Protesters gathered at a Verizon store in MIssion Viejo, California on Thursday to demand the FCC uphold net neutrality rules. The demonstration was one of hundreds held all over the country. (Photo: Brendan Cleak--Team Internet/Flickr/cc)
FCC Commissioner Urges Fraud Investigation Ahead of Net Neutrality Vote
Jessica Rosenworcel argued on Saturday that her own agency should be investigated for its fraudulent public comment process, days before a vote on net neutrality protections
Calls grew over the weekend for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate potential fraud regarding its call for public comments on net neutrality--before the panel votes on the issue on Thursday.
At Wired, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel--one of two Democrats on the commission who are expected to vote against a net neutrality repeal--raised alarm with an editorial about the integrity of the 23 million comments that have been left on the FCC's website.
"Roughly a million comments were fraudulently filed using the names of real people," wrote Rosenworcel. "What's more, as many as half a million additional comments were filed from Russian email addresses. And 50,000 FCC consumer complaints are missing from the record, even though this is just the kind of data the FCC should be using to inform its efforts."
The commissioner cited a Wired report about mounting evidence that bots generated more than one million comments that were submitted to the FCC, "to artificially amplify the call to repeal net neutrality protections" as well as to defend the rule, resulting in an obscured picture of how Americans view the issue.
The transparent public comment process demanded by the Administrative Procedure Act, Rosenworcel wrote, "has been utterly corrupted, and it could have wide-ranging implications at every other government agency that seeks public input on its policies."
A poll taken by Comsumer Reports in September found that two-thirds of Americans support an open Internet, and on Thursday, hundreds of protests were held at Verizon stores across the country to defend the rule.
Net neutrality protections keep internet service providers (ISPs) from discriminating against websites and content by placing them in an internet "slow lane," while other sites that can afford to pay a premium for faster service. Proponents of the rule say allowing companies like Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner to discriminate against content would threaten the ability of journalists to report the news freely and activists to use the Internet to reach supporters, and would unfairly favor wealthy companies like Google and Facebook which would be able to pay to be in the "fast lane."
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has opened an investigation into the potential fraud, but FCC chair Ajit Pai has indicated that the vote will go on as scheduled on December 14. On Friday, the panel refused to turn over documents regarding the potentially fake comments to Schneiderman's office.
Supporters of net neutrality spoke out on social media on Sunday about the fraudulent comments and the impending vote.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Calls grew over the weekend for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate potential fraud regarding its call for public comments on net neutrality--before the panel votes on the issue on Thursday.
At Wired, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel--one of two Democrats on the commission who are expected to vote against a net neutrality repeal--raised alarm with an editorial about the integrity of the 23 million comments that have been left on the FCC's website.
"Roughly a million comments were fraudulently filed using the names of real people," wrote Rosenworcel. "What's more, as many as half a million additional comments were filed from Russian email addresses. And 50,000 FCC consumer complaints are missing from the record, even though this is just the kind of data the FCC should be using to inform its efforts."
The commissioner cited a Wired report about mounting evidence that bots generated more than one million comments that were submitted to the FCC, "to artificially amplify the call to repeal net neutrality protections" as well as to defend the rule, resulting in an obscured picture of how Americans view the issue.
The transparent public comment process demanded by the Administrative Procedure Act, Rosenworcel wrote, "has been utterly corrupted, and it could have wide-ranging implications at every other government agency that seeks public input on its policies."
A poll taken by Comsumer Reports in September found that two-thirds of Americans support an open Internet, and on Thursday, hundreds of protests were held at Verizon stores across the country to defend the rule.
Net neutrality protections keep internet service providers (ISPs) from discriminating against websites and content by placing them in an internet "slow lane," while other sites that can afford to pay a premium for faster service. Proponents of the rule say allowing companies like Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner to discriminate against content would threaten the ability of journalists to report the news freely and activists to use the Internet to reach supporters, and would unfairly favor wealthy companies like Google and Facebook which would be able to pay to be in the "fast lane."
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has opened an investigation into the potential fraud, but FCC chair Ajit Pai has indicated that the vote will go on as scheduled on December 14. On Friday, the panel refused to turn over documents regarding the potentially fake comments to Schneiderman's office.
Supporters of net neutrality spoke out on social media on Sunday about the fraudulent comments and the impending vote.
Calls grew over the weekend for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to investigate potential fraud regarding its call for public comments on net neutrality--before the panel votes on the issue on Thursday.
At Wired, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel--one of two Democrats on the commission who are expected to vote against a net neutrality repeal--raised alarm with an editorial about the integrity of the 23 million comments that have been left on the FCC's website.
"Roughly a million comments were fraudulently filed using the names of real people," wrote Rosenworcel. "What's more, as many as half a million additional comments were filed from Russian email addresses. And 50,000 FCC consumer complaints are missing from the record, even though this is just the kind of data the FCC should be using to inform its efforts."
The commissioner cited a Wired report about mounting evidence that bots generated more than one million comments that were submitted to the FCC, "to artificially amplify the call to repeal net neutrality protections" as well as to defend the rule, resulting in an obscured picture of how Americans view the issue.
The transparent public comment process demanded by the Administrative Procedure Act, Rosenworcel wrote, "has been utterly corrupted, and it could have wide-ranging implications at every other government agency that seeks public input on its policies."
A poll taken by Comsumer Reports in September found that two-thirds of Americans support an open Internet, and on Thursday, hundreds of protests were held at Verizon stores across the country to defend the rule.
Net neutrality protections keep internet service providers (ISPs) from discriminating against websites and content by placing them in an internet "slow lane," while other sites that can afford to pay a premium for faster service. Proponents of the rule say allowing companies like Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner to discriminate against content would threaten the ability of journalists to report the news freely and activists to use the Internet to reach supporters, and would unfairly favor wealthy companies like Google and Facebook which would be able to pay to be in the "fast lane."
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has opened an investigation into the potential fraud, but FCC chair Ajit Pai has indicated that the vote will go on as scheduled on December 14. On Friday, the panel refused to turn over documents regarding the potentially fake comments to Schneiderman's office.
Supporters of net neutrality spoke out on social media on Sunday about the fraudulent comments and the impending vote.