ending the filibuster, as the sole holdout in their party--they still haven't formally signed on as co-sponsors.
Without calling out any lawmakers by name, AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler in late August signaled there could be electoral consequences for right-wing Democrats like Sinema who won't support ending the filibuster or passing the PRO Act.
"Workers want to hold elected officials accountable on an agenda that they voted for. Right now that agenda is being blocked by arcane rules in the Senate. We believe that voters will take that into consideration for the next election," Shuler said. "Elected officials, if they're not listening, that's when elections end up having consequences."
As workers worldwide took to the streets while shoppers flooded stores for Black Friday, progressive U.S. lawmakers used the event to pressure the Senate to pass sweeping, House-approved labor rights legislation.
"The Senate should celebrate Black Friday by passing the PRO Act to protect the hardworking folks who are being underpaid and overworked this holiday season."
The Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act is backed by economists, labor groups, and various progressive advocacy organizations. It would boost access to union elections, expand collective bargaining rights, and introduce penalties for exploitative companies.
Although the PRO Act (H.R. 842/S. 420) was opposed by 205 House Republicans and one Democrat--Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas, who faces a progressive primary challenger for 2022--it passed the lower chamber in March. Since then, the evenly split Senate has failed to vote on it.
"The Senate should celebrate Black Friday by passing the PRO Act to protect the hardworking folks who are being underpaid and overworked this holiday season," tweeted Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.). "Every worker deserves a union."
Congressman Jesus "Chuy" Garcia (D-Ill.) concurred, declaring that "the right to organize, fight for better working conditions, and fair pay must always be protected."
Garcia also shared a video from Amnesty International USA calling on Amazon to "respect workers' right to organize a union."
As Common Dreams reported Friday, a coalition of advocacy groups and unions planned #MakeAmazonPay protests and strikes in at least 20 countries to demand the e-commerce giant raise wages, improve workplace conditions, operate more sustainably, and pay its fair share of taxes.
In response to d of a mandatory anti-union meeting for Amazon warehouse workers in Staten Island, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) also recently called for passing the PRO Act.
"If unions didn't help working people," he said, "then massive corporations like Amazon wouldn't fight so hard to stop their workers from unionizing."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, pointed out this week that the filibuster is blocking the PRO Act and other Democratic legislation--including voting rights bills and a measure that would protect the right to abortion nationwide.
Despite Senate Republicans' dedication to obstructing Democrats' agenda, a few Democratic senators still refuse to support abolishing or amending the filibuster. However, even if it were killed or changed, it's not clear the PRO Act--spearheaded by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.)--would pass the upper chamber.
Although reporting earlier this year suggested that Sens. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) were planning to support the pro-union bill--which would leave Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), who also opposes ending the filibuster, as the sole holdout in their party--they still haven't formally signed on as co-sponsors.
Without calling out any lawmakers by name, AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler in late August signaled there could be electoral consequences for right-wing Democrats like Sinema who won't support ending the filibuster or passing the PRO Act.
"Workers want to hold elected officials accountable on an agenda that they voted for. Right now that agenda is being blocked by arcane rules in the Senate. We believe that voters will take that into consideration for the next election," Shuler said. "Elected officials, if they're not listening, that's when elections end up having consequences."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.