To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
US President Donald Trump and Democratic Presidential candidate and former US Vice President Joe Biden exchange arguments during the first presidential debate at Case Western Reserve University and Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, on September 29, 2020. (Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images)
The first twenty minutes of Tuesday night's debate was denounced in real-time as a nearly "unwatchable" and tedious "charade" after Fox News moderator Chris Wallace proved incapable of refereeing exchanges between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
"Would you just shut up, man," Biden declared towards the end of an initial round of questioning after Trump refused to stop interrupting him.
\u201cAs Pres. Trump repeatedly interrupts Joe Biden, Biden says, "Will you shut up, man?"\n\n"That was really a productive segment, wasn't it?" Biden says sarcastically. "Keep yappin', man." https://t.co/5Bl4Ob3O2t #Debates2020\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1601429205
"This is utterly unwatchable," tweeted progressive journalist Krystal Ball after just 17 minutes.
"This debate is chaotic and unfocused because Chris Wallace and his team didn't have the guts to control the mics," commented John Nichols of The Nation. "The interruptions don't add anything to the discourse. They disrupt it."
For many progressive commentators, it was both a grotesque and depressing political and media display given the current realities in the world.
"I have nothing snarky to say," tweeted journalist and former Bernie Sanders campaign speechwriter David Sirota at 9:20 pm. "I have only this to say: this is a sad state of affairs when thousands are dying from a pandemic, an economic crisis is destroying millions of lives and climate change is burning down the planet's ecosystem."
Others, like Working Families Party national director Maurice Moe Mitchell, called on viewers to recognize what Trump's performance is designed to achieve:
\u201cLook everybody. This debate is as bad as you think. \n\nThe president\u2019s performance is designed to promote cynicism and despair. Don\u2019t succumb to it. \n\nIf you\u2019re watching, translate whatever emotion you\u2019re feeling to action and organize like your life depends on it.\u201d— Maurice Moe Mitchell \ud83d\udc3a (@Maurice Moe Mitchell \ud83d\udc3a) 1601431072
"Wallace lost control immediately," lamented Zach Carter of the HuffPost, "there's nothing of substance to be gleaned from this fracas, and the president looks like a jerk."
"Tonight, America saw a sad, unhinged, orange-in-the-face embarrassment of a president who showed no temperament to lead this country," said Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, in the wake of the debate.
The president, said Green, "would have done better to take Joe Biden's advice--and shut up, man--rather than show his inadequacy in tackling the coronavirus and economic plight of millions of Americans. It was an embarrassment. Joe Biden made clear that by replacing Donald Trump, we can achieve competence in the White House and address key progressive goals from health care to corporate accountability to tackling systemic racism."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
The first twenty minutes of Tuesday night's debate was denounced in real-time as a nearly "unwatchable" and tedious "charade" after Fox News moderator Chris Wallace proved incapable of refereeing exchanges between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
"Would you just shut up, man," Biden declared towards the end of an initial round of questioning after Trump refused to stop interrupting him.
\u201cAs Pres. Trump repeatedly interrupts Joe Biden, Biden says, "Will you shut up, man?"\n\n"That was really a productive segment, wasn't it?" Biden says sarcastically. "Keep yappin', man." https://t.co/5Bl4Ob3O2t #Debates2020\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1601429205
"This is utterly unwatchable," tweeted progressive journalist Krystal Ball after just 17 minutes.
"This debate is chaotic and unfocused because Chris Wallace and his team didn't have the guts to control the mics," commented John Nichols of The Nation. "The interruptions don't add anything to the discourse. They disrupt it."
For many progressive commentators, it was both a grotesque and depressing political and media display given the current realities in the world.
"I have nothing snarky to say," tweeted journalist and former Bernie Sanders campaign speechwriter David Sirota at 9:20 pm. "I have only this to say: this is a sad state of affairs when thousands are dying from a pandemic, an economic crisis is destroying millions of lives and climate change is burning down the planet's ecosystem."
Others, like Working Families Party national director Maurice Moe Mitchell, called on viewers to recognize what Trump's performance is designed to achieve:
\u201cLook everybody. This debate is as bad as you think. \n\nThe president\u2019s performance is designed to promote cynicism and despair. Don\u2019t succumb to it. \n\nIf you\u2019re watching, translate whatever emotion you\u2019re feeling to action and organize like your life depends on it.\u201d— Maurice Moe Mitchell \ud83d\udc3a (@Maurice Moe Mitchell \ud83d\udc3a) 1601431072
"Wallace lost control immediately," lamented Zach Carter of the HuffPost, "there's nothing of substance to be gleaned from this fracas, and the president looks like a jerk."
"Tonight, America saw a sad, unhinged, orange-in-the-face embarrassment of a president who showed no temperament to lead this country," said Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, in the wake of the debate.
The president, said Green, "would have done better to take Joe Biden's advice--and shut up, man--rather than show his inadequacy in tackling the coronavirus and economic plight of millions of Americans. It was an embarrassment. Joe Biden made clear that by replacing Donald Trump, we can achieve competence in the White House and address key progressive goals from health care to corporate accountability to tackling systemic racism."
The first twenty minutes of Tuesday night's debate was denounced in real-time as a nearly "unwatchable" and tedious "charade" after Fox News moderator Chris Wallace proved incapable of refereeing exchanges between President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
"Would you just shut up, man," Biden declared towards the end of an initial round of questioning after Trump refused to stop interrupting him.
\u201cAs Pres. Trump repeatedly interrupts Joe Biden, Biden says, "Will you shut up, man?"\n\n"That was really a productive segment, wasn't it?" Biden says sarcastically. "Keep yappin', man." https://t.co/5Bl4Ob3O2t #Debates2020\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1601429205
"This is utterly unwatchable," tweeted progressive journalist Krystal Ball after just 17 minutes.
"This debate is chaotic and unfocused because Chris Wallace and his team didn't have the guts to control the mics," commented John Nichols of The Nation. "The interruptions don't add anything to the discourse. They disrupt it."
For many progressive commentators, it was both a grotesque and depressing political and media display given the current realities in the world.
"I have nothing snarky to say," tweeted journalist and former Bernie Sanders campaign speechwriter David Sirota at 9:20 pm. "I have only this to say: this is a sad state of affairs when thousands are dying from a pandemic, an economic crisis is destroying millions of lives and climate change is burning down the planet's ecosystem."
Others, like Working Families Party national director Maurice Moe Mitchell, called on viewers to recognize what Trump's performance is designed to achieve:
\u201cLook everybody. This debate is as bad as you think. \n\nThe president\u2019s performance is designed to promote cynicism and despair. Don\u2019t succumb to it. \n\nIf you\u2019re watching, translate whatever emotion you\u2019re feeling to action and organize like your life depends on it.\u201d— Maurice Moe Mitchell \ud83d\udc3a (@Maurice Moe Mitchell \ud83d\udc3a) 1601431072
"Wallace lost control immediately," lamented Zach Carter of the HuffPost, "there's nothing of substance to be gleaned from this fracas, and the president looks like a jerk."
"Tonight, America saw a sad, unhinged, orange-in-the-face embarrassment of a president who showed no temperament to lead this country," said Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, in the wake of the debate.
The president, said Green, "would have done better to take Joe Biden's advice--and shut up, man--rather than show his inadequacy in tackling the coronavirus and economic plight of millions of Americans. It was an embarrassment. Joe Biden made clear that by replacing Donald Trump, we can achieve competence in the White House and address key progressive goals from health care to corporate accountability to tackling systemic racism."
