(Photo: An Rong Xu for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Mar 08, 2021
Opponents of the decades-long trend of corporate consolidation applauded President Joe Biden's reported decision to nominate Columbia Law School professor and "antitrust trailblazer" Lina Khan to a seat on the five-member Federal Trade Commission, a key regulatory agency tasked with protecting consumers from business abuses.
First reported by Politico Tuesday morning, Biden's selection of Khan for the FTC slot comes days after the president named Tim Wu--another leading monopoly critic who coined the term "net neutrality"--to a spot on the National Economic Council, a position that does not require Senate confirmation.
"Lina Khan going to the FTC and Tim Wu going to the White House are two extraordinary, powerful choices by Biden," said Zephyr Teachout, an associate professor of law at Fordham University. "Lina is brilliant, kind, careful, and original, with nerves of steel. I am so happy for our country."
"One last thing to highlight: antitrust is not just about Big Tech," Teachout added. "It's ag[riculture] and hospitals. It's about democratic/economic policy broadly. About how private power is dispersed or centralized. Khan and Wu are not 'tech critics,' they are visionary anti-monopolists across the board."
Prior to serving as counsel to the House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law during its year and a half-long investigation of the digital marketplace, Khan rose to prominence as a critic of corporate concentration following the 2017 publication of her paper titled "Amazon's Antitrust Paradox," which criticized the failure of current antitrust law to restrain the tech behemoth's anti-competitive practices.
In a 2018 profile, the New York Times characterized Khan's article--published when she was a student at Yale University--as a challenge to "decades of monopoly law."
"We applaud President Biden for recognizing that Lina Khan is a once-in-a-generation legal mind," Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, said in a statement Tuesday.
"Professor Khan is the intellectual architect of the bipartisan suits against Facebook and Google," Miller continued. "She has exposed the dangerous concentration of power in the meat industry. She's identified key national security concerns posed by our concentrated supply chains. And she has written thoughtfully about all of the tools the government should bring to bear to advance the interests of working people, smaller businesses, and local communities."
\u201cLina Khan basically singlehandedly reinvigorated antitrust law as an academic. Then, at @HouseJudiciary, she laid out road map for breaking up Big Tech. Now, she\u2019ll have the power of the FTC at her disposal.\n\nThis is massive.\u201d— Zach Fisch (@Zach Fisch) 1615299893
Politico noted Tuesday morning that Biden's decision to elevate Khan and Wu to prominent government positions "represents a massive shift in philosophy away from the era of Barack Obama, who proudly forged an alliance between the Democratic Party and Big Tech."
Joining the chorus of applause, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) said Tuesday that "there is no possible better pick for FTC than Lina Khan."
"She is a thought leader and the embodiment of the modern antitrust movement," the group added. "Big move."
Justice Democrats, a progressive advocacy organization, offered similar praise for Biden's decision to nominate Khan, which has not yet been formally announced.
"This is a major progressive pick by the Biden administration to check the concentration of corporate power and uplift working families," the group tweeted.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
amazon.comcorporate powerdemocracyfacebookfederal trade commissiongoogleinequalityjoe bidenjustice democratstechnologyzephyr teachoutantitrustftctim wulina khan
Opponents of the decades-long trend of corporate consolidation applauded President Joe Biden's reported decision to nominate Columbia Law School professor and "antitrust trailblazer" Lina Khan to a seat on the five-member Federal Trade Commission, a key regulatory agency tasked with protecting consumers from business abuses.
First reported by Politico Tuesday morning, Biden's selection of Khan for the FTC slot comes days after the president named Tim Wu--another leading monopoly critic who coined the term "net neutrality"--to a spot on the National Economic Council, a position that does not require Senate confirmation.
"Lina Khan going to the FTC and Tim Wu going to the White House are two extraordinary, powerful choices by Biden," said Zephyr Teachout, an associate professor of law at Fordham University. "Lina is brilliant, kind, careful, and original, with nerves of steel. I am so happy for our country."
"One last thing to highlight: antitrust is not just about Big Tech," Teachout added. "It's ag[riculture] and hospitals. It's about democratic/economic policy broadly. About how private power is dispersed or centralized. Khan and Wu are not 'tech critics,' they are visionary anti-monopolists across the board."
Prior to serving as counsel to the House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law during its year and a half-long investigation of the digital marketplace, Khan rose to prominence as a critic of corporate concentration following the 2017 publication of her paper titled "Amazon's Antitrust Paradox," which criticized the failure of current antitrust law to restrain the tech behemoth's anti-competitive practices.
In a 2018 profile, the New York Times characterized Khan's article--published when she was a student at Yale University--as a challenge to "decades of monopoly law."
"We applaud President Biden for recognizing that Lina Khan is a once-in-a-generation legal mind," Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, said in a statement Tuesday.
"Professor Khan is the intellectual architect of the bipartisan suits against Facebook and Google," Miller continued. "She has exposed the dangerous concentration of power in the meat industry. She's identified key national security concerns posed by our concentrated supply chains. And she has written thoughtfully about all of the tools the government should bring to bear to advance the interests of working people, smaller businesses, and local communities."
\u201cLina Khan basically singlehandedly reinvigorated antitrust law as an academic. Then, at @HouseJudiciary, she laid out road map for breaking up Big Tech. Now, she\u2019ll have the power of the FTC at her disposal.\n\nThis is massive.\u201d— Zach Fisch (@Zach Fisch) 1615299893
Politico noted Tuesday morning that Biden's decision to elevate Khan and Wu to prominent government positions "represents a massive shift in philosophy away from the era of Barack Obama, who proudly forged an alliance between the Democratic Party and Big Tech."
Joining the chorus of applause, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) said Tuesday that "there is no possible better pick for FTC than Lina Khan."
"She is a thought leader and the embodiment of the modern antitrust movement," the group added. "Big move."
Justice Democrats, a progressive advocacy organization, offered similar praise for Biden's decision to nominate Khan, which has not yet been formally announced.
"This is a major progressive pick by the Biden administration to check the concentration of corporate power and uplift working families," the group tweeted.
Opponents of the decades-long trend of corporate consolidation applauded President Joe Biden's reported decision to nominate Columbia Law School professor and "antitrust trailblazer" Lina Khan to a seat on the five-member Federal Trade Commission, a key regulatory agency tasked with protecting consumers from business abuses.
First reported by Politico Tuesday morning, Biden's selection of Khan for the FTC slot comes days after the president named Tim Wu--another leading monopoly critic who coined the term "net neutrality"--to a spot on the National Economic Council, a position that does not require Senate confirmation.
"Lina Khan going to the FTC and Tim Wu going to the White House are two extraordinary, powerful choices by Biden," said Zephyr Teachout, an associate professor of law at Fordham University. "Lina is brilliant, kind, careful, and original, with nerves of steel. I am so happy for our country."
"One last thing to highlight: antitrust is not just about Big Tech," Teachout added. "It's ag[riculture] and hospitals. It's about democratic/economic policy broadly. About how private power is dispersed or centralized. Khan and Wu are not 'tech critics,' they are visionary anti-monopolists across the board."
Prior to serving as counsel to the House Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law during its year and a half-long investigation of the digital marketplace, Khan rose to prominence as a critic of corporate concentration following the 2017 publication of her paper titled "Amazon's Antitrust Paradox," which criticized the failure of current antitrust law to restrain the tech behemoth's anti-competitive practices.
In a 2018 profile, the New York Times characterized Khan's article--published when she was a student at Yale University--as a challenge to "decades of monopoly law."
"We applaud President Biden for recognizing that Lina Khan is a once-in-a-generation legal mind," Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, said in a statement Tuesday.
"Professor Khan is the intellectual architect of the bipartisan suits against Facebook and Google," Miller continued. "She has exposed the dangerous concentration of power in the meat industry. She's identified key national security concerns posed by our concentrated supply chains. And she has written thoughtfully about all of the tools the government should bring to bear to advance the interests of working people, smaller businesses, and local communities."
\u201cLina Khan basically singlehandedly reinvigorated antitrust law as an academic. Then, at @HouseJudiciary, she laid out road map for breaking up Big Tech. Now, she\u2019ll have the power of the FTC at her disposal.\n\nThis is massive.\u201d— Zach Fisch (@Zach Fisch) 1615299893
Politico noted Tuesday morning that Biden's decision to elevate Khan and Wu to prominent government positions "represents a massive shift in philosophy away from the era of Barack Obama, who proudly forged an alliance between the Democratic Party and Big Tech."
Joining the chorus of applause, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) said Tuesday that "there is no possible better pick for FTC than Lina Khan."
"She is a thought leader and the embodiment of the modern antitrust movement," the group added. "Big move."
Justice Democrats, a progressive advocacy organization, offered similar praise for Biden's decision to nominate Khan, which has not yet been formally announced.
"This is a major progressive pick by the Biden administration to check the concentration of corporate power and uplift working families," the group tweeted.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.