

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An election official checks in a resident at a drive-up polling place set up outside of Roosevelt Elementary School on April 7, 2020 in Racine, Wisconsin. The polling place was set up to offer drive-up voting where residents voted from their vehicles but it offered one outdoor voting booth for residents who walked to the polling place. The extreme measures were put in place to make the process safer for residents and election officials as the state continues its shelter-in-place order to help curtail the spread of COVID-19. (Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)
As footage of Wisconsin's crowded polling stations flooded the internet Tuesday, public health officials and civil rights advocates condemned the state's Supreme Court and Republican legislative leaders for allowing in-person voting during the coronavirus pandemic and thwarting Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' last-minute efforts to address voter safety concerns.
"These are dangerous times for democracy."
--Aquene Freechild, Public Citizen
"It's not going to be a safe election. People are going to get sick from this," Brook Soltvedt, a 60-year-old textbook editor who is in charge of running the polling place at Thoreau Elementary School in Madison, Wisconsin's capital, told The Cap Times.
Soltvedt added that though she thinks "the city has done about the best that they can do," she worries that the election will cause voter confusion and health consequences. In an effort to protect her 77-year-old husband, Soltvedt said she plans to "strip in the garage, put my clothes in the washer, and go downstairs for two weeks."
\u201cVoting lines in Milwaukee: One hour and 40 minutes\n\n#fightfor15\u201d— Fight For 15 (@Fight For 15) 1586270610
After days of Wisconsin's Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald resisting widespread demands to delay in-person voting and expand absentee voting--like other states have done--Evers on Monday issued an executive order to postpone the election until June 9. However, the order was overturned by the state Surpreme Court Monday night.
The right-wing U.S. Supreme Court added insult to injury on Monday, overturning a lower court ruling that extended the deadline for absentee voting. Absentee ballots must be postmarked Tuesday or returned to a polling place or local clerk's office by 8 pm. Local leaders have expressed worries that due to a backlog of requests, residents may not receive absentee ballots in time to vote.
"What that meant was that, for a substantial portion of the electorate, Election Day presented a harsh choice," John Nichols wrote Tuesday in a column for The Cap Times. "Those who had applied for absentee ballots but not yet received them, and those who had not applied for an absentee ballot by last Friday's deadline, were forced to decide whether to risk exposure to the coronavirus in order to exercise their right to vote."
Nichols denounced the dilemma faced by voters as "unreasonable" and characterized Vos and Fitzgerald as "legislative charlatans" who "threw tantrums at a point when everyone else was working to save lives, keep people healthy, stabilize the economy, and preserve democracy."
"Tony Evers did his part," wrote Nichols. "Vos, Fitzgerald, and the [state] Supreme Court majority failed us."
Other concerned individuals and advocacy organizations issued similarly scathing critiques of Wisconsin's lawmakers and high court while circulating on social media footage of longs lines at the limited polling stations that were able to open.
\u201cPolls are open in Wisconsin.\n\nWith a global pandemic, this election should be delayed.\n\nRepublicans in the state legislature & SCOTUS have ensured that thousands of ballots won\u2019t even count.\n\nIn 24 hrs, they\u2019ve threatened the health of our nation & democracy.\n\nStay safe Wisconsin\u201d— Rep. Mark Pocan (@Rep. Mark Pocan) 1586263880
\u201cThis is beyond irresponsible\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1586262264
"Today there are five Milwaukee polling locations open. Usually there are 180 sites," tweeted the group March for Our Lives. "There's no way to skirt around it; this is wrong. People are forced to gather in long lines at central locations in the midst of a pandemic. Wisconsinites deserve better."
Aquene Freechild, co-director of Public Citizen's Democracy Is For People Campaign, said in a statement about the Wisconsin election that "these are dangerous times for democracy."
"Vos and Fitzgerald know that, with only five polling locations open in the Democratic stronghold of Milwaukee, holding the election now will suppress the Democratic vote more than the GOP vote," Freechild added. "That outcome will skew votes for some statewide elections, such as for the state Supreme Court, to their party."
In a statement Tuesday, Harvard Law School professor and Equal Citizens founder Lawrence Lessig said, "That partisan politics would drive partisan leaders to force citizens to choose between accelerating a pandemic and exercising their right to vote is outrageous."
\u201cWhat used to be almost 200 polling locations in Milwaukee, has been cut down to 5. At this location alone the wait is an hour and 40 min.\n\nThere is no way to justify the #WisconsinPrimary. But Republicans don't care about justifying it, just that they'll get to maintain power.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1586269982
Teasing an episode of the Intercepted podcast to be released Wednesday, journalist Jeremy Scahill--who grew up in Wisconsin--tweeted an audio clip of Milwaukee Health Commissioner Dr. Jeannette Kowalik explaining that "unfortunately it's not" safe to tell voters to go to the polls.
"People are being forced to risk their lives to place their vote or fulfill their right as an American to vote. It's just unbelievable that we are even having this conversation right now," Kowalik said. She added that it has been "disheartening" to work behind-the-scenes on this issue and some people in positions of power in Wisconsin "are killing people by the decisions that they're making."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry tweeted a video from a Milwaukee polling site and wrote that "this is a deliberate attempt by WI GOP to exclude voters, to limit participation, [and] to undermine democracy."
In a lengthy Twitter thread, AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka, declared that "it's unconscionable that Wisconsin voters are being forced to choose between their health amid a pandemic and their constitutional right to vote."
"It's unconscionable that Wisconsin voters are being forced to choose between their health amid a pandemic and their constitutional right to vote."
--Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO
"Taking away the fundamental right to vote that so many have fought and died for is disgraceful. Democracy in our country is dying, and those meant to uphold our Constitution have failed miserably in their duty," Trumka added. "Working people see what's happening, and we're not going to stand for it in November and beyond."
Common Cause Wisconsin called Tuesday "a day that will live in infamy." The group's director, Jay Heck, said in a statement that "Wisconsin is the only state in the nation that has failed to step up and respond responsibly and safely to the current national health pandemic emergency. We have seven months until the general election and there is time to fix these issues before November to ensure we are protecting public health and the right to vote."
Voters who participated in Wisconsin's Tuesday election weighed in on local races as well as the Democratic presidential primary contest between Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who spoke out against the state Supreme Court decision--and former Vice President Joe Biden, who remains the frontrunner and recently claimed that in-person voting could be done safely.
Election officials across Wisconsin took various steps to protect voters. Palmyra Clerk/Treasurer Laurie Mueller told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the village's sole polling place was moved to a bigger location.
According to the newspaper:
Mueller said a volunteer at the door is spray-sanitizing everyone's hands as they enter, and voters are being instructed to take a pen to vote and then either throw it away or take it home with them.
Poll workers outfitted with masks and gloves are working behind sneeze guards made by the village's public works employees. There are Xes on the floor at 6-foot intervals.
"We have a person wiping down the poll booths after everyone votes," Mueller said, "and then randomly wiping down other areas in the voting location."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
As footage of Wisconsin's crowded polling stations flooded the internet Tuesday, public health officials and civil rights advocates condemned the state's Supreme Court and Republican legislative leaders for allowing in-person voting during the coronavirus pandemic and thwarting Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' last-minute efforts to address voter safety concerns.
"These are dangerous times for democracy."
--Aquene Freechild, Public Citizen
"It's not going to be a safe election. People are going to get sick from this," Brook Soltvedt, a 60-year-old textbook editor who is in charge of running the polling place at Thoreau Elementary School in Madison, Wisconsin's capital, told The Cap Times.
Soltvedt added that though she thinks "the city has done about the best that they can do," she worries that the election will cause voter confusion and health consequences. In an effort to protect her 77-year-old husband, Soltvedt said she plans to "strip in the garage, put my clothes in the washer, and go downstairs for two weeks."
\u201cVoting lines in Milwaukee: One hour and 40 minutes\n\n#fightfor15\u201d— Fight For 15 (@Fight For 15) 1586270610
After days of Wisconsin's Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald resisting widespread demands to delay in-person voting and expand absentee voting--like other states have done--Evers on Monday issued an executive order to postpone the election until June 9. However, the order was overturned by the state Surpreme Court Monday night.
The right-wing U.S. Supreme Court added insult to injury on Monday, overturning a lower court ruling that extended the deadline for absentee voting. Absentee ballots must be postmarked Tuesday or returned to a polling place or local clerk's office by 8 pm. Local leaders have expressed worries that due to a backlog of requests, residents may not receive absentee ballots in time to vote.
"What that meant was that, for a substantial portion of the electorate, Election Day presented a harsh choice," John Nichols wrote Tuesday in a column for The Cap Times. "Those who had applied for absentee ballots but not yet received them, and those who had not applied for an absentee ballot by last Friday's deadline, were forced to decide whether to risk exposure to the coronavirus in order to exercise their right to vote."
Nichols denounced the dilemma faced by voters as "unreasonable" and characterized Vos and Fitzgerald as "legislative charlatans" who "threw tantrums at a point when everyone else was working to save lives, keep people healthy, stabilize the economy, and preserve democracy."
"Tony Evers did his part," wrote Nichols. "Vos, Fitzgerald, and the [state] Supreme Court majority failed us."
Other concerned individuals and advocacy organizations issued similarly scathing critiques of Wisconsin's lawmakers and high court while circulating on social media footage of longs lines at the limited polling stations that were able to open.
\u201cPolls are open in Wisconsin.\n\nWith a global pandemic, this election should be delayed.\n\nRepublicans in the state legislature & SCOTUS have ensured that thousands of ballots won\u2019t even count.\n\nIn 24 hrs, they\u2019ve threatened the health of our nation & democracy.\n\nStay safe Wisconsin\u201d— Rep. Mark Pocan (@Rep. Mark Pocan) 1586263880
\u201cThis is beyond irresponsible\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1586262264
"Today there are five Milwaukee polling locations open. Usually there are 180 sites," tweeted the group March for Our Lives. "There's no way to skirt around it; this is wrong. People are forced to gather in long lines at central locations in the midst of a pandemic. Wisconsinites deserve better."
Aquene Freechild, co-director of Public Citizen's Democracy Is For People Campaign, said in a statement about the Wisconsin election that "these are dangerous times for democracy."
"Vos and Fitzgerald know that, with only five polling locations open in the Democratic stronghold of Milwaukee, holding the election now will suppress the Democratic vote more than the GOP vote," Freechild added. "That outcome will skew votes for some statewide elections, such as for the state Supreme Court, to their party."
In a statement Tuesday, Harvard Law School professor and Equal Citizens founder Lawrence Lessig said, "That partisan politics would drive partisan leaders to force citizens to choose between accelerating a pandemic and exercising their right to vote is outrageous."
\u201cWhat used to be almost 200 polling locations in Milwaukee, has been cut down to 5. At this location alone the wait is an hour and 40 min.\n\nThere is no way to justify the #WisconsinPrimary. But Republicans don't care about justifying it, just that they'll get to maintain power.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1586269982
Teasing an episode of the Intercepted podcast to be released Wednesday, journalist Jeremy Scahill--who grew up in Wisconsin--tweeted an audio clip of Milwaukee Health Commissioner Dr. Jeannette Kowalik explaining that "unfortunately it's not" safe to tell voters to go to the polls.
"People are being forced to risk their lives to place their vote or fulfill their right as an American to vote. It's just unbelievable that we are even having this conversation right now," Kowalik said. She added that it has been "disheartening" to work behind-the-scenes on this issue and some people in positions of power in Wisconsin "are killing people by the decisions that they're making."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry tweeted a video from a Milwaukee polling site and wrote that "this is a deliberate attempt by WI GOP to exclude voters, to limit participation, [and] to undermine democracy."
In a lengthy Twitter thread, AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka, declared that "it's unconscionable that Wisconsin voters are being forced to choose between their health amid a pandemic and their constitutional right to vote."
"It's unconscionable that Wisconsin voters are being forced to choose between their health amid a pandemic and their constitutional right to vote."
--Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO
"Taking away the fundamental right to vote that so many have fought and died for is disgraceful. Democracy in our country is dying, and those meant to uphold our Constitution have failed miserably in their duty," Trumka added. "Working people see what's happening, and we're not going to stand for it in November and beyond."
Common Cause Wisconsin called Tuesday "a day that will live in infamy." The group's director, Jay Heck, said in a statement that "Wisconsin is the only state in the nation that has failed to step up and respond responsibly and safely to the current national health pandemic emergency. We have seven months until the general election and there is time to fix these issues before November to ensure we are protecting public health and the right to vote."
Voters who participated in Wisconsin's Tuesday election weighed in on local races as well as the Democratic presidential primary contest between Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who spoke out against the state Supreme Court decision--and former Vice President Joe Biden, who remains the frontrunner and recently claimed that in-person voting could be done safely.
Election officials across Wisconsin took various steps to protect voters. Palmyra Clerk/Treasurer Laurie Mueller told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the village's sole polling place was moved to a bigger location.
According to the newspaper:
Mueller said a volunteer at the door is spray-sanitizing everyone's hands as they enter, and voters are being instructed to take a pen to vote and then either throw it away or take it home with them.
Poll workers outfitted with masks and gloves are working behind sneeze guards made by the village's public works employees. There are Xes on the floor at 6-foot intervals.
"We have a person wiping down the poll booths after everyone votes," Mueller said, "and then randomly wiping down other areas in the voting location."
As footage of Wisconsin's crowded polling stations flooded the internet Tuesday, public health officials and civil rights advocates condemned the state's Supreme Court and Republican legislative leaders for allowing in-person voting during the coronavirus pandemic and thwarting Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' last-minute efforts to address voter safety concerns.
"These are dangerous times for democracy."
--Aquene Freechild, Public Citizen
"It's not going to be a safe election. People are going to get sick from this," Brook Soltvedt, a 60-year-old textbook editor who is in charge of running the polling place at Thoreau Elementary School in Madison, Wisconsin's capital, told The Cap Times.
Soltvedt added that though she thinks "the city has done about the best that they can do," she worries that the election will cause voter confusion and health consequences. In an effort to protect her 77-year-old husband, Soltvedt said she plans to "strip in the garage, put my clothes in the washer, and go downstairs for two weeks."
\u201cVoting lines in Milwaukee: One hour and 40 minutes\n\n#fightfor15\u201d— Fight For 15 (@Fight For 15) 1586270610
After days of Wisconsin's Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald resisting widespread demands to delay in-person voting and expand absentee voting--like other states have done--Evers on Monday issued an executive order to postpone the election until June 9. However, the order was overturned by the state Surpreme Court Monday night.
The right-wing U.S. Supreme Court added insult to injury on Monday, overturning a lower court ruling that extended the deadline for absentee voting. Absentee ballots must be postmarked Tuesday or returned to a polling place or local clerk's office by 8 pm. Local leaders have expressed worries that due to a backlog of requests, residents may not receive absentee ballots in time to vote.
"What that meant was that, for a substantial portion of the electorate, Election Day presented a harsh choice," John Nichols wrote Tuesday in a column for The Cap Times. "Those who had applied for absentee ballots but not yet received them, and those who had not applied for an absentee ballot by last Friday's deadline, were forced to decide whether to risk exposure to the coronavirus in order to exercise their right to vote."
Nichols denounced the dilemma faced by voters as "unreasonable" and characterized Vos and Fitzgerald as "legislative charlatans" who "threw tantrums at a point when everyone else was working to save lives, keep people healthy, stabilize the economy, and preserve democracy."
"Tony Evers did his part," wrote Nichols. "Vos, Fitzgerald, and the [state] Supreme Court majority failed us."
Other concerned individuals and advocacy organizations issued similarly scathing critiques of Wisconsin's lawmakers and high court while circulating on social media footage of longs lines at the limited polling stations that were able to open.
\u201cPolls are open in Wisconsin.\n\nWith a global pandemic, this election should be delayed.\n\nRepublicans in the state legislature & SCOTUS have ensured that thousands of ballots won\u2019t even count.\n\nIn 24 hrs, they\u2019ve threatened the health of our nation & democracy.\n\nStay safe Wisconsin\u201d— Rep. Mark Pocan (@Rep. Mark Pocan) 1586263880
\u201cThis is beyond irresponsible\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1586262264
"Today there are five Milwaukee polling locations open. Usually there are 180 sites," tweeted the group March for Our Lives. "There's no way to skirt around it; this is wrong. People are forced to gather in long lines at central locations in the midst of a pandemic. Wisconsinites deserve better."
Aquene Freechild, co-director of Public Citizen's Democracy Is For People Campaign, said in a statement about the Wisconsin election that "these are dangerous times for democracy."
"Vos and Fitzgerald know that, with only five polling locations open in the Democratic stronghold of Milwaukee, holding the election now will suppress the Democratic vote more than the GOP vote," Freechild added. "That outcome will skew votes for some statewide elections, such as for the state Supreme Court, to their party."
In a statement Tuesday, Harvard Law School professor and Equal Citizens founder Lawrence Lessig said, "That partisan politics would drive partisan leaders to force citizens to choose between accelerating a pandemic and exercising their right to vote is outrageous."
\u201cWhat used to be almost 200 polling locations in Milwaukee, has been cut down to 5. At this location alone the wait is an hour and 40 min.\n\nThere is no way to justify the #WisconsinPrimary. But Republicans don't care about justifying it, just that they'll get to maintain power.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1586269982
Teasing an episode of the Intercepted podcast to be released Wednesday, journalist Jeremy Scahill--who grew up in Wisconsin--tweeted an audio clip of Milwaukee Health Commissioner Dr. Jeannette Kowalik explaining that "unfortunately it's not" safe to tell voters to go to the polls.
"People are being forced to risk their lives to place their vote or fulfill their right as an American to vote. It's just unbelievable that we are even having this conversation right now," Kowalik said. She added that it has been "disheartening" to work behind-the-scenes on this issue and some people in positions of power in Wisconsin "are killing people by the decisions that they're making."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry tweeted a video from a Milwaukee polling site and wrote that "this is a deliberate attempt by WI GOP to exclude voters, to limit participation, [and] to undermine democracy."
In a lengthy Twitter thread, AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka, declared that "it's unconscionable that Wisconsin voters are being forced to choose between their health amid a pandemic and their constitutional right to vote."
"It's unconscionable that Wisconsin voters are being forced to choose between their health amid a pandemic and their constitutional right to vote."
--Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO
"Taking away the fundamental right to vote that so many have fought and died for is disgraceful. Democracy in our country is dying, and those meant to uphold our Constitution have failed miserably in their duty," Trumka added. "Working people see what's happening, and we're not going to stand for it in November and beyond."
Common Cause Wisconsin called Tuesday "a day that will live in infamy." The group's director, Jay Heck, said in a statement that "Wisconsin is the only state in the nation that has failed to step up and respond responsibly and safely to the current national health pandemic emergency. We have seven months until the general election and there is time to fix these issues before November to ensure we are protecting public health and the right to vote."
Voters who participated in Wisconsin's Tuesday election weighed in on local races as well as the Democratic presidential primary contest between Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who spoke out against the state Supreme Court decision--and former Vice President Joe Biden, who remains the frontrunner and recently claimed that in-person voting could be done safely.
Election officials across Wisconsin took various steps to protect voters. Palmyra Clerk/Treasurer Laurie Mueller told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the village's sole polling place was moved to a bigger location.
According to the newspaper:
Mueller said a volunteer at the door is spray-sanitizing everyone's hands as they enter, and voters are being instructed to take a pen to vote and then either throw it away or take it home with them.
Poll workers outfitted with masks and gloves are working behind sneeze guards made by the village's public works employees. There are Xes on the floor at 6-foot intervals.
"We have a person wiping down the poll booths after everyone votes," Mueller said, "and then randomly wiping down other areas in the voting location."
The senator said the negotiations could be "a positive step forward" after three and a half years of war.
Echoing the concerns of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders about an upcoming summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday said the interests of Ukrainians must be represented in any talks regarding an end to the fighting between the two countries—but expressed hope that the negotiations planned for August 15 will be "a positive step forward."
On CNN's "State of the Union," Sanders (I-Vt.) told anchor Dana Bash that Ukraine "has got to be part of the discussion" regarding a potential cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine, which Putin said last week he would agree to in exchange for major land concessions in Eastern Ukraine.
Putin reportedly proposed a deal in which Ukraine would withdraw its armed forces from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, giving Russia full control of the two areas along with Crimea, which it annexed in 2014.
On Friday, Trump said a peace deal could include "some swapping of territories"—but did not mention potential security guarantees for Ukraine, or what territories the country might gain control of—and announced that talks had been scheduled between the White House and Putin in Alaska this coming Friday.
As Trump announced the meeting, a deadline he had set earlier for Putin to agree to a cease-fire or face "secondary sanctions" targeting countries that buy oil from Russia passed.
Zelenskyy on Saturday rejected the suggestion that Ukraine would accept any deal brokered by the U.S. and Russia without the input of his government—especially one that includes land concessions. In a video statement on the social media platform X, Zelenskyy said that "Ukraine is ready for real decisions that can bring peace."
"Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace," he said. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier."
Sanders on Sunday agreed that "it can't be Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump" deciding the terms of a peace deal to end the war that the United Nations says has killed more than 13,000 Ukrainian civilians since Russia began its invasion in February 2022.
"If in fact an agreement can be negotiated which does not compromise what the Ukrainians feel they need, I think that's a positive step forward. We all want to see an end to the bloodshed," said Sanders. "The people of Ukraine obviously have got to have a significant say. It is their country, so if the people of Ukraine feel it is a positive agreement, that's good. If not, that's another story."
A senior White House official told NewsNation that the president is "open to a trilateral summit with both leaders."
"Right now, the White House is planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin," they said.
On Saturday, Vice President JD Vance took part in talks with European Union and Ukrainian officials in the United Kingdom, where Andriy Yermak, head of the Office of the President in Ukraine, said the country's positions were made "clear: a reliable, lasting peace is only possible with Ukraine at the negotiating table, with full respect for our sovereignty and without recognizing the occupation."
European leaders pushed for the inclusion of Zelenskyy in talks in a statement Saturday, saying Ukraine's vital interests "include the need for robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity."
"Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a cease-fire or reduction of hostilities," said the leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Cancellor Friedrich Merz, and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force."
At the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, British journalist and analyst Anatol Lieven wrote Saturday that the talks scheduled for next week are "an essential first step" toward ending the bloodshed in Ukraine, even though they include proposed land concessions that would be "painful" for Kyiv.
If Ukraine were to ultimately agree to ceding land to Russia, said Lieven, "Russia will need drastically to scale back its demands for Ukrainian 'denazification' and 'demilitarization,' which in their extreme form would mean Ukrainian regime change and disarmament—which no government in Kyiv could or should accept."
A recent Gallup poll showed 69% of Ukrainians now favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. In 2022, more than 70% believed the country should continue fighting until it achieved victory.
Suleiman Al-Obeid was killed by the Israel Defense Forces while seeking humanitarian aid.
Mohamed Salah, the Egyptian soccer star who plays for Liverpool's Premiere League club and serves as captain of Egypt's national team, had three questions for the Union of European Football Associations on Saturday after the governing body acknowledged the death of another venerated former player.
"Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?" asked Salah in response to the UEFA's vague tribute to Suleiman Al-Obeid, who was nicknamed the "Palestinian Pelé" during his career with the Palestinian National Team.
The soccer organization had written a simple 21-word "farewell" message to Al-Obeid, calling him "a talent who gave hope to countless children, even in the darkest of times."
The UEFA made no mention of reports from the Palestine Football Association that Al-Obeid last week became one of the nearly 1,400 Palestinians who have been killed while seeking aid since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israel- and U.S.-backed, privatized organization, began operating aid hubs in Gaza.
As with the Israel Defense Forces' killings of aid workers and bombings of so-called "safe zones" since Israel began bombarding Gaza in October 2023, the IDF has claimed its killings of Palestinians seeking desperately-needed food have been inadvertent—but Israeli soldiers themselves have described being ordered to shoot at civilians who approach the aid sites.
Salah has been an outspoken advocate for Palestinians since Israel began its attacks, which have killed more than 61,000 people, and imposed a near-total blockade that has caused an "unfolding" famine, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. At least 217 Palestinians have now starved to death, including at least 100 children.
The Peace and Justice Project, founded by British Parliament member Jeremy Corbyn, applauded Salah's criticism of UEFA.
The Palestine Football Association released a statement saying, "Former national team player and star of the Khadamat al-Shati team, Suleiman Al-Obeid, was martyred after the occupation forces targeted those waiting for humanitarian aid in the southern Gaza Strip on Wednesday."
Al-Obeid represented the Palestinian team 24 times internationally and scored a famous goal against Yemen's National Team in the East Asian Federation's 2010 cup.
He is survived by his wife and five children, Al Jazeera reported.
Bassil Mikdadi, the founder of Football Palestine, told the outlet that he was surprised the UEFA acknowledged Al-Obeid's killing at all, considering the silence of international soccer federations regarding Israel's assault on Gaza, which is the subject of a genocide case at the International Court of Justice and has been called a genocide by numerous Holocaust scholars and human rights groups.
As Jules Boykoff wrote in a column at Common Dreams in June, the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) has mostly "looked the other way when it comes to Israel's attacks on Palestinians," and although the group joined the UEFA in expressing solidarity with Ukrainian players and civilians when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, "no such solidarity has been forthcoming for Palestinians."
Mikdadi noted that Al-Obeid "is not the first Palestinian footballer to perish in this genocide—there's been over 400—but he's by far the most prominent as of now."
Al-Obeid was killed days before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved a plan to take over Gaza City—believed to be the first step in the eventual occupation of all of Gaza.
The United Nations Security Council was holding an emergency meeting Sunday to discuss Israel's move, with U.N. Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia, and the Americas Miroslav Jenca warning the council that a full takeover would risk "igniting another horrific chapter in this conflict."
"We are already witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe of unimaginable scale in Gaza," said Jenca. "If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza, reverberating across the region and causing further forced displacement, killings, and destruction, compounding the unbearable suffering of the population."
"Whoever said West Virginia was a conservative state?" Sanders asked the crowd in Wheeling. "Somebody got it wrong."
On the latest leg of his Fighting Oligarchy Tour, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders headed to West Virginia for rallies on Friday and Saturday where he continued to speak out against the billionaire class's control over the political system and the Republican Party's cuts to healthcare, food assistance, and other social programs for millions of Americans—and prove that his message resonates with working people even in solidly red districts.
"Whoever said West Virginia was a conservative state?" Sanders (I-Vt.) asked a roaring, standing-room-only crowd at the Capitol Theater in Wheeling. "Somebody got it wrong."
As the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported, some in the crowd sported red bandanas around their necks—a nod to the state's long history of labor organizing and the thousands of coal mine workers who formed a multiracial coalition in 1921 and marched wearing bandanas for the right to join a union with fair pay and safety protections.
Sanders spoke to the crowd about how President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which was supported by all five Republican lawmakers who represent the districts Sanders is visiting this weekend, could impact their families and neighbors.
"Fifteen million Americans, including 50,000 right here in West Virginia, are going to lose their healthcare," Sanders said of the Medicaid cuts that are projected to amount to more than $1 trillion over the next decade. "Cuts to nutrition—literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids."
Seven hospitals are expected to shut down in the state as a result of the law's Medicaid cuts, and 84,000 West Virginians will lose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, according to estimates.
Sanders continued his West Virginia tour with a stop in the small town of Lenore on Saturday afternoon and was scheduled to address a crowd in Charleston Saturday evening before heading to North Carolina for more rallies on Sunday.
The event in Lenore was a town hall, where the senator heard from residents of the area—which Trump won with 74% of the vote in 2024. Anna Bahr, Sanders' communications director, said more than 400 people came to hear the senator speak—equivalent to about a third of Lenore's population.
Sanders invited one young attendee on stage after she asked how Trump's domestic policy law's cuts to education are likely to affect poverty rates in West Virginia, which are some of the highest in the nation.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a federal voucher program which education advocates warn will further drain funding from public schools, and the loss of Medicaid funding for states could lead to staff cuts in K-12 schools. The law also impacts higher education, imposing new limits for federal student loans.
"Sometimes I am attacked by my opponents for being far-left, fringe, out of touch with where America is," said Sanders. "Actually, much of what I talk about is exactly where America is... You are living in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, and if we had good policy and the courage to take on the billionaire class, there is no reason that every kid in this country could not get an excellent higher education, regardless of his or her income. That is not a radical idea."
Sanders' events scheduled for Sunday in North Carolina include a rally at 2:00 pm ET at the Steven Tanger Center for the Performing Arts in Greensboro and one at 6:00 pm ET at the Harrah Cherokee Center in Asheville.