Published on
by

As Critics Struggle to Portray 70% Tax Rate for Rich as Unrealistic, Dems Get Behind Idea Ahead of 2020 Election

Julián Castro said unequivocally on Sunday that he supports "folks at the top paying [their] fair share"

Former San Antonio mayor and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro said Sunday that he favors a 70 percent tax rate for Americans who earn $10 million per year. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's (D-N.Y.) unflinching support for taxing the wealthiest Americans at a rate doubling what they currently pay each year made waves among conservatives over the weekend—but at least one likely Democratic presidential candidate's backing of the proposal may indicate that it may soon get broader support from the party.

On ABC's "The Week," former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro unequivocally told George Stephanopoulos that he has "no problem" forcing Americans who make more than $10 million per year to pay far more than they currently pay in taxes.

"There was a time in this country where the top marginal tax rate was over 90 percent, even during Reagan's era in the 1980s it was around 50 percent. So do I support, in order to have something like Medicare for all, that we ask folks that are in the top .05 percent or .5 percent or top one percent to pay more? ...Yeah, I support that."                                              —Julián Castro

"I can support folks at the top paying [their] fair share," Castro said when Stephanopoulos asked if he would back the wealthiest households being taxed at 60 to 70 percent, as Ocasio-Cortez said on "60 Minutes" on Sunday, daring critics to call the proposal "radical."

The former San Antonio mayor, who is expected to make an announcement next weekend regarding a potential 2020 run, cited historical precedent for a higher top marginal tax rate.

"There was a time in this country where the top marginal tax rate was over 90 percent, even during Reagan's era in the 1980s it was around 50 percent. So do I support, in order to have something like Medicare for all, that we ask folks that are in the top .05 percent or .5 percent or top one percent to pay more? ...Yeah, I support that," Castro said.

Castro pointed out how simply ensuring that the 16,000 Americans earning more than $10 million per year pay their fair share, which would generate $720 billion over 10 years according to the Washington Post, would pay for a universal healthcare system that would lighten the burden on American families who are forced to prop up the for-profit insurance industry every year by paying exorbitant premiums.

The former Obama official urged "that we get more serious about making sure the corporations pay their fair share, and that we're smart about understanding how instead of folks having to pay sky high premiums to companies that are seeking a profit to deliver health care that we can have a better system where people can get good healthcare and have peace of mind, even if that means that we rearrange where those dollars go."

Indivisible co-founder Ezra Levin praised Castro for unapologetically speaking up for an idea that Republicans spent the weekend scoffing at on social media.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The media landscape is changing fast

Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.

Change is coming. And we've got it covered.



Republicans attempted to attack Ocasio-Cortez's proposal—but were able to only by entirely misrepresenting what she said on "60 Minutes," suggesting that she supports taxing all Americans' income at 70 percent.

At the Washington Post, Tory Newmyer wrote that political observers should "expect other Democratic 2020 hopefuls to go there soon, too." Castro is the first probable 2020 candidate to openly support taxing the wealthy at a specific, significantly higher rate, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who announced that she was forming an exploratory committee late last month, has also pointed to the top tax rate that was "well above 50 percent" in the post-World War II era when CNBC's John Harwood asked whether "it's wrong for more than half of somebody's marginal income to be taken."

Meanwhile, economist Paul Krugman pointed out that Ocasio-Cortez and Castro are arguing for tax reform that has been supported by "top public finance economists...for some time" and that the proposal is "not at all outlandish."

At Jacobin, Matt Bruenig also wrote about high top marginal tax rates that currently, particularly in Sweden, where households earning more than $98,000 are currently taxed at a 70 percent rate—making Ocasio-Cortez's proposal seem "quite modest by comparison."

"What a 70 percent tax rate would look like is thus much less hypothetical than people imagine it to be," wrote Bruenig. "Sweden is not perfect but it's a successful high-income country where ordinary people have a higher standard of living than their U.S. peers."

Sweden is consistently lauded for its robust social welfare system and ranked third on U.S. New & World Report's annual list of countries with the best quality of life—a list on which the U.S. did not appear.

We want a more open and sharing world.

That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.

Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.

Share This Article