SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Demonstrators with the March for in Washington, D.C. on April 22, 2017. (Photo: Stephen Melkisethian/flickr/cc)
The Trump administration appears to be ramping up its war on science.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the Interior Department, which overseas the U.S. Geological Survey, has told scientists there they must obtain approval from officials at the parent agency before responding to most media requests.
"This is censorship," commented the March for Science.
Among the documents the Times cites is an April 25 email to employees from the DOI press secretary, which describes protocol as interviews by scientists demanding such approval in cases when there's a request from a national outlet, or when the topic is "very controversial" or "likely to become a national story."
A later email from a USGS official describes the press secretary as being the one authorized to give the thumbs or down to the media requests, and offered up a list of questions they could answer to facilitate that process, including "How will the scientist answer the questions? Be specific. Include links to published studies if available."
"The new protocol also permits the Department of the Interior's communications office to reject interview requests on scientific matters," the Times adds.
Deputy press secretary for the Interior Department, Faith Vander Voort, brushed off the protocol as a change, framing the directive as merely a call to follow guidelines laid out in 2012.
But that assertion just doesn't pass muster, argued Michael Halpern, the deputy director at the Union of Concerned Scientists' Center for Science and Democracy.
"In reality," he tweeted, the Obama-era "policy encourages scientists to 'freely and openly discuss scientific, scholarly, technical information, findings, and conclusions.' No 'permission' needed."
\u201cThey claim the new muzzling directive is based on an Obama-era comms policy. \n\nIn reality, that policy encourages scientists to "freely and openly discuss scientific, scholarly, technical information, findings and conclusions." No "permission" needed.\nhttps://t.co/SGHH64PtXW https://t.co/PqOcLfbBR4\u201d— Michael Halpern (@Michael Halpern) 1529616028
According to seismologist and author Dr. Lucy Jones, it is, in fact, a clear shift from her time with the USGS--a tenure of over three decades that ended in 2016. She also noted that "taxpayers have paid for this science and it belongs to them."
\u201cWhen I worked for @USGS, I was asked to notify DOI about national-level interviews, but never had to ask for permission. Taxpayers have paid for this science & it belongs to them. We need to be able to trust what we hear from our scientists. https://t.co/2nFiFkLoBZ\u201d— Dr. Lucy Jones (@Dr. Lucy Jones) 1529614048
Word of the new rules also comes a week after the Washignton Post reported that USGS scientists, in order to attend two major conferences, needed to seek Interior's stamp of approval on presentation titles to make sure they aligned with Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke's priorities.
Responding to Thursday's story in the Times, some social media users suggested there were echoes of the muzzling of scientists that occurred in Canada under the former government of conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper:
\u201cI\u2019m having deja vu (Harper). #ScienceNotSilence https://t.co/zE5eseQMho\u201d— Mayo Takeuchi (@Mayo Takeuchi) 1529648743
\u201cEchoes of Canada, 2009-2015... What did we learn? \n\n1) Donate + volunteer for groups like @UCSUSA. \n2) Speak up + don't stop. Write op-eds, letters to editor, elected officials. You don't have to be a scientist to support science.\n3) Organize.\n\n#ScienceNotSilence #USPoli https://t.co/ClDJkbCPlW\u201d— Aerin Jacob (@Aerin Jacob) 1529616828
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Trump administration appears to be ramping up its war on science.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the Interior Department, which overseas the U.S. Geological Survey, has told scientists there they must obtain approval from officials at the parent agency before responding to most media requests.
"This is censorship," commented the March for Science.
Among the documents the Times cites is an April 25 email to employees from the DOI press secretary, which describes protocol as interviews by scientists demanding such approval in cases when there's a request from a national outlet, or when the topic is "very controversial" or "likely to become a national story."
A later email from a USGS official describes the press secretary as being the one authorized to give the thumbs or down to the media requests, and offered up a list of questions they could answer to facilitate that process, including "How will the scientist answer the questions? Be specific. Include links to published studies if available."
"The new protocol also permits the Department of the Interior's communications office to reject interview requests on scientific matters," the Times adds.
Deputy press secretary for the Interior Department, Faith Vander Voort, brushed off the protocol as a change, framing the directive as merely a call to follow guidelines laid out in 2012.
But that assertion just doesn't pass muster, argued Michael Halpern, the deputy director at the Union of Concerned Scientists' Center for Science and Democracy.
"In reality," he tweeted, the Obama-era "policy encourages scientists to 'freely and openly discuss scientific, scholarly, technical information, findings, and conclusions.' No 'permission' needed."
\u201cThey claim the new muzzling directive is based on an Obama-era comms policy. \n\nIn reality, that policy encourages scientists to "freely and openly discuss scientific, scholarly, technical information, findings and conclusions." No "permission" needed.\nhttps://t.co/SGHH64PtXW https://t.co/PqOcLfbBR4\u201d— Michael Halpern (@Michael Halpern) 1529616028
According to seismologist and author Dr. Lucy Jones, it is, in fact, a clear shift from her time with the USGS--a tenure of over three decades that ended in 2016. She also noted that "taxpayers have paid for this science and it belongs to them."
\u201cWhen I worked for @USGS, I was asked to notify DOI about national-level interviews, but never had to ask for permission. Taxpayers have paid for this science & it belongs to them. We need to be able to trust what we hear from our scientists. https://t.co/2nFiFkLoBZ\u201d— Dr. Lucy Jones (@Dr. Lucy Jones) 1529614048
Word of the new rules also comes a week after the Washignton Post reported that USGS scientists, in order to attend two major conferences, needed to seek Interior's stamp of approval on presentation titles to make sure they aligned with Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke's priorities.
Responding to Thursday's story in the Times, some social media users suggested there were echoes of the muzzling of scientists that occurred in Canada under the former government of conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper:
\u201cI\u2019m having deja vu (Harper). #ScienceNotSilence https://t.co/zE5eseQMho\u201d— Mayo Takeuchi (@Mayo Takeuchi) 1529648743
\u201cEchoes of Canada, 2009-2015... What did we learn? \n\n1) Donate + volunteer for groups like @UCSUSA. \n2) Speak up + don't stop. Write op-eds, letters to editor, elected officials. You don't have to be a scientist to support science.\n3) Organize.\n\n#ScienceNotSilence #USPoli https://t.co/ClDJkbCPlW\u201d— Aerin Jacob (@Aerin Jacob) 1529616828
The Trump administration appears to be ramping up its war on science.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the Interior Department, which overseas the U.S. Geological Survey, has told scientists there they must obtain approval from officials at the parent agency before responding to most media requests.
"This is censorship," commented the March for Science.
Among the documents the Times cites is an April 25 email to employees from the DOI press secretary, which describes protocol as interviews by scientists demanding such approval in cases when there's a request from a national outlet, or when the topic is "very controversial" or "likely to become a national story."
A later email from a USGS official describes the press secretary as being the one authorized to give the thumbs or down to the media requests, and offered up a list of questions they could answer to facilitate that process, including "How will the scientist answer the questions? Be specific. Include links to published studies if available."
"The new protocol also permits the Department of the Interior's communications office to reject interview requests on scientific matters," the Times adds.
Deputy press secretary for the Interior Department, Faith Vander Voort, brushed off the protocol as a change, framing the directive as merely a call to follow guidelines laid out in 2012.
But that assertion just doesn't pass muster, argued Michael Halpern, the deputy director at the Union of Concerned Scientists' Center for Science and Democracy.
"In reality," he tweeted, the Obama-era "policy encourages scientists to 'freely and openly discuss scientific, scholarly, technical information, findings, and conclusions.' No 'permission' needed."
\u201cThey claim the new muzzling directive is based on an Obama-era comms policy. \n\nIn reality, that policy encourages scientists to "freely and openly discuss scientific, scholarly, technical information, findings and conclusions." No "permission" needed.\nhttps://t.co/SGHH64PtXW https://t.co/PqOcLfbBR4\u201d— Michael Halpern (@Michael Halpern) 1529616028
According to seismologist and author Dr. Lucy Jones, it is, in fact, a clear shift from her time with the USGS--a tenure of over three decades that ended in 2016. She also noted that "taxpayers have paid for this science and it belongs to them."
\u201cWhen I worked for @USGS, I was asked to notify DOI about national-level interviews, but never had to ask for permission. Taxpayers have paid for this science & it belongs to them. We need to be able to trust what we hear from our scientists. https://t.co/2nFiFkLoBZ\u201d— Dr. Lucy Jones (@Dr. Lucy Jones) 1529614048
Word of the new rules also comes a week after the Washignton Post reported that USGS scientists, in order to attend two major conferences, needed to seek Interior's stamp of approval on presentation titles to make sure they aligned with Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke's priorities.
Responding to Thursday's story in the Times, some social media users suggested there were echoes of the muzzling of scientists that occurred in Canada under the former government of conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper:
\u201cI\u2019m having deja vu (Harper). #ScienceNotSilence https://t.co/zE5eseQMho\u201d— Mayo Takeuchi (@Mayo Takeuchi) 1529648743
\u201cEchoes of Canada, 2009-2015... What did we learn? \n\n1) Donate + volunteer for groups like @UCSUSA. \n2) Speak up + don't stop. Write op-eds, letters to editor, elected officials. You don't have to be a scientist to support science.\n3) Organize.\n\n#ScienceNotSilence #USPoli https://t.co/ClDJkbCPlW\u201d— Aerin Jacob (@Aerin Jacob) 1529616828