To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Museum-goers visit the Sackler Wing in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The wing was named for the Sackler family, major donors to a number of major museums and the owners of Purdue Pharma, which fueled the opioid crisis by manufacturing the painkiller OxyContin. (Photo: Phil Roeder/Flickr/cc)
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
\u201cIn March 2018, Nan Goldin staged her first anti-Sackler action at the Met (https://t.co/qpPXH8EV0L). Just 14 months later, she has made them pariahs. A reminder that change can seem like a long-shot, and then come very quickly.\u201d— Andrew Russeth (@Andrew Russeth) 1557939362
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
\u201cIdentify a few \u201cHarvey Weinsteins\u201d of this toxic philanthropy- ax them - the rest may start to fall. \u201cThe Met Will Turn Down Sackler Money Amid Fury Over the Opioid Crisis - The New York Times.\u201d https://t.co/jdUgOYU1ee\u201d— Jerry Saltz (@Jerry Saltz) 1557937984
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
\u201cIn March 2018, Nan Goldin staged her first anti-Sackler action at the Met (https://t.co/qpPXH8EV0L). Just 14 months later, she has made them pariahs. A reminder that change can seem like a long-shot, and then come very quickly.\u201d— Andrew Russeth (@Andrew Russeth) 1557939362
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
\u201cIdentify a few \u201cHarvey Weinsteins\u201d of this toxic philanthropy- ax them - the rest may start to fall. \u201cThe Met Will Turn Down Sackler Money Amid Fury Over the Opioid Crisis - The New York Times.\u201d https://t.co/jdUgOYU1ee\u201d— Jerry Saltz (@Jerry Saltz) 1557937984
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
\u201cIn March 2018, Nan Goldin staged her first anti-Sackler action at the Met (https://t.co/qpPXH8EV0L). Just 14 months later, she has made them pariahs. A reminder that change can seem like a long-shot, and then come very quickly.\u201d— Andrew Russeth (@Andrew Russeth) 1557939362
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
\u201cIdentify a few \u201cHarvey Weinsteins\u201d of this toxic philanthropy- ax them - the rest may start to fall. \u201cThe Met Will Turn Down Sackler Money Amid Fury Over the Opioid Crisis - The New York Times.\u201d https://t.co/jdUgOYU1ee\u201d— Jerry Saltz (@Jerry Saltz) 1557937984
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.
