Delivering another blow to people across the United States still struggling financially during the coronavirus pandemic and related economic crisis, a Trump-appointed federal judge on Wednesday vacated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention\u0026#039;s temporary federal eviction moratorium, which was set to expire at the end of next month.\r\n\r\nFirst enacted under former President Donald Trump last year, the CDC moratorium has been repeatedly extended—including twice under President Joe Biden.\r\n\r\n\u0022The Covid-19 pandemic has presented a historic threat to the nation\u0026#039;s public health. Keeping people in their homes and out of crowded or congregate settings—like homeless shelters—by preventing evictions is a key step in helping to stop the spread of Covid-19,\u0022 CDC Director Rochelle P. Walensky said in March, when the agency extended the moratorium until June 30, amid estimates that 12 million U.S. tenants were behind on rent.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nGo back to work (laid off, oh well!), sacrifice your health and put your life on the line during a pandemic or else....\r\n\r\nFederal judge vacates CDC\u0026#039;s eviction moratorium https://t.co/nGxhC8GhFD\r\n\r\nProperty must be obeyed. That’s #capitalism.@DemSocialists\r\n— Michael Lighty (@mlighty60) May 5, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nIn a 20-page ruling (pdf) expected by legal experts, Judge Dabney Friedrich of the U.S. District Court for D.C. wrote: \u0022The court recognizes that the Covid-19 pandemic is a serious public health crisis that has presented unprecedented challenges for public health officials and the nation as a whole. The pandemic has triggered difficult policy decisions that have had enormous real-world consequences. The nationwide eviction moratorium is one such decision.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022It is the role of the political branches, and not the courts, to assess the merits of policy measures designed to combat the spread of disease, even during a global pandemic. The question for the court is a narrow one: Does the Public Health Service Act grant the CDC the legal authority to impose a nationwide eviction moratorium? It does not,\u0022 concluded the Trump appointee, confirmed in 2017 by a 97-3 vote in the U.S. Senate.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nA US Court with a Trump appointed Judge vacated a nationwide eviction moratorium. The Courts were packed for a purpose and prioritizing wealthy over the poor is part of the payback. #EndTheFilibuster #ExpandTheCourts https://t.co/R52RaphZig\r\n— May it Displease the Court Podcast (@courtpod) May 5, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nFriedrich\u0026#039;s ruling comes in response to one of multiple legal challenges to the moratorium, including another in which an Ohio-based federal judge determined that the CDC overstepped its authority. The U.S. Department of Justice, which represents the CDC in such disputes, is appealing a similar ruling by a federal judge in Texas.\r\n\r\nDuring a Wednesday press briefing, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said the Deparment of Justice is now reviewing the latest ruling.\r\n\r\nIn a series of tweets about the development, Diane Yentel, president and CEO of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, said it is \u0022infuriating\u0022 that landlords are continuing to push for evictions during the pandemic just as $46 billion in rental assistance slowly reaches renters in need.\r\n\r\n\u0022Several district courts have attempted to strike down moratorium, but all had limited application,\u0022 Yentel noted. \u0022There are now numerous conflicting court rulings at the district court level, with several judges ruling in favor of the moratorium and several ruling against.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThe DOJ should immediately appeal the flawed ruling \u0026amp; Biden admin should continue to vigorously defend and enforce the moratorium, at least until emergency rental assistance provided by Congress reaches the renters who need it to remain stably housed.\r\n— Diane Yentel (@dianeyentel) May 5, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nLike Yentel, Emily A. Benfer, a law professor and expert in health and housing justice, urged the Justice Department to appeal Friedrich\u0026#039;s decision:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIn a decision that jeopardizes U.S. ability to control the pandemic, U.S. District Court for DC vacated the CDC moratorium. @DOJPH must file for stay pending appeal; Congress must ratify the moratorium (again); states must adopt moratoriums. pic.twitter.com/nY3c8Vtrts\r\n— Emily A. Benfer (@emilyabenfer) May 5, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nOther advocates and reporters also took issue with the judge\u0026#039;s reasoning and warned of the impact that the ruling could have on renters.\r\n\r\nJennifer Epps-Addison, co-executive director of Center for Popular Democracy, said the ruling \u0022will cause irreparable harm to millions of families across the country who have been devastated by the economic and global health crisis.\u0022\r\n\r\n\u0022Right now, nearly one in seven renters are behind on rent and the eviction moratorium provided temporary relief for families who were on the brink of losing their homes,\u0022 she said. \u0022This ruling has stripped critical housing relief from millions of families and will force them and their children into homelessness or unsafe housing. This decision will remove the precarious safety net that has kept families in their homes and will have long-term consequences for them and their children.\u0022\r\n\r\nCalling on the Biden administration and Congress to take immediate action, she added that \u0022the Covid-19 pandemic has laid bare the inequalities in our housing system\u0022 and emphasized the need for long-term protections for tenants during the crisis.\r\n\r\n\u0022Our families voted for support and guidance through this pandemic,\u0022 Epps-Addison said, \u0022and it is the Biden administration\u0026#039;s responsibility to ensure they continue receiving it.\u0022\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nJust as America is starting to turn a corner on coronavirus, the CDC\u0026#039;s eviction moratorium was struck down under the sweeping theory that it does not regulate economic activity or substantially affect interstate commerce. That is flatly incorrect as a matter of law and economics. pic.twitter.com/ESoAKSI41O\r\n— JP Schnapper-Casteras (@jpscasteras) May 5, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nA potential victory for landlords but a jolt for renters as a federal judge vacates CDC\u0026#039;s eviction moratorium that was put in place to help people keep their homes during the pandemic. #evictions #CDC #renters #landlords #COVID19 #coronavirus #pandemic https://t.co/gElPPzac8j\r\n— John Gravois (@Grav1) May 5, 2021\r\n\r\n\r\nThe Hill noted that the ruling comes as landlords are trying to throw out tens of thousands of tenants for nonpayment, citing a study from the Private Equity Stakeholder Project that found across just seven states, corporate landlords filed more than 56,000 eviction actions since the moratorium first took effect last September.\r\n\r\nRenters and housing advocates, meanwhile, have argued that the CDC\u0026#039;s moratorium is far from enough and called on Congress to also cancel rent and enact housing debt forgiveness during the public health crisis. In March, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and other progressives reintroduced the Rent and Mortgage Cancellation Act.\r\n\r\nThis post has been updated with comment from the Center for Popular Democracy.