SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
More than 70 protesters have been dragged out of the Senate hearing room where Judge Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearing is taking place, in the first two days of the proceedings. (Photo: @dcexaminer/Twitter)
As Civil Disobedience Dominates Kavanaugh Hearing, Trump Says "It's Embarrassing for Country to Allow Protesters"
"Tireless and creative, rambunctious, confrontational, and peaceful protest is unnerving to him. It is one of many aspects of American life that he, simply, cannot control."
Sep 05, 2018
With his deeply unpopular U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, facing outraged protests at his confirmation hearing and veteran journalist Bob Woodward's book about the inner workings of the White House making waves, President Donald Trump launched his latest attacks on the First Amendment on Wednesday.
According to reports from the Daily Beast and Hill Reporter, Trump took aim at protesters like the dozens who were dragged away in handcuffs from Kavanaugh's hearing on Tuesday and Wednesday. In an Oval Office interview with the conservative Daily Caller on Tuesday, the president was quoted as saying:
I don't know why they don't take care of a situation like that...I think it's embarrassing for the country to allow protesters. You don't even know what side the protesters are on...In the old days, we used to throw them out. Today, I guess they just keep screaming.
The reports did not indicate what Trump, whose only political position has been as President of the United States, was referring to by "the old days" when "we used to throw them out," but as a presidential candidate in 2016, he made a habit of ordering the removal of protesters from his rallies--as well as encouraging his supporters to violently attack them.
\u201cTrump thinks protests should be illegal and Kavanaugh thinks someone who wants to shake his hand is a security threat. \n\nThey are telling you what they want this country to be. Believe them.\u201d— Moira Whelan (@Moira Whelan) 1536121017
Demonstrators have already faced consequences for exercising their First Amendment rights at Kavanaugh's hearing. CNN reported that a total of 70 protesters were arrested for protesting on the first day of the proceedings.
On Wednesday morning, the protesters returned to the hearing room to find no apparent allies on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is overseeing the confirmation hearings. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) apologized to Kavanaugh for "the circumstances" after several demonstrators were removed for vocally opposing the anti-choice extremist, while Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) warned against "insolence" in the chamber.
After a few protests early in the hearing, Lisa Desjardins, a correspondent for the PBS "Newshour" tweeted that the public had been barred from the room.
\u201cNOW: Police and staff are keeping all seats for the public empty. No more public inside. There is a line outside, unclear if this is temporary. \n\nThis is why you hear no more protests.\u201d— Lisa Desjardins (@Lisa Desjardins) 1536156805
Organizers with the Women's March later tweeted that they and other protesters were back in the room and ready to continue demonstrating.
\u201cProtesters interrupted Brett #Kavanaugh\u2019s Supreme Court confirmation hearings for a second day. Police arrested 70 protesters, mostly women, yesterday.\u201d— AJ+ (@AJ+) 1536160152
Not content to attempt to curb legal protests, the president also raged against Woodward's book, "Fear: Trump in the White House." The book portrays Trump as a serial liar who officials have privately worried possesses the knowledge of "a fifth or sixth grader" regarding issues like relations with North Korea--and wondered why lawmakers wouldn't "change libel laws" to protect someone such as himself from such accounts.
\u201cIsn\u2019t it a shame that someone can write an article or book, totally make up stories and form a picture of a person that is literally the exact opposite of the fact, and get away with it without retribution or cost. Don\u2019t know why Washington politicians don\u2019t change libel laws?\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1536147198
Trump has frequently railed against journalists for writing negative stories about him, and this is just the latest time he has made a public call for Congress to amend libel laws to protect him.
Last winter, following the release of another White House expose, Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury," Trump warned that he would "be taking a look at our nation's libel laws."
As MSNBC reporter Ari Melber noted on "Morning Joe," the president suggestion served to chill free press rights--and was not based in an understanding of U.S. laws regarding libel and defamation.
"Libel laws are state laws," Melber said. "That tweet, beyond being a potential abuse of the president's role in trying to bully the free press given the federal First Amendment, also shows a stunning lack of knowledge and total ignorance about how libel laws work."
\u201cTrump "shows a stunning lack of knowledge and total ignorance about how libel laws work"\n\n"He would need all 50 states to change the laws if he wants pro-Trump libel laws" - @AriMelber reporting on @Morning_Joe\u201d— The Beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC \ud83d\udcfa (@The Beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC \ud83d\udcfa) 1536157210
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With his deeply unpopular U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, facing outraged protests at his confirmation hearing and veteran journalist Bob Woodward's book about the inner workings of the White House making waves, President Donald Trump launched his latest attacks on the First Amendment on Wednesday.
According to reports from the Daily Beast and Hill Reporter, Trump took aim at protesters like the dozens who were dragged away in handcuffs from Kavanaugh's hearing on Tuesday and Wednesday. In an Oval Office interview with the conservative Daily Caller on Tuesday, the president was quoted as saying:
I don't know why they don't take care of a situation like that...I think it's embarrassing for the country to allow protesters. You don't even know what side the protesters are on...In the old days, we used to throw them out. Today, I guess they just keep screaming.
The reports did not indicate what Trump, whose only political position has been as President of the United States, was referring to by "the old days" when "we used to throw them out," but as a presidential candidate in 2016, he made a habit of ordering the removal of protesters from his rallies--as well as encouraging his supporters to violently attack them.
\u201cTrump thinks protests should be illegal and Kavanaugh thinks someone who wants to shake his hand is a security threat. \n\nThey are telling you what they want this country to be. Believe them.\u201d— Moira Whelan (@Moira Whelan) 1536121017
Demonstrators have already faced consequences for exercising their First Amendment rights at Kavanaugh's hearing. CNN reported that a total of 70 protesters were arrested for protesting on the first day of the proceedings.
On Wednesday morning, the protesters returned to the hearing room to find no apparent allies on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is overseeing the confirmation hearings. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) apologized to Kavanaugh for "the circumstances" after several demonstrators were removed for vocally opposing the anti-choice extremist, while Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) warned against "insolence" in the chamber.
After a few protests early in the hearing, Lisa Desjardins, a correspondent for the PBS "Newshour" tweeted that the public had been barred from the room.
\u201cNOW: Police and staff are keeping all seats for the public empty. No more public inside. There is a line outside, unclear if this is temporary. \n\nThis is why you hear no more protests.\u201d— Lisa Desjardins (@Lisa Desjardins) 1536156805
Organizers with the Women's March later tweeted that they and other protesters were back in the room and ready to continue demonstrating.
\u201cProtesters interrupted Brett #Kavanaugh\u2019s Supreme Court confirmation hearings for a second day. Police arrested 70 protesters, mostly women, yesterday.\u201d— AJ+ (@AJ+) 1536160152
Not content to attempt to curb legal protests, the president also raged against Woodward's book, "Fear: Trump in the White House." The book portrays Trump as a serial liar who officials have privately worried possesses the knowledge of "a fifth or sixth grader" regarding issues like relations with North Korea--and wondered why lawmakers wouldn't "change libel laws" to protect someone such as himself from such accounts.
\u201cIsn\u2019t it a shame that someone can write an article or book, totally make up stories and form a picture of a person that is literally the exact opposite of the fact, and get away with it without retribution or cost. Don\u2019t know why Washington politicians don\u2019t change libel laws?\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1536147198
Trump has frequently railed against journalists for writing negative stories about him, and this is just the latest time he has made a public call for Congress to amend libel laws to protect him.
Last winter, following the release of another White House expose, Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury," Trump warned that he would "be taking a look at our nation's libel laws."
As MSNBC reporter Ari Melber noted on "Morning Joe," the president suggestion served to chill free press rights--and was not based in an understanding of U.S. laws regarding libel and defamation.
"Libel laws are state laws," Melber said. "That tweet, beyond being a potential abuse of the president's role in trying to bully the free press given the federal First Amendment, also shows a stunning lack of knowledge and total ignorance about how libel laws work."
\u201cTrump "shows a stunning lack of knowledge and total ignorance about how libel laws work"\n\n"He would need all 50 states to change the laws if he wants pro-Trump libel laws" - @AriMelber reporting on @Morning_Joe\u201d— The Beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC \ud83d\udcfa (@The Beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC \ud83d\udcfa) 1536157210
With his deeply unpopular U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, facing outraged protests at his confirmation hearing and veteran journalist Bob Woodward's book about the inner workings of the White House making waves, President Donald Trump launched his latest attacks on the First Amendment on Wednesday.
According to reports from the Daily Beast and Hill Reporter, Trump took aim at protesters like the dozens who were dragged away in handcuffs from Kavanaugh's hearing on Tuesday and Wednesday. In an Oval Office interview with the conservative Daily Caller on Tuesday, the president was quoted as saying:
I don't know why they don't take care of a situation like that...I think it's embarrassing for the country to allow protesters. You don't even know what side the protesters are on...In the old days, we used to throw them out. Today, I guess they just keep screaming.
The reports did not indicate what Trump, whose only political position has been as President of the United States, was referring to by "the old days" when "we used to throw them out," but as a presidential candidate in 2016, he made a habit of ordering the removal of protesters from his rallies--as well as encouraging his supporters to violently attack them.
\u201cTrump thinks protests should be illegal and Kavanaugh thinks someone who wants to shake his hand is a security threat. \n\nThey are telling you what they want this country to be. Believe them.\u201d— Moira Whelan (@Moira Whelan) 1536121017
Demonstrators have already faced consequences for exercising their First Amendment rights at Kavanaugh's hearing. CNN reported that a total of 70 protesters were arrested for protesting on the first day of the proceedings.
On Wednesday morning, the protesters returned to the hearing room to find no apparent allies on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is overseeing the confirmation hearings. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) apologized to Kavanaugh for "the circumstances" after several demonstrators were removed for vocally opposing the anti-choice extremist, while Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) warned against "insolence" in the chamber.
After a few protests early in the hearing, Lisa Desjardins, a correspondent for the PBS "Newshour" tweeted that the public had been barred from the room.
\u201cNOW: Police and staff are keeping all seats for the public empty. No more public inside. There is a line outside, unclear if this is temporary. \n\nThis is why you hear no more protests.\u201d— Lisa Desjardins (@Lisa Desjardins) 1536156805
Organizers with the Women's March later tweeted that they and other protesters were back in the room and ready to continue demonstrating.
\u201cProtesters interrupted Brett #Kavanaugh\u2019s Supreme Court confirmation hearings for a second day. Police arrested 70 protesters, mostly women, yesterday.\u201d— AJ+ (@AJ+) 1536160152
Not content to attempt to curb legal protests, the president also raged against Woodward's book, "Fear: Trump in the White House." The book portrays Trump as a serial liar who officials have privately worried possesses the knowledge of "a fifth or sixth grader" regarding issues like relations with North Korea--and wondered why lawmakers wouldn't "change libel laws" to protect someone such as himself from such accounts.
\u201cIsn\u2019t it a shame that someone can write an article or book, totally make up stories and form a picture of a person that is literally the exact opposite of the fact, and get away with it without retribution or cost. Don\u2019t know why Washington politicians don\u2019t change libel laws?\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1536147198
Trump has frequently railed against journalists for writing negative stories about him, and this is just the latest time he has made a public call for Congress to amend libel laws to protect him.
Last winter, following the release of another White House expose, Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury," Trump warned that he would "be taking a look at our nation's libel laws."
As MSNBC reporter Ari Melber noted on "Morning Joe," the president suggestion served to chill free press rights--and was not based in an understanding of U.S. laws regarding libel and defamation.
"Libel laws are state laws," Melber said. "That tweet, beyond being a potential abuse of the president's role in trying to bully the free press given the federal First Amendment, also shows a stunning lack of knowledge and total ignorance about how libel laws work."
\u201cTrump "shows a stunning lack of knowledge and total ignorance about how libel laws work"\n\n"He would need all 50 states to change the laws if he wants pro-Trump libel laws" - @AriMelber reporting on @Morning_Joe\u201d— The Beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC \ud83d\udcfa (@The Beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC \ud83d\udcfa) 1536157210
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.