SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown (Ohio) and Ron Wyden (Ore.) walk during a break in the impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump at the U.S. Capitol on February 10, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Joshua Roberts-Pool/Getty Images)
'Now Is the Time for Boldness': Senators Urge Biden to Back Recurring Payments for Covid Relief Package
"This crisis is far from over, and families deserve certainty that they can put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads," the 10 members of the Democratic caucus wrote.
Mar 01, 2021
Sen. Ron Wyden led a group of 10 senators on Tuesday in urging President Joe Biden to include recurring direct payments and automatic unemployment insurance extensions tied to economic conditions in his "Build Back Better" recovery proposal, telling the president that "now is the time for boldness."
The measures are effective and widely supported, the letter (pdf), released Tuesday, notes.
"This crisis is far from over, and families deserve certainty that they can put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads. Families should not be at the mercy of constantly-shifting legislative timelines and ad hoc solutions," the lawmakers wrote.
The letter was spearheaded by Wyden (D-Ore.), chair of the Senate Finance Committee Chairman. Senate Budget Committee chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs chair Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) also signed on. The other signatories to the letter, all Democrats, are: Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Cory Booker (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Ed Markey (Mass.) Alex Padilla (Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.).
While unemployment insurance has provided a needed economic boost to millions, that support does not reach all the families severely impacted by the pandemic. The direct cash injections are thus "crucial for supporting struggling families," says the letter. What's more, recurring payments also serve as an "economic stimulus by increasing spending and supporting jobs."
To bolster their argument the senators pointed to an Urban Institute analysis from July showing that just one additional $1,200 check along with extension of unemployment benefits and boosting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits would keep 12 million people out of poverty.
The proposed one-time $1,400 checks is simply not enough, the group warns.
"Almost six in 10 people say the $1,400 payments set to be included in the rescue package will last them less than three months," the senators said.
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) is amplifying the senators' call on social media and encouraging supporters to be "citizen cosigners" of the letter.
It's not the first time Biden has faced demands to go big with pandemic stimulus payments. In January, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) led a letter also calling on Biden to include recurring direct payments in any future coronavirus relief package.
"The stunning financial crisis for those at the bottom of the income ladder demands massive relief to those who need it most," the letter stated.
"As we look at the coming year, another one-time round of checks would provide a temporary lifeline, but when that money runs out, families will once again struggle to pay for basic necessities," the letter added. "One more check is not enough during this public health and economic crisis. Many families cannot afford to wait for eight months between payments."
Efforts to extend an economic lifeline to struggling families is facing resistance from within the Democratic caucus, however.
A key obstacle is Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a $15 minimum wage opponent who's asking Biden for a "tightening [of] income eligibility for the [one-time] $1,400 stimulus payments" and reducing the proposed weekly unemployment supplement from $400 to $300 per week.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, put that call in stark terms.
"Further 'targeting' or 'tightening' eligibility means taking survival checks away from millions of families who got them last time," Jayapal tweeted Monday.
"That's bad policy and bad politics too," she added.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sen. Ron Wyden led a group of 10 senators on Tuesday in urging President Joe Biden to include recurring direct payments and automatic unemployment insurance extensions tied to economic conditions in his "Build Back Better" recovery proposal, telling the president that "now is the time for boldness."
The measures are effective and widely supported, the letter (pdf), released Tuesday, notes.
"This crisis is far from over, and families deserve certainty that they can put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads. Families should not be at the mercy of constantly-shifting legislative timelines and ad hoc solutions," the lawmakers wrote.
The letter was spearheaded by Wyden (D-Ore.), chair of the Senate Finance Committee Chairman. Senate Budget Committee chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs chair Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) also signed on. The other signatories to the letter, all Democrats, are: Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Cory Booker (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Ed Markey (Mass.) Alex Padilla (Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.).
While unemployment insurance has provided a needed economic boost to millions, that support does not reach all the families severely impacted by the pandemic. The direct cash injections are thus "crucial for supporting struggling families," says the letter. What's more, recurring payments also serve as an "economic stimulus by increasing spending and supporting jobs."
To bolster their argument the senators pointed to an Urban Institute analysis from July showing that just one additional $1,200 check along with extension of unemployment benefits and boosting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits would keep 12 million people out of poverty.
The proposed one-time $1,400 checks is simply not enough, the group warns.
"Almost six in 10 people say the $1,400 payments set to be included in the rescue package will last them less than three months," the senators said.
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) is amplifying the senators' call on social media and encouraging supporters to be "citizen cosigners" of the letter.
It's not the first time Biden has faced demands to go big with pandemic stimulus payments. In January, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) led a letter also calling on Biden to include recurring direct payments in any future coronavirus relief package.
"The stunning financial crisis for those at the bottom of the income ladder demands massive relief to those who need it most," the letter stated.
"As we look at the coming year, another one-time round of checks would provide a temporary lifeline, but when that money runs out, families will once again struggle to pay for basic necessities," the letter added. "One more check is not enough during this public health and economic crisis. Many families cannot afford to wait for eight months between payments."
Efforts to extend an economic lifeline to struggling families is facing resistance from within the Democratic caucus, however.
A key obstacle is Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a $15 minimum wage opponent who's asking Biden for a "tightening [of] income eligibility for the [one-time] $1,400 stimulus payments" and reducing the proposed weekly unemployment supplement from $400 to $300 per week.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, put that call in stark terms.
"Further 'targeting' or 'tightening' eligibility means taking survival checks away from millions of families who got them last time," Jayapal tweeted Monday.
"That's bad policy and bad politics too," she added.
Sen. Ron Wyden led a group of 10 senators on Tuesday in urging President Joe Biden to include recurring direct payments and automatic unemployment insurance extensions tied to economic conditions in his "Build Back Better" recovery proposal, telling the president that "now is the time for boldness."
The measures are effective and widely supported, the letter (pdf), released Tuesday, notes.
"This crisis is far from over, and families deserve certainty that they can put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads. Families should not be at the mercy of constantly-shifting legislative timelines and ad hoc solutions," the lawmakers wrote.
The letter was spearheaded by Wyden (D-Ore.), chair of the Senate Finance Committee Chairman. Senate Budget Committee chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs chair Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) also signed on. The other signatories to the letter, all Democrats, are: Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Cory Booker (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Ed Markey (Mass.) Alex Padilla (Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.).
While unemployment insurance has provided a needed economic boost to millions, that support does not reach all the families severely impacted by the pandemic. The direct cash injections are thus "crucial for supporting struggling families," says the letter. What's more, recurring payments also serve as an "economic stimulus by increasing spending and supporting jobs."
To bolster their argument the senators pointed to an Urban Institute analysis from July showing that just one additional $1,200 check along with extension of unemployment benefits and boosting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits would keep 12 million people out of poverty.
The proposed one-time $1,400 checks is simply not enough, the group warns.
"Almost six in 10 people say the $1,400 payments set to be included in the rescue package will last them less than three months," the senators said.
The Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC) is amplifying the senators' call on social media and encouraging supporters to be "citizen cosigners" of the letter.
It's not the first time Biden has faced demands to go big with pandemic stimulus payments. In January, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) led a letter also calling on Biden to include recurring direct payments in any future coronavirus relief package.
"The stunning financial crisis for those at the bottom of the income ladder demands massive relief to those who need it most," the letter stated.
"As we look at the coming year, another one-time round of checks would provide a temporary lifeline, but when that money runs out, families will once again struggle to pay for basic necessities," the letter added. "One more check is not enough during this public health and economic crisis. Many families cannot afford to wait for eight months between payments."
Efforts to extend an economic lifeline to struggling families is facing resistance from within the Democratic caucus, however.
A key obstacle is Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a $15 minimum wage opponent who's asking Biden for a "tightening [of] income eligibility for the [one-time] $1,400 stimulus payments" and reducing the proposed weekly unemployment supplement from $400 to $300 per week.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, put that call in stark terms.
"Further 'targeting' or 'tightening' eligibility means taking survival checks away from millions of families who got them last time," Jayapal tweeted Monday.
"That's bad policy and bad politics too," she added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.