Mar 03, 2020
While there is still much counting of votes to be done before the overall outcome of Super Tuesday is fully calculated and understood, the key takeaway from the Democratic Party's largest single-day of voting thus far--with 14 states up for grabs, including Texas and California--is that what was once the largest presidential field of candidates in living memory is now down to just two: Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden.
As of this writing, Biden--whose campaign was considered all but dead last week but enjoyed a great night for his campaign by steamrolling in the South and nabbing at least two upsets from Sanders--was able to claim victory in eight states: Virginia, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Minnesota, Alabama, Arkansas, and Oklahoma.
Meanwhile, news outlets called the biggest prize of the night, California, for Sanders, who also won in Colorado, Utah, and Vermont.
\u201cI am proud we delivered a big win for @BernieSanders in California. \n\nAs the only CA House member backing Sanders, I was told it wasn\u2019t a good political move to be his National Co-Chair. \n\nOur showing is a glimpse of the multicultural coalition that is the future of our party.\u201d— Ro Khanna (@Ro Khanna) 1583296353
In Texas--the second-largest state which voted Tuesday--Biden was declared the winner by a slim margin. In Maine, where the race between the two was neck-in-neck, Biden looked to be holding a slight edge.
"It's still early, but things are looking awful, awful good," Biden said at a rally in California. While acknowledging his campaign has appeared to be in rough shape, Biden said, "I'm here to report, we are very much alive!"
With the final tallies still to be counted in all the states to determine final delegate counts--a process that could take days or even weeks--it was clear to observers that the likely Democratic nominee is almost certain to be either one of two candidates: Sanders or Biden--each offering a clear choice and a distinct contrast.
\u201cWe effectively have a two-person race for the future of the Democratic Party and the country.\n\n#Bernie vs. #Biden\n\nI'm firmly with #NotMeUs because it represents what we need to become.\n\n#SuperTuesday\u201d— Peter Daou (@Peter Daou) 1583295902
At his rally in Vermont, Sanders addressed supporters by saying the choice before future Democratic primary voters will now be clear as he noted Biden's record of supporting corporate-friendly free trade agreements, voting in favor of the Iraq War, repeated calls to cut Social Security, and his status quo approach. "You cannot beat [President Donald] Trump with the same-old, same-old kind of politics," Sanders told the crowd. "This will become a contrast in ideas."
As Common Dreamsreported Tuesday, an internal Sanders campaign memo reveals that it is already preparing to make those contrasts explicit going forward.
"With Biden bankrolled by a super PAC and boosted by billionaire donors, the primary is far from over," the memo states. "We are now entering the phase of the primary in which the differences between Bernie and Biden will take center stage."
With reports indicating that mega-billionaire Michael Bloomberg is considering dropping out of the primary race after his poor performance in the first states able to cast votes for him Tuesday, the pressure is seen to be mounting on Sen. Elizabeth Warren after placing third in her home state of Massachusetts and with no viable path to the nomination.
\u201cRight now there's a conversation in Warren's camp about next steps. What Bernie needs right now is a full-throated endorsement from Warren & subsequent embrace by her dejected supporters. The thing least likely to produce those outcomes is meanness, vitriol, & recrimination.\u201d— Sam Adler-Bell (@Sam Adler-Bell) 1583297112
To push back against the corporate media framing of the Super Tuesday results thus far--which on MSNBC meant fawning coverage of the remarkable comeback of Biden's campaign--journalist Jeremy Scahill, who along with his colleagues at The Intercept and Democracy Now!hosted a roundtable of progressive coverage throughout the evening, tweeted just after midnight:
\u201cThe corporate media & establishment panic over Sanders created a myth that pretends tonight was some epic defeat for Sanders. In reality, he is fighting very powerful political & economic forces and insidious smears and propaganda. This is a close race. Keep all this in context.\u201d— jeremy scahill (@jeremy scahill) 1583299820
Glenn Greenwald, Scahill's fellow co-founder of The Intercept, also offered his thoughts on the coverage of the race in recent days, the establishment's swift coalescence around their now-anointed candidate, and the prospects of the contrast between Sanders and a candidate like Biden:
\u201c.@ggreenwald says it's "pretty stunning" how quickly the Democratic establishment has lined up behind Joe Biden. The lesson of 2016, he says, is that a centrist establishment candidate with decades of experience in Washington can't beat Trump. https://t.co/VcrcZLNEvh\u201d— Democracy Now! (@Democracy Now!) 1583287626
In earlier remarks, Greenwald did not mince words about what he sees happening. "The Democratic establishment--given the choice--would rather lose with Biden than win with Bernie, so being reminded of his visible cognitive decline won't change their calculus at all," Greenwald said. "The party elites are all already aware of it as they're lining up behind him."
Princeton University historian Matt Karp, in a tweet on Tuesday, put the situation going forward this way: "Joe Biden is getting a bounce today, mostly from nervous Dems who want to believe that a vote for Biden is a vote for unity against chaos. But tomorrow we'll wake up to a close race--not between unity and chaos, but between Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. May the best candidate win."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.