"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Gloria Smith, attorney with the Sierra Club. (Photo: Mani Albrecht/U.S. Border Patrol/Flickr)
'No One Is Above the Law': Federal Court Rules Trump Effort to Seize Pentagon Funds for Border Wall Is Illegal
"This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities."
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Donald Trump another rebuke Friday by ruling that the administration's efforts to redirect previously appropriated Pentagon funds towards his border wall was an unlawful violation of the Constitution.
"These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to 'drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause,'" wrote Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas in the majority opinion."Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful."
"Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
--Dror Ladin, ACLUAccording to the 2 to 1 decision authored by Thomas, "the border wall was not an unforeseen military requirement, and that funding for the wall had been denied by Congress. Absent such statutory authority, the Executive Branch lacked independent constitutional authority to transfer the funds at issue here."
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, among those who have challenged the legality of Trump's redirection of the funds, welcomed the decision, saying the "court reminded the president--once again--that no one is above the law."
The ruling came in a lawsuit, Sierra Club v. Trump, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition. Though the Trump administration is certain to appeal the ruling, the ACLU said the court's decision was a clear vindication for the merits of the legal challenge brought.
"This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities," Dror Ladin, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement. "President Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
Gloria Smith, managing attorney at the Sierra Club, applauded the ruling as "monumental for our border communities and desert wildlands" the stretch along the U.S.-Mexico border.
"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Smith. "We rise with border communities to stop this administration from further inflicting its relentless agenda-- harming the people and places we know and love."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Donald Trump another rebuke Friday by ruling that the administration's efforts to redirect previously appropriated Pentagon funds towards his border wall was an unlawful violation of the Constitution.
"These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to 'drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause,'" wrote Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas in the majority opinion."Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful."
"Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
--Dror Ladin, ACLUAccording to the 2 to 1 decision authored by Thomas, "the border wall was not an unforeseen military requirement, and that funding for the wall had been denied by Congress. Absent such statutory authority, the Executive Branch lacked independent constitutional authority to transfer the funds at issue here."
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, among those who have challenged the legality of Trump's redirection of the funds, welcomed the decision, saying the "court reminded the president--once again--that no one is above the law."
The ruling came in a lawsuit, Sierra Club v. Trump, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition. Though the Trump administration is certain to appeal the ruling, the ACLU said the court's decision was a clear vindication for the merits of the legal challenge brought.
"This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities," Dror Ladin, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement. "President Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
Gloria Smith, managing attorney at the Sierra Club, applauded the ruling as "monumental for our border communities and desert wildlands" the stretch along the U.S.-Mexico border.
"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Smith. "We rise with border communities to stop this administration from further inflicting its relentless agenda-- harming the people and places we know and love."
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Donald Trump another rebuke Friday by ruling that the administration's efforts to redirect previously appropriated Pentagon funds towards his border wall was an unlawful violation of the Constitution.
"These funds were appropriated for other purposes, and the transfer amounted to 'drawing funds from the Treasury without authorization by statute and thus violating the Appropriations Clause,'" wrote Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Sidney Thomas in the majority opinion."Therefore, the transfer of funds here was unlawful."
"Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
--Dror Ladin, ACLUAccording to the 2 to 1 decision authored by Thomas, "the border wall was not an unforeseen military requirement, and that funding for the wall had been denied by Congress. Absent such statutory authority, the Executive Branch lacked independent constitutional authority to transfer the funds at issue here."
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, among those who have challenged the legality of Trump's redirection of the funds, welcomed the decision, saying the "court reminded the president--once again--that no one is above the law."
The ruling came in a lawsuit, Sierra Club v. Trump, which was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition. Though the Trump administration is certain to appeal the ruling, the ACLU said the court's decision was a clear vindication for the merits of the legal challenge brought.
"This ruling is a win for the rule of law, the environment, and border communities," Dror Ladin, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project, said in a statement. "President Trump's xenophobic wall is already leveling protected lands, desecrating cultural sites, and destroying wildlife. There's no undoing the damage that's been done, but we will be back before the Supreme Court to finally put a stop to this destructive wall."
Gloria Smith, managing attorney at the Sierra Club, applauded the ruling as "monumental for our border communities and desert wildlands" the stretch along the U.S.-Mexico border.
"We should be protecting communities, our democracy, and the environment, not tearing these things apart as Trump hoped to do," said Smith. "We rise with border communities to stop this administration from further inflicting its relentless agenda-- harming the people and places we know and love."