Protesters gathered at a Verizon store in MIssion Viejo, California on Thursday to demand the FCC uphold net neutrality rules. The demonstration was one of hundreds held all over the country. (Photo: Brendan Cleak--Team Internet/Flickr/cc)
Dec 10, 2017
Calls grew over the weekend for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate potential fraud regarding its call for public comments on net neutrality--before the panel votes on the issue on Thursday.
At Wired, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel--one of two Democrats on the commission who are expected to vote against a net neutrality repeal--raised alarm with an editorial about the integrity of the 23 million comments that have been left on the FCC's website.
"Roughly a million comments were fraudulently filed using the names of real people," wrote Rosenworcel. "What's more, as many as half a million additional comments were filed from Russian email addresses. And 50,000 FCC consumer complaints are missing from the record, even though this is just the kind of data the FCC should be using to inform its efforts."
The commissioner cited a Wired report about mounting evidence that bots generated more than one million comments that were submitted to the FCC, "to artificially amplify the call to repeal net neutrality protections" as well as to defend the rule, resulting in an obscured picture of how Americans view the issue.
The transparent public comment process demanded by the Administrative Procedure Act, Rosenworcel wrote, "has been utterly corrupted, and it could have wide-ranging implications at every other government agency that seeks public input on its policies."
A poll taken by Comsumer Reports in September found that two-thirds of Americans support an open Internet, and on Thursday, hundreds of protests were held at Verizon stores across the country to defend the rule.
Net neutrality protections keep internet service providers (ISPs) from discriminating against websites and content by placing them in an internet "slow lane," while other sites that can afford to pay a premium for faster service. Proponents of the rule say allowing companies like Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner to discriminate against content would threaten the ability of journalists to report the news freely and activists to use the Internet to reach supporters, and would unfairly favor wealthy companies like Google and Facebook which would be able to pay to be in the "fast lane."
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has opened an investigation into the potential fraud, but FCC chair Ajit Pai has indicated that the vote will go on as scheduled on December 14. On Friday, the panel refused to turn over documents regarding the potentially fake comments to Schneiderman's office.
Supporters of net neutrality spoke out on social media on Sunday about the fraudulent comments and the impending vote.
\u201cAgain, USA: Tell Congress & the FCC to protect #NetNeutrality.\n\nAnd do not accept FCC not cooperating with investigation of large-scale identity fraud & fraudulent comments during the public comment period. https://t.co/x5HdxTSPjY\u201d— Michael Busch (@Michael Busch) 1512852442
\u201c@FCC @AjitPaiFCC you are literally going against the will of the majority of American people. You have not acknowledged that there has been massive fraud in the hearing process. If you repeal net neutrality you are engaging in tyranny. #SaveNetNeutrality\u201d— Darth\ud83c\udfa7Vader\ud83c\udf9bOf the\ud83c\udf9aCrossfader! \u270a\ud83c\udfff#BLM (@Darth\ud83c\udfa7Vader\ud83c\udf9bOf the\ud83c\udf9aCrossfader! \u270a\ud83c\udfff#BLM) 1512920617
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Calls grew over the weekend for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate potential fraud regarding its call for public comments on net neutrality--before the panel votes on the issue on Thursday.
At Wired, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel--one of two Democrats on the commission who are expected to vote against a net neutrality repeal--raised alarm with an editorial about the integrity of the 23 million comments that have been left on the FCC's website.
"Roughly a million comments were fraudulently filed using the names of real people," wrote Rosenworcel. "What's more, as many as half a million additional comments were filed from Russian email addresses. And 50,000 FCC consumer complaints are missing from the record, even though this is just the kind of data the FCC should be using to inform its efforts."
The commissioner cited a Wired report about mounting evidence that bots generated more than one million comments that were submitted to the FCC, "to artificially amplify the call to repeal net neutrality protections" as well as to defend the rule, resulting in an obscured picture of how Americans view the issue.
The transparent public comment process demanded by the Administrative Procedure Act, Rosenworcel wrote, "has been utterly corrupted, and it could have wide-ranging implications at every other government agency that seeks public input on its policies."
A poll taken by Comsumer Reports in September found that two-thirds of Americans support an open Internet, and on Thursday, hundreds of protests were held at Verizon stores across the country to defend the rule.
Net neutrality protections keep internet service providers (ISPs) from discriminating against websites and content by placing them in an internet "slow lane," while other sites that can afford to pay a premium for faster service. Proponents of the rule say allowing companies like Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner to discriminate against content would threaten the ability of journalists to report the news freely and activists to use the Internet to reach supporters, and would unfairly favor wealthy companies like Google and Facebook which would be able to pay to be in the "fast lane."
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has opened an investigation into the potential fraud, but FCC chair Ajit Pai has indicated that the vote will go on as scheduled on December 14. On Friday, the panel refused to turn over documents regarding the potentially fake comments to Schneiderman's office.
Supporters of net neutrality spoke out on social media on Sunday about the fraudulent comments and the impending vote.
\u201cAgain, USA: Tell Congress & the FCC to protect #NetNeutrality.\n\nAnd do not accept FCC not cooperating with investigation of large-scale identity fraud & fraudulent comments during the public comment period. https://t.co/x5HdxTSPjY\u201d— Michael Busch (@Michael Busch) 1512852442
\u201c@FCC @AjitPaiFCC you are literally going against the will of the majority of American people. You have not acknowledged that there has been massive fraud in the hearing process. If you repeal net neutrality you are engaging in tyranny. #SaveNetNeutrality\u201d— Darth\ud83c\udfa7Vader\ud83c\udf9bOf the\ud83c\udf9aCrossfader! \u270a\ud83c\udfff#BLM (@Darth\ud83c\udfa7Vader\ud83c\udf9bOf the\ud83c\udf9aCrossfader! \u270a\ud83c\udfff#BLM) 1512920617
Calls grew over the weekend for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate potential fraud regarding its call for public comments on net neutrality--before the panel votes on the issue on Thursday.
At Wired, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel--one of two Democrats on the commission who are expected to vote against a net neutrality repeal--raised alarm with an editorial about the integrity of the 23 million comments that have been left on the FCC's website.
"Roughly a million comments were fraudulently filed using the names of real people," wrote Rosenworcel. "What's more, as many as half a million additional comments were filed from Russian email addresses. And 50,000 FCC consumer complaints are missing from the record, even though this is just the kind of data the FCC should be using to inform its efforts."
The commissioner cited a Wired report about mounting evidence that bots generated more than one million comments that were submitted to the FCC, "to artificially amplify the call to repeal net neutrality protections" as well as to defend the rule, resulting in an obscured picture of how Americans view the issue.
The transparent public comment process demanded by the Administrative Procedure Act, Rosenworcel wrote, "has been utterly corrupted, and it could have wide-ranging implications at every other government agency that seeks public input on its policies."
A poll taken by Comsumer Reports in September found that two-thirds of Americans support an open Internet, and on Thursday, hundreds of protests were held at Verizon stores across the country to defend the rule.
Net neutrality protections keep internet service providers (ISPs) from discriminating against websites and content by placing them in an internet "slow lane," while other sites that can afford to pay a premium for faster service. Proponents of the rule say allowing companies like Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner to discriminate against content would threaten the ability of journalists to report the news freely and activists to use the Internet to reach supporters, and would unfairly favor wealthy companies like Google and Facebook which would be able to pay to be in the "fast lane."
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has opened an investigation into the potential fraud, but FCC chair Ajit Pai has indicated that the vote will go on as scheduled on December 14. On Friday, the panel refused to turn over documents regarding the potentially fake comments to Schneiderman's office.
Supporters of net neutrality spoke out on social media on Sunday about the fraudulent comments and the impending vote.
\u201cAgain, USA: Tell Congress & the FCC to protect #NetNeutrality.\n\nAnd do not accept FCC not cooperating with investigation of large-scale identity fraud & fraudulent comments during the public comment period. https://t.co/x5HdxTSPjY\u201d— Michael Busch (@Michael Busch) 1512852442
\u201c@FCC @AjitPaiFCC you are literally going against the will of the majority of American people. You have not acknowledged that there has been massive fraud in the hearing process. If you repeal net neutrality you are engaging in tyranny. #SaveNetNeutrality\u201d— Darth\ud83c\udfa7Vader\ud83c\udf9bOf the\ud83c\udf9aCrossfader! \u270a\ud83c\udfff#BLM (@Darth\ud83c\udfa7Vader\ud83c\udf9bOf the\ud83c\udf9aCrossfader! \u270a\ud83c\udfff#BLM) 1512920617
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.