Residents cast votes at St. Paul Methodist Church November 5, 2019 in Louisville, Kentucky. (Photo: John Sommers II/Getty Images)
Jun 20, 2020
Voting rights advocates sounded alarm Friday after a federal judge denied an effort to expand the number of polling places in Kentucky.
The state, which holds a primary election on June 23 in which Democrats will determine the candidate to face off against Sen. Mitch McConnell, will have "[f]ewer than 200 polling places," reported the Washington Post, "down from 3,700 in a typical election year."
Most of the state's 120 counties will have just one polling location. That includes the most populous county, Jefferson, home to Louisville. "About 1 in 5 residents in the county is African American, the largest black population in the state," the Post noted.
\u201cKentucky officials have slashed the number of polling sites from 3700 to 200 statewide.\n\nJefferson Cty, where Louisville sits, will have 1 site for 767K people. The county is 1/5 Black, 54 miles long w/ poor public transit.\n\nThis is POOR decision-making.\nhttps://t.co/rWl5U3PwFW\u201d— Kristen Clarke (@Kristen Clarke) 1592616765
"This is going to be a disaster," tweeted author and voting rights expert Ari Berman, and People For the American Way president Ben Jealous said the scenario represented "our next electoral nightmare."
Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, after reaching an agreement with Republican Secretary of State Michael Adams, unveiled in April an executive order loosening restrictions on who can receive an absentee ballot in light of the coronavirus pandemic. The order also allowed counties to open a singular polling site regardless of a county's population.
Local NPR affiliate WVIKreported:
In a ruling issued Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Simpson said there was no evidence that only having one polling location in the affected counties would result in voter suppression.
"Comprehensive plans were put in place which included making absentee ballots available for all voters, providing early in-person voting options for 15 days leading up to Election Day, and establishing a polling place for Election Day in-person voting," Simpson wrote.
"This Triple Crown of voting options wins against the pandemic's risk of disenfranchising the Kentucky voter."
In a joint statement Thursday, state Rep. Jason Nemes, a Republican who filed the suit along with voters to increase polling locations, and Louisville Metro Councilwoman Keisha Dorsey, a Democrat who filed a motion to join the suit, expressed disappointment with the ruling.
"We believe the judge disregarded evidence from our expert witness that one location will suppress the vote, particularly among African Americans," Nemes and Dorsey said.
The pair announced they would not appeal the ruling, citing fears of putting "our community into confusion over where to vote this close to Election Day."
Judge Simpson pointed in his ruling to absentee ballots as a guardrail against voter disenfranchisement, but recent reporting shows cause for concern.
Local WDRB reported Friday that some voters in Louisville received absentee ballots in the mail that did not correspond to their party registration. The outlet added:
"This mistake follows news of a computer coding error that sent out thousands of absentee ballots statewide with the wrong middle initial on voters' names. For some, the error is hurting voter confidence."
[...]
[Hardin County Clerk Debbie ] Donnelly said she's seeing a common error on ballots coming in through the mail. People are not signing both the ballot envelope and the mailing envelop. Both signatures are required for the vote to count.
According to the Associated Press, roughly three-quarters of Tuesday's ballots could be mail-in ones.
A closely watched race to be decided in Kentucky Tuesday includes state Rep. Charles Booker, Mike Broihier, and establishment-backed Amy McGrath, who are all vying take on McConnell for his long-held Senate seat.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Voting rights advocates sounded alarm Friday after a federal judge denied an effort to expand the number of polling places in Kentucky.
The state, which holds a primary election on June 23 in which Democrats will determine the candidate to face off against Sen. Mitch McConnell, will have "[f]ewer than 200 polling places," reported the Washington Post, "down from 3,700 in a typical election year."
Most of the state's 120 counties will have just one polling location. That includes the most populous county, Jefferson, home to Louisville. "About 1 in 5 residents in the county is African American, the largest black population in the state," the Post noted.
\u201cKentucky officials have slashed the number of polling sites from 3700 to 200 statewide.\n\nJefferson Cty, where Louisville sits, will have 1 site for 767K people. The county is 1/5 Black, 54 miles long w/ poor public transit.\n\nThis is POOR decision-making.\nhttps://t.co/rWl5U3PwFW\u201d— Kristen Clarke (@Kristen Clarke) 1592616765
"This is going to be a disaster," tweeted author and voting rights expert Ari Berman, and People For the American Way president Ben Jealous said the scenario represented "our next electoral nightmare."
Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, after reaching an agreement with Republican Secretary of State Michael Adams, unveiled in April an executive order loosening restrictions on who can receive an absentee ballot in light of the coronavirus pandemic. The order also allowed counties to open a singular polling site regardless of a county's population.
Local NPR affiliate WVIKreported:
In a ruling issued Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Simpson said there was no evidence that only having one polling location in the affected counties would result in voter suppression.
"Comprehensive plans were put in place which included making absentee ballots available for all voters, providing early in-person voting options for 15 days leading up to Election Day, and establishing a polling place for Election Day in-person voting," Simpson wrote.
"This Triple Crown of voting options wins against the pandemic's risk of disenfranchising the Kentucky voter."
In a joint statement Thursday, state Rep. Jason Nemes, a Republican who filed the suit along with voters to increase polling locations, and Louisville Metro Councilwoman Keisha Dorsey, a Democrat who filed a motion to join the suit, expressed disappointment with the ruling.
"We believe the judge disregarded evidence from our expert witness that one location will suppress the vote, particularly among African Americans," Nemes and Dorsey said.
The pair announced they would not appeal the ruling, citing fears of putting "our community into confusion over where to vote this close to Election Day."
Judge Simpson pointed in his ruling to absentee ballots as a guardrail against voter disenfranchisement, but recent reporting shows cause for concern.
Local WDRB reported Friday that some voters in Louisville received absentee ballots in the mail that did not correspond to their party registration. The outlet added:
"This mistake follows news of a computer coding error that sent out thousands of absentee ballots statewide with the wrong middle initial on voters' names. For some, the error is hurting voter confidence."
[...]
[Hardin County Clerk Debbie ] Donnelly said she's seeing a common error on ballots coming in through the mail. People are not signing both the ballot envelope and the mailing envelop. Both signatures are required for the vote to count.
According to the Associated Press, roughly three-quarters of Tuesday's ballots could be mail-in ones.
A closely watched race to be decided in Kentucky Tuesday includes state Rep. Charles Booker, Mike Broihier, and establishment-backed Amy McGrath, who are all vying take on McConnell for his long-held Senate seat.
Voting rights advocates sounded alarm Friday after a federal judge denied an effort to expand the number of polling places in Kentucky.
The state, which holds a primary election on June 23 in which Democrats will determine the candidate to face off against Sen. Mitch McConnell, will have "[f]ewer than 200 polling places," reported the Washington Post, "down from 3,700 in a typical election year."
Most of the state's 120 counties will have just one polling location. That includes the most populous county, Jefferson, home to Louisville. "About 1 in 5 residents in the county is African American, the largest black population in the state," the Post noted.
\u201cKentucky officials have slashed the number of polling sites from 3700 to 200 statewide.\n\nJefferson Cty, where Louisville sits, will have 1 site for 767K people. The county is 1/5 Black, 54 miles long w/ poor public transit.\n\nThis is POOR decision-making.\nhttps://t.co/rWl5U3PwFW\u201d— Kristen Clarke (@Kristen Clarke) 1592616765
"This is going to be a disaster," tweeted author and voting rights expert Ari Berman, and People For the American Way president Ben Jealous said the scenario represented "our next electoral nightmare."
Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, after reaching an agreement with Republican Secretary of State Michael Adams, unveiled in April an executive order loosening restrictions on who can receive an absentee ballot in light of the coronavirus pandemic. The order also allowed counties to open a singular polling site regardless of a county's population.
Local NPR affiliate WVIKreported:
In a ruling issued Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Simpson said there was no evidence that only having one polling location in the affected counties would result in voter suppression.
"Comprehensive plans were put in place which included making absentee ballots available for all voters, providing early in-person voting options for 15 days leading up to Election Day, and establishing a polling place for Election Day in-person voting," Simpson wrote.
"This Triple Crown of voting options wins against the pandemic's risk of disenfranchising the Kentucky voter."
In a joint statement Thursday, state Rep. Jason Nemes, a Republican who filed the suit along with voters to increase polling locations, and Louisville Metro Councilwoman Keisha Dorsey, a Democrat who filed a motion to join the suit, expressed disappointment with the ruling.
"We believe the judge disregarded evidence from our expert witness that one location will suppress the vote, particularly among African Americans," Nemes and Dorsey said.
The pair announced they would not appeal the ruling, citing fears of putting "our community into confusion over where to vote this close to Election Day."
Judge Simpson pointed in his ruling to absentee ballots as a guardrail against voter disenfranchisement, but recent reporting shows cause for concern.
Local WDRB reported Friday that some voters in Louisville received absentee ballots in the mail that did not correspond to their party registration. The outlet added:
"This mistake follows news of a computer coding error that sent out thousands of absentee ballots statewide with the wrong middle initial on voters' names. For some, the error is hurting voter confidence."
[...]
[Hardin County Clerk Debbie ] Donnelly said she's seeing a common error on ballots coming in through the mail. People are not signing both the ballot envelope and the mailing envelop. Both signatures are required for the vote to count.
According to the Associated Press, roughly three-quarters of Tuesday's ballots could be mail-in ones.
A closely watched race to be decided in Kentucky Tuesday includes state Rep. Charles Booker, Mike Broihier, and establishment-backed Amy McGrath, who are all vying take on McConnell for his long-held Senate seat.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.