SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A new study by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) linked contaminated tap water to 100,000 cases of cancer across the United States.
(Photo: EPA/Flickr/cc)
'Perfectly Legal' Levels of Contaminants in US Tap Water Could Result in 100,000 Cancer Cases: New Study
"The vast majority of community water systems meet legal standards. Yet the latest research shows that contaminants present in the water at those concentrations can still harm human health."
Sep 19, 2019
After examining drinking water contaminants using a more complex method than the U.S. government uses to assess risks, scientists revealed Thursday that they found carcinogenic elements and chemicals in water could cause 100,000 cancer cases over a lifetime.
In a study published in the journal Heliyon, researchers at the Environmental Working Group (EWG) revealed that the cumulative effects of multiple contaminants can render drinking water unsafe even after its contamination levels are below the legal limit.
"We need to prioritize source water protection, to make sure that these contaminants don't get into the drinking water supplies to begin with." --Olga Naidenko, EWG
"The vast majority of community water systems meet legal standards," said Dr. Olga Naidenko, vice president for science investigations at EWG. "Yet the latest research shows that contaminants present in the water at those concentrations--perfectly legal--can still harm human health."
The scientists studied more than 48,000 water systems across the U.S., finding that naturally occurring arsenic, byproducts of chemicals used to disinfect water, and radioactive elements including radium and uranium were the most frequently detected contaminants in water that serves million of Americans.
The study was released a week after President Donald Trump's EPA rolled back an Obama-era regulation on water pollution, in a move the watchdog group Food & Water Watch said was designed to "create a safe haven for agrochemical industrial interests against the wellbeing of public and environmental health."
While the government assesses water quality by examining contaminants individually, EWG determined that in various combinations, a total of 22 carcinogens could be causing thousands of cancer cases over the course of 70 years--the timeframe the U.S. government uses to determine calculated cancer risk over a statistical lifetime.
"In the real world, people are exposed to combinations of chemicals, so it is important that we start to assess health impacts by looking at the combined effects of multiple pollutants," Sydney Evans, lead author of the study, said in a statement.
The cumulative approach to assessing cancer risks from contaminants is already applied to the government's assessment of air pollution, EWG said.
Another recent study by EWG found that California's drinking water could cause more than 15,000 cancer cases in the state.
While the vast majority of cancer cases in the U.S. are not linked to drinking water contamination, carcinogens in water are linked to a high percentage of cancer cases caused by environmental factors, Naidenko told The Guardian.
"We need to prioritize source water protection, to make sure that these contaminants don't get into the drinking water supplies to begin with," Naidenko said in a statement.
EWG offers a database on its website which allows users to see the contamination and risk levels in drinking water in their communities.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
epaenvironmentenvironmental working groupfood & water watchwatercarcinogensdonald trumpdrinking watercancer
After examining drinking water contaminants using a more complex method than the U.S. government uses to assess risks, scientists revealed Thursday that they found carcinogenic elements and chemicals in water could cause 100,000 cancer cases over a lifetime.
In a study published in the journal Heliyon, researchers at the Environmental Working Group (EWG) revealed that the cumulative effects of multiple contaminants can render drinking water unsafe even after its contamination levels are below the legal limit.
"We need to prioritize source water protection, to make sure that these contaminants don't get into the drinking water supplies to begin with." --Olga Naidenko, EWG
"The vast majority of community water systems meet legal standards," said Dr. Olga Naidenko, vice president for science investigations at EWG. "Yet the latest research shows that contaminants present in the water at those concentrations--perfectly legal--can still harm human health."
The scientists studied more than 48,000 water systems across the U.S., finding that naturally occurring arsenic, byproducts of chemicals used to disinfect water, and radioactive elements including radium and uranium were the most frequently detected contaminants in water that serves million of Americans.
The study was released a week after President Donald Trump's EPA rolled back an Obama-era regulation on water pollution, in a move the watchdog group Food & Water Watch said was designed to "create a safe haven for agrochemical industrial interests against the wellbeing of public and environmental health."
While the government assesses water quality by examining contaminants individually, EWG determined that in various combinations, a total of 22 carcinogens could be causing thousands of cancer cases over the course of 70 years--the timeframe the U.S. government uses to determine calculated cancer risk over a statistical lifetime.
"In the real world, people are exposed to combinations of chemicals, so it is important that we start to assess health impacts by looking at the combined effects of multiple pollutants," Sydney Evans, lead author of the study, said in a statement.
The cumulative approach to assessing cancer risks from contaminants is already applied to the government's assessment of air pollution, EWG said.
Another recent study by EWG found that California's drinking water could cause more than 15,000 cancer cases in the state.
While the vast majority of cancer cases in the U.S. are not linked to drinking water contamination, carcinogens in water are linked to a high percentage of cancer cases caused by environmental factors, Naidenko told The Guardian.
"We need to prioritize source water protection, to make sure that these contaminants don't get into the drinking water supplies to begin with," Naidenko said in a statement.
EWG offers a database on its website which allows users to see the contamination and risk levels in drinking water in their communities.
From Your Site Articles
After examining drinking water contaminants using a more complex method than the U.S. government uses to assess risks, scientists revealed Thursday that they found carcinogenic elements and chemicals in water could cause 100,000 cancer cases over a lifetime.
In a study published in the journal Heliyon, researchers at the Environmental Working Group (EWG) revealed that the cumulative effects of multiple contaminants can render drinking water unsafe even after its contamination levels are below the legal limit.
"We need to prioritize source water protection, to make sure that these contaminants don't get into the drinking water supplies to begin with." --Olga Naidenko, EWG
"The vast majority of community water systems meet legal standards," said Dr. Olga Naidenko, vice president for science investigations at EWG. "Yet the latest research shows that contaminants present in the water at those concentrations--perfectly legal--can still harm human health."
The scientists studied more than 48,000 water systems across the U.S., finding that naturally occurring arsenic, byproducts of chemicals used to disinfect water, and radioactive elements including radium and uranium were the most frequently detected contaminants in water that serves million of Americans.
The study was released a week after President Donald Trump's EPA rolled back an Obama-era regulation on water pollution, in a move the watchdog group Food & Water Watch said was designed to "create a safe haven for agrochemical industrial interests against the wellbeing of public and environmental health."
While the government assesses water quality by examining contaminants individually, EWG determined that in various combinations, a total of 22 carcinogens could be causing thousands of cancer cases over the course of 70 years--the timeframe the U.S. government uses to determine calculated cancer risk over a statistical lifetime.
"In the real world, people are exposed to combinations of chemicals, so it is important that we start to assess health impacts by looking at the combined effects of multiple pollutants," Sydney Evans, lead author of the study, said in a statement.
The cumulative approach to assessing cancer risks from contaminants is already applied to the government's assessment of air pollution, EWG said.
Another recent study by EWG found that California's drinking water could cause more than 15,000 cancer cases in the state.
While the vast majority of cancer cases in the U.S. are not linked to drinking water contamination, carcinogens in water are linked to a high percentage of cancer cases caused by environmental factors, Naidenko told The Guardian.
"We need to prioritize source water protection, to make sure that these contaminants don't get into the drinking water supplies to begin with," Naidenko said in a statement.
EWG offers a database on its website which allows users to see the contamination and risk levels in drinking water in their communities.
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.