The companies are reportedly in "advanced talks" for AT&T to acquire Time Warner--thus taking over CNN, HBO, TBS, TNT, and Warner Brothers, among other properties. (Photo: Mike Mozart/flickr/cc)
Oct 22, 2016
A mega-merger between AT&T and Time Warner, which could come as early as this weekend, would create a "media colossus" at the expense of customers and fair competition, watchdogs warned on Saturday.
The companies are reportedly in "advanced talks" for AT&T to acquire Time Warner--thus taking over CNN, HBO, TBS, TNT, and Warner Brothers, among other properties--at a time when federal regulators and lawmakers are beginning to respond to consumer demands for programming diversity and safeguards against discrimination.
According to anonymous insiders, Time Warner is asking AT&T to pay $90 a share, which would put the price of the deal at around $70 billion--one of the largest of the year, out-pricing even Bayer's takeover of Monsanto, which opponents have referred to as a "five-alarm threat."
Massive mergers are often followed by price hikes on users to offset the costs of the acquisition, as happened with AT&T's other recent purchase of DirecTV, the advocacy organization Free Press said. The group cautioned that the proliferation of media empires risks net neutrality rules that dictate fair competition and prevent discrimination against smaller providers.
"Any time you hear media executives talking about synergies, throwing around the business-babble that always accompanies these rumors, you know it's time grab your wallet and hang on tight. Big mergers like this inevitably mean higher prices for real people, to pay down the money borrowed to finance these deals and their golden parachutes," Free Press policy director Matt Wood said.
"The deals are driven by Wall Street's insatiable desire for short term growth at any cost. And just as AT&T's recent purchase of DirecTV was quickly followed by price hikes, there's every reason to expect this potential tie-up would cost internet users and TV viewers dearly too," he said.
As the New York Times reported, this deal is not the only one in the works:
More combinations, possibly involving Comcast, Viacom or Apple, could reshape the media landscape. Already, the family that controls Viacom and CBS has asked their boards to study a possible merger, a deal that could happen before the end of the year.
Regulators have been wary of allowing combinations of businesses that could create less competition and thwart innovation by start-ups, and a tie-up of AT&T and Time Warner could raise concerns. It is a bold move in an election year that will usher in a new administration and a fresh set of regulators.
Wood continued: "It's a good thing there's a renewed interest among lawmakers and antitrust enforcers in addressing this merger-mania. It's also a good thing we have solid net neutrality rules on the books--even though companies like AT&T continue to test those rules in the market, threaten them in Congress, and challenge them in the courts."
"In the absence of strong antitrust enforcement and nondiscrimination rules, we know how AT&T will use acquisitions like this. They'll deny programming to other distributors and favor their own content--slashing their own costs, but without passing any of those savings along to their customers," he said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A mega-merger between AT&T and Time Warner, which could come as early as this weekend, would create a "media colossus" at the expense of customers and fair competition, watchdogs warned on Saturday.
The companies are reportedly in "advanced talks" for AT&T to acquire Time Warner--thus taking over CNN, HBO, TBS, TNT, and Warner Brothers, among other properties--at a time when federal regulators and lawmakers are beginning to respond to consumer demands for programming diversity and safeguards against discrimination.
According to anonymous insiders, Time Warner is asking AT&T to pay $90 a share, which would put the price of the deal at around $70 billion--one of the largest of the year, out-pricing even Bayer's takeover of Monsanto, which opponents have referred to as a "five-alarm threat."
Massive mergers are often followed by price hikes on users to offset the costs of the acquisition, as happened with AT&T's other recent purchase of DirecTV, the advocacy organization Free Press said. The group cautioned that the proliferation of media empires risks net neutrality rules that dictate fair competition and prevent discrimination against smaller providers.
"Any time you hear media executives talking about synergies, throwing around the business-babble that always accompanies these rumors, you know it's time grab your wallet and hang on tight. Big mergers like this inevitably mean higher prices for real people, to pay down the money borrowed to finance these deals and their golden parachutes," Free Press policy director Matt Wood said.
"The deals are driven by Wall Street's insatiable desire for short term growth at any cost. And just as AT&T's recent purchase of DirecTV was quickly followed by price hikes, there's every reason to expect this potential tie-up would cost internet users and TV viewers dearly too," he said.
As the New York Times reported, this deal is not the only one in the works:
More combinations, possibly involving Comcast, Viacom or Apple, could reshape the media landscape. Already, the family that controls Viacom and CBS has asked their boards to study a possible merger, a deal that could happen before the end of the year.
Regulators have been wary of allowing combinations of businesses that could create less competition and thwart innovation by start-ups, and a tie-up of AT&T and Time Warner could raise concerns. It is a bold move in an election year that will usher in a new administration and a fresh set of regulators.
Wood continued: "It's a good thing there's a renewed interest among lawmakers and antitrust enforcers in addressing this merger-mania. It's also a good thing we have solid net neutrality rules on the books--even though companies like AT&T continue to test those rules in the market, threaten them in Congress, and challenge them in the courts."
"In the absence of strong antitrust enforcement and nondiscrimination rules, we know how AT&T will use acquisitions like this. They'll deny programming to other distributors and favor their own content--slashing their own costs, but without passing any of those savings along to their customers," he said.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A mega-merger between AT&T and Time Warner, which could come as early as this weekend, would create a "media colossus" at the expense of customers and fair competition, watchdogs warned on Saturday.
The companies are reportedly in "advanced talks" for AT&T to acquire Time Warner--thus taking over CNN, HBO, TBS, TNT, and Warner Brothers, among other properties--at a time when federal regulators and lawmakers are beginning to respond to consumer demands for programming diversity and safeguards against discrimination.
According to anonymous insiders, Time Warner is asking AT&T to pay $90 a share, which would put the price of the deal at around $70 billion--one of the largest of the year, out-pricing even Bayer's takeover of Monsanto, which opponents have referred to as a "five-alarm threat."
Massive mergers are often followed by price hikes on users to offset the costs of the acquisition, as happened with AT&T's other recent purchase of DirecTV, the advocacy organization Free Press said. The group cautioned that the proliferation of media empires risks net neutrality rules that dictate fair competition and prevent discrimination against smaller providers.
"Any time you hear media executives talking about synergies, throwing around the business-babble that always accompanies these rumors, you know it's time grab your wallet and hang on tight. Big mergers like this inevitably mean higher prices for real people, to pay down the money borrowed to finance these deals and their golden parachutes," Free Press policy director Matt Wood said.
"The deals are driven by Wall Street's insatiable desire for short term growth at any cost. And just as AT&T's recent purchase of DirecTV was quickly followed by price hikes, there's every reason to expect this potential tie-up would cost internet users and TV viewers dearly too," he said.
As the New York Times reported, this deal is not the only one in the works:
More combinations, possibly involving Comcast, Viacom or Apple, could reshape the media landscape. Already, the family that controls Viacom and CBS has asked their boards to study a possible merger, a deal that could happen before the end of the year.
Regulators have been wary of allowing combinations of businesses that could create less competition and thwart innovation by start-ups, and a tie-up of AT&T and Time Warner could raise concerns. It is a bold move in an election year that will usher in a new administration and a fresh set of regulators.
Wood continued: "It's a good thing there's a renewed interest among lawmakers and antitrust enforcers in addressing this merger-mania. It's also a good thing we have solid net neutrality rules on the books--even though companies like AT&T continue to test those rules in the market, threaten them in Congress, and challenge them in the courts."
"In the absence of strong antitrust enforcement and nondiscrimination rules, we know how AT&T will use acquisitions like this. They'll deny programming to other distributors and favor their own content--slashing their own costs, but without passing any of those savings along to their customers," he said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.