Defense Confirms that Endless War in Iraq Will Continue Under Trump
The plan to remain part of the protracted conflict, particularly to aid in retaking the Islamic State stronghold of Mosul, goes against statements made by Trump on the campaign trail
One thing, it seems, that will not change under President Donald Trump is the United States military's occupation of Iraq after Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday that he believed "we'll be in this fight for a while."
During his presidential campaign, Trump claimed that he had opposed the Iraq invasion from the start and boasted repeatedly that he had an undisclosed plan to defeat the Islamic State (ISIS or IS).
But that plan may end up being the same endless war, launched in 2003 by then-President George W. Bush and continued by his successor, President Barack Obama.
After meeting with military commanders and Iraqi leaders on Monday, Secretary Mattis announced that "he is open to any request from his military commanders to aid the battle to retake Mosul and launch a major battle to oust IS from the base of its so-called caliphate in Raqqa, Syria," AP reported.
And despite calls for the U.S. military to retreat after the so-called Battle of Mosul, Mattis indicated that U.S. involvement in Iraq will likely continue, telling reporters, "I imagine we'll be in this fight for a while and we'll stand by each other."
On Sunday, Iraqi Prime Minister Haideral-Abadi announced the start of a ground offensive on western Mosul, "where Islamic State militants are under siege along with an estimated 650,000 civilians," Reuters observed.
In response, Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr reportedly called on the Iraqi government on Monday to "demand that all occupying and so-called friendly forces leave Iraq" after the battle "in order to preserve the prestige and the sovereignty of the state."
According to Reuters, "Mattis declined to address Sadr's remarks directly, describing them as an internal political matter."
During the press conference, Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend similarly declined to say how long the U.S. will stay in Iraq, telling reporters: "I don't anticipate that we'll be asked to leave by the government of Iraq immediately after Mosul...I think that the government of Iraq realizes their very complex fight, and they're going to need the assistance of the coalition even beyond Mosul," AP reported.
The plan to remain part of the protracted conflict, particularly to aid in retaking the ISIS stronghold, goes against statements made by Trump on the campaign trail. Among other things, he said that the "U.S. doesn't gain anything" in helping Iraq recapture Mosul.
Mattis also clarified on Monday that "[w]e're not in Iraq to seize anybody's oil," despite repeated statements made by Trump that the U.S. might use the resource grab as a strategy to defeat ISIS.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
One thing, it seems, that will not change under President Donald Trump is the United States military's occupation of Iraq after Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday that he believed "we'll be in this fight for a while."
During his presidential campaign, Trump claimed that he had opposed the Iraq invasion from the start and boasted repeatedly that he had an undisclosed plan to defeat the Islamic State (ISIS or IS).
But that plan may end up being the same endless war, launched in 2003 by then-President George W. Bush and continued by his successor, President Barack Obama.
After meeting with military commanders and Iraqi leaders on Monday, Secretary Mattis announced that "he is open to any request from his military commanders to aid the battle to retake Mosul and launch a major battle to oust IS from the base of its so-called caliphate in Raqqa, Syria," AP reported.
And despite calls for the U.S. military to retreat after the so-called Battle of Mosul, Mattis indicated that U.S. involvement in Iraq will likely continue, telling reporters, "I imagine we'll be in this fight for a while and we'll stand by each other."
On Sunday, Iraqi Prime Minister Haideral-Abadi announced the start of a ground offensive on western Mosul, "where Islamic State militants are under siege along with an estimated 650,000 civilians," Reuters observed.
In response, Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr reportedly called on the Iraqi government on Monday to "demand that all occupying and so-called friendly forces leave Iraq" after the battle "in order to preserve the prestige and the sovereignty of the state."
According to Reuters, "Mattis declined to address Sadr's remarks directly, describing them as an internal political matter."
During the press conference, Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend similarly declined to say how long the U.S. will stay in Iraq, telling reporters: "I don't anticipate that we'll be asked to leave by the government of Iraq immediately after Mosul...I think that the government of Iraq realizes their very complex fight, and they're going to need the assistance of the coalition even beyond Mosul," AP reported.
The plan to remain part of the protracted conflict, particularly to aid in retaking the ISIS stronghold, goes against statements made by Trump on the campaign trail. Among other things, he said that the "U.S. doesn't gain anything" in helping Iraq recapture Mosul.
Mattis also clarified on Monday that "[w]e're not in Iraq to seize anybody's oil," despite repeated statements made by Trump that the U.S. might use the resource grab as a strategy to defeat ISIS.
One thing, it seems, that will not change under President Donald Trump is the United States military's occupation of Iraq after Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday that he believed "we'll be in this fight for a while."
During his presidential campaign, Trump claimed that he had opposed the Iraq invasion from the start and boasted repeatedly that he had an undisclosed plan to defeat the Islamic State (ISIS or IS).
But that plan may end up being the same endless war, launched in 2003 by then-President George W. Bush and continued by his successor, President Barack Obama.
After meeting with military commanders and Iraqi leaders on Monday, Secretary Mattis announced that "he is open to any request from his military commanders to aid the battle to retake Mosul and launch a major battle to oust IS from the base of its so-called caliphate in Raqqa, Syria," AP reported.
And despite calls for the U.S. military to retreat after the so-called Battle of Mosul, Mattis indicated that U.S. involvement in Iraq will likely continue, telling reporters, "I imagine we'll be in this fight for a while and we'll stand by each other."
On Sunday, Iraqi Prime Minister Haideral-Abadi announced the start of a ground offensive on western Mosul, "where Islamic State militants are under siege along with an estimated 650,000 civilians," Reuters observed.
In response, Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr reportedly called on the Iraqi government on Monday to "demand that all occupying and so-called friendly forces leave Iraq" after the battle "in order to preserve the prestige and the sovereignty of the state."
According to Reuters, "Mattis declined to address Sadr's remarks directly, describing them as an internal political matter."
During the press conference, Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend similarly declined to say how long the U.S. will stay in Iraq, telling reporters: "I don't anticipate that we'll be asked to leave by the government of Iraq immediately after Mosul...I think that the government of Iraq realizes their very complex fight, and they're going to need the assistance of the coalition even beyond Mosul," AP reported.
The plan to remain part of the protracted conflict, particularly to aid in retaking the ISIS stronghold, goes against statements made by Trump on the campaign trail. Among other things, he said that the "U.S. doesn't gain anything" in helping Iraq recapture Mosul.
Mattis also clarified on Monday that "[w]e're not in Iraq to seize anybody's oil," despite repeated statements made by Trump that the U.S. might use the resource grab as a strategy to defeat ISIS.