

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) speaks during a meeting with cabinet members and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) in the Oval Office at the White House on July 20, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Doug Mills/Getty Images)
Progressives are pushing Democratic congressional leaders to forcefully oppose the Senate GOP's coronavirus stimulus legislation after new reporting Monday revealed the package is likely to include a payroll tax cut, a reduction in enhanced unemployment payments, conditions on school funding, and little aid to state and local governments.
"After weeks of sitting on their hands and doing nothing while infections and deaths rise and tens of millions of people fear an imminent economic catastrophe, the reported plan Senate Republicans put out today would be laughable if it wasn't so outright shameful and harmful," said Care in Action, Community Change Action, Indivisible, MoveOn, and Greenpeace in a joint statement Monday.
The advocacy groups called on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to "reject this plan outright."
"Sounds like Senate Republicans want to go cheap (and cruel) on by far the most-important bits of the economic response to Covid--enhanced UI benefits and aid to state/local governments."
--Josh Bivens, Economic Policy Institute
"The plan put forth by Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans will do nothing but double down on the failed policies that put corporate profits before workers and families, and that helped get us here in the first place," the groups said. "It is not a good faith starting point to negotiations."
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) confirmed to reporters Monday that the plan being crafted in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) office will include a cut to the payroll tax--a funding mechanism for Social Security and Medicare. "It's one of the issues that we're proposing," said McCarthy.
An anonymous White House official told Roll Call that the Republican proposal under consideration would defer payment of the payroll tax to a later date. Congress would then have the option of waiving the payback requirement with separate legislation.
Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, said in a statement Monday that the Trump-GOP push for a payroll tax cut amounts to an effort to "raid" the Social Security system's "dedicated revenue as a pathway to destroying it."
"If the money lost in payroll contributions is replaced with general revenue, Social Security will still be a target," warned Altman. "Currently, Social Security doesn't add a penny to the deficit. Raiding its dedicated revenue is a set up to the claim that it must be cut in the name of reining in the debt! McCarthy's statement today means that every Republican member of Congress supports defunding Social Security--unless they quickly and explicitly denounce their party's plan to raid our earned benefits."
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, was among the few Republicans who publicly voiced skepticism Monday about the payroll tax cut, calling the proposal a "public relations problem" for the GOP.
"Social Security people think we're raiding the Social Security fund," said Grassley, to which Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson responded:
Schumer and Pelosi are expected to meet with White House officials Tuesday to formally kick off negotiations over the stimulus legislation. The Trump administration is advocating a relief package that contains "roughly $1 trillion in new programs, though officials are expected to use budget gimmicks to make the initial package slightly larger," the Post reported.
By comparison, the $3 trillion HEROES Act passed by the Democrat-controlled House in May proposed more than $1 trillion just for state and local governments as they face pandemic-induced budget crises.
"The bill is expected to omit new aid that Democrats have sought for cities and states, instead allowing governors and local leaders more flexibility to spend the $150 billion already allocated," the Post noted.
The GOP plan will also likely include another round of $1,200 direct stimulus payments and a cut to the $600-per-week increase in unemployment benefits, which is set to expire at the end of the week. During a private White House meeting on Monday, according to the Post, "Trump criticized the enhanced unemployment benefit, saying it never should have been agreed to in the first place."
"From what we understand from press reports, McConnell's bill will prioritize corporate special interests over workers and Main Street businesses," Schumer said in a floor speech Monday afternoon. "It will fail to adequately address the worsening spread of the virus. There are currently between 20 million and 30 million unemployed Americans, and from all accounts the Republican bill will not do nearly enough for them."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) warned on Twitter that reducing the boosted unemployment insurance (UI) payments will slash the incomes of 30 million Americans who are currently relying on the payments to meet basic needs.
Josh Bivens, director of research at the Economic Policy Institute, said Monday that it "sounds like Senate Republicans want to go cheap (and cruel) on by far the most-important bits of the economic response to Covid--enhanced UI benefits and aid to state/local governments."
"Hard not see all of this as Republicans in the Senate and administration having given up trying to fix problems and shifting to attempts to hobble the political prospects of the next Congress and administration," Bivens added. "We deserve a lot better than this."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Progressives are pushing Democratic congressional leaders to forcefully oppose the Senate GOP's coronavirus stimulus legislation after new reporting Monday revealed the package is likely to include a payroll tax cut, a reduction in enhanced unemployment payments, conditions on school funding, and little aid to state and local governments.
"After weeks of sitting on their hands and doing nothing while infections and deaths rise and tens of millions of people fear an imminent economic catastrophe, the reported plan Senate Republicans put out today would be laughable if it wasn't so outright shameful and harmful," said Care in Action, Community Change Action, Indivisible, MoveOn, and Greenpeace in a joint statement Monday.
The advocacy groups called on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to "reject this plan outright."
"Sounds like Senate Republicans want to go cheap (and cruel) on by far the most-important bits of the economic response to Covid--enhanced UI benefits and aid to state/local governments."
--Josh Bivens, Economic Policy Institute
"The plan put forth by Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans will do nothing but double down on the failed policies that put corporate profits before workers and families, and that helped get us here in the first place," the groups said. "It is not a good faith starting point to negotiations."
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) confirmed to reporters Monday that the plan being crafted in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) office will include a cut to the payroll tax--a funding mechanism for Social Security and Medicare. "It's one of the issues that we're proposing," said McCarthy.
An anonymous White House official told Roll Call that the Republican proposal under consideration would defer payment of the payroll tax to a later date. Congress would then have the option of waiving the payback requirement with separate legislation.
Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, said in a statement Monday that the Trump-GOP push for a payroll tax cut amounts to an effort to "raid" the Social Security system's "dedicated revenue as a pathway to destroying it."
"If the money lost in payroll contributions is replaced with general revenue, Social Security will still be a target," warned Altman. "Currently, Social Security doesn't add a penny to the deficit. Raiding its dedicated revenue is a set up to the claim that it must be cut in the name of reining in the debt! McCarthy's statement today means that every Republican member of Congress supports defunding Social Security--unless they quickly and explicitly denounce their party's plan to raid our earned benefits."
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, was among the few Republicans who publicly voiced skepticism Monday about the payroll tax cut, calling the proposal a "public relations problem" for the GOP.
"Social Security people think we're raiding the Social Security fund," said Grassley, to which Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson responded:
Schumer and Pelosi are expected to meet with White House officials Tuesday to formally kick off negotiations over the stimulus legislation. The Trump administration is advocating a relief package that contains "roughly $1 trillion in new programs, though officials are expected to use budget gimmicks to make the initial package slightly larger," the Post reported.
By comparison, the $3 trillion HEROES Act passed by the Democrat-controlled House in May proposed more than $1 trillion just for state and local governments as they face pandemic-induced budget crises.
"The bill is expected to omit new aid that Democrats have sought for cities and states, instead allowing governors and local leaders more flexibility to spend the $150 billion already allocated," the Post noted.
The GOP plan will also likely include another round of $1,200 direct stimulus payments and a cut to the $600-per-week increase in unemployment benefits, which is set to expire at the end of the week. During a private White House meeting on Monday, according to the Post, "Trump criticized the enhanced unemployment benefit, saying it never should have been agreed to in the first place."
"From what we understand from press reports, McConnell's bill will prioritize corporate special interests over workers and Main Street businesses," Schumer said in a floor speech Monday afternoon. "It will fail to adequately address the worsening spread of the virus. There are currently between 20 million and 30 million unemployed Americans, and from all accounts the Republican bill will not do nearly enough for them."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) warned on Twitter that reducing the boosted unemployment insurance (UI) payments will slash the incomes of 30 million Americans who are currently relying on the payments to meet basic needs.
Josh Bivens, director of research at the Economic Policy Institute, said Monday that it "sounds like Senate Republicans want to go cheap (and cruel) on by far the most-important bits of the economic response to Covid--enhanced UI benefits and aid to state/local governments."
"Hard not see all of this as Republicans in the Senate and administration having given up trying to fix problems and shifting to attempts to hobble the political prospects of the next Congress and administration," Bivens added. "We deserve a lot better than this."
Progressives are pushing Democratic congressional leaders to forcefully oppose the Senate GOP's coronavirus stimulus legislation after new reporting Monday revealed the package is likely to include a payroll tax cut, a reduction in enhanced unemployment payments, conditions on school funding, and little aid to state and local governments.
"After weeks of sitting on their hands and doing nothing while infections and deaths rise and tens of millions of people fear an imminent economic catastrophe, the reported plan Senate Republicans put out today would be laughable if it wasn't so outright shameful and harmful," said Care in Action, Community Change Action, Indivisible, MoveOn, and Greenpeace in a joint statement Monday.
The advocacy groups called on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to "reject this plan outright."
"Sounds like Senate Republicans want to go cheap (and cruel) on by far the most-important bits of the economic response to Covid--enhanced UI benefits and aid to state/local governments."
--Josh Bivens, Economic Policy Institute
"The plan put forth by Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans will do nothing but double down on the failed policies that put corporate profits before workers and families, and that helped get us here in the first place," the groups said. "It is not a good faith starting point to negotiations."
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) confirmed to reporters Monday that the plan being crafted in Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) office will include a cut to the payroll tax--a funding mechanism for Social Security and Medicare. "It's one of the issues that we're proposing," said McCarthy.
An anonymous White House official told Roll Call that the Republican proposal under consideration would defer payment of the payroll tax to a later date. Congress would then have the option of waiving the payback requirement with separate legislation.
Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, said in a statement Monday that the Trump-GOP push for a payroll tax cut amounts to an effort to "raid" the Social Security system's "dedicated revenue as a pathway to destroying it."
"If the money lost in payroll contributions is replaced with general revenue, Social Security will still be a target," warned Altman. "Currently, Social Security doesn't add a penny to the deficit. Raiding its dedicated revenue is a set up to the claim that it must be cut in the name of reining in the debt! McCarthy's statement today means that every Republican member of Congress supports defunding Social Security--unless they quickly and explicitly denounce their party's plan to raid our earned benefits."
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, was among the few Republicans who publicly voiced skepticism Monday about the payroll tax cut, calling the proposal a "public relations problem" for the GOP.
"Social Security people think we're raiding the Social Security fund," said Grassley, to which Social Security Works executive director Alex Lawson responded:
Schumer and Pelosi are expected to meet with White House officials Tuesday to formally kick off negotiations over the stimulus legislation. The Trump administration is advocating a relief package that contains "roughly $1 trillion in new programs, though officials are expected to use budget gimmicks to make the initial package slightly larger," the Post reported.
By comparison, the $3 trillion HEROES Act passed by the Democrat-controlled House in May proposed more than $1 trillion just for state and local governments as they face pandemic-induced budget crises.
"The bill is expected to omit new aid that Democrats have sought for cities and states, instead allowing governors and local leaders more flexibility to spend the $150 billion already allocated," the Post noted.
The GOP plan will also likely include another round of $1,200 direct stimulus payments and a cut to the $600-per-week increase in unemployment benefits, which is set to expire at the end of the week. During a private White House meeting on Monday, according to the Post, "Trump criticized the enhanced unemployment benefit, saying it never should have been agreed to in the first place."
"From what we understand from press reports, McConnell's bill will prioritize corporate special interests over workers and Main Street businesses," Schumer said in a floor speech Monday afternoon. "It will fail to adequately address the worsening spread of the virus. There are currently between 20 million and 30 million unemployed Americans, and from all accounts the Republican bill will not do nearly enough for them."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) warned on Twitter that reducing the boosted unemployment insurance (UI) payments will slash the incomes of 30 million Americans who are currently relying on the payments to meet basic needs.
Josh Bivens, director of research at the Economic Policy Institute, said Monday that it "sounds like Senate Republicans want to go cheap (and cruel) on by far the most-important bits of the economic response to Covid--enhanced UI benefits and aid to state/local governments."
"Hard not see all of this as Republicans in the Senate and administration having given up trying to fix problems and shifting to attempts to hobble the political prospects of the next Congress and administration," Bivens added. "We deserve a lot better than this."