SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), pictured during a hearing on February 27, 2019, decided Friday not to accept Israel's restrictive conditions for her visit to family in the occupied West Bank. (Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images)
Refusing to Be Humiliated, Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Restrictive Conditions on Visiting Palestine
"What Israel proposed to Rashida Tlaib was their age-old proposition: you can stay in your homeland as a humanitarian exception—without political rights—and on condition you surrender and cease to resist."
Aug 16, 2019
After receiving permission from Israel to visit her grandmother in the occupied West Bank on humanitarian grounds, Rep. Rashida Tlaib decided Friday morning to forego the trip, calling the restrictions an example of "oppressive conditions" that represent everything the congresswoman stands against.
According to The Washington Post, "Tlaib said she had decided not to travel to Israel under conditions that would have included a pledge in writing not to 'promote boycotts against Israel' while there," an unacceptable provision for the Michigan Democrat.
In a statement announcing her decision, Tlaib was defiant.
"I am a duly elected United States Congresswoman," Tlaib said, "and I will not allow the Israeli government to humiliate me and my family."
Tlaib's decision came after a tumultuous 24 hours in which the Israeli government banned Tlaib and her colleague Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) from entering Israel based in part on the encouragement of U.S. President Donald Trump and on the lawmakers' support for the nonviolent resistance movement known as BDS--short for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions--which aims to use economic pressure to end the occupation.
According to The New York Times:
An Israeli official close to the prime minister's office said on Thursday that a call came from the Trump administration as recently as this week pressing Mr. Netanyahu to bar the congresswomen. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss delicate information, said the prime minister found himself in a "lose lose" situation, having to choose between upsetting Mr. Trump or the Democrats.
As Common Dreams reported Thursday, the decision to bar the congresswomen angered progressives who saw it as an "attempt to silence hard truths about the occupation will backfire."
And, wrote New York Magazine's Eric Levitz, it may already have backfired:
It's hard to imagine a better way of hardening young, nonwhite Democrats' skepticism toward Israel than prohibiting two of America's most prominent nonwhite Democratic politicians from visiting the country. Which is to say: On Thursday, Trump and Bibi did more to aid the BDS movement (and less radical allies of the Palestinian cause) than Omar and Tlaib's trip ever could.
The Israeli government said that it would reconsider if Tlaib applied to enter the country on humanitarian grounds and refuse to engage in boycott activities. Tlaib acceded to that demand, and received permission, but reversed her acceptance of the conditions hours later.
In a series of tweets, Tlaib explained that despite her desire to see her family, particularly her grandmother, the conditions on Tlaib's visit were too onerous and were seen as intended to kill her spirit.
"I have decided that visiting my grandmother under these oppressive conditions stands against everything I believe in," said Tlaib, "fighting against racism, oppression, and injustice."
Attorney and professor Noura Erakat tweeted that Tlaib was faced with an impossible decision.
"What Israel proposed to Rashida Tlaib was their age-old proposition: you can stay in your homeland as a humanitarian exception--without political rights-- and on condition you surrender and cease to resist," said Erakat. "Thank you Rashida for rejecting these terms and making it clear what is at stake."
Journalists weighed in on Tlaib's choice to reject the Israeli offer of a visit on restrictive grounds.
"Rashida Tlaib was offered permission by the Israeli government to visit her family in the West Bank--on the condition she doesn't talk about the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement which seeks to end the system of occupation that her family lives under," said Novara Media editor Ash Sarkar. "This is disgusting."
Jewish Currents editor David Klion delivered a blistering couplet of tweets on Tlaib's decision and the bad faith interpretations of her choice to not visit Palestine.
"I'm going to go a step further," said Klion. "To weigh in on this like it's open for debate, like you individually have the right to determine whether her conduct makes sense and is worthy of being granted a visit, is racist, in a way that precisely replicates the racism of Israel's occupation."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After receiving permission from Israel to visit her grandmother in the occupied West Bank on humanitarian grounds, Rep. Rashida Tlaib decided Friday morning to forego the trip, calling the restrictions an example of "oppressive conditions" that represent everything the congresswoman stands against.
According to The Washington Post, "Tlaib said she had decided not to travel to Israel under conditions that would have included a pledge in writing not to 'promote boycotts against Israel' while there," an unacceptable provision for the Michigan Democrat.
In a statement announcing her decision, Tlaib was defiant.
"I am a duly elected United States Congresswoman," Tlaib said, "and I will not allow the Israeli government to humiliate me and my family."
Tlaib's decision came after a tumultuous 24 hours in which the Israeli government banned Tlaib and her colleague Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) from entering Israel based in part on the encouragement of U.S. President Donald Trump and on the lawmakers' support for the nonviolent resistance movement known as BDS--short for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions--which aims to use economic pressure to end the occupation.
According to The New York Times:
An Israeli official close to the prime minister's office said on Thursday that a call came from the Trump administration as recently as this week pressing Mr. Netanyahu to bar the congresswomen. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss delicate information, said the prime minister found himself in a "lose lose" situation, having to choose between upsetting Mr. Trump or the Democrats.
As Common Dreams reported Thursday, the decision to bar the congresswomen angered progressives who saw it as an "attempt to silence hard truths about the occupation will backfire."
And, wrote New York Magazine's Eric Levitz, it may already have backfired:
It's hard to imagine a better way of hardening young, nonwhite Democrats' skepticism toward Israel than prohibiting two of America's most prominent nonwhite Democratic politicians from visiting the country. Which is to say: On Thursday, Trump and Bibi did more to aid the BDS movement (and less radical allies of the Palestinian cause) than Omar and Tlaib's trip ever could.
The Israeli government said that it would reconsider if Tlaib applied to enter the country on humanitarian grounds and refuse to engage in boycott activities. Tlaib acceded to that demand, and received permission, but reversed her acceptance of the conditions hours later.
In a series of tweets, Tlaib explained that despite her desire to see her family, particularly her grandmother, the conditions on Tlaib's visit were too onerous and were seen as intended to kill her spirit.
"I have decided that visiting my grandmother under these oppressive conditions stands against everything I believe in," said Tlaib, "fighting against racism, oppression, and injustice."
Attorney and professor Noura Erakat tweeted that Tlaib was faced with an impossible decision.
"What Israel proposed to Rashida Tlaib was their age-old proposition: you can stay in your homeland as a humanitarian exception--without political rights-- and on condition you surrender and cease to resist," said Erakat. "Thank you Rashida for rejecting these terms and making it clear what is at stake."
Journalists weighed in on Tlaib's choice to reject the Israeli offer of a visit on restrictive grounds.
"Rashida Tlaib was offered permission by the Israeli government to visit her family in the West Bank--on the condition she doesn't talk about the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement which seeks to end the system of occupation that her family lives under," said Novara Media editor Ash Sarkar. "This is disgusting."
Jewish Currents editor David Klion delivered a blistering couplet of tweets on Tlaib's decision and the bad faith interpretations of her choice to not visit Palestine.
"I'm going to go a step further," said Klion. "To weigh in on this like it's open for debate, like you individually have the right to determine whether her conduct makes sense and is worthy of being granted a visit, is racist, in a way that precisely replicates the racism of Israel's occupation."
After receiving permission from Israel to visit her grandmother in the occupied West Bank on humanitarian grounds, Rep. Rashida Tlaib decided Friday morning to forego the trip, calling the restrictions an example of "oppressive conditions" that represent everything the congresswoman stands against.
According to The Washington Post, "Tlaib said she had decided not to travel to Israel under conditions that would have included a pledge in writing not to 'promote boycotts against Israel' while there," an unacceptable provision for the Michigan Democrat.
In a statement announcing her decision, Tlaib was defiant.
"I am a duly elected United States Congresswoman," Tlaib said, "and I will not allow the Israeli government to humiliate me and my family."
Tlaib's decision came after a tumultuous 24 hours in which the Israeli government banned Tlaib and her colleague Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) from entering Israel based in part on the encouragement of U.S. President Donald Trump and on the lawmakers' support for the nonviolent resistance movement known as BDS--short for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions--which aims to use economic pressure to end the occupation.
According to The New York Times:
An Israeli official close to the prime minister's office said on Thursday that a call came from the Trump administration as recently as this week pressing Mr. Netanyahu to bar the congresswomen. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss delicate information, said the prime minister found himself in a "lose lose" situation, having to choose between upsetting Mr. Trump or the Democrats.
As Common Dreams reported Thursday, the decision to bar the congresswomen angered progressives who saw it as an "attempt to silence hard truths about the occupation will backfire."
And, wrote New York Magazine's Eric Levitz, it may already have backfired:
It's hard to imagine a better way of hardening young, nonwhite Democrats' skepticism toward Israel than prohibiting two of America's most prominent nonwhite Democratic politicians from visiting the country. Which is to say: On Thursday, Trump and Bibi did more to aid the BDS movement (and less radical allies of the Palestinian cause) than Omar and Tlaib's trip ever could.
The Israeli government said that it would reconsider if Tlaib applied to enter the country on humanitarian grounds and refuse to engage in boycott activities. Tlaib acceded to that demand, and received permission, but reversed her acceptance of the conditions hours later.
In a series of tweets, Tlaib explained that despite her desire to see her family, particularly her grandmother, the conditions on Tlaib's visit were too onerous and were seen as intended to kill her spirit.
"I have decided that visiting my grandmother under these oppressive conditions stands against everything I believe in," said Tlaib, "fighting against racism, oppression, and injustice."
Attorney and professor Noura Erakat tweeted that Tlaib was faced with an impossible decision.
"What Israel proposed to Rashida Tlaib was their age-old proposition: you can stay in your homeland as a humanitarian exception--without political rights-- and on condition you surrender and cease to resist," said Erakat. "Thank you Rashida for rejecting these terms and making it clear what is at stake."
Journalists weighed in on Tlaib's choice to reject the Israeli offer of a visit on restrictive grounds.
"Rashida Tlaib was offered permission by the Israeli government to visit her family in the West Bank--on the condition she doesn't talk about the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement which seeks to end the system of occupation that her family lives under," said Novara Media editor Ash Sarkar. "This is disgusting."
Jewish Currents editor David Klion delivered a blistering couplet of tweets on Tlaib's decision and the bad faith interpretations of her choice to not visit Palestine.
"I'm going to go a step further," said Klion. "To weigh in on this like it's open for debate, like you individually have the right to determine whether her conduct makes sense and is worthy of being granted a visit, is racist, in a way that precisely replicates the racism of Israel's occupation."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.