According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure on Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics." (Photo: Shawn Baldwin/AP)
Apr 23, 2019
In what critics denounced as the Trump administration's latest attack on women's rights across the globe, U.S. officials are reportedly threatening to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution seeking to end the use of rape as a weapon of war over its language on reproductive health.
"In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
--Heather Barr, Human Rights Watch
According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure late Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics."
"In recent months, the Trump administration has taken a hard line, refusing to agree to any U.N. documents that refer to sexual or reproductive health, on grounds that such language implies support for abortions," the Guardian reported. "It has also opposed the use of the word 'gender,' seeing it as a cover for liberal promotion of transgender rights."
The Trump administration's opposition to the measure, proposed by Germany, quickly sparked international outrage.
"If we let the Americans do this and take out this language, it will be watered down for a long time," an anonymous European diplomat told the Guardian. "It is, at its heart, an attack on the progressive normative framework established over the past 25 years."
Heather Barr, acting co-director of the women's rights division at Human Rights Watch, tweeted: "In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
Others also took to Twitter to condemn the Trump administration's efforts:
\u201cThe Trump administration is so obsessed with ensuring women remain walking incubators that it is willing to destroy an anti-rape resolution.\n\nUS threatens to veto UN resolution on rape as weapon of war, officials say https://t.co/Gk8vQ5m39h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1555974523
\u201cA reminder of how morally despicable the US is on the global stage https://t.co/irJQpVKWSa\u201d— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn) 1555975100
Pramila Patten, U.N. special representative on sexual violence in conflict, told the Guardian that the resolution's passage is now in serious doubt due to U.S. opposition.
"We are not even sure whether we are having the resolution [Tuesday], because of the threats of a veto from the U.S.," Patten said.
The resolution seeks to improve monitoring of sexual violence in conflict, punish perpetrators, and increase support for victims.
Patten said the language on reproductive health "is being maintained for the time being and we'll see over the next 24 hours how the situation evolves."
"It will be a huge contradiction that you are talking about a survivor-centered approach and you do not have language on sexual and reproductive healthcare services, which is for me the most critical," said Patten.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what critics denounced as the Trump administration's latest attack on women's rights across the globe, U.S. officials are reportedly threatening to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution seeking to end the use of rape as a weapon of war over its language on reproductive health.
"In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
--Heather Barr, Human Rights Watch
According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure late Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics."
"In recent months, the Trump administration has taken a hard line, refusing to agree to any U.N. documents that refer to sexual or reproductive health, on grounds that such language implies support for abortions," the Guardian reported. "It has also opposed the use of the word 'gender,' seeing it as a cover for liberal promotion of transgender rights."
The Trump administration's opposition to the measure, proposed by Germany, quickly sparked international outrage.
"If we let the Americans do this and take out this language, it will be watered down for a long time," an anonymous European diplomat told the Guardian. "It is, at its heart, an attack on the progressive normative framework established over the past 25 years."
Heather Barr, acting co-director of the women's rights division at Human Rights Watch, tweeted: "In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
Others also took to Twitter to condemn the Trump administration's efforts:
\u201cThe Trump administration is so obsessed with ensuring women remain walking incubators that it is willing to destroy an anti-rape resolution.\n\nUS threatens to veto UN resolution on rape as weapon of war, officials say https://t.co/Gk8vQ5m39h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1555974523
\u201cA reminder of how morally despicable the US is on the global stage https://t.co/irJQpVKWSa\u201d— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn) 1555975100
Pramila Patten, U.N. special representative on sexual violence in conflict, told the Guardian that the resolution's passage is now in serious doubt due to U.S. opposition.
"We are not even sure whether we are having the resolution [Tuesday], because of the threats of a veto from the U.S.," Patten said.
The resolution seeks to improve monitoring of sexual violence in conflict, punish perpetrators, and increase support for victims.
Patten said the language on reproductive health "is being maintained for the time being and we'll see over the next 24 hours how the situation evolves."
"It will be a huge contradiction that you are talking about a survivor-centered approach and you do not have language on sexual and reproductive healthcare services, which is for me the most critical," said Patten.
In what critics denounced as the Trump administration's latest attack on women's rights across the globe, U.S. officials are reportedly threatening to veto a United Nations Security Council resolution seeking to end the use of rape as a weapon of war over its language on reproductive health.
"In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
--Heather Barr, Human Rights Watch
According to the Guardian--which first reported on U.S. opposition to the measure late Monday--Trump officials are objecting to the resolution's "language on victims' support from family planning clinics."
"In recent months, the Trump administration has taken a hard line, refusing to agree to any U.N. documents that refer to sexual or reproductive health, on grounds that such language implies support for abortions," the Guardian reported. "It has also opposed the use of the word 'gender,' seeing it as a cover for liberal promotion of transgender rights."
The Trump administration's opposition to the measure, proposed by Germany, quickly sparked international outrage.
"If we let the Americans do this and take out this language, it will be watered down for a long time," an anonymous European diplomat told the Guardian. "It is, at its heart, an attack on the progressive normative framework established over the past 25 years."
Heather Barr, acting co-director of the women's rights division at Human Rights Watch, tweeted: "In the latest step in Trump's war on women, U.S. opposes healthcare for survivors of rape during war. Yes, you read that right."
Others also took to Twitter to condemn the Trump administration's efforts:
\u201cThe Trump administration is so obsessed with ensuring women remain walking incubators that it is willing to destroy an anti-rape resolution.\n\nUS threatens to veto UN resolution on rape as weapon of war, officials say https://t.co/Gk8vQ5m39h\u201d— Mona Eltahawy (@Mona Eltahawy) 1555974523
\u201cA reminder of how morally despicable the US is on the global stage https://t.co/irJQpVKWSa\u201d— Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn (@Jonathan 'Boo and Vote' Cohn) 1555975100
Pramila Patten, U.N. special representative on sexual violence in conflict, told the Guardian that the resolution's passage is now in serious doubt due to U.S. opposition.
"We are not even sure whether we are having the resolution [Tuesday], because of the threats of a veto from the U.S.," Patten said.
The resolution seeks to improve monitoring of sexual violence in conflict, punish perpetrators, and increase support for victims.
Patten said the language on reproductive health "is being maintained for the time being and we'll see over the next 24 hours how the situation evolves."
"It will be a huge contradiction that you are talking about a survivor-centered approach and you do not have language on sexual and reproductive healthcare services, which is for me the most critical," said Patten.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.