A Republican bill in the Missouri state House would empower parental review board to order the removal of books deemed "inappropriate" from library shelves across the state. (Photo: Washington State Library/Flickr/cc)
Jan 15, 2020
The Missouri Library Association says it is monitoring a bill put forward in the state House by a Republican lawmaker, which, if passed, could create committees across the state with the power to jail librarians for distributing material the panels deem "inappropriate."
Under the Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act (H.B. 2044), proposed by Rep. Ben Baker, locally elected "parental library review boards" would be permitted to unilaterally remove books they decide are sexually explicit or otherwise inappropriate for young readers from library shelves.
Libraries that allow children to borrow books that have been banned or whose access has been restricted would risk losing state funding, and librarians could be ordered to pay fines of up to $500 or sentenced to jail time for up to a year.
The Missouri Library Association (MLA), a non-profit which advocates for library service and librarians, said in a statement and on social media on Wednesday that it "will always stand against censorship and for the freedom to read, and therefore opposes Missouri House Bill 2044."
\u201cThe Missouri Library Association is committed to supporting all types of libraries. MLA exists to support the mission, vision, and values of those libraries, which connect their communities to vital resources. (3)\u201d— MO Library Association (@MO Library Association) 1579130520
\u201cWe support the American Library Association\u2019s Library Bill of Rights and Freedom to Read Statement. Public libraries exist to provide equitable access to information to all of its users, as it is key to having an informed populace. (4)\u201d— MO Library Association (@MO Library Association) 1579130520
Baker told local radio news station KOAM that the bill came out of his desire to ensure libraries are a "safe environment, and that [children] are not going to be exposed to something that is objectionable material."
MLA President Cynthia Dudenhoffer rejected that explanation.
"Public libraries already have procedures in place to assist patrons in protecting their own children while not infringing upon the rights of other patrons or restricting materials," Dudenhoffer said. "Missouri Library Association will always oppose legislation that infringes on these rights."
Libraries, authors, and others in the literary community also spoke out about the proposal.
Freedom of expression advocacy group PEN America called H.B. 2044 "a shockingly transparent attempt to legalize book banning."
"Books wrestling with sexual themes, books uplifting LGBTQIA+ characters, books addressing issues such as sexual assault--all of these books are potentially on the chopping block if this bill is passed," said James Tager, the group's deputy director of free expression research and policy. "Every reader and writer in the country should be horrified, absolutely horrified, at this bill."
On social media, Tager added that the bill, while only in the early stages of consideration in Missouri's legislature, shows why groups like PEN America are vigilant regarding the fight against censorship.
\u201cEvery Banned Books Week, you'll see a few op-eds that cheekily start off with "But do we really still NEED to be vigilant about book banning in the United States?"\n\nYes. Yes we do. Every year. Every day. Read about this Missouri bill to see why.\u201d— James Tager (@James Tager) 1579125753
Others slammed the bill as "absolutely detestable" and "ominous."
\u201cNew bill being proposed in Missouri. Absolutely detestable. Censoring information/what\u2019s available to readers is a direct violation to what our country stands for. Could jail librarians.\n#writingcommmunity #HorrorCommunity #writing #libraries\n\nhttps://t.co/sMlUVBUUOe\u201d— Justin Montgomery (@Justin Montgomery) 1579182848
\u201cHard to imagine a more ominous name for a bill than the "Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act." https://t.co/AGvUswrgWe\u201d— Literary Hub (@Literary Hub) 1579192634
In Cincinnati, the city's public library suggested on its official Twitter account that the bill is a warning that all organizations promoting free expression should "stand with Missouri libraries in the fight against censorship."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Missouri Library Association says it is monitoring a bill put forward in the state House by a Republican lawmaker, which, if passed, could create committees across the state with the power to jail librarians for distributing material the panels deem "inappropriate."
Under the Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act (H.B. 2044), proposed by Rep. Ben Baker, locally elected "parental library review boards" would be permitted to unilaterally remove books they decide are sexually explicit or otherwise inappropriate for young readers from library shelves.
Libraries that allow children to borrow books that have been banned or whose access has been restricted would risk losing state funding, and librarians could be ordered to pay fines of up to $500 or sentenced to jail time for up to a year.
The Missouri Library Association (MLA), a non-profit which advocates for library service and librarians, said in a statement and on social media on Wednesday that it "will always stand against censorship and for the freedom to read, and therefore opposes Missouri House Bill 2044."
\u201cThe Missouri Library Association is committed to supporting all types of libraries. MLA exists to support the mission, vision, and values of those libraries, which connect their communities to vital resources. (3)\u201d— MO Library Association (@MO Library Association) 1579130520
\u201cWe support the American Library Association\u2019s Library Bill of Rights and Freedom to Read Statement. Public libraries exist to provide equitable access to information to all of its users, as it is key to having an informed populace. (4)\u201d— MO Library Association (@MO Library Association) 1579130520
Baker told local radio news station KOAM that the bill came out of his desire to ensure libraries are a "safe environment, and that [children] are not going to be exposed to something that is objectionable material."
MLA President Cynthia Dudenhoffer rejected that explanation.
"Public libraries already have procedures in place to assist patrons in protecting their own children while not infringing upon the rights of other patrons or restricting materials," Dudenhoffer said. "Missouri Library Association will always oppose legislation that infringes on these rights."
Libraries, authors, and others in the literary community also spoke out about the proposal.
Freedom of expression advocacy group PEN America called H.B. 2044 "a shockingly transparent attempt to legalize book banning."
"Books wrestling with sexual themes, books uplifting LGBTQIA+ characters, books addressing issues such as sexual assault--all of these books are potentially on the chopping block if this bill is passed," said James Tager, the group's deputy director of free expression research and policy. "Every reader and writer in the country should be horrified, absolutely horrified, at this bill."
On social media, Tager added that the bill, while only in the early stages of consideration in Missouri's legislature, shows why groups like PEN America are vigilant regarding the fight against censorship.
\u201cEvery Banned Books Week, you'll see a few op-eds that cheekily start off with "But do we really still NEED to be vigilant about book banning in the United States?"\n\nYes. Yes we do. Every year. Every day. Read about this Missouri bill to see why.\u201d— James Tager (@James Tager) 1579125753
Others slammed the bill as "absolutely detestable" and "ominous."
\u201cNew bill being proposed in Missouri. Absolutely detestable. Censoring information/what\u2019s available to readers is a direct violation to what our country stands for. Could jail librarians.\n#writingcommmunity #HorrorCommunity #writing #libraries\n\nhttps://t.co/sMlUVBUUOe\u201d— Justin Montgomery (@Justin Montgomery) 1579182848
\u201cHard to imagine a more ominous name for a bill than the "Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act." https://t.co/AGvUswrgWe\u201d— Literary Hub (@Literary Hub) 1579192634
In Cincinnati, the city's public library suggested on its official Twitter account that the bill is a warning that all organizations promoting free expression should "stand with Missouri libraries in the fight against censorship."
The Missouri Library Association says it is monitoring a bill put forward in the state House by a Republican lawmaker, which, if passed, could create committees across the state with the power to jail librarians for distributing material the panels deem "inappropriate."
Under the Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act (H.B. 2044), proposed by Rep. Ben Baker, locally elected "parental library review boards" would be permitted to unilaterally remove books they decide are sexually explicit or otherwise inappropriate for young readers from library shelves.
Libraries that allow children to borrow books that have been banned or whose access has been restricted would risk losing state funding, and librarians could be ordered to pay fines of up to $500 or sentenced to jail time for up to a year.
The Missouri Library Association (MLA), a non-profit which advocates for library service and librarians, said in a statement and on social media on Wednesday that it "will always stand against censorship and for the freedom to read, and therefore opposes Missouri House Bill 2044."
\u201cThe Missouri Library Association is committed to supporting all types of libraries. MLA exists to support the mission, vision, and values of those libraries, which connect their communities to vital resources. (3)\u201d— MO Library Association (@MO Library Association) 1579130520
\u201cWe support the American Library Association\u2019s Library Bill of Rights and Freedom to Read Statement. Public libraries exist to provide equitable access to information to all of its users, as it is key to having an informed populace. (4)\u201d— MO Library Association (@MO Library Association) 1579130520
Baker told local radio news station KOAM that the bill came out of his desire to ensure libraries are a "safe environment, and that [children] are not going to be exposed to something that is objectionable material."
MLA President Cynthia Dudenhoffer rejected that explanation.
"Public libraries already have procedures in place to assist patrons in protecting their own children while not infringing upon the rights of other patrons or restricting materials," Dudenhoffer said. "Missouri Library Association will always oppose legislation that infringes on these rights."
Libraries, authors, and others in the literary community also spoke out about the proposal.
Freedom of expression advocacy group PEN America called H.B. 2044 "a shockingly transparent attempt to legalize book banning."
"Books wrestling with sexual themes, books uplifting LGBTQIA+ characters, books addressing issues such as sexual assault--all of these books are potentially on the chopping block if this bill is passed," said James Tager, the group's deputy director of free expression research and policy. "Every reader and writer in the country should be horrified, absolutely horrified, at this bill."
On social media, Tager added that the bill, while only in the early stages of consideration in Missouri's legislature, shows why groups like PEN America are vigilant regarding the fight against censorship.
\u201cEvery Banned Books Week, you'll see a few op-eds that cheekily start off with "But do we really still NEED to be vigilant about book banning in the United States?"\n\nYes. Yes we do. Every year. Every day. Read about this Missouri bill to see why.\u201d— James Tager (@James Tager) 1579125753
Others slammed the bill as "absolutely detestable" and "ominous."
\u201cNew bill being proposed in Missouri. Absolutely detestable. Censoring information/what\u2019s available to readers is a direct violation to what our country stands for. Could jail librarians.\n#writingcommmunity #HorrorCommunity #writing #libraries\n\nhttps://t.co/sMlUVBUUOe\u201d— Justin Montgomery (@Justin Montgomery) 1579182848
\u201cHard to imagine a more ominous name for a bill than the "Parental Oversight of Public Libraries Act." https://t.co/AGvUswrgWe\u201d— Literary Hub (@Literary Hub) 1579192634
In Cincinnati, the city's public library suggested on its official Twitter account that the bill is a warning that all organizations promoting free expression should "stand with Missouri libraries in the fight against censorship."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.