A Republican bill in the Missouri state House would empower parental review board to order the removal of books deemed "inappropriate" from library shelves across the state. (Photo: Washington State Library/Flickr/cc)
Right-Wing 'Review Boards' in Missouri Would Pave Way for Arresting Librarians Over Books Deemed 'Inappropriate'
"Every reader and writer in the country should be horrified, absolutely horrified, at this bill."
The Missouri Library Association says it is monitoring a bill put forward in the state House by a Republican lawmaker, which, if passed, could create committees across the state with the power to jail librarians for distributing material the panels deem "inappropriate."
Under the Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act (H.B. 2044), proposed by Rep. Ben Baker, locally elected "parental library review boards" would be permitted to unilaterally remove books they decide are sexually explicit or otherwise inappropriate for young readers from library shelves.
Libraries that allow children to borrow books that have been banned or whose access has been restricted would risk losing state funding, and librarians could be ordered to pay fines of up to $500 or sentenced to jail time for up to a year.
The Missouri Library Association (MLA), a non-profit which advocates for library service and librarians, said in a statement and on social media on Wednesday that it "will always stand against censorship and for the freedom to read, and therefore opposes Missouri House Bill 2044."
Baker told local radio news station KOAM that the bill came out of his desire to ensure libraries are a "safe environment, and that [children] are not going to be exposed to something that is objectionable material."
MLA President Cynthia Dudenhoffer rejected that explanation.
"Public libraries already have procedures in place to assist patrons in protecting their own children while not infringing upon the rights of other patrons or restricting materials," Dudenhoffer said. "Missouri Library Association will always oppose legislation that infringes on these rights."
Libraries, authors, and others in the literary community also spoke out about the proposal.
Freedom of expression advocacy group PEN America called H.B. 2044 "a shockingly transparent attempt to legalize book banning."
"Books wrestling with sexual themes, books uplifting LGBTQIA+ characters, books addressing issues such as sexual assault--all of these books are potentially on the chopping block if this bill is passed," said James Tager, the group's deputy director of free expression research and policy. "Every reader and writer in the country should be horrified, absolutely horrified, at this bill."
On social media, Tager added that the bill, while only in the early stages of consideration in Missouri's legislature, shows why groups like PEN America are vigilant regarding the fight against censorship.
Others slammed the bill as "absolutely detestable" and "ominous."
In Cincinnati, the city's public library suggested on its official Twitter account that the bill is a warning that all organizations promoting free expression should "stand with Missouri libraries in the fight against censorship."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Missouri Library Association says it is monitoring a bill put forward in the state House by a Republican lawmaker, which, if passed, could create committees across the state with the power to jail librarians for distributing material the panels deem "inappropriate."
Under the Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act (H.B. 2044), proposed by Rep. Ben Baker, locally elected "parental library review boards" would be permitted to unilaterally remove books they decide are sexually explicit or otherwise inappropriate for young readers from library shelves.
Libraries that allow children to borrow books that have been banned or whose access has been restricted would risk losing state funding, and librarians could be ordered to pay fines of up to $500 or sentenced to jail time for up to a year.
The Missouri Library Association (MLA), a non-profit which advocates for library service and librarians, said in a statement and on social media on Wednesday that it "will always stand against censorship and for the freedom to read, and therefore opposes Missouri House Bill 2044."
Baker told local radio news station KOAM that the bill came out of his desire to ensure libraries are a "safe environment, and that [children] are not going to be exposed to something that is objectionable material."
MLA President Cynthia Dudenhoffer rejected that explanation.
"Public libraries already have procedures in place to assist patrons in protecting their own children while not infringing upon the rights of other patrons or restricting materials," Dudenhoffer said. "Missouri Library Association will always oppose legislation that infringes on these rights."
Libraries, authors, and others in the literary community also spoke out about the proposal.
Freedom of expression advocacy group PEN America called H.B. 2044 "a shockingly transparent attempt to legalize book banning."
"Books wrestling with sexual themes, books uplifting LGBTQIA+ characters, books addressing issues such as sexual assault--all of these books are potentially on the chopping block if this bill is passed," said James Tager, the group's deputy director of free expression research and policy. "Every reader and writer in the country should be horrified, absolutely horrified, at this bill."
On social media, Tager added that the bill, while only in the early stages of consideration in Missouri's legislature, shows why groups like PEN America are vigilant regarding the fight against censorship.
Others slammed the bill as "absolutely detestable" and "ominous."
In Cincinnati, the city's public library suggested on its official Twitter account that the bill is a warning that all organizations promoting free expression should "stand with Missouri libraries in the fight against censorship."
The Missouri Library Association says it is monitoring a bill put forward in the state House by a Republican lawmaker, which, if passed, could create committees across the state with the power to jail librarians for distributing material the panels deem "inappropriate."
Under the Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act (H.B. 2044), proposed by Rep. Ben Baker, locally elected "parental library review boards" would be permitted to unilaterally remove books they decide are sexually explicit or otherwise inappropriate for young readers from library shelves.
Libraries that allow children to borrow books that have been banned or whose access has been restricted would risk losing state funding, and librarians could be ordered to pay fines of up to $500 or sentenced to jail time for up to a year.
The Missouri Library Association (MLA), a non-profit which advocates for library service and librarians, said in a statement and on social media on Wednesday that it "will always stand against censorship and for the freedom to read, and therefore opposes Missouri House Bill 2044."
Baker told local radio news station KOAM that the bill came out of his desire to ensure libraries are a "safe environment, and that [children] are not going to be exposed to something that is objectionable material."
MLA President Cynthia Dudenhoffer rejected that explanation.
"Public libraries already have procedures in place to assist patrons in protecting their own children while not infringing upon the rights of other patrons or restricting materials," Dudenhoffer said. "Missouri Library Association will always oppose legislation that infringes on these rights."
Libraries, authors, and others in the literary community also spoke out about the proposal.
Freedom of expression advocacy group PEN America called H.B. 2044 "a shockingly transparent attempt to legalize book banning."
"Books wrestling with sexual themes, books uplifting LGBTQIA+ characters, books addressing issues such as sexual assault--all of these books are potentially on the chopping block if this bill is passed," said James Tager, the group's deputy director of free expression research and policy. "Every reader and writer in the country should be horrified, absolutely horrified, at this bill."
On social media, Tager added that the bill, while only in the early stages of consideration in Missouri's legislature, shows why groups like PEN America are vigilant regarding the fight against censorship.
Others slammed the bill as "absolutely detestable" and "ominous."
In Cincinnati, the city's public library suggested on its official Twitter account that the bill is a warning that all organizations promoting free expression should "stand with Missouri libraries in the fight against censorship."