

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"With the strong support of the American public, we must fight to ensure that this short-sighted provision to authorize oil and gas development in the iconic Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not a part of any final budget reconciliation package," said Jennie Olson of Environment America. (Photo: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Headquarters/Flickr/cc)
In addition to mounting a "horrific" assault on life-saving social safety net programs like Medicaid and Medicaid, the GOP-crafted budget resolution passed by 51 Republican senators late Thursday also lays the groundwork for "drastic cuts" to programs that help shield the nation's land, air, and water from exploitation by big polluters.
"This is the wrong budget for our health, environment, and kids"
--Jennie Olson, Environment America
"Adding insult to injury," 51 Republicans also teamed up with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to thwart an amendment to their budget that would have barred drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
In a statement on Friday, Jennie Olson of Environment America said the GOP's decision to kill the amendment--crafted by a group of Senate Democrats--opens the pristine refuge to "irreversible damage...just so corporate polluters can make a profit."
"This is the wrong budget for our health, environment, and kids," Olson concluded. "With the strong support of the American public, we must fight to ensure that this short-sighted provision to authorize oil and gas development in the iconic Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not a part of any final budget reconciliation package."
Environmental groups were also quick to note that oil and gas exploration in the ANWR poses risks not just to the refuge and its inhabitants, but also to the Arctic Ocean, "where an oil spill could cause irreversible harm if development is allowed to proceed," said Earthjustice president Trip Van Noppen.
"Drilling in the Arctic Refuge is not a budget issue, and should not be part of the budget reconciliation process. This is a blatant attempt to use the budget reconciliation process to pass a divisive and controversial proposal that would lead us in the wrong direction on climate," Van Noppen concluded. "Sacrificing our public lands and waters to benefit the oil and gas industry is both environmentally and fiscally irresponsible."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In addition to mounting a "horrific" assault on life-saving social safety net programs like Medicaid and Medicaid, the GOP-crafted budget resolution passed by 51 Republican senators late Thursday also lays the groundwork for "drastic cuts" to programs that help shield the nation's land, air, and water from exploitation by big polluters.
"This is the wrong budget for our health, environment, and kids"
--Jennie Olson, Environment America
"Adding insult to injury," 51 Republicans also teamed up with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to thwart an amendment to their budget that would have barred drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
In a statement on Friday, Jennie Olson of Environment America said the GOP's decision to kill the amendment--crafted by a group of Senate Democrats--opens the pristine refuge to "irreversible damage...just so corporate polluters can make a profit."
"This is the wrong budget for our health, environment, and kids," Olson concluded. "With the strong support of the American public, we must fight to ensure that this short-sighted provision to authorize oil and gas development in the iconic Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not a part of any final budget reconciliation package."
Environmental groups were also quick to note that oil and gas exploration in the ANWR poses risks not just to the refuge and its inhabitants, but also to the Arctic Ocean, "where an oil spill could cause irreversible harm if development is allowed to proceed," said Earthjustice president Trip Van Noppen.
"Drilling in the Arctic Refuge is not a budget issue, and should not be part of the budget reconciliation process. This is a blatant attempt to use the budget reconciliation process to pass a divisive and controversial proposal that would lead us in the wrong direction on climate," Van Noppen concluded. "Sacrificing our public lands and waters to benefit the oil and gas industry is both environmentally and fiscally irresponsible."
In addition to mounting a "horrific" assault on life-saving social safety net programs like Medicaid and Medicaid, the GOP-crafted budget resolution passed by 51 Republican senators late Thursday also lays the groundwork for "drastic cuts" to programs that help shield the nation's land, air, and water from exploitation by big polluters.
"This is the wrong budget for our health, environment, and kids"
--Jennie Olson, Environment America
"Adding insult to injury," 51 Republicans also teamed up with Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) to thwart an amendment to their budget that would have barred drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
In a statement on Friday, Jennie Olson of Environment America said the GOP's decision to kill the amendment--crafted by a group of Senate Democrats--opens the pristine refuge to "irreversible damage...just so corporate polluters can make a profit."
"This is the wrong budget for our health, environment, and kids," Olson concluded. "With the strong support of the American public, we must fight to ensure that this short-sighted provision to authorize oil and gas development in the iconic Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is not a part of any final budget reconciliation package."
Environmental groups were also quick to note that oil and gas exploration in the ANWR poses risks not just to the refuge and its inhabitants, but also to the Arctic Ocean, "where an oil spill could cause irreversible harm if development is allowed to proceed," said Earthjustice president Trip Van Noppen.
"Drilling in the Arctic Refuge is not a budget issue, and should not be part of the budget reconciliation process. This is a blatant attempt to use the budget reconciliation process to pass a divisive and controversial proposal that would lead us in the wrong direction on climate," Van Noppen concluded. "Sacrificing our public lands and waters to benefit the oil and gas industry is both environmentally and fiscally irresponsible."