A person sleeps on a park bench on September 10, 2013 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Majority of US Voters Want Government to Invest More in Healthcare, Education, and Fighting Poverty: Poll
57% of the electorate thinks the government doesn't spend enough on anti-poverty initiatives, while 56% want to see more investment in education and healthcare.
Lawmakers working on a new relief package to mitigate the ongoing coronavirus crisis shouldn't hesitate to go big considering that a majority of U.S. voters say the government spends "too little" on healthcare, education, and anti-poverty measures, according to a new Hill-HarrisX poll released Tuesday.
The poll, conducted online from February 12 to 15 among 2,835 registered voters, found that 57% of the electorate thinks the federal government doesn't spend enough to combat poverty, while 56% want to see more investment in education.
As Common Dreams reported last year, the $1,200 stimulus checks and enhanced unemployment benefits distributed to Americans through the CARES Act passed in March 2020 reduced poverty even in the midst of an economic calamity driven by the Covid-19 pandemic, providing evidence that substantive anti-poverty programs are effective.
As the House prepares to vote Friday on its version of President Joe Biden's American Rescue Package, nearly half of voters (49%) say the country should spend more on coronavirus relief. Among Democrats, that figure jumps to 58%, while half of independents and 38% of Republicans agree.
In addition, 56% of those surveyed say the government spends too little on healthcare. While increased investments in public health would be welcome in the wake of a pandemic that has claimed the lives of more than 500,000 people in the U.S., improving health outcomes nationwide may not depend on spending more.
As Common Dreams has reported, the Congressional Budget Office found that implementing a single-payer health insurance program like Medicare for All would guarantee coverage for every person in the country while reducing overall healthcare spending by $650 billion per year.
Notably, 43% of voters said the government should spend more on national security, despite the fact that throwing more money at endless wars is at odds with increasing public investments aimed at improving social and environmental well-being.
\u201cTo put in perspective, $100 billion could pay 1.24 million elementary school teacher salaries for a year, or cover 3.3 million covid-19 hospital stays. \n\nIt\u2019s enough to build a massive wall to protect NYC from sea level rise. It\u2019s enough to get to Mars. \ud83e\udd2f https://t.co/36mVkzbcsS\u201d— National Priorities Project (@National Priorities Project) 1614112258
As Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said about the Pentagon budget earlier this month, "After the past year, watching more than 400,000 fellow Americans die, tens of millions unemployed due to Covid-19, millions more who are lined up at food banks, and even millions more who are on the threshold of losing their homes and being put out on the street, spending $740 billion dollars a year on this one piece of the federal budget is unconscionable."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Lawmakers working on a new relief package to mitigate the ongoing coronavirus crisis shouldn't hesitate to go big considering that a majority of U.S. voters say the government spends "too little" on healthcare, education, and anti-poverty measures, according to a new Hill-HarrisX poll released Tuesday.
The poll, conducted online from February 12 to 15 among 2,835 registered voters, found that 57% of the electorate thinks the federal government doesn't spend enough to combat poverty, while 56% want to see more investment in education.
As Common Dreams reported last year, the $1,200 stimulus checks and enhanced unemployment benefits distributed to Americans through the CARES Act passed in March 2020 reduced poverty even in the midst of an economic calamity driven by the Covid-19 pandemic, providing evidence that substantive anti-poverty programs are effective.
As the House prepares to vote Friday on its version of President Joe Biden's American Rescue Package, nearly half of voters (49%) say the country should spend more on coronavirus relief. Among Democrats, that figure jumps to 58%, while half of independents and 38% of Republicans agree.
In addition, 56% of those surveyed say the government spends too little on healthcare. While increased investments in public health would be welcome in the wake of a pandemic that has claimed the lives of more than 500,000 people in the U.S., improving health outcomes nationwide may not depend on spending more.
As Common Dreams has reported, the Congressional Budget Office found that implementing a single-payer health insurance program like Medicare for All would guarantee coverage for every person in the country while reducing overall healthcare spending by $650 billion per year.
Notably, 43% of voters said the government should spend more on national security, despite the fact that throwing more money at endless wars is at odds with increasing public investments aimed at improving social and environmental well-being.
\u201cTo put in perspective, $100 billion could pay 1.24 million elementary school teacher salaries for a year, or cover 3.3 million covid-19 hospital stays. \n\nIt\u2019s enough to build a massive wall to protect NYC from sea level rise. It\u2019s enough to get to Mars. \ud83e\udd2f https://t.co/36mVkzbcsS\u201d— National Priorities Project (@National Priorities Project) 1614112258
As Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said about the Pentagon budget earlier this month, "After the past year, watching more than 400,000 fellow Americans die, tens of millions unemployed due to Covid-19, millions more who are lined up at food banks, and even millions more who are on the threshold of losing their homes and being put out on the street, spending $740 billion dollars a year on this one piece of the federal budget is unconscionable."
Lawmakers working on a new relief package to mitigate the ongoing coronavirus crisis shouldn't hesitate to go big considering that a majority of U.S. voters say the government spends "too little" on healthcare, education, and anti-poverty measures, according to a new Hill-HarrisX poll released Tuesday.
The poll, conducted online from February 12 to 15 among 2,835 registered voters, found that 57% of the electorate thinks the federal government doesn't spend enough to combat poverty, while 56% want to see more investment in education.
As Common Dreams reported last year, the $1,200 stimulus checks and enhanced unemployment benefits distributed to Americans through the CARES Act passed in March 2020 reduced poverty even in the midst of an economic calamity driven by the Covid-19 pandemic, providing evidence that substantive anti-poverty programs are effective.
As the House prepares to vote Friday on its version of President Joe Biden's American Rescue Package, nearly half of voters (49%) say the country should spend more on coronavirus relief. Among Democrats, that figure jumps to 58%, while half of independents and 38% of Republicans agree.
In addition, 56% of those surveyed say the government spends too little on healthcare. While increased investments in public health would be welcome in the wake of a pandemic that has claimed the lives of more than 500,000 people in the U.S., improving health outcomes nationwide may not depend on spending more.
As Common Dreams has reported, the Congressional Budget Office found that implementing a single-payer health insurance program like Medicare for All would guarantee coverage for every person in the country while reducing overall healthcare spending by $650 billion per year.
Notably, 43% of voters said the government should spend more on national security, despite the fact that throwing more money at endless wars is at odds with increasing public investments aimed at improving social and environmental well-being.
\u201cTo put in perspective, $100 billion could pay 1.24 million elementary school teacher salaries for a year, or cover 3.3 million covid-19 hospital stays. \n\nIt\u2019s enough to build a massive wall to protect NYC from sea level rise. It\u2019s enough to get to Mars. \ud83e\udd2f https://t.co/36mVkzbcsS\u201d— National Priorities Project (@National Priorities Project) 1614112258
As Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said about the Pentagon budget earlier this month, "After the past year, watching more than 400,000 fellow Americans die, tens of millions unemployed due to Covid-19, millions more who are lined up at food banks, and even millions more who are on the threshold of losing their homes and being put out on the street, spending $740 billion dollars a year on this one piece of the federal budget is unconscionable."