(Photo: WildEarth Guardians/flickr/cc)
Jun 22, 2016
In a blow to environmentalists calling on the Obama administration to keep fossil fuels in the ground, a judge on Tuesday struck down as unlawful the new rule meant to regulate fracking on federal lands.
The decision from Judge Scott Skavdahl of the District Court of Wyoming "is a major loss for the administration, which worked for years to update its oil and natural gas drilling regulations to account for dramatic increases and innovations in fracking," The Hillreports.
The rules released in March 2015 were blasted at the time as "toothless" and "nothing more than a giveaway to the oil and gas industry." But Skavdahl, siding with industry groups and some western states, said the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)—which resides within the federal Department of the Interior—lacked the authority to implement even these loophole-ridden rules.
"Congress has not delegated to the Department of Interior the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing," Skavdahl wrote in his opinion (pdf), which was published late Tuesday. "The BLM's effort to do so through the Fracking Rule is in excess of its statutory authority and contrary to law."
Previously, Skavdahl placed a temporary injunction on the fracking rule, which remains under the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals review.
And that is where Bill Snape, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, believes the final determination will be made. Describing Skavdahl's ruling as "illogical" and "absurd," Snape told Common Dreams the fracking rule "will prevail" before the three judges of the 10th Circuit.
"How could it not?" he wondered. "We're just supposed to allow this detrimental act to sully our public lands?"
Lena Moffitt, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign, agreed.
"It has been clear all along that the Bureau of Land Management has the authority to safeguard our health and our environment from the dangers of fracking," she said in a statement on Wednesday. "Our hope remains that the full 10th Circuit will continue its review of the case and uphold this rule."
Indeed, in a brief filed to the 10th Circuit just this week, BLM lawyers and their environmental allies argued (pdf) that both "the plain language and history" of federal law grant the agency power over development and environmental protection on federal lands.
Far from being "an unlawful federal power grab," as opponents have argued, the fracking regulations are "simply a long-overdue update of BLM's rules to address the recent hydraulic fracturing boom," the brief states.
The government could appeal Tuesday's ruling.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
bureau of land managementcenter for biological diversitydepartment of the interiorenvironmentfossil fuelsfrackingobama administrationpublic landssierra clubwyoming
In a blow to environmentalists calling on the Obama administration to keep fossil fuels in the ground, a judge on Tuesday struck down as unlawful the new rule meant to regulate fracking on federal lands.
The decision from Judge Scott Skavdahl of the District Court of Wyoming "is a major loss for the administration, which worked for years to update its oil and natural gas drilling regulations to account for dramatic increases and innovations in fracking," The Hillreports.
The rules released in March 2015 were blasted at the time as "toothless" and "nothing more than a giveaway to the oil and gas industry." But Skavdahl, siding with industry groups and some western states, said the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)—which resides within the federal Department of the Interior—lacked the authority to implement even these loophole-ridden rules.
"Congress has not delegated to the Department of Interior the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing," Skavdahl wrote in his opinion (pdf), which was published late Tuesday. "The BLM's effort to do so through the Fracking Rule is in excess of its statutory authority and contrary to law."
Previously, Skavdahl placed a temporary injunction on the fracking rule, which remains under the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals review.
And that is where Bill Snape, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, believes the final determination will be made. Describing Skavdahl's ruling as "illogical" and "absurd," Snape told Common Dreams the fracking rule "will prevail" before the three judges of the 10th Circuit.
"How could it not?" he wondered. "We're just supposed to allow this detrimental act to sully our public lands?"
Lena Moffitt, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign, agreed.
"It has been clear all along that the Bureau of Land Management has the authority to safeguard our health and our environment from the dangers of fracking," she said in a statement on Wednesday. "Our hope remains that the full 10th Circuit will continue its review of the case and uphold this rule."
Indeed, in a brief filed to the 10th Circuit just this week, BLM lawyers and their environmental allies argued (pdf) that both "the plain language and history" of federal law grant the agency power over development and environmental protection on federal lands.
Far from being "an unlawful federal power grab," as opponents have argued, the fracking regulations are "simply a long-overdue update of BLM's rules to address the recent hydraulic fracturing boom," the brief states.
The government could appeal Tuesday's ruling.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In a blow to environmentalists calling on the Obama administration to keep fossil fuels in the ground, a judge on Tuesday struck down as unlawful the new rule meant to regulate fracking on federal lands.
The decision from Judge Scott Skavdahl of the District Court of Wyoming "is a major loss for the administration, which worked for years to update its oil and natural gas drilling regulations to account for dramatic increases and innovations in fracking," The Hillreports.
The rules released in March 2015 were blasted at the time as "toothless" and "nothing more than a giveaway to the oil and gas industry." But Skavdahl, siding with industry groups and some western states, said the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)—which resides within the federal Department of the Interior—lacked the authority to implement even these loophole-ridden rules.
"Congress has not delegated to the Department of Interior the authority to regulate hydraulic fracturing," Skavdahl wrote in his opinion (pdf), which was published late Tuesday. "The BLM's effort to do so through the Fracking Rule is in excess of its statutory authority and contrary to law."
Previously, Skavdahl placed a temporary injunction on the fracking rule, which remains under the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals review.
And that is where Bill Snape, senior counsel at the Center for Biological Diversity, believes the final determination will be made. Describing Skavdahl's ruling as "illogical" and "absurd," Snape told Common Dreams the fracking rule "will prevail" before the three judges of the 10th Circuit.
"How could it not?" he wondered. "We're just supposed to allow this detrimental act to sully our public lands?"
Lena Moffitt, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Dirty Fuels campaign, agreed.
"It has been clear all along that the Bureau of Land Management has the authority to safeguard our health and our environment from the dangers of fracking," she said in a statement on Wednesday. "Our hope remains that the full 10th Circuit will continue its review of the case and uphold this rule."
Indeed, in a brief filed to the 10th Circuit just this week, BLM lawyers and their environmental allies argued (pdf) that both "the plain language and history" of federal law grant the agency power over development and environmental protection on federal lands.
Far from being "an unlawful federal power grab," as opponents have argued, the fracking regulations are "simply a long-overdue update of BLM's rules to address the recent hydraulic fracturing boom," the brief states.
The government could appeal Tuesday's ruling.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.