SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A senior woman wears a homemade face mask, an indispensable tool in the fight against Covid-19. (Photo: Lucy Lambriex/iStock/via Getty Images)
Trump Mocks Biden Mask-Wearing Just as New Research Shows Stricter Compliance Could Save 120,000 Lives in US Over Next 4 Months
"These are not numbers or statistics but family members, friends, and loved ones."
Sep 04, 2020
While a new forecast released by health researchers estimates that a mask-wearing compliance rate of 95% in the U.S. could reduce a projected death toll over the next four months by 120,000 people, President Donald Trump at a campaign event Thursday night continued to undermine the widespread adoption of face coverings by ridiculing Joe Biden's frequent use of a mask.
During Thursday night's packed rally in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, which violated the state's mandate against outdoor gatherings of more than 250 people, Trump said:
Did you ever see a man that likes a mask as much as him? And then he makes a speech, and he always has that--not always, but a lot of times he has it hanging down, because, you know what, it gives him a feeling of security. If I were a psychiatrist--right?--no, I'd say--I'd say, 'This guy's got some big issues.'
In an interview with CNN, Biden said that "it's hard to respond to something so idiotic."
Trump's statement--part of a broader defense of his administration's coronavirus response--came one day before the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IMHE) at the University of Washington announced its latest projection, which warns that under the most likely scenario, just over 410,000 people in the U.S.--and 2.8 million globally--will have died from Covid-19 by Jan. 1. With the country's Covid fatalities nearing 190,000 at press time, such an estimate means more than 220,000 additional coronavirus-related deaths in the U.S. alone during the remainder of 2020.
The best-case scenario, which assumes a near-universal adoption of face masks, is just under 290,000 coronavirus-related deaths in the U.S. by the end of the year--120,000 less than the current projection.
Under the worst-case scenario, which has the potential to occur if public health mandates are eased prematurely in favor of a so-called "herd immunity" approach, over 620,000 people in the U.S. will have succumbed to the disease by the start of 2021.
According to the IHME's forecasts, which are based on a model that hinges on human behavior and public policies, anywhere from 100,000 to 430,000 additional U.S. residents are likely to die from Covid-19 in the next four months.
Whether the eventual outcome reflects the low estimate or the high one, say researchers, depends in part on the willingness of people to use face coverings regularly, along with other policy responses and behavioral modifications.
Several scientists support Bernie Sanders' Masks for All Act, which invokes the Defense Production Act to manufacture and distribute three high-quality, reusable masks to every person in the country via the U.S. Postal Service.
95% compliance with regular mask-wearing and strict adherence to social distancing could save up to 120,000 lives in the U.S. by the end of the year, and as many as 770,000 lives could be saved worldwide in the same time period, the IMHE estimates.
Christopher Murray, director of the IMHE, lamented to the Washington Post that there are "bleak times ahead in the Northern Hemisphere winter, and unfortunately we are not collectively doing everything we can to learn from the last five months."
In a statement, Murray blasted proponents of the so-called "herd immunity" strategy, which he said "ignores science and ethics," and if applied globally would produce "millions of avoidable deaths," and is "quite simply, reprehensible."
"The science is clear and the evidence irrefutable," Murray said. "Mask-wearing, social distancing, and limits to social gatherings are vital to helping prevent transmission of the virus."
According to infectious disease expert Jeffrey Shaman, "What happens the next few months really depends on what we do as a society in the next few weeks."
Ali Mokdad, a professor of population health, issued a reminder: "These are not numbers or statistics but family members, friends, and loved ones."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
While a new forecast released by health researchers estimates that a mask-wearing compliance rate of 95% in the U.S. could reduce a projected death toll over the next four months by 120,000 people, President Donald Trump at a campaign event Thursday night continued to undermine the widespread adoption of face coverings by ridiculing Joe Biden's frequent use of a mask.
During Thursday night's packed rally in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, which violated the state's mandate against outdoor gatherings of more than 250 people, Trump said:
Did you ever see a man that likes a mask as much as him? And then he makes a speech, and he always has that--not always, but a lot of times he has it hanging down, because, you know what, it gives him a feeling of security. If I were a psychiatrist--right?--no, I'd say--I'd say, 'This guy's got some big issues.'
In an interview with CNN, Biden said that "it's hard to respond to something so idiotic."
Trump's statement--part of a broader defense of his administration's coronavirus response--came one day before the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IMHE) at the University of Washington announced its latest projection, which warns that under the most likely scenario, just over 410,000 people in the U.S.--and 2.8 million globally--will have died from Covid-19 by Jan. 1. With the country's Covid fatalities nearing 190,000 at press time, such an estimate means more than 220,000 additional coronavirus-related deaths in the U.S. alone during the remainder of 2020.
The best-case scenario, which assumes a near-universal adoption of face masks, is just under 290,000 coronavirus-related deaths in the U.S. by the end of the year--120,000 less than the current projection.
Under the worst-case scenario, which has the potential to occur if public health mandates are eased prematurely in favor of a so-called "herd immunity" approach, over 620,000 people in the U.S. will have succumbed to the disease by the start of 2021.
According to the IHME's forecasts, which are based on a model that hinges on human behavior and public policies, anywhere from 100,000 to 430,000 additional U.S. residents are likely to die from Covid-19 in the next four months.
Whether the eventual outcome reflects the low estimate or the high one, say researchers, depends in part on the willingness of people to use face coverings regularly, along with other policy responses and behavioral modifications.
Several scientists support Bernie Sanders' Masks for All Act, which invokes the Defense Production Act to manufacture and distribute three high-quality, reusable masks to every person in the country via the U.S. Postal Service.
95% compliance with regular mask-wearing and strict adherence to social distancing could save up to 120,000 lives in the U.S. by the end of the year, and as many as 770,000 lives could be saved worldwide in the same time period, the IMHE estimates.
Christopher Murray, director of the IMHE, lamented to the Washington Post that there are "bleak times ahead in the Northern Hemisphere winter, and unfortunately we are not collectively doing everything we can to learn from the last five months."
In a statement, Murray blasted proponents of the so-called "herd immunity" strategy, which he said "ignores science and ethics," and if applied globally would produce "millions of avoidable deaths," and is "quite simply, reprehensible."
"The science is clear and the evidence irrefutable," Murray said. "Mask-wearing, social distancing, and limits to social gatherings are vital to helping prevent transmission of the virus."
According to infectious disease expert Jeffrey Shaman, "What happens the next few months really depends on what we do as a society in the next few weeks."
Ali Mokdad, a professor of population health, issued a reminder: "These are not numbers or statistics but family members, friends, and loved ones."
Kenny Stancil
Kenny Stancil is senior researcher at the Revolving Door Project and a former staff writer for Common Dreams.
While a new forecast released by health researchers estimates that a mask-wearing compliance rate of 95% in the U.S. could reduce a projected death toll over the next four months by 120,000 people, President Donald Trump at a campaign event Thursday night continued to undermine the widespread adoption of face coverings by ridiculing Joe Biden's frequent use of a mask.
During Thursday night's packed rally in Latrobe, Pennsylvania, which violated the state's mandate against outdoor gatherings of more than 250 people, Trump said:
Did you ever see a man that likes a mask as much as him? And then he makes a speech, and he always has that--not always, but a lot of times he has it hanging down, because, you know what, it gives him a feeling of security. If I were a psychiatrist--right?--no, I'd say--I'd say, 'This guy's got some big issues.'
In an interview with CNN, Biden said that "it's hard to respond to something so idiotic."
Trump's statement--part of a broader defense of his administration's coronavirus response--came one day before the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IMHE) at the University of Washington announced its latest projection, which warns that under the most likely scenario, just over 410,000 people in the U.S.--and 2.8 million globally--will have died from Covid-19 by Jan. 1. With the country's Covid fatalities nearing 190,000 at press time, such an estimate means more than 220,000 additional coronavirus-related deaths in the U.S. alone during the remainder of 2020.
The best-case scenario, which assumes a near-universal adoption of face masks, is just under 290,000 coronavirus-related deaths in the U.S. by the end of the year--120,000 less than the current projection.
Under the worst-case scenario, which has the potential to occur if public health mandates are eased prematurely in favor of a so-called "herd immunity" approach, over 620,000 people in the U.S. will have succumbed to the disease by the start of 2021.
According to the IHME's forecasts, which are based on a model that hinges on human behavior and public policies, anywhere from 100,000 to 430,000 additional U.S. residents are likely to die from Covid-19 in the next four months.
Whether the eventual outcome reflects the low estimate or the high one, say researchers, depends in part on the willingness of people to use face coverings regularly, along with other policy responses and behavioral modifications.
Several scientists support Bernie Sanders' Masks for All Act, which invokes the Defense Production Act to manufacture and distribute three high-quality, reusable masks to every person in the country via the U.S. Postal Service.
95% compliance with regular mask-wearing and strict adherence to social distancing could save up to 120,000 lives in the U.S. by the end of the year, and as many as 770,000 lives could be saved worldwide in the same time period, the IMHE estimates.
Christopher Murray, director of the IMHE, lamented to the Washington Post that there are "bleak times ahead in the Northern Hemisphere winter, and unfortunately we are not collectively doing everything we can to learn from the last five months."
In a statement, Murray blasted proponents of the so-called "herd immunity" strategy, which he said "ignores science and ethics," and if applied globally would produce "millions of avoidable deaths," and is "quite simply, reprehensible."
"The science is clear and the evidence irrefutable," Murray said. "Mask-wearing, social distancing, and limits to social gatherings are vital to helping prevent transmission of the virus."
According to infectious disease expert Jeffrey Shaman, "What happens the next few months really depends on what we do as a society in the next few weeks."
Ali Mokdad, a professor of population health, issued a reminder: "These are not numbers or statistics but family members, friends, and loved ones."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.