SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A woman holds up her arm with the pro-choice slogan "my body, my choice" written on it during a May 21, 2019 reproductive rights rally in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo: Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)
'All In for the EACH Act': Rights Advocates Applaud Bill to End Hyde Amendment
"Congress has the opportunity to bring us one step closer to a world where access to abortion care doesn't depend on where you live, how you are insured, or how much money you have."
Mar 25, 2021
Reproductive rights advocates cheered news that Sen. Tammy Duckworth and Rep. Barbara Lee planned to re-introduce the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance--or EACH--Act in Congress on Thursday in the latest bid to reverse what Lee called the "anti-choice" and "blatantly racist" Hyde Amendment.
"The Hyde Amendment has been used by anti-choice politicians to keep abortion care out of the reach for people already marginalized by our healthcare system."
--Rep. Barbara Lee
"This isn't about what side you're on in the abortion debate, it's about equality and opportunity plain and simple," Duckworth (D-Ill.) said on a call with reporters Wednesday, according to HuffPost. "Whatever you think about the procedure, we should all agree that what's legal for wealthy Americans should not be so inaccessible for Americans of color and low-income Americans."
Lee (D-Calif.), who was also on the Wednesday call, said: "Let's call this amendment what it is: It's anti-choice and it's blatantly racist. We know it disproportionately impacts low-income people and women of color. It should never have been signed into law and it's way past time that it was repealed."
"The Hyde Amendment has been used by anti-choice politicians to keep abortion care out of the reach for people already marginalized by our healthcare system," she added.
Although the landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade legalized abortion throughout the nation, the 44-year-old Hyde Amendment prohibits federal Medicaid funding for most abortion services. Three extremely narrow exceptions were added in 1994 permitting Medicaid funding for abortions in cases of incest, rape, and if a continued pregnancy endangers patient life.
Reproductive rights groups long have pushed lawmakers to repeal the amendment, with Planned Parenthood Action Fund arguing that it "is particularly harmful to people with low incomes, people of color, young people, and immigrants--who all disproportionately rely on Medicaid for their healthcare coverage."
In 1980, Thurgood Marshall, the first Black justice to serve on the Supreme Court, asserted that "the Hyde Amendment is designed to deprive poor and minority women of the constitutional right to choose abortion."
Advocates hailed the imminent re-introduction--versions of the bill have been introduced several times since 2015--of the EACH Act. More than 130 reproductive rights groups in the All* Above All coalition have endorsed the proposed legislation.
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson tweeted that "Hyde disproportionately harms Black people, Latinos, and members of the LGBTQ+ community, who because of systemic racism and oppression are more likely to get their health insurance through Medicaid and other public health programs. We need the EACH Act now."
Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said in a statement that "thanks to the reproductive justice movement's dedication and leadership, Congress has the opportunity to bring us one step closer to a world where access to abortion care doesn't depend on where you live, how you are insured, or how much money you have."
"Reproductive freedom is not a reality unless we all have the freedom to make decisions about our health and futures with dignity and without interference from politicians," added Hogue.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
womenroe v. wadeus senatehealthcarenaralus supreme courthyde amendmentplanned parenthoodreproductive rightsus housebarbara lee
Reproductive rights advocates cheered news that Sen. Tammy Duckworth and Rep. Barbara Lee planned to re-introduce the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance--or EACH--Act in Congress on Thursday in the latest bid to reverse what Lee called the "anti-choice" and "blatantly racist" Hyde Amendment.
"The Hyde Amendment has been used by anti-choice politicians to keep abortion care out of the reach for people already marginalized by our healthcare system."
--Rep. Barbara Lee
"This isn't about what side you're on in the abortion debate, it's about equality and opportunity plain and simple," Duckworth (D-Ill.) said on a call with reporters Wednesday, according to HuffPost. "Whatever you think about the procedure, we should all agree that what's legal for wealthy Americans should not be so inaccessible for Americans of color and low-income Americans."
Lee (D-Calif.), who was also on the Wednesday call, said: "Let's call this amendment what it is: It's anti-choice and it's blatantly racist. We know it disproportionately impacts low-income people and women of color. It should never have been signed into law and it's way past time that it was repealed."
"The Hyde Amendment has been used by anti-choice politicians to keep abortion care out of the reach for people already marginalized by our healthcare system," she added.
Although the landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade legalized abortion throughout the nation, the 44-year-old Hyde Amendment prohibits federal Medicaid funding for most abortion services. Three extremely narrow exceptions were added in 1994 permitting Medicaid funding for abortions in cases of incest, rape, and if a continued pregnancy endangers patient life.
Reproductive rights groups long have pushed lawmakers to repeal the amendment, with Planned Parenthood Action Fund arguing that it "is particularly harmful to people with low incomes, people of color, young people, and immigrants--who all disproportionately rely on Medicaid for their healthcare coverage."
In 1980, Thurgood Marshall, the first Black justice to serve on the Supreme Court, asserted that "the Hyde Amendment is designed to deprive poor and minority women of the constitutional right to choose abortion."
Advocates hailed the imminent re-introduction--versions of the bill have been introduced several times since 2015--of the EACH Act. More than 130 reproductive rights groups in the All* Above All coalition have endorsed the proposed legislation.
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson tweeted that "Hyde disproportionately harms Black people, Latinos, and members of the LGBTQ+ community, who because of systemic racism and oppression are more likely to get their health insurance through Medicaid and other public health programs. We need the EACH Act now."
Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said in a statement that "thanks to the reproductive justice movement's dedication and leadership, Congress has the opportunity to bring us one step closer to a world where access to abortion care doesn't depend on where you live, how you are insured, or how much money you have."
"Reproductive freedom is not a reality unless we all have the freedom to make decisions about our health and futures with dignity and without interference from politicians," added Hogue.
Reproductive rights advocates cheered news that Sen. Tammy Duckworth and Rep. Barbara Lee planned to re-introduce the Equal Access to Abortion Coverage in Health Insurance--or EACH--Act in Congress on Thursday in the latest bid to reverse what Lee called the "anti-choice" and "blatantly racist" Hyde Amendment.
"The Hyde Amendment has been used by anti-choice politicians to keep abortion care out of the reach for people already marginalized by our healthcare system."
--Rep. Barbara Lee
"This isn't about what side you're on in the abortion debate, it's about equality and opportunity plain and simple," Duckworth (D-Ill.) said on a call with reporters Wednesday, according to HuffPost. "Whatever you think about the procedure, we should all agree that what's legal for wealthy Americans should not be so inaccessible for Americans of color and low-income Americans."
Lee (D-Calif.), who was also on the Wednesday call, said: "Let's call this amendment what it is: It's anti-choice and it's blatantly racist. We know it disproportionately impacts low-income people and women of color. It should never have been signed into law and it's way past time that it was repealed."
"The Hyde Amendment has been used by anti-choice politicians to keep abortion care out of the reach for people already marginalized by our healthcare system," she added.
Although the landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade legalized abortion throughout the nation, the 44-year-old Hyde Amendment prohibits federal Medicaid funding for most abortion services. Three extremely narrow exceptions were added in 1994 permitting Medicaid funding for abortions in cases of incest, rape, and if a continued pregnancy endangers patient life.
Reproductive rights groups long have pushed lawmakers to repeal the amendment, with Planned Parenthood Action Fund arguing that it "is particularly harmful to people with low incomes, people of color, young people, and immigrants--who all disproportionately rely on Medicaid for their healthcare coverage."
In 1980, Thurgood Marshall, the first Black justice to serve on the Supreme Court, asserted that "the Hyde Amendment is designed to deprive poor and minority women of the constitutional right to choose abortion."
Advocates hailed the imminent re-introduction--versions of the bill have been introduced several times since 2015--of the EACH Act. More than 130 reproductive rights groups in the All* Above All coalition have endorsed the proposed legislation.
Planned Parenthood Action Fund president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson tweeted that "Hyde disproportionately harms Black people, Latinos, and members of the LGBTQ+ community, who because of systemic racism and oppression are more likely to get their health insurance through Medicaid and other public health programs. We need the EACH Act now."
Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said in a statement that "thanks to the reproductive justice movement's dedication and leadership, Congress has the opportunity to bring us one step closer to a world where access to abortion care doesn't depend on where you live, how you are insured, or how much money you have."
"Reproductive freedom is not a reality unless we all have the freedom to make decisions about our health and futures with dignity and without interference from politicians," added Hogue.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.