Oct 22, 2021
Environmental and Indigenous advocates on Friday cheered as a federal judge rejected a Biden administration request to temporarily keep in place a Trump-era Clean Water Act rule that one attorney said would have "devastated" states' ability to manage their rivers.
"The Trump administration took an industry wish list and ran with it, trampling over state and tribal authority and public rights to clean water in the process."
On Thursday, Judge William H. Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco threw out a June 2020 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule changing the Clean Water Act Section 401 certification process to allow federal agencies to approve large projects--including fossil fuel pipelines, hydroelectric dams, industrial plants, wetland developments, and municipal facilities--against the wishes of states and Native American tribes.
In July 2020, 20 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration over the rule change. That September, Indigenous tribes and green groups also filed suit against the administration, claiming the new rule would jeopardize tribal and state efforts to protect their water quality.
"We feel vindicated by this win today," Western Environmental Law Center (WELC) attorney Sangye Ince-Johannsen said in a statement following the ruling. "The court's order immediately restores an essential clean water safeguard--and the careful balance of state and federal power to protect clean water--that Congress intended when it wrote the Clean Water Act."
Ince-Johannsen added that "the Trump administration took an industry wish list and ran with it, trampling over state and tribal authority and public rights to clean water in the process."
\u201cBREAKING: Fishing, rec advocates topple critical Trump-era #CleanWater Act federal power grab.\n\nBad Trump Clean Water Act rule immediately, completely nullified.\n\nLike it never happened.\n\nAwesome.\n\nhttps://t.co/EO0WmiQGEm\u2026 @americanrivers @AmerWhitewater @IdahoRivers @CalTrout\u201d— Western Environmental Law Center (@Western Environmental Law Center) 1634918829
The rule change, which was first proposed in 2019 and finalized in June 2020 during the tenure of former coal lobbyist and then-EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler, set a one-year deadline for permitting decisions and limited the factors that state and tribal officials could consider.
At the time, Food & Water Action executive director Wenonah Hauter called the move--part of a broader regulatory rollback aggressively pursued during the administration of former President Donald Trump--"vindictive, spiteful, and capricious."
The Biden administration in July asked the California federal court to keep its predecessor's controversial rule in place until 2023 pending revision. Alsup found that "plaintiffs have established that significant environmental harms will likely transpire" if he granted the administration's request.
This order finds particularly persuasive the state of Washington's example concerning three hydropower dams on the Skagit River. These dams will each require Section 401 certifications prior to EPA's promulgation of a replacement for the current certification rule.
As noted in the state of Washington's brief, "because [Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] licenses for dams will last between 30-50 years, the lack of adequate water quality conditions attached to these licenses will have adverse impacts for a generation"...
The new certification rule curtails restrictions certifying authorities can impose on dams to limit increases in water temperature. The threatened Chinook salmon that reside in the Skagit River are vulnerable to these changes in water temperature, which puts at risk a primary food source for the endangered southern resident orca population in Puget Sound, of which there are currently only 73, the lowest number in over four decades.
According to WELC, Alsup's ruling "restores the broad authority of states and tribes to halt such projects, and alternatively to impose conditions on them, and restores opportunities for robust public participation in permit decisions."
\u201cToday, the court vacated, effective immediately and nationwide, the Trump Administration\u2019s attempt to dismantle key environmental protections in section 401 of the Clean Water Act \u2014 our office's latest win against a Trump administration action. Read more: https://t.co/uQQKSeLLSj\u201d— Attorney General Bob Ferguson (@Attorney General Bob Ferguson) 1634937839
Washington Attorney General and case co-plaintiff Bob Ferguson welcomed the ruling, contending in a statement that the Trump administration "did everything it could to yield to the interests of polluting industries."
"Today's ruling stopped one of his most egregious attempts to strip states' ability to protect their communities against threats to water quality," he added.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta, also a plaintiff in the case, said that "as the state records its driest year in nearly a century, Californians are acutely aware of the value of water and its critical importance to sustaining our communities, ecosystems, and agriculture."
"We're pleased that the district court agreed to vacate this unlawful Trump-era rule and restore California's authority under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act," Bonta added. "State agencies rely on Section 401 to safeguard our precious resources by ensuring that federal projects meet the state's robust water quality requirements."
\u201cGOOD NEWS! We secured a decision by the District Court vacating an unlawful Trump-era rule & restoring the state's Clean Water Act authority.\n\nAs CA records its driest year in nearly a century, we won't stop fighting to safeguard this precious resource!\nhttps://t.co/R8pdBNEjUE\u201d— Rob Bonta (@Rob Bonta) 1634936689
Jennifer Marshall, general counsel for American Rivers, said that "the Trump administration's unlawful 401 rules abandoned the Clean Water Act's commitment to provide a voice for states and communities to protect and manage their rivers and streams, allowing potentially harmful projects to escape critical local review."
"We're proud to have played a role in protecting the rights of states and tribes to defend clean water safeguards," she added.
Redgie Collins, legal and policy director at California Trout, asserted that "the rule changes would have devastated California's ability to manage its rivers. We are relieved hydroelectric projects must still comply with local and state rules to provide flowing water and protect fish."
American Whitewater legal director Bob Nasdor said his organization is "thrilled to have defended the Clean Water Act from an attack that would have undermined the public's ability to protect rivers and communities from harms to the environment and recreation opportunity at hydropower dams and other federally-licensed energy projects."
Nasdor added that "this victory restores our access to information, time for review, and ability of the states to protect water quality that we've counted on for the past 50 years to ensure our rivers are safe, healthy, and accessible."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.