SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Gitmo 2.0 Called 'Disaster': Draft Executive Order Reveals Trump Plan to Expand Offshore Prison
New document swirls as prison appears to be 'gearing up' for new prisoners from expansive global battlefield
Feb 08, 2017
A draft executive order reported to be circulating within the Trump White House calls for keeping the notorious Guantanamo Bay prison open and allowing for individuals associated with the Islamic State (ISIS) to be sent there--a plan described by one expert as "toxic policy" and "a national security disaster."
"Guantanamo 2.0 would be a national security disaster, fueling ISIS recruitment for years to come. It is another toxic policy that will distract and dismay but serve no useful purpose." --Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, Reprieve
The New York Times reported Wednesday on the document, Protecting America Through Lawful Detention of Terrorists and Other Designated Enemy Elements, the latest "in an evolving series of drafts" that is "being circulated among national security officials for comment."
New to this version is a statement that rescinds President Barack Obama's 2009 executive order calling for the prison to be closed.
It also directs the Secretary of Defense to keep the facility open to house enemy combatants from conflicts with "al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces, including individuals and networks associated with the Islamic State." It also allows for them to be held in "other facilities."
But holding ISIS combatants at Guantanamo could put the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which the Obama administration used to claim legality for its war on the Islamic State, under legal scrutiny.
Robert Chesney writes at Lawfare that "it already is established that habeas jurisdiction applies to all GTMO [Guantanamo] detainees. As a result, bringing an Islamic State captive to GTMO almost certainly will result in federal judges weighing in for the first time on whether the 2001 AUMF properly extends to the Islamic State." The judges, he writes, are likely to agree that the AUMF does cover ISIS, but that is not guaranteed.
Times reporter Charlie Savage quotes Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and former senior Justice Department official in the Bush administration, who said: "If a judge says the Sept. 11 authorization does not cover such a detention, it would not only make that detention unlawful, it would weaken the legal basis for the entire war against the Islamic State."
Savage adds: "Congress has continued to give no sign that it has the will or the consensus to explicitly authorize war on the Islamic State."
NPR also reported Wednesday that "far from winding down, Guantanamo's prison complex these days is gearing up. Construction projects suggests its 'expeditionary' era is ending and the notorious prison complex may be there to stay."
According to Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, an attorney with human rights organization Reprieve who represents multiple Guantanamo inmates, "Guantanamo 2.0 would be a national security disaster, fueling ISIS recruitment for years to come. It is another toxic policy that will distract and dismay but serve no useful purpose. President Trump seems determined to squander his presidency on a futile fight with the courts, the law, and basic human decency."
The offshore prison is now in its 16th year of operation, and is where, according to Jeremy Varon with Witness Against Torture, "America has institutionalized the idea of indefinite detention without charge or trial." President Trump, however, has vowed to "load up" the prison with "bad dudes."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A draft executive order reported to be circulating within the Trump White House calls for keeping the notorious Guantanamo Bay prison open and allowing for individuals associated with the Islamic State (ISIS) to be sent there--a plan described by one expert as "toxic policy" and "a national security disaster."
"Guantanamo 2.0 would be a national security disaster, fueling ISIS recruitment for years to come. It is another toxic policy that will distract and dismay but serve no useful purpose." --Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, Reprieve
The New York Times reported Wednesday on the document, Protecting America Through Lawful Detention of Terrorists and Other Designated Enemy Elements, the latest "in an evolving series of drafts" that is "being circulated among national security officials for comment."
New to this version is a statement that rescinds President Barack Obama's 2009 executive order calling for the prison to be closed.
It also directs the Secretary of Defense to keep the facility open to house enemy combatants from conflicts with "al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces, including individuals and networks associated with the Islamic State." It also allows for them to be held in "other facilities."
But holding ISIS combatants at Guantanamo could put the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which the Obama administration used to claim legality for its war on the Islamic State, under legal scrutiny.
Robert Chesney writes at Lawfare that "it already is established that habeas jurisdiction applies to all GTMO [Guantanamo] detainees. As a result, bringing an Islamic State captive to GTMO almost certainly will result in federal judges weighing in for the first time on whether the 2001 AUMF properly extends to the Islamic State." The judges, he writes, are likely to agree that the AUMF does cover ISIS, but that is not guaranteed.
Times reporter Charlie Savage quotes Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and former senior Justice Department official in the Bush administration, who said: "If a judge says the Sept. 11 authorization does not cover such a detention, it would not only make that detention unlawful, it would weaken the legal basis for the entire war against the Islamic State."
Savage adds: "Congress has continued to give no sign that it has the will or the consensus to explicitly authorize war on the Islamic State."
NPR also reported Wednesday that "far from winding down, Guantanamo's prison complex these days is gearing up. Construction projects suggests its 'expeditionary' era is ending and the notorious prison complex may be there to stay."
According to Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, an attorney with human rights organization Reprieve who represents multiple Guantanamo inmates, "Guantanamo 2.0 would be a national security disaster, fueling ISIS recruitment for years to come. It is another toxic policy that will distract and dismay but serve no useful purpose. President Trump seems determined to squander his presidency on a futile fight with the courts, the law, and basic human decency."
The offshore prison is now in its 16th year of operation, and is where, according to Jeremy Varon with Witness Against Torture, "America has institutionalized the idea of indefinite detention without charge or trial." President Trump, however, has vowed to "load up" the prison with "bad dudes."
A draft executive order reported to be circulating within the Trump White House calls for keeping the notorious Guantanamo Bay prison open and allowing for individuals associated with the Islamic State (ISIS) to be sent there--a plan described by one expert as "toxic policy" and "a national security disaster."
"Guantanamo 2.0 would be a national security disaster, fueling ISIS recruitment for years to come. It is another toxic policy that will distract and dismay but serve no useful purpose." --Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, Reprieve
The New York Times reported Wednesday on the document, Protecting America Through Lawful Detention of Terrorists and Other Designated Enemy Elements, the latest "in an evolving series of drafts" that is "being circulated among national security officials for comment."
New to this version is a statement that rescinds President Barack Obama's 2009 executive order calling for the prison to be closed.
It also directs the Secretary of Defense to keep the facility open to house enemy combatants from conflicts with "al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces, including individuals and networks associated with the Islamic State." It also allows for them to be held in "other facilities."
But holding ISIS combatants at Guantanamo could put the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which the Obama administration used to claim legality for its war on the Islamic State, under legal scrutiny.
Robert Chesney writes at Lawfare that "it already is established that habeas jurisdiction applies to all GTMO [Guantanamo] detainees. As a result, bringing an Islamic State captive to GTMO almost certainly will result in federal judges weighing in for the first time on whether the 2001 AUMF properly extends to the Islamic State." The judges, he writes, are likely to agree that the AUMF does cover ISIS, but that is not guaranteed.
Times reporter Charlie Savage quotes Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and former senior Justice Department official in the Bush administration, who said: "If a judge says the Sept. 11 authorization does not cover such a detention, it would not only make that detention unlawful, it would weaken the legal basis for the entire war against the Islamic State."
Savage adds: "Congress has continued to give no sign that it has the will or the consensus to explicitly authorize war on the Islamic State."
NPR also reported Wednesday that "far from winding down, Guantanamo's prison complex these days is gearing up. Construction projects suggests its 'expeditionary' era is ending and the notorious prison complex may be there to stay."
According to Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, an attorney with human rights organization Reprieve who represents multiple Guantanamo inmates, "Guantanamo 2.0 would be a national security disaster, fueling ISIS recruitment for years to come. It is another toxic policy that will distract and dismay but serve no useful purpose. President Trump seems determined to squander his presidency on a futile fight with the courts, the law, and basic human decency."
The offshore prison is now in its 16th year of operation, and is where, according to Jeremy Varon with Witness Against Torture, "America has institutionalized the idea of indefinite detention without charge or trial." President Trump, however, has vowed to "load up" the prison with "bad dudes."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.