SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Construction championed by then-President Donald Trump continued on a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border on January 12, 2021 in Sasabe, Arizona. (Photo: Micah Garen/Getty Images)
Advocacy groups and politicians on Friday welcomed the Pentagon's announcement that the Biden administration is canceling all barrier construction projects along the U.S.-Mexico border for which former President Donald Trump used emergency powers to divert billions of dollars in military funds.
"It's time for Biden to work with Congress to rescind funding for all border wall construction and help border communities, Indigenous tribes, and land managers begin healing what's been destroyed."
--Laiken Jordahl, Center for Biological Diversity
The move comes after President Joe Biden, the day he took office, delivered on his campaign promise to suspend work on his predecessor's infamous project; the president, in February, also terminated Trump's emergency declaration and halted the flow of funding toward wall construction.
Deputy Pentagon spokesperson Jamal Brown said in a statement Friday that "consistent with the president's proclamation, the Department of Defense is proceeding with canceling all border barrier construction projects paid for with funds originally intended for other military missions and functions such as schools for military children, overseas military construction projects in partner nations, and the National Guard and Reserve equipment account."
"DOD has begun taking all necessary actions to cancel border barrier projects and to coordinate with interagency partners," Brown said. "Today's action reflects this administration's continued commitment to defending our nation and supporting our service members and their families."
Laiken Jordahl, borderlands campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity, welcomed the announcement and urged the Biden administration to go even further.
"This long overdue reprieve is a huge step toward justice for people and wildlife in the borderlands. We're grateful that the Biden administration has stopped this senseless destruction," Jordahl said. "Now they must commit to restoring protected public lands and sacred sites, and tearing down sections of wall."
"It's time for Biden to work with Congress to rescind funding for all border wall construction and help border communities, Indigenous tribes, and land managers begin healing what's been destroyed," he added.
\u201cCritical to note here that while this announcement stops wall construction in AZ, people & wildlife in South Texas and San Diego are still very much in danger. Biden must direct DOJ to halt land takings & work with Congress to rescind *all* wall funding.https://t.co/Tfm8PgXmBs\u201d— Laiken Jordahl (@Laiken Jordahl) 1619817968
"Trump built 450 miles of new barriers during his term, much of it across the deserts and mountains of southern Arizona where his administration built along national forest land, wildlife preserves, and other federal property already under government control," according to the Washington Post--which noted that his administration "built far less in the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, the busiest area for border crossings and the epicenter to a major migration influx."
As VICE reported in January, before Biden took office:
Several Indigenous nations who live along the U.S.-Mexico border have spoken out against wall construction and the resulting desecration of sacred sites, including graves. They also say the physical wall further separates them from their families and ancestral sites on opposite sides of the border.
"We know Border Patrol people are finding arrowheads and selling them to collectors," said Juan Mancias, tribal chair of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe of Texas, or Esto'k Gna. "We had an ex-Border Patrol agent return things he had found while he was in the field."
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) on Friday accused Trump of "stealing money from the military for his border wall," adding that "this reversal is a victory for Texas and the rule of law."
\u201cI led the charge in Congress against President Trump\u2019s unconstitutional order stealing money from the military for his border wall.\n\nThis reversal is a victory for Texas and the rule of law.\n\nI urge @POTUS to also withdraw all lawsuits and return private land seized for the wall.\u201d— Joaquin Castro (@Joaquin Castro) 1619813776
Separately, the Department of Homeland Security announced Friday its "initial steps to protect border communities from physical dangers resulting from the previous administration's approach to border wall construction." According to a DHS statement, the Biden administration will use congressionally appropriated funds to:
In a statement to the Post, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), whose district includes portions of the river levee, said that "it's imperative that these structures are fixed prior to the hurricane season."
The Hill reports that Rep. Raul Girjalva (D-Ariz.), who represents a border district and chairs the House Natural Resources Committee, also celebrated the development.
"President Biden promised to not build one more foot of border wall under his watch, and I welcome this step by his administration to begin repairing the damage caused by border wall construction," said Girjalva.
"The border wall has done nothing but militarize border communities, destroy precious environmental habitats, and desecrate Native American sacred sites," he added. "After such abuses of power, canceling the contracts and repairing the environmental damage is the least we can do."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Advocacy groups and politicians on Friday welcomed the Pentagon's announcement that the Biden administration is canceling all barrier construction projects along the U.S.-Mexico border for which former President Donald Trump used emergency powers to divert billions of dollars in military funds.
"It's time for Biden to work with Congress to rescind funding for all border wall construction and help border communities, Indigenous tribes, and land managers begin healing what's been destroyed."
--Laiken Jordahl, Center for Biological Diversity
The move comes after President Joe Biden, the day he took office, delivered on his campaign promise to suspend work on his predecessor's infamous project; the president, in February, also terminated Trump's emergency declaration and halted the flow of funding toward wall construction.
Deputy Pentagon spokesperson Jamal Brown said in a statement Friday that "consistent with the president's proclamation, the Department of Defense is proceeding with canceling all border barrier construction projects paid for with funds originally intended for other military missions and functions such as schools for military children, overseas military construction projects in partner nations, and the National Guard and Reserve equipment account."
"DOD has begun taking all necessary actions to cancel border barrier projects and to coordinate with interagency partners," Brown said. "Today's action reflects this administration's continued commitment to defending our nation and supporting our service members and their families."
Laiken Jordahl, borderlands campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity, welcomed the announcement and urged the Biden administration to go even further.
"This long overdue reprieve is a huge step toward justice for people and wildlife in the borderlands. We're grateful that the Biden administration has stopped this senseless destruction," Jordahl said. "Now they must commit to restoring protected public lands and sacred sites, and tearing down sections of wall."
"It's time for Biden to work with Congress to rescind funding for all border wall construction and help border communities, Indigenous tribes, and land managers begin healing what's been destroyed," he added.
\u201cCritical to note here that while this announcement stops wall construction in AZ, people & wildlife in South Texas and San Diego are still very much in danger. Biden must direct DOJ to halt land takings & work with Congress to rescind *all* wall funding.https://t.co/Tfm8PgXmBs\u201d— Laiken Jordahl (@Laiken Jordahl) 1619817968
"Trump built 450 miles of new barriers during his term, much of it across the deserts and mountains of southern Arizona where his administration built along national forest land, wildlife preserves, and other federal property already under government control," according to the Washington Post--which noted that his administration "built far less in the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, the busiest area for border crossings and the epicenter to a major migration influx."
As VICE reported in January, before Biden took office:
Several Indigenous nations who live along the U.S.-Mexico border have spoken out against wall construction and the resulting desecration of sacred sites, including graves. They also say the physical wall further separates them from their families and ancestral sites on opposite sides of the border.
"We know Border Patrol people are finding arrowheads and selling them to collectors," said Juan Mancias, tribal chair of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe of Texas, or Esto'k Gna. "We had an ex-Border Patrol agent return things he had found while he was in the field."
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) on Friday accused Trump of "stealing money from the military for his border wall," adding that "this reversal is a victory for Texas and the rule of law."
\u201cI led the charge in Congress against President Trump\u2019s unconstitutional order stealing money from the military for his border wall.\n\nThis reversal is a victory for Texas and the rule of law.\n\nI urge @POTUS to also withdraw all lawsuits and return private land seized for the wall.\u201d— Joaquin Castro (@Joaquin Castro) 1619813776
Separately, the Department of Homeland Security announced Friday its "initial steps to protect border communities from physical dangers resulting from the previous administration's approach to border wall construction." According to a DHS statement, the Biden administration will use congressionally appropriated funds to:
In a statement to the Post, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), whose district includes portions of the river levee, said that "it's imperative that these structures are fixed prior to the hurricane season."
The Hill reports that Rep. Raul Girjalva (D-Ariz.), who represents a border district and chairs the House Natural Resources Committee, also celebrated the development.
"President Biden promised to not build one more foot of border wall under his watch, and I welcome this step by his administration to begin repairing the damage caused by border wall construction," said Girjalva.
"The border wall has done nothing but militarize border communities, destroy precious environmental habitats, and desecrate Native American sacred sites," he added. "After such abuses of power, canceling the contracts and repairing the environmental damage is the least we can do."
Advocacy groups and politicians on Friday welcomed the Pentagon's announcement that the Biden administration is canceling all barrier construction projects along the U.S.-Mexico border for which former President Donald Trump used emergency powers to divert billions of dollars in military funds.
"It's time for Biden to work with Congress to rescind funding for all border wall construction and help border communities, Indigenous tribes, and land managers begin healing what's been destroyed."
--Laiken Jordahl, Center for Biological Diversity
The move comes after President Joe Biden, the day he took office, delivered on his campaign promise to suspend work on his predecessor's infamous project; the president, in February, also terminated Trump's emergency declaration and halted the flow of funding toward wall construction.
Deputy Pentagon spokesperson Jamal Brown said in a statement Friday that "consistent with the president's proclamation, the Department of Defense is proceeding with canceling all border barrier construction projects paid for with funds originally intended for other military missions and functions such as schools for military children, overseas military construction projects in partner nations, and the National Guard and Reserve equipment account."
"DOD has begun taking all necessary actions to cancel border barrier projects and to coordinate with interagency partners," Brown said. "Today's action reflects this administration's continued commitment to defending our nation and supporting our service members and their families."
Laiken Jordahl, borderlands campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity, welcomed the announcement and urged the Biden administration to go even further.
"This long overdue reprieve is a huge step toward justice for people and wildlife in the borderlands. We're grateful that the Biden administration has stopped this senseless destruction," Jordahl said. "Now they must commit to restoring protected public lands and sacred sites, and tearing down sections of wall."
"It's time for Biden to work with Congress to rescind funding for all border wall construction and help border communities, Indigenous tribes, and land managers begin healing what's been destroyed," he added.
\u201cCritical to note here that while this announcement stops wall construction in AZ, people & wildlife in South Texas and San Diego are still very much in danger. Biden must direct DOJ to halt land takings & work with Congress to rescind *all* wall funding.https://t.co/Tfm8PgXmBs\u201d— Laiken Jordahl (@Laiken Jordahl) 1619817968
"Trump built 450 miles of new barriers during his term, much of it across the deserts and mountains of southern Arizona where his administration built along national forest land, wildlife preserves, and other federal property already under government control," according to the Washington Post--which noted that his administration "built far less in the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, the busiest area for border crossings and the epicenter to a major migration influx."
As VICE reported in January, before Biden took office:
Several Indigenous nations who live along the U.S.-Mexico border have spoken out against wall construction and the resulting desecration of sacred sites, including graves. They also say the physical wall further separates them from their families and ancestral sites on opposite sides of the border.
"We know Border Patrol people are finding arrowheads and selling them to collectors," said Juan Mancias, tribal chair of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Tribe of Texas, or Esto'k Gna. "We had an ex-Border Patrol agent return things he had found while he was in the field."
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) on Friday accused Trump of "stealing money from the military for his border wall," adding that "this reversal is a victory for Texas and the rule of law."
\u201cI led the charge in Congress against President Trump\u2019s unconstitutional order stealing money from the military for his border wall.\n\nThis reversal is a victory for Texas and the rule of law.\n\nI urge @POTUS to also withdraw all lawsuits and return private land seized for the wall.\u201d— Joaquin Castro (@Joaquin Castro) 1619813776
Separately, the Department of Homeland Security announced Friday its "initial steps to protect border communities from physical dangers resulting from the previous administration's approach to border wall construction." According to a DHS statement, the Biden administration will use congressionally appropriated funds to:
In a statement to the Post, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas), whose district includes portions of the river levee, said that "it's imperative that these structures are fixed prior to the hurricane season."
The Hill reports that Rep. Raul Girjalva (D-Ariz.), who represents a border district and chairs the House Natural Resources Committee, also celebrated the development.
"President Biden promised to not build one more foot of border wall under his watch, and I welcome this step by his administration to begin repairing the damage caused by border wall construction," said Girjalva.
"The border wall has done nothing but militarize border communities, destroy precious environmental habitats, and desecrate Native American sacred sites," he added. "After such abuses of power, canceling the contracts and repairing the environmental damage is the least we can do."
Rep. Greg Casar accused Trump and his Republican allies of "trying to pull off the most corrupt bargain I've ever seen."
Progressives rallied across the country on Saturday to protest against US President Donald Trump's attempts to get Republican-run state legislatures to redraw their maps to benefit GOP candidates in the 2026 midterm elections.
The anchor rally for the nationwide "Fight the Trump Takeover" protests was held in Austin, Texas, where Republicans in the state are poised to become the first in the nation to redraw their maps at the president's behest.
Progressives in the Lone Star State capital rallied against Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott for breaking with historical precedent by carrying out congressional redistricting in the middle of the decade. Independent experts have estimated that the Texas gerrymandering alone could yield the GOP five additional seats in the US House of Representatives.
Speaking before a boisterous crowd of thousands of people, Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) charged that the Texas GOP was drawing up "districts set up to elect a Trump minion" in next year's midterms. However, Doggett also said that progressives should still try to compete in these districts, whose residents voted for Trump in the 2024 election but who also have histories of supporting Democratic candidates.
"Next year, [Trump is] not going to be on the ballot to draw the MAGA vote," said Doggett. "Is there anyone here who believes that we ought to abandon any of these redrawn districts and surrender them to Trump?"
Leonard Aguilar, the secretary-treasurer of Texas AFL-CIO, attacked Abbott for doing the president's bidding even as people in central Texas are still struggling in the aftermath of the deadly floods last month that killed at least 136 people.
"It's time for Gov. Abbott to cut the bullshit," he said. "We need help now but he's working at the behest of the president, on behalf of Trump... He's letting Trump take over Texas!"
Aguilar also speculated that Trump is fixated on having Texas redraw its maps because he "knows he's in trouble and he wants to change the rules midstream."
Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) went through a litany of grievances against Trump and the Republican Party, ranging from the Texas redistricting plan, to hardline immigration policies, to the massive GOP budget package passed last month that is projected to kick 17 million Americans off of Medicaid.
However, Casar also said that he felt hope watching how people in Austin were fighting back against Trump and his policies.
"I'm proud that our city is fighting," he said. "I'm proud of the grit that we have even when the odds are stacked against us. The only answer to oligarchy is organization."
Casar went on to accuse Trump and Republicans or "trying to pull off the most corrupt bargain I've ever seen," and then added that "as they try to kick us off our healthcare, as they try to rig this election, we're not going to let them!"
Saturday's protests are being done in partnership with several prominent progressive groups, including Indivisible, MoveOn, Human Rights Campaign, Public Citizen, and the Communication Workers of America. Some Texas-specific groups—including Texas Freedom Network, Texas AFL-CIO, and Texas for All—are also partners in the protest.
Judge Rossie Alston Jr. ruled the plaintiffs had failed to prove the groups provided "ongoing, continuous, systematic, and material support for Hamas and its affiliates."
A federal judge appointed in 2019 by US President Donald Trump has dismissed a lawsuit filed against pro-Palestinian organizations that alleged they were fronts for the terrorist organization Hamas.
In a ruling issued on Friday, Judge Rossie Alston Jr. of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found that the plaintiffs who filed the case against the pro-Palestine groups had not sufficiently demonstrated a clear link between the groups and Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.
The plaintiffs in the case—consisting of seven Americans and two Israelis—were all victims of the Hamas attack that killed an estimated 1,200 people, including more than 700 Israeli civilians.
They alleged that the pro-Palestinian groups—including National Students for Justice in Palestine, WESPAC Foundation, and Americans for Justice in Palestine Educational Foundation—provided material support to Hamas that directly led to injuries they suffered as a result of the October 7 attack.
This alleged support for Hamas, the plaintiffs argued, violated both the Anti-Terrorism Act and the Alien Tort Statute.
However, after examining all the evidence presented by the plaintiffs, Alston found they had not proven their claim that the organizations in question provide "ongoing, continuous, systematic, and material support for Hamas and its affiliates."
Specifically, Alston said that the claims made by the plaintiffs "are all very general and conclusory and do not specifically relate to the injuries" that they suffered in the Hamas attack.
"Although plaintiffs conclude that defendants have aided and abetted Hamas by providing it with 'material support despite knowledge of Hamas' terrorist activity both before, during, and after its October 7 terrorist attack,' plaintiffs do not allege that any planning, preparation, funding, or execution of the October 7, 2023 attack or any violations of international law by Hamas occurred in the United States," Alston emphasized. "None of the direct attackers are alleged to be citizens of the United States."
Alston was unconvinced by the plaintiffs' claims that the pro-Palestinian organizations "act as Hamas' public relations division, recruiting domestic foot soldiers to disseminate Hamas’s propaganda," and he similarly dismissed them as "vague and conclusory."
He then said that the plaintiffs did not establish that these "public relations" activities purportedly done on behalf of Hamas had "aided and abetted Hamas in carrying out the specific October 7, 2023 attack (or subsequent or continuing Hamas violations) that caused the Israeli Plaintiffs' injuries."
Alston concluded by dismissing the plaintiffs' case without prejudice, meaning they are free to file an amended lawsuit against the plaintiffs within 30 days of the judge's ruling.
"Putin got one hell of a photo op out of Trump," wrote one critic.
US President Donald Trump on Saturday morning tried to put his best spin on a Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin that yielded neither a cease-fire agreement nor a comprehensive peace deal to end the war in Ukraine.
Writing on his Truth Social page, the president took a victory lap over the summit despite coming home completely empty-handed when he flew back from Alaska on Friday night.
"A great and very successful day in Alaska!" Trump began. "The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO."
Trump then pivoted to saying that he was fine with not obtaining a cease-fire agreement, even though he said just days before that he'd impose "severe consequences" on Russia if it did not agree to one.
"It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Cease-fire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump said. "President Zelenskyy will be coming to DC, the Oval Office, on Monday afternoon. If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin. Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved."
While Trump did his best to put a happy face on the summit, many critics contended it was nothing short of a debacle for the US president.
Writing in The New Yorker, Susan Glasser argued that the entire summit with Putin was a "self-own of embarrassing proportions," given that he literally rolled out the red carpet for his Russian counterpart and did not achieve any success in bringing the war to a close.
"Putin got one hell of a photo op out of Trump, and still more time on the clock to prosecute his war against the 'brotherly' Ukrainian people, as he had the chutzpah to call them during his remarks in Alaska," she wrote. "The most enduring images from Anchorage, it seems, will be its grotesque displays of bonhomie between the dictator and his longtime American admirer."
She also noted that Trump appeared to shift the entire burden of ending the war onto Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and he even said after the Putin summit that "it's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done."
This led Glasser to comment that "if there's one unwavering Law of Trump, this is it: Whatever happens, it is never, ever, his fault."
Glasser wasn't the only critic to offer a scathing assessment of the summit. The Economist blasted Trump in an editorial about the meeting, which it labeled a "gift" to Putin. The magazine also contrasted the way that Trump treated Putin during his visit to American soil with the way that he treated Zelenskyy during an Oval Office meeting earlier this year.
"The honors for Mr. Putin were in sharp contrast to the public humiliation that Mr. Trump and his advisers inflicted on Mr. Zelenskyy during his first visit to the White House earlier this year," they wrote. "Since then relations with Ukraine have improved, but Mr. Trump has often been quick to blame it for being invaded; and he has proved strangely indulgent with Mr. Putin."
Michael McFaul, an American ambassador to Russia under former President Barack Obama, was struck by just how much effort went into holding a summit that accomplished nothing.
"Summits usually have deliverables," he told The Atlantic. "This meeting had none... I hope that they made some progress towards next steps in the peace process. But there is no evidence of that yet."