Environmental advocates and indigenous groups on Monday welcomed the news that Wells Fargo would not finance oil and gas projects in the Arctic, including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge—an area the Trump administration is poised to open for fossil fuel exploration—the latest victory in a pressure campaign on banks over their role in abetting the climate crisis.According to Sierra Club, the announcement came in an update to the banking giant\u0026#039;s environmental policy. \u0022Wells Fargo does not directly finance oil and gas projects in the Arctic region, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)—part of a larger 2018 risk-based decision to forego participation in any project-specific transaction in the region,\u0022 the document (pdf) states.\u0022In just the last three months, half of the top six U.S. banks have rejected funding Arctic drilling.\u0022—Ben Cushing, Sierra ClubThe update was not, however, met with full-throttled cheers from climate advocates. \u0022The update does not make improvements to the bank\u0026#039;s other oil and gas financing policies,\u0022 Sierra Club noted.Yet something remarkable appears to be shifting. Wells Fargo is not the only bank forgoing financing Arctic development. Just last week, JPMorgan Chase ruled out financing new oil and gas development in the Arctic. In December, Goldman Sachs announced it would not finance such projects either.Putting the new development in context, Sierra Club campaign representative Ben Cushing said on Twitter, \u0022In just the last three months, half of the top six U.S. banks have rejected funding Arctic drilling.\u0022Cushing called out the other three major U.S. banks—Citigroup, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley—and asked, \u0022Which one of you wants to be last of the bunch to #ProtectTheArctic \u0026amp; #StandWithTheGwichin?\u0022The latter hashtag is in reference to the Gwich\u0026#039;in, the indigenous people who call the coastal plain of the refuge—the calving grounds of the Porcupine Caribou Herd—\u0022the sacred place where life begins.\u0022They\u0026#039;ve fought against development of ANWR, saying it threatened \u0022cultural genocide.\u0022\u0022For years, we have been speaking out about the need to keep drill rigs out of our sacred lands in the Arctic Refuge, and it\u0026#039;s amazing that a growing number of major banks are listening,\u0022 said Gwich\u0026#039;in Steering Committee executive director Bernadette Demientieff. \u0022The Arctic Refuge is critical to our people\u0026#039;s food security and way of life. Our human rights will not be dismissed.\u0022\u0022The fight to protect this place is far from over,\u0022 she continued, \u0022and we will continue to hold accountable any bank, oil company, or politician that seeks to benefit from its destruction.\u0022Author Bill McKibben, founder of the climate advocacy group 350.org, called the new development a \u0022victory for the Gwich\u0026#039;in, the wildlife, and the planet.\u0022\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;View this post on InstagramSince time immemorial the Gwich’in Nation and the porcupine caribou herd have had a cultural and spiritual connection. For over 40,000 years the Gwich’in people of Northeast Alaska and Northwest Canada migrated with the caribou. The migratory route of the caribou and the Gwich’in communities are identical. It has been shared that a piece of the Gwich’in heart lie within the caribou and a piece of the caribou heart lie within the Gwich’in. The porcupine caribou is apart of our identity and our identity is not up for negotiation. We stand against any disturbance or destruction to the calving grounds of the porcupine caribou herd.A post shared byBerna (@berna_demientieff) on Mar 2, 2020 at 9:51am PSTThere are signs that fight over fossil fuel extraction in the area could soon reach a critical moment. According to Bloomberg News, former fossil fuel lobbying Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said Saturday the Trump administration is \u0022about to finalize a leasing plan\u0022 for ANRW—a prospect that\u0026#039;s previously drawn ire over ecological and human rights impacts.\u0022The Trump administration still hasn\u0026#039;t given up on trying to sell off the Arctic Refuge for drilling, but oil companies should pay close attention to the events of the past few months and think twice before bidding,\u0022 said Sierra Club\u0026#039;s Cushing.Dozens of House Democrats recently issued a letter pushing bank CEOs to do their part to protect the refuge, calling on them to follow in the steps of Goldman with regards to Arctic project financing.\u0022Any development in the coastal plain would permanently destroy this critically important intact ecosystem. We urge you to take a leadership role in recognizing that investing in a project that would threaten human rights and worsen the climate crisis is an expensive risk that\u0026#039;s not worth taking,\u0022 said the letter.\u0022The House of Representatives understands the importance of protecting the Arctic Refuge, which is why we approved legislation last year to protect this important landscape from destructive oil and gas exploration. Now is the time for banks to do their part,\u0022 the lawmakers wrote.The Wells Fargo announcement also comes a day after Democratic presidential primary candidate Elizabeth Warren released a plan \u0022to stop Wall Street from financing the climate crisis.\u0022Warren pointed to actions including Goldman\u0026#039;s recent Arctic announcement and called for using the power of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to make companies account for climate risks.Growing pressure from the public \u0026amp; investors has pushed major Wall Street firms to take some action.But as @ewarren says, “We will not defeat the climate crisis if we have to wait for the financial industry to self-regulate or come forward with piecemeal voluntary commitments.” pic.twitter.com/ZWcK4fTfIh— Ben Cushing (@bmcushing) March 1, 2020\u0022While these actions are a small step in the right direction,\u0022 wrote Warren, \u0022they are long overdue given the relative impact the financial industry has had on the climate crisis—and they\u0026#039;re not enough to protect us from a climate-fueled financial collapse, either.\u0022\u0022We will not defeat the climate crisis if we have to wait for the financial industry to self-regulate or come forward with piecemeal voluntary commitments,\u0022 she wrote.