People on low incomes and retirees choose food at the World Harvest Food Bank in Los Angeles, California on July 24, 2019 after the announcement that the Trump administration has plans to cut food stamps to more than three million people across the country. (Photo: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images)
Warnings That Millions More Could Go Hungry as Trump Pushes $4.5 Billion in Food Benefit Cuts
"The Trump administration's latest proposal to cut SNAP would leave millions of people, including struggling families, seniors, and people with disabilities, with less help putting food on the table."
In its latest potentially devastating attack on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the Trump administration on Tuesday unveiled a proposal that would slash food stamps benefits by $4.5 billion over five years, a move analysts warned would increase hunger for millions of low-income families.
The new plan, announced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), would cut food benefits for nearly 20 percent of the millions of households that use SNAP to afford groceries.
HuffPost's Arthur Delaney outlined the administration's latest rule, which he noted is the USDA's "third proposed cut to SNAP benefits in the past year":
Federal law allows households to deduct shelter and utility costs that exceed 50 percent of their net income. By taking the deduction, households can qualify for a bigger benefit. States are allowed to set standard utility allowances to avoid the hassle of figuring out individual households' specific costs.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is proposing a more uniform national standard, taking the matter out of states' hands--a similar strategy employed in the two previous proposals to trim SNAP.
Stacy Dean, vice president for food assistance policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), said in a series of tweets Tuesday that "the Trump administration's latest proposal to cut SNAP... would leave millions of people, including struggling families, seniors, and people with disabilities, with less help putting food on the table."
"While some households would see a small increase in benefits under the proposal, nearly 1/5 of SNAP households would experience an average monthly benefit cut of $30 per month," Dean tweeted. "That can be days or weeks worth of groceries."
"The Trump administration describes its SNAP proposals as a means to 'modernize' SNAP, but they all would reduce benefits or eligibility," Dean added. "Americans struggling to put food on the table will be worse off if the administration's regulatory agenda for SNAP moves forward."
The USDA's proposed rule, which is expected to be submitted to the Federal Register this week, comes days after the end of the public comment period for the Trump administration's plan to kick three million people off food stamps--a move that would also strip free school lunches from hundreds of thousands of children.
The proposal received more than 75,000 comments from ordinary Americans and political officials who warned of the "catastrophic" impact the rule would have on millions of people.
"There is absolutely no reason that a child should go hungry in our country," wrote one commenter.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In its latest potentially devastating attack on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the Trump administration on Tuesday unveiled a proposal that would slash food stamps benefits by $4.5 billion over five years, a move analysts warned would increase hunger for millions of low-income families.
The new plan, announced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), would cut food benefits for nearly 20 percent of the millions of households that use SNAP to afford groceries.
HuffPost's Arthur Delaney outlined the administration's latest rule, which he noted is the USDA's "third proposed cut to SNAP benefits in the past year":
Federal law allows households to deduct shelter and utility costs that exceed 50 percent of their net income. By taking the deduction, households can qualify for a bigger benefit. States are allowed to set standard utility allowances to avoid the hassle of figuring out individual households' specific costs.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is proposing a more uniform national standard, taking the matter out of states' hands--a similar strategy employed in the two previous proposals to trim SNAP.
Stacy Dean, vice president for food assistance policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), said in a series of tweets Tuesday that "the Trump administration's latest proposal to cut SNAP... would leave millions of people, including struggling families, seniors, and people with disabilities, with less help putting food on the table."
"While some households would see a small increase in benefits under the proposal, nearly 1/5 of SNAP households would experience an average monthly benefit cut of $30 per month," Dean tweeted. "That can be days or weeks worth of groceries."
"The Trump administration describes its SNAP proposals as a means to 'modernize' SNAP, but they all would reduce benefits or eligibility," Dean added. "Americans struggling to put food on the table will be worse off if the administration's regulatory agenda for SNAP moves forward."
The USDA's proposed rule, which is expected to be submitted to the Federal Register this week, comes days after the end of the public comment period for the Trump administration's plan to kick three million people off food stamps--a move that would also strip free school lunches from hundreds of thousands of children.
The proposal received more than 75,000 comments from ordinary Americans and political officials who warned of the "catastrophic" impact the rule would have on millions of people.
"There is absolutely no reason that a child should go hungry in our country," wrote one commenter.
In its latest potentially devastating attack on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the Trump administration on Tuesday unveiled a proposal that would slash food stamps benefits by $4.5 billion over five years, a move analysts warned would increase hunger for millions of low-income families.
The new plan, announced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), would cut food benefits for nearly 20 percent of the millions of households that use SNAP to afford groceries.
HuffPost's Arthur Delaney outlined the administration's latest rule, which he noted is the USDA's "third proposed cut to SNAP benefits in the past year":
Federal law allows households to deduct shelter and utility costs that exceed 50 percent of their net income. By taking the deduction, households can qualify for a bigger benefit. States are allowed to set standard utility allowances to avoid the hassle of figuring out individual households' specific costs.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is proposing a more uniform national standard, taking the matter out of states' hands--a similar strategy employed in the two previous proposals to trim SNAP.
Stacy Dean, vice president for food assistance policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), said in a series of tweets Tuesday that "the Trump administration's latest proposal to cut SNAP... would leave millions of people, including struggling families, seniors, and people with disabilities, with less help putting food on the table."
"While some households would see a small increase in benefits under the proposal, nearly 1/5 of SNAP households would experience an average monthly benefit cut of $30 per month," Dean tweeted. "That can be days or weeks worth of groceries."
"The Trump administration describes its SNAP proposals as a means to 'modernize' SNAP, but they all would reduce benefits or eligibility," Dean added. "Americans struggling to put food on the table will be worse off if the administration's regulatory agenda for SNAP moves forward."
The USDA's proposed rule, which is expected to be submitted to the Federal Register this week, comes days after the end of the public comment period for the Trump administration's plan to kick three million people off food stamps--a move that would also strip free school lunches from hundreds of thousands of children.
The proposal received more than 75,000 comments from ordinary Americans and political officials who warned of the "catastrophic" impact the rule would have on millions of people.
"There is absolutely no reason that a child should go hungry in our country," wrote one commenter.