Flames are visible from a flaring pit near a well in the Bakken Oil Field. The primary component of natural gas is methane, which is odorless when it comes directly out of the gas well. (Photo: Orjan F. Ellingvag/Corbis via Getty Images)
24 More Nations Join Global Methane Pledge Welcomed as 'Great Start' But Inadequate
"There's one move left to keep the planet from catastrophe, cutting methane as fast as we can from all sources."
Experts on Monday cautiously welcomed announcements that another 24 nations have joined a U.S.- and European Union-led initiative to voluntarily slash methane emissions 30% from 2020 levels by the end of the decade, while climate campaigners underscored earlier assertions that much greater reductions are essential to combating the climate emergency.
"Cutting methane pollution is the fastest opportunity we have to help avert our most acute climate risks, including crop loss, wildfires, extreme weather, and rising sea levels."
The E.U. and eight countries--Argentina, Ghana, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States--signed the Global Methane Pledge last month ahead of the United Nations Climate Change Conference, also known as COP 26, which is set to begin in Glasgow, Scotland on October 31.
The two dozen new signatories to the pledge include Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Japan, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Sweden. All told, the parties to the agreement account for 60% of the world's gross domestic product and 30% of global methane emissions. However, major methane polluters including Australia, Brazil, China, India, and Russia have not signed the pledge.
Methane is the second-biggest contributor to human-caused global heating after carbon dioxide and has been found to be up to 87 times more potent than CO2 over a 20-year period. Proponents of the Global Methane Pledge say it will help keep the rise in global temperatures below the Paris agreement's more ambitious target of 1.5degC above pre-industrial levels.
U.S. climate envoy John Kerry on Monday called cutting methane emissions the "single-fastest strategy that we have to keep a safer 1.5degC future within reach."
While announcing the new initiative last month, President Joe Biden said it will "not only rapidly reduce the rate of global warming, but it will also produce a very valuable side benefit, like improving public health and agricultural output."
However, while acknowledging that the pledge is a step in the right direction, experts argue that a 30% reduction in methane emissions by 2030 is not good enough.
Last week, the International Energy Agency published a report calling a 75% reduction in methane emissions by the end of the decade "essential" to combating the climate emergency.
Durwood Zaelke, president of the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development, called the Global Methane Pledge a "great start," while encouraging more urgent action.
"There's one move left to keep the planet from catastrophe, cutting methane as fast as we can from all sources," he stressed.
Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, told The Washington Post that "momentum is building for a methane moment at Glasgow."
"Cutting methane pollution is the fastest opportunity we have to help avert our most acute climate risks, including crop loss, wildfires, extreme weather, and rising sea levels," he said.
As Common Dreams reported last month, experts say that scaling down animal agriculture is an essential component of limiting methane emissions. According to research recently published in Nature Food, 35% of all global greenhouse gas emissions are attributable to food production, "of which 57% corresponds to the production of animal-based food," including livestock feed.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Experts on Monday cautiously welcomed announcements that another 24 nations have joined a U.S.- and European Union-led initiative to voluntarily slash methane emissions 30% from 2020 levels by the end of the decade, while climate campaigners underscored earlier assertions that much greater reductions are essential to combating the climate emergency.
"Cutting methane pollution is the fastest opportunity we have to help avert our most acute climate risks, including crop loss, wildfires, extreme weather, and rising sea levels."
The E.U. and eight countries--Argentina, Ghana, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States--signed the Global Methane Pledge last month ahead of the United Nations Climate Change Conference, also known as COP 26, which is set to begin in Glasgow, Scotland on October 31.
The two dozen new signatories to the pledge include Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Japan, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Sweden. All told, the parties to the agreement account for 60% of the world's gross domestic product and 30% of global methane emissions. However, major methane polluters including Australia, Brazil, China, India, and Russia have not signed the pledge.
Methane is the second-biggest contributor to human-caused global heating after carbon dioxide and has been found to be up to 87 times more potent than CO2 over a 20-year period. Proponents of the Global Methane Pledge say it will help keep the rise in global temperatures below the Paris agreement's more ambitious target of 1.5degC above pre-industrial levels.
U.S. climate envoy John Kerry on Monday called cutting methane emissions the "single-fastest strategy that we have to keep a safer 1.5degC future within reach."
While announcing the new initiative last month, President Joe Biden said it will "not only rapidly reduce the rate of global warming, but it will also produce a very valuable side benefit, like improving public health and agricultural output."
However, while acknowledging that the pledge is a step in the right direction, experts argue that a 30% reduction in methane emissions by 2030 is not good enough.
Last week, the International Energy Agency published a report calling a 75% reduction in methane emissions by the end of the decade "essential" to combating the climate emergency.
Durwood Zaelke, president of the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development, called the Global Methane Pledge a "great start," while encouraging more urgent action.
"There's one move left to keep the planet from catastrophe, cutting methane as fast as we can from all sources," he stressed.
Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, told The Washington Post that "momentum is building for a methane moment at Glasgow."
"Cutting methane pollution is the fastest opportunity we have to help avert our most acute climate risks, including crop loss, wildfires, extreme weather, and rising sea levels," he said.
As Common Dreams reported last month, experts say that scaling down animal agriculture is an essential component of limiting methane emissions. According to research recently published in Nature Food, 35% of all global greenhouse gas emissions are attributable to food production, "of which 57% corresponds to the production of animal-based food," including livestock feed.
Experts on Monday cautiously welcomed announcements that another 24 nations have joined a U.S.- and European Union-led initiative to voluntarily slash methane emissions 30% from 2020 levels by the end of the decade, while climate campaigners underscored earlier assertions that much greater reductions are essential to combating the climate emergency.
"Cutting methane pollution is the fastest opportunity we have to help avert our most acute climate risks, including crop loss, wildfires, extreme weather, and rising sea levels."
The E.U. and eight countries--Argentina, Ghana, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States--signed the Global Methane Pledge last month ahead of the United Nations Climate Change Conference, also known as COP 26, which is set to begin in Glasgow, Scotland on October 31.
The two dozen new signatories to the pledge include Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Japan, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Sweden. All told, the parties to the agreement account for 60% of the world's gross domestic product and 30% of global methane emissions. However, major methane polluters including Australia, Brazil, China, India, and Russia have not signed the pledge.
Methane is the second-biggest contributor to human-caused global heating after carbon dioxide and has been found to be up to 87 times more potent than CO2 over a 20-year period. Proponents of the Global Methane Pledge say it will help keep the rise in global temperatures below the Paris agreement's more ambitious target of 1.5degC above pre-industrial levels.
U.S. climate envoy John Kerry on Monday called cutting methane emissions the "single-fastest strategy that we have to keep a safer 1.5degC future within reach."
While announcing the new initiative last month, President Joe Biden said it will "not only rapidly reduce the rate of global warming, but it will also produce a very valuable side benefit, like improving public health and agricultural output."
However, while acknowledging that the pledge is a step in the right direction, experts argue that a 30% reduction in methane emissions by 2030 is not good enough.
Last week, the International Energy Agency published a report calling a 75% reduction in methane emissions by the end of the decade "essential" to combating the climate emergency.
Durwood Zaelke, president of the Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development, called the Global Methane Pledge a "great start," while encouraging more urgent action.
"There's one move left to keep the planet from catastrophe, cutting methane as fast as we can from all sources," he stressed.
Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, told The Washington Post that "momentum is building for a methane moment at Glasgow."
"Cutting methane pollution is the fastest opportunity we have to help avert our most acute climate risks, including crop loss, wildfires, extreme weather, and rising sea levels," he said.
As Common Dreams reported last month, experts say that scaling down animal agriculture is an essential component of limiting methane emissions. According to research recently published in Nature Food, 35% of all global greenhouse gas emissions are attributable to food production, "of which 57% corresponds to the production of animal-based food," including livestock feed.