

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Human rights campaigners protest at the Farnborough International arms fair on July 11, 2016. (Photo: Campaign Against Arms Trade/flickr/cc)
Update: The U.S. House on Wednesday afternoon said the War Powers Resolution "shall not apply to" the bipartisan Yemen resolution. The development--stripping the legislation of its privileged status--as the Forum on the Arms Trade notes, draws "into question when a full vote on the resolution would occur ... Earlier, it appeared a vote would happen around November 3."
Earlier: Hours before a House resolution on stopping U.S. support for the bombing campaign may face a vote, a Saudi-led strike killed over two dozen civilians in northern Yemen.
The attack in the province of Saada on Wednesday "demolished the budget hotel and reduced market stalls outside to a heap of twisted sheet metal," the Irish Times reports.
"The bodies of the victims, many of their faces disfigured beyond recognition, were laid out on white body bags for families to identify in the courtyard of a hospital morgue," Al Jazeera reports.
The health service put the death toll at 29. Al Jazeera adds: "Abdulrahman, who declined to give his surname, said there were no Houthi fighters in the area when the attack happened."
The latest such attack on civilians follows ongoing criticism directed at Saudi Arabia for potential war crimes committed since the bombing campaign on the impoverished nation began in 2015--a conflict in which the U.S. is complicit through its arms sales, as well as logistical and intelligence support to the kingdom.
As Reuters reports: "The 2-1/2 year war effort has yet to achieve its goal of restoring to power the internationally recognized government, but the conflict has unleashed one of the world's worst humanitarian crises and killed at least 10,000 people."
And as author and journalist Stephen Kinzer recently noted, "This war could not proceed without American help."
As such, it puts in sharp relief House Concurrent Resolution 81, led by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and 39 co-sponsors, which calls for an end of U.S. support for Saudi Arabia's campaign against the Houthis in Yemen 30 days within 30 days of its passage.
Ongoing military support for Saudi Arabia in Yemen, said Stephen Miles, director of Win Without War, "is the poster child of what's wrong with American foreign policy." And that aid, he said, has helped fuel "the largest humanitarian crisis on the planet under the absurd belief that more bombs would somehow bring peace."
The resolution, said William Hartung, director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy, is "a chance for Congress to take a stand against the seemingly endless wars the United States has engaged in during this century, most of which have not been appropriately authorized by the Congress."
"It's long past time for the United States to stop supporting a war that independent human rights organizations believe may involve war crimes on all sides. Continuing down this path will not only risk implicating the United States in these violations of the laws of war, but it will foster resentment that will make it easier for groups like Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) to garner support," Hartung continued.
While House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) is reportedly trying to kill the effort, progressive voices are urging voters to call their representatives to add their support for the resolution.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Update: The U.S. House on Wednesday afternoon said the War Powers Resolution "shall not apply to" the bipartisan Yemen resolution. The development--stripping the legislation of its privileged status--as the Forum on the Arms Trade notes, draws "into question when a full vote on the resolution would occur ... Earlier, it appeared a vote would happen around November 3."
Earlier: Hours before a House resolution on stopping U.S. support for the bombing campaign may face a vote, a Saudi-led strike killed over two dozen civilians in northern Yemen.
The attack in the province of Saada on Wednesday "demolished the budget hotel and reduced market stalls outside to a heap of twisted sheet metal," the Irish Times reports.
"The bodies of the victims, many of their faces disfigured beyond recognition, were laid out on white body bags for families to identify in the courtyard of a hospital morgue," Al Jazeera reports.
The health service put the death toll at 29. Al Jazeera adds: "Abdulrahman, who declined to give his surname, said there were no Houthi fighters in the area when the attack happened."
The latest such attack on civilians follows ongoing criticism directed at Saudi Arabia for potential war crimes committed since the bombing campaign on the impoverished nation began in 2015--a conflict in which the U.S. is complicit through its arms sales, as well as logistical and intelligence support to the kingdom.
As Reuters reports: "The 2-1/2 year war effort has yet to achieve its goal of restoring to power the internationally recognized government, but the conflict has unleashed one of the world's worst humanitarian crises and killed at least 10,000 people."
And as author and journalist Stephen Kinzer recently noted, "This war could not proceed without American help."
As such, it puts in sharp relief House Concurrent Resolution 81, led by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and 39 co-sponsors, which calls for an end of U.S. support for Saudi Arabia's campaign against the Houthis in Yemen 30 days within 30 days of its passage.
Ongoing military support for Saudi Arabia in Yemen, said Stephen Miles, director of Win Without War, "is the poster child of what's wrong with American foreign policy." And that aid, he said, has helped fuel "the largest humanitarian crisis on the planet under the absurd belief that more bombs would somehow bring peace."
The resolution, said William Hartung, director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy, is "a chance for Congress to take a stand against the seemingly endless wars the United States has engaged in during this century, most of which have not been appropriately authorized by the Congress."
"It's long past time for the United States to stop supporting a war that independent human rights organizations believe may involve war crimes on all sides. Continuing down this path will not only risk implicating the United States in these violations of the laws of war, but it will foster resentment that will make it easier for groups like Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) to garner support," Hartung continued.
While House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) is reportedly trying to kill the effort, progressive voices are urging voters to call their representatives to add their support for the resolution.
Update: The U.S. House on Wednesday afternoon said the War Powers Resolution "shall not apply to" the bipartisan Yemen resolution. The development--stripping the legislation of its privileged status--as the Forum on the Arms Trade notes, draws "into question when a full vote on the resolution would occur ... Earlier, it appeared a vote would happen around November 3."
Earlier: Hours before a House resolution on stopping U.S. support for the bombing campaign may face a vote, a Saudi-led strike killed over two dozen civilians in northern Yemen.
The attack in the province of Saada on Wednesday "demolished the budget hotel and reduced market stalls outside to a heap of twisted sheet metal," the Irish Times reports.
"The bodies of the victims, many of their faces disfigured beyond recognition, were laid out on white body bags for families to identify in the courtyard of a hospital morgue," Al Jazeera reports.
The health service put the death toll at 29. Al Jazeera adds: "Abdulrahman, who declined to give his surname, said there were no Houthi fighters in the area when the attack happened."
The latest such attack on civilians follows ongoing criticism directed at Saudi Arabia for potential war crimes committed since the bombing campaign on the impoverished nation began in 2015--a conflict in which the U.S. is complicit through its arms sales, as well as logistical and intelligence support to the kingdom.
As Reuters reports: "The 2-1/2 year war effort has yet to achieve its goal of restoring to power the internationally recognized government, but the conflict has unleashed one of the world's worst humanitarian crises and killed at least 10,000 people."
And as author and journalist Stephen Kinzer recently noted, "This war could not proceed without American help."
As such, it puts in sharp relief House Concurrent Resolution 81, led by Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and 39 co-sponsors, which calls for an end of U.S. support for Saudi Arabia's campaign against the Houthis in Yemen 30 days within 30 days of its passage.
Ongoing military support for Saudi Arabia in Yemen, said Stephen Miles, director of Win Without War, "is the poster child of what's wrong with American foreign policy." And that aid, he said, has helped fuel "the largest humanitarian crisis on the planet under the absurd belief that more bombs would somehow bring peace."
The resolution, said William Hartung, director of the Arms and Security Project at the Center for International Policy, is "a chance for Congress to take a stand against the seemingly endless wars the United States has engaged in during this century, most of which have not been appropriately authorized by the Congress."
"It's long past time for the United States to stop supporting a war that independent human rights organizations believe may involve war crimes on all sides. Continuing down this path will not only risk implicating the United States in these violations of the laws of war, but it will foster resentment that will make it easier for groups like Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) to garner support," Hartung continued.
While House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) is reportedly trying to kill the effort, progressive voices are urging voters to call their representatives to add their support for the resolution.