To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
The U.N. Food Systems Summit "did not listen to the voices of marginalized rural peoples, nor forward real solutions to the food, biodiversity, and climate crises," said Sylvia Mallari, global co-chairperson of the People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty. (Photo: Wendy Stone/Corbis via Getty Images)
Despite branding itself as a "people's summit," the 2021 United Nations Food Systems gathering prioritized the perspectives and interests of large corporations, shut out small producers, and peddled sham solutions to the intensifying global crises of hunger and climate change.
That's the view of an international coalition of food sovereignty advocates, which on Saturday issued a statement blasting the U.N. Food Systems Summit (FSS) for "paving the way for greater control of big corporations over global food systems and misleading the people through corporate-led false solutions."
"The U.N. FSS did not listen to the voices of marginalized rural peoples, nor forward real solutions to the food, biodiversity, and climate crises," said Sylvia Mallari, global co-chairperson of the People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty. "Instead, it let powerful nations and big corporations play an even bigger role in determining food and agricultural policies."
"The U.N. has finally made it clear what 'multilateralism' is all about--paying lip service to the people while skewing priorities for the interests of imperialists and monopoly capitalists," Mallari added.
In the months leading up to the FSS--which took place during the U.N. General Assembly in New York last week--food justice campaigners repeatedly warned that the event had been "hijacked" by big businesses and wealthy private donors, including Nestle and the Gates Foundation.
Following the event, advocates argued their warnings were justified, pointing specifically to a number of statements and pledges made during the FSS to spotlight its corporate-friendly nature and exclusion of small food producers from its proposed solutions:
Hardly a fringe assessment of the FSS, the food sovereignty coalition's critique of the summit was echoed by Michael Fakhri, the U.N. special rapporteur on the right to food.
"The summit is being led by scientists and research institutes who are pro-corporate sector," Fakhri said in an interview with The Guardian. "People say, let's give them the benefit of the doubt, let's see if it is the 'people's summit' it is claiming to be. But they have failed in what they had set out to do. It is not the people's summit. It is elitist."
Fakhri added that while corporations may not have played a direct role "in the day-to-day operations of the summit," the "leadership picked comes from organizations that believe corporations are part of the solution."
As The Guardian noted, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' "choice of Agnes Kalibata, the former Rwandan minister for agriculture, to lead the summit was met with protests last year, given her role as president of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (Agra), which has been accused of promoting damaging, business-focused practices."
In an effort to counter the business-dominated U.N. event, thousands of rural farmers, civil society organizations, and food sovereignty advocates convened their own Global People's Summit (GPS) on Food Systems, which aimed to "expose and oppose the control of big corporations over food and agriculture the corporate capture of the U.N."
At the close of the three-day GPS, which consisted of virtual events and on-the-ground protests, participants adopted a "People's Declaration" that decried "a pandemic of systemic and perpetual hunger being perpetrated by big business through the globalized food economy--a system characterized by unsustainable monoculture production, environmental plunder, and waste; as well as wars and conflicts fueled by imperialist competition for resources, land, and markets." Attendees also resolved to carry out "People's Action Plans" devised at GPS workshops and public forums.
"We believe that an equitable food system can only be built on the people's right to land and livelihoods, and to decent working and living conditions for all," the declaration reads. "This means that food production must be decided by the sovereign will of the people, based on their particular circumstances, priorities, and needs. Profit motives of corporations--euphemistically called market forces--should not determine what food to produce, how to produce it, and for whom."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Despite branding itself as a "people's summit," the 2021 United Nations Food Systems gathering prioritized the perspectives and interests of large corporations, shut out small producers, and peddled sham solutions to the intensifying global crises of hunger and climate change.
That's the view of an international coalition of food sovereignty advocates, which on Saturday issued a statement blasting the U.N. Food Systems Summit (FSS) for "paving the way for greater control of big corporations over global food systems and misleading the people through corporate-led false solutions."
"The U.N. FSS did not listen to the voices of marginalized rural peoples, nor forward real solutions to the food, biodiversity, and climate crises," said Sylvia Mallari, global co-chairperson of the People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty. "Instead, it let powerful nations and big corporations play an even bigger role in determining food and agricultural policies."
"The U.N. has finally made it clear what 'multilateralism' is all about--paying lip service to the people while skewing priorities for the interests of imperialists and monopoly capitalists," Mallari added.
In the months leading up to the FSS--which took place during the U.N. General Assembly in New York last week--food justice campaigners repeatedly warned that the event had been "hijacked" by big businesses and wealthy private donors, including Nestle and the Gates Foundation.
Following the event, advocates argued their warnings were justified, pointing specifically to a number of statements and pledges made during the FSS to spotlight its corporate-friendly nature and exclusion of small food producers from its proposed solutions:
Hardly a fringe assessment of the FSS, the food sovereignty coalition's critique of the summit was echoed by Michael Fakhri, the U.N. special rapporteur on the right to food.
"The summit is being led by scientists and research institutes who are pro-corporate sector," Fakhri said in an interview with The Guardian. "People say, let's give them the benefit of the doubt, let's see if it is the 'people's summit' it is claiming to be. But they have failed in what they had set out to do. It is not the people's summit. It is elitist."
Fakhri added that while corporations may not have played a direct role "in the day-to-day operations of the summit," the "leadership picked comes from organizations that believe corporations are part of the solution."
As The Guardian noted, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' "choice of Agnes Kalibata, the former Rwandan minister for agriculture, to lead the summit was met with protests last year, given her role as president of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (Agra), which has been accused of promoting damaging, business-focused practices."
In an effort to counter the business-dominated U.N. event, thousands of rural farmers, civil society organizations, and food sovereignty advocates convened their own Global People's Summit (GPS) on Food Systems, which aimed to "expose and oppose the control of big corporations over food and agriculture the corporate capture of the U.N."
At the close of the three-day GPS, which consisted of virtual events and on-the-ground protests, participants adopted a "People's Declaration" that decried "a pandemic of systemic and perpetual hunger being perpetrated by big business through the globalized food economy--a system characterized by unsustainable monoculture production, environmental plunder, and waste; as well as wars and conflicts fueled by imperialist competition for resources, land, and markets." Attendees also resolved to carry out "People's Action Plans" devised at GPS workshops and public forums.
"We believe that an equitable food system can only be built on the people's right to land and livelihoods, and to decent working and living conditions for all," the declaration reads. "This means that food production must be decided by the sovereign will of the people, based on their particular circumstances, priorities, and needs. Profit motives of corporations--euphemistically called market forces--should not determine what food to produce, how to produce it, and for whom."
Despite branding itself as a "people's summit," the 2021 United Nations Food Systems gathering prioritized the perspectives and interests of large corporations, shut out small producers, and peddled sham solutions to the intensifying global crises of hunger and climate change.
That's the view of an international coalition of food sovereignty advocates, which on Saturday issued a statement blasting the U.N. Food Systems Summit (FSS) for "paving the way for greater control of big corporations over global food systems and misleading the people through corporate-led false solutions."
"The U.N. FSS did not listen to the voices of marginalized rural peoples, nor forward real solutions to the food, biodiversity, and climate crises," said Sylvia Mallari, global co-chairperson of the People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty. "Instead, it let powerful nations and big corporations play an even bigger role in determining food and agricultural policies."
"The U.N. has finally made it clear what 'multilateralism' is all about--paying lip service to the people while skewing priorities for the interests of imperialists and monopoly capitalists," Mallari added.
In the months leading up to the FSS--which took place during the U.N. General Assembly in New York last week--food justice campaigners repeatedly warned that the event had been "hijacked" by big businesses and wealthy private donors, including Nestle and the Gates Foundation.
Following the event, advocates argued their warnings were justified, pointing specifically to a number of statements and pledges made during the FSS to spotlight its corporate-friendly nature and exclusion of small food producers from its proposed solutions:
Hardly a fringe assessment of the FSS, the food sovereignty coalition's critique of the summit was echoed by Michael Fakhri, the U.N. special rapporteur on the right to food.
"The summit is being led by scientists and research institutes who are pro-corporate sector," Fakhri said in an interview with The Guardian. "People say, let's give them the benefit of the doubt, let's see if it is the 'people's summit' it is claiming to be. But they have failed in what they had set out to do. It is not the people's summit. It is elitist."
Fakhri added that while corporations may not have played a direct role "in the day-to-day operations of the summit," the "leadership picked comes from organizations that believe corporations are part of the solution."
As The Guardian noted, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' "choice of Agnes Kalibata, the former Rwandan minister for agriculture, to lead the summit was met with protests last year, given her role as president of the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (Agra), which has been accused of promoting damaging, business-focused practices."
In an effort to counter the business-dominated U.N. event, thousands of rural farmers, civil society organizations, and food sovereignty advocates convened their own Global People's Summit (GPS) on Food Systems, which aimed to "expose and oppose the control of big corporations over food and agriculture the corporate capture of the U.N."
At the close of the three-day GPS, which consisted of virtual events and on-the-ground protests, participants adopted a "People's Declaration" that decried "a pandemic of systemic and perpetual hunger being perpetrated by big business through the globalized food economy--a system characterized by unsustainable monoculture production, environmental plunder, and waste; as well as wars and conflicts fueled by imperialist competition for resources, land, and markets." Attendees also resolved to carry out "People's Action Plans" devised at GPS workshops and public forums.
"We believe that an equitable food system can only be built on the people's right to land and livelihoods, and to decent working and living conditions for all," the declaration reads. "This means that food production must be decided by the sovereign will of the people, based on their particular circumstances, priorities, and needs. Profit motives of corporations--euphemistically called market forces--should not determine what food to produce, how to produce it, and for whom."
