

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Assembly line workers at the General Motors Detroit Hamtramck Assembly Plant in Hamtramck, Michigan. (Photo: Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
Tax justice and labor advocates were among those who expressed outrage Monday at the news that General Motors--one of the corporate giants that benefited immensely from the Republican tax plan last year--would cut 15 percent of its workforce, shuttering production facilities in three states as well as Canada to trim costs.
The auto maker is closing five plants in Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, and Ontario, with plans to cut thousands of office jobs in January--slashing a total of 14,700 jobs.
The move comes less than a year after the Republican Party pushed through its tax plan, which offered $514 million tax break to the company. According to the advocacy group Not One Penny, $100 million of those savings went to enriching GM's shareholders, contrary to the GOP's claims that corporate benefits of the tax cuts would trickle down to workers in the form of raises and bonuses.
"General Motors' decision to gut its workforce epitomizes the bad corporate behavior Republicans in Congress have incentivized for generations. Instead of using its massive tax savings to increase employee wages or invest in its workforce, GM is shuttering plants and cutting jobs to increase profits and further enrich shareholders," said Ryan Thomas, a spokesperson for Not One Penny. "The American people will not forget that Republicans in Congress permitted these morally reprehensible and irresponsible actions."
Meanwhile, GM has already spent much of the last year cutting its workforce, offering buyouts to 18,000 workers.
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) called GM's decision "corporate greed at its worst."
"The workers at Lordstown are the best at what they do, and it's clear once again that GM doesn't respect them," Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) wrote on Twitter, referring to the plant that would be closing in his home state. "Ohio taxpayers rescued GM, and it's shameful that the company is now abandoning the Mahoning Valley and laying off workers right before the holidays."
President Donald Trump's steel tariffs have contributed to rising costs facing GM, as domestic steel has grown more expensive--but critics suggested that the company's huge profits and financial assistance from the government over the past several years should have left GM capable of keeping its workforce intact.
In addition to the financial windfall it enjoyed thanks to the GOP tax plan, GM has been given a total of $50 billion in government funds over the past decade as the U.S. sought to bail the company out.
The United Auto Workers (UAW) union slammed GM for moving production of some of its top-selling vehicles to China and Mexico while putting Americans out of work.
"We must step away from the anti-worker thinking of seeking simply the lowest labor cost on the planet," UAW President Gary Jones said. "The practice of circumventing American labor in favor of moving production to nations that tolerate wages less than half of what our American brothers and sisters make, must stop. More importantly, we must understand that these companies, including GM, are no longer in trouble. They are recording annual profits in the tens of billions."
The company earned $6 billion in the first three quarters of 2018, according to Not One Penny, while CEO Mary Barra received $22 million in compensation last year--nearly 300 times the average salary of GM's employees.
Former Michigan gubernatorial candidate Abdul El-Sayed pointed to the news of the impending layoffs as further evidence that the U.S. should look far beyond corporations to create sustainable jobs that won't be subject to the whims of high-earning CEOs and shareholders.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Tax justice and labor advocates were among those who expressed outrage Monday at the news that General Motors--one of the corporate giants that benefited immensely from the Republican tax plan last year--would cut 15 percent of its workforce, shuttering production facilities in three states as well as Canada to trim costs.
The auto maker is closing five plants in Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, and Ontario, with plans to cut thousands of office jobs in January--slashing a total of 14,700 jobs.
The move comes less than a year after the Republican Party pushed through its tax plan, which offered $514 million tax break to the company. According to the advocacy group Not One Penny, $100 million of those savings went to enriching GM's shareholders, contrary to the GOP's claims that corporate benefits of the tax cuts would trickle down to workers in the form of raises and bonuses.
"General Motors' decision to gut its workforce epitomizes the bad corporate behavior Republicans in Congress have incentivized for generations. Instead of using its massive tax savings to increase employee wages or invest in its workforce, GM is shuttering plants and cutting jobs to increase profits and further enrich shareholders," said Ryan Thomas, a spokesperson for Not One Penny. "The American people will not forget that Republicans in Congress permitted these morally reprehensible and irresponsible actions."
Meanwhile, GM has already spent much of the last year cutting its workforce, offering buyouts to 18,000 workers.
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) called GM's decision "corporate greed at its worst."
"The workers at Lordstown are the best at what they do, and it's clear once again that GM doesn't respect them," Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) wrote on Twitter, referring to the plant that would be closing in his home state. "Ohio taxpayers rescued GM, and it's shameful that the company is now abandoning the Mahoning Valley and laying off workers right before the holidays."
President Donald Trump's steel tariffs have contributed to rising costs facing GM, as domestic steel has grown more expensive--but critics suggested that the company's huge profits and financial assistance from the government over the past several years should have left GM capable of keeping its workforce intact.
In addition to the financial windfall it enjoyed thanks to the GOP tax plan, GM has been given a total of $50 billion in government funds over the past decade as the U.S. sought to bail the company out.
The United Auto Workers (UAW) union slammed GM for moving production of some of its top-selling vehicles to China and Mexico while putting Americans out of work.
"We must step away from the anti-worker thinking of seeking simply the lowest labor cost on the planet," UAW President Gary Jones said. "The practice of circumventing American labor in favor of moving production to nations that tolerate wages less than half of what our American brothers and sisters make, must stop. More importantly, we must understand that these companies, including GM, are no longer in trouble. They are recording annual profits in the tens of billions."
The company earned $6 billion in the first three quarters of 2018, according to Not One Penny, while CEO Mary Barra received $22 million in compensation last year--nearly 300 times the average salary of GM's employees.
Former Michigan gubernatorial candidate Abdul El-Sayed pointed to the news of the impending layoffs as further evidence that the U.S. should look far beyond corporations to create sustainable jobs that won't be subject to the whims of high-earning CEOs and shareholders.
Tax justice and labor advocates were among those who expressed outrage Monday at the news that General Motors--one of the corporate giants that benefited immensely from the Republican tax plan last year--would cut 15 percent of its workforce, shuttering production facilities in three states as well as Canada to trim costs.
The auto maker is closing five plants in Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, and Ontario, with plans to cut thousands of office jobs in January--slashing a total of 14,700 jobs.
The move comes less than a year after the Republican Party pushed through its tax plan, which offered $514 million tax break to the company. According to the advocacy group Not One Penny, $100 million of those savings went to enriching GM's shareholders, contrary to the GOP's claims that corporate benefits of the tax cuts would trickle down to workers in the form of raises and bonuses.
"General Motors' decision to gut its workforce epitomizes the bad corporate behavior Republicans in Congress have incentivized for generations. Instead of using its massive tax savings to increase employee wages or invest in its workforce, GM is shuttering plants and cutting jobs to increase profits and further enrich shareholders," said Ryan Thomas, a spokesperson for Not One Penny. "The American people will not forget that Republicans in Congress permitted these morally reprehensible and irresponsible actions."
Meanwhile, GM has already spent much of the last year cutting its workforce, offering buyouts to 18,000 workers.
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) called GM's decision "corporate greed at its worst."
"The workers at Lordstown are the best at what they do, and it's clear once again that GM doesn't respect them," Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) wrote on Twitter, referring to the plant that would be closing in his home state. "Ohio taxpayers rescued GM, and it's shameful that the company is now abandoning the Mahoning Valley and laying off workers right before the holidays."
President Donald Trump's steel tariffs have contributed to rising costs facing GM, as domestic steel has grown more expensive--but critics suggested that the company's huge profits and financial assistance from the government over the past several years should have left GM capable of keeping its workforce intact.
In addition to the financial windfall it enjoyed thanks to the GOP tax plan, GM has been given a total of $50 billion in government funds over the past decade as the U.S. sought to bail the company out.
The United Auto Workers (UAW) union slammed GM for moving production of some of its top-selling vehicles to China and Mexico while putting Americans out of work.
"We must step away from the anti-worker thinking of seeking simply the lowest labor cost on the planet," UAW President Gary Jones said. "The practice of circumventing American labor in favor of moving production to nations that tolerate wages less than half of what our American brothers and sisters make, must stop. More importantly, we must understand that these companies, including GM, are no longer in trouble. They are recording annual profits in the tens of billions."
The company earned $6 billion in the first three quarters of 2018, according to Not One Penny, while CEO Mary Barra received $22 million in compensation last year--nearly 300 times the average salary of GM's employees.
Former Michigan gubernatorial candidate Abdul El-Sayed pointed to the news of the impending layoffs as further evidence that the U.S. should look far beyond corporations to create sustainable jobs that won't be subject to the whims of high-earning CEOs and shareholders.