SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and his wife Louise Linton arrive at the White House for a state dinner April 24, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images)
No longer bothering to pretend that its tax policy amounts to anything more than dumping as much money as possible into the pockets of ultra-wealthy CEOs and investors, the Trump administration is considering a plan to leapfrog Congress and unilaterally hand the richest Americans another $100 billion in tax cuts.
" Donald Trump wants to go around Congress and hand $100 billion to his rich buddies on top of the $1.5 trillion he gave away to billionaires and big corporations last year. D.C. works great if you're rich and powerful."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
As the New York Times reports, Treasury Secretary and wannabe Bond villain Steve Mnuchin is studying whether his department has the authority to change "the definition of 'cost' for calculating capital gains, allowing taxpayers to adjust the initial value of an asset, such as a home or a share of stock, for inflation when it sells."
Almost two-thirds of the benefits of such a change would go to the top 0.1 percent, the Times notes.
How will the White House pay for such a windfall to the wealthy? This question is always raised to squash proposals that benefit the poor and working class, but--as The Debt Collective notes on Twitter--it "never applies to billion dollar transfers to the one percent."
\u201c"But how are we going to pay for it?" never applies to billion dollar transfers to the 1%\nhttps://t.co/7NBuZE7Oj2\u201d— The Debt Collective \ud83d\udfe5 (@The Debt Collective \ud83d\udfe5) 1533039053
\u201c"we can't afford single payer"\u201d— JD-800 \ud83d\udcbd (@JD-800 \ud83d\udcbd) 1532997493
While lauded by Republican members of Congress and prominent right-wing anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, the Trump administration's legally questionable plot was quickly denounced by progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups as yet another "disgusting" attempt by Trump to do "everything he can to enrich the wealthy while stacking the deck against the middle class."
Ted Genoways, editor-at-large of Pacific Standard, likened the White House's plan to reward the richest Americans by executive fiat to "that part of every bank heist movie, where the robbers realize they've triggered the alarms and the cops are on the way, and so they just start stuffing the bags with as much money as they can carry."
\u201c.@realDonaldTrump wants to go around Congress & hand $100 billion to his rich buddies on top of $1.5 trillion he gave away to billionaires & big corporations last year. DC works great if you\u2019re rich & powerful. How about a gov't that works for everyone? https://t.co/Go0He6UoKl\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1532986456
\u201cJust think of what America could do with $102 billion, which the White House is trying to figure out how to let multimillionaires keep. https://t.co/jcKhCLAdZb\u201d— Lydia DePillis (@Lydia DePillis) 1532985267
\u201cAdd insult to injury. Yet, another #TaxScam \nhttps://t.co/3BZaQCpWQd\u201d— AFL-CIO \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 | #AFLCIOVotes (@AFL-CIO \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 | #AFLCIOVotes) 1533045743
Trump's latest plan to reward the wealthy comes as Republicans are fast at work on their "tax cuts 2.0," which will double down on the $1.5 trillion gift to the rich Trump signed into law last year.
While, as predicted, the tax cuts have been a major boon for CEOs and major corporations--which have used a huge portion of their savings to buy back their own stock--workers have seen virtually no gains from the tax bill. In fact, even as the economy continues to grow at a steady clip, wages are actually declining--which means that all of the new growth is going straight to the top.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
No longer bothering to pretend that its tax policy amounts to anything more than dumping as much money as possible into the pockets of ultra-wealthy CEOs and investors, the Trump administration is considering a plan to leapfrog Congress and unilaterally hand the richest Americans another $100 billion in tax cuts.
" Donald Trump wants to go around Congress and hand $100 billion to his rich buddies on top of the $1.5 trillion he gave away to billionaires and big corporations last year. D.C. works great if you're rich and powerful."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
As the New York Times reports, Treasury Secretary and wannabe Bond villain Steve Mnuchin is studying whether his department has the authority to change "the definition of 'cost' for calculating capital gains, allowing taxpayers to adjust the initial value of an asset, such as a home or a share of stock, for inflation when it sells."
Almost two-thirds of the benefits of such a change would go to the top 0.1 percent, the Times notes.
How will the White House pay for such a windfall to the wealthy? This question is always raised to squash proposals that benefit the poor and working class, but--as The Debt Collective notes on Twitter--it "never applies to billion dollar transfers to the one percent."
\u201c"But how are we going to pay for it?" never applies to billion dollar transfers to the 1%\nhttps://t.co/7NBuZE7Oj2\u201d— The Debt Collective \ud83d\udfe5 (@The Debt Collective \ud83d\udfe5) 1533039053
\u201c"we can't afford single payer"\u201d— JD-800 \ud83d\udcbd (@JD-800 \ud83d\udcbd) 1532997493
While lauded by Republican members of Congress and prominent right-wing anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, the Trump administration's legally questionable plot was quickly denounced by progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups as yet another "disgusting" attempt by Trump to do "everything he can to enrich the wealthy while stacking the deck against the middle class."
Ted Genoways, editor-at-large of Pacific Standard, likened the White House's plan to reward the richest Americans by executive fiat to "that part of every bank heist movie, where the robbers realize they've triggered the alarms and the cops are on the way, and so they just start stuffing the bags with as much money as they can carry."
\u201c.@realDonaldTrump wants to go around Congress & hand $100 billion to his rich buddies on top of $1.5 trillion he gave away to billionaires & big corporations last year. DC works great if you\u2019re rich & powerful. How about a gov't that works for everyone? https://t.co/Go0He6UoKl\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1532986456
\u201cJust think of what America could do with $102 billion, which the White House is trying to figure out how to let multimillionaires keep. https://t.co/jcKhCLAdZb\u201d— Lydia DePillis (@Lydia DePillis) 1532985267
\u201cAdd insult to injury. Yet, another #TaxScam \nhttps://t.co/3BZaQCpWQd\u201d— AFL-CIO \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 | #AFLCIOVotes (@AFL-CIO \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 | #AFLCIOVotes) 1533045743
Trump's latest plan to reward the wealthy comes as Republicans are fast at work on their "tax cuts 2.0," which will double down on the $1.5 trillion gift to the rich Trump signed into law last year.
While, as predicted, the tax cuts have been a major boon for CEOs and major corporations--which have used a huge portion of their savings to buy back their own stock--workers have seen virtually no gains from the tax bill. In fact, even as the economy continues to grow at a steady clip, wages are actually declining--which means that all of the new growth is going straight to the top.
No longer bothering to pretend that its tax policy amounts to anything more than dumping as much money as possible into the pockets of ultra-wealthy CEOs and investors, the Trump administration is considering a plan to leapfrog Congress and unilaterally hand the richest Americans another $100 billion in tax cuts.
" Donald Trump wants to go around Congress and hand $100 billion to his rich buddies on top of the $1.5 trillion he gave away to billionaires and big corporations last year. D.C. works great if you're rich and powerful."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
As the New York Times reports, Treasury Secretary and wannabe Bond villain Steve Mnuchin is studying whether his department has the authority to change "the definition of 'cost' for calculating capital gains, allowing taxpayers to adjust the initial value of an asset, such as a home or a share of stock, for inflation when it sells."
Almost two-thirds of the benefits of such a change would go to the top 0.1 percent, the Times notes.
How will the White House pay for such a windfall to the wealthy? This question is always raised to squash proposals that benefit the poor and working class, but--as The Debt Collective notes on Twitter--it "never applies to billion dollar transfers to the one percent."
\u201c"But how are we going to pay for it?" never applies to billion dollar transfers to the 1%\nhttps://t.co/7NBuZE7Oj2\u201d— The Debt Collective \ud83d\udfe5 (@The Debt Collective \ud83d\udfe5) 1533039053
\u201c"we can't afford single payer"\u201d— JD-800 \ud83d\udcbd (@JD-800 \ud83d\udcbd) 1532997493
While lauded by Republican members of Congress and prominent right-wing anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, the Trump administration's legally questionable plot was quickly denounced by progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups as yet another "disgusting" attempt by Trump to do "everything he can to enrich the wealthy while stacking the deck against the middle class."
Ted Genoways, editor-at-large of Pacific Standard, likened the White House's plan to reward the richest Americans by executive fiat to "that part of every bank heist movie, where the robbers realize they've triggered the alarms and the cops are on the way, and so they just start stuffing the bags with as much money as they can carry."
\u201c.@realDonaldTrump wants to go around Congress & hand $100 billion to his rich buddies on top of $1.5 trillion he gave away to billionaires & big corporations last year. DC works great if you\u2019re rich & powerful. How about a gov't that works for everyone? https://t.co/Go0He6UoKl\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1532986456
\u201cJust think of what America could do with $102 billion, which the White House is trying to figure out how to let multimillionaires keep. https://t.co/jcKhCLAdZb\u201d— Lydia DePillis (@Lydia DePillis) 1532985267
\u201cAdd insult to injury. Yet, another #TaxScam \nhttps://t.co/3BZaQCpWQd\u201d— AFL-CIO \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 | #AFLCIOVotes (@AFL-CIO \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 | #AFLCIOVotes) 1533045743
Trump's latest plan to reward the wealthy comes as Republicans are fast at work on their "tax cuts 2.0," which will double down on the $1.5 trillion gift to the rich Trump signed into law last year.
While, as predicted, the tax cuts have been a major boon for CEOs and major corporations--which have used a huge portion of their savings to buy back their own stock--workers have seen virtually no gains from the tax bill. In fact, even as the economy continues to grow at a steady clip, wages are actually declining--which means that all of the new growth is going straight to the top.