Ryan's GOP Regurgitates "Anti-Poverty" Policies that Amount to War on Poor
"It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate."
Continuing the GOP's war on the poor, Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans unveiled an ostensibly new "anti-poverty" plan on Tuesday, marked by cuts to critical safety-net programs and further austerity.
According to Politico, "much of this latest initiative is repackaged GOP proposals"--and the last time around, those ideas weren't very popular.
Politico's John Bresnahan reports that much of the plan is
focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for those receiving federal welfare, food or housing assistance; more "flexibility" for state and local governments to improve programs, although what that means isn't always fully defined; consolidation of dozens of existing federal programs into fewer, better run efforts; improved accountability for federal programs while "rewarding" those which show the best results; more effectively target those Americans in greatest need of help; and reducing waste and duplication, a mantra for politicians in both parties every election year.
House Republicans call for the use of more "public-private partnerships" to fight poverty, better technology, and vastly improved metrics in measuring the effectiveness of federal programs, as well as more oversight by Congress into the hundreds of billions of dollars funneled to low-income Americans annually. "Altogether... total federal and state spending on programs for low-income people currently equals about $1 trillion per year," the GOP report states.
The plan also seeks to expand "school choice," which allocates public funds for charter schools and other alternatives; slash support for higher education Pell Grants; repeal the Labor Department's "fiduciary rule," which protects retirees from greedy brokers; and dismantle parts of the Dodd-Frank bank reform law--all in the name of reducing poverty, Ryan claims.
"The Republicans would like to shed their 'party of the rich' image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that."
--Simon Maloy, Salon
Unfortunately, Ryan's core argument--that anti-poverty spending has been inefficient--is spurious, political writer Simon Maloy wrote at Salon on Tuesday. In fact, programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have done their job quite well, he argued, pointing to a Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analysis that showed the program "kept about 10.3 million people out of poverty, including about 4.9 million children" in 2012 alone.
Yet "[w]hat Ryan and the House Republicans want to do," Maloy said, "is alter its funding mechanism and cut its overall funding to make it (and other anti-poverty programs) less responsive and less effective."
Indeed, Maloy wrote:
The Republicans would like to shed their "party of the rich" image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that - they're going to gut social programs that are working as they should be, all the while claiming that they're "fixing" a problem that doesn't really exist. It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate.
The anti-poverty plan is one of several proposals the GOP will unroll over the next three weeks as part of its election-year blueprint, titled "A Better Way." According to the Huffington Post, a proposal on national security will be released on Thursday while initiatives on regulation, constitutional authority, healthcare, and tax reform are in the pipeline.
On Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers lambasted not only the proposal itself but also Ryan's choice of location for the unveiling: a drug and alcohol rehab facility in Washington, D.C.
But perhaps it's not surprising that Ryan and establishment Republicans are so out of touch. As Philadelphia mom Tianna Gaines-Turner wrote in a powerful op-ed on Monday: "How would Congress ever know what they should do to address poverty if they don't ever speak to us?"
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Continuing the GOP's war on the poor, Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans unveiled an ostensibly new "anti-poverty" plan on Tuesday, marked by cuts to critical safety-net programs and further austerity.
According to Politico, "much of this latest initiative is repackaged GOP proposals"--and the last time around, those ideas weren't very popular.
Politico's John Bresnahan reports that much of the plan is
focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for those receiving federal welfare, food or housing assistance; more "flexibility" for state and local governments to improve programs, although what that means isn't always fully defined; consolidation of dozens of existing federal programs into fewer, better run efforts; improved accountability for federal programs while "rewarding" those which show the best results; more effectively target those Americans in greatest need of help; and reducing waste and duplication, a mantra for politicians in both parties every election year.
House Republicans call for the use of more "public-private partnerships" to fight poverty, better technology, and vastly improved metrics in measuring the effectiveness of federal programs, as well as more oversight by Congress into the hundreds of billions of dollars funneled to low-income Americans annually. "Altogether... total federal and state spending on programs for low-income people currently equals about $1 trillion per year," the GOP report states.
The plan also seeks to expand "school choice," which allocates public funds for charter schools and other alternatives; slash support for higher education Pell Grants; repeal the Labor Department's "fiduciary rule," which protects retirees from greedy brokers; and dismantle parts of the Dodd-Frank bank reform law--all in the name of reducing poverty, Ryan claims.
"The Republicans would like to shed their 'party of the rich' image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that."
--Simon Maloy, Salon
Unfortunately, Ryan's core argument--that anti-poverty spending has been inefficient--is spurious, political writer Simon Maloy wrote at Salon on Tuesday. In fact, programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have done their job quite well, he argued, pointing to a Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analysis that showed the program "kept about 10.3 million people out of poverty, including about 4.9 million children" in 2012 alone.
Yet "[w]hat Ryan and the House Republicans want to do," Maloy said, "is alter its funding mechanism and cut its overall funding to make it (and other anti-poverty programs) less responsive and less effective."
Indeed, Maloy wrote:
The Republicans would like to shed their "party of the rich" image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that - they're going to gut social programs that are working as they should be, all the while claiming that they're "fixing" a problem that doesn't really exist. It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate.
The anti-poverty plan is one of several proposals the GOP will unroll over the next three weeks as part of its election-year blueprint, titled "A Better Way." According to the Huffington Post, a proposal on national security will be released on Thursday while initiatives on regulation, constitutional authority, healthcare, and tax reform are in the pipeline.
On Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers lambasted not only the proposal itself but also Ryan's choice of location for the unveiling: a drug and alcohol rehab facility in Washington, D.C.
But perhaps it's not surprising that Ryan and establishment Republicans are so out of touch. As Philadelphia mom Tianna Gaines-Turner wrote in a powerful op-ed on Monday: "How would Congress ever know what they should do to address poverty if they don't ever speak to us?"
Continuing the GOP's war on the poor, Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans unveiled an ostensibly new "anti-poverty" plan on Tuesday, marked by cuts to critical safety-net programs and further austerity.
According to Politico, "much of this latest initiative is repackaged GOP proposals"--and the last time around, those ideas weren't very popular.
Politico's John Bresnahan reports that much of the plan is
focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for those receiving federal welfare, food or housing assistance; more "flexibility" for state and local governments to improve programs, although what that means isn't always fully defined; consolidation of dozens of existing federal programs into fewer, better run efforts; improved accountability for federal programs while "rewarding" those which show the best results; more effectively target those Americans in greatest need of help; and reducing waste and duplication, a mantra for politicians in both parties every election year.
House Republicans call for the use of more "public-private partnerships" to fight poverty, better technology, and vastly improved metrics in measuring the effectiveness of federal programs, as well as more oversight by Congress into the hundreds of billions of dollars funneled to low-income Americans annually. "Altogether... total federal and state spending on programs for low-income people currently equals about $1 trillion per year," the GOP report states.
The plan also seeks to expand "school choice," which allocates public funds for charter schools and other alternatives; slash support for higher education Pell Grants; repeal the Labor Department's "fiduciary rule," which protects retirees from greedy brokers; and dismantle parts of the Dodd-Frank bank reform law--all in the name of reducing poverty, Ryan claims.
"The Republicans would like to shed their 'party of the rich' image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that."
--Simon Maloy, Salon
Unfortunately, Ryan's core argument--that anti-poverty spending has been inefficient--is spurious, political writer Simon Maloy wrote at Salon on Tuesday. In fact, programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) have done their job quite well, he argued, pointing to a Center on Budget and Policy Priorities analysis that showed the program "kept about 10.3 million people out of poverty, including about 4.9 million children" in 2012 alone.
Yet "[w]hat Ryan and the House Republicans want to do," Maloy said, "is alter its funding mechanism and cut its overall funding to make it (and other anti-poverty programs) less responsive and less effective."
Indeed, Maloy wrote:
The Republicans would like to shed their "party of the rich" image without actually going to the trouble of changing their policies, and the anti-poverty push is part of that - they're going to gut social programs that are working as they should be, all the while claiming that they're "fixing" a problem that doesn't really exist. It's more about reducing government spending than it is about helping the less fortunate.
The anti-poverty plan is one of several proposals the GOP will unroll over the next three weeks as part of its election-year blueprint, titled "A Better Way." According to the Huffington Post, a proposal on national security will be released on Thursday while initiatives on regulation, constitutional authority, healthcare, and tax reform are in the pipeline.
On Tuesday, Democratic lawmakers lambasted not only the proposal itself but also Ryan's choice of location for the unveiling: a drug and alcohol rehab facility in Washington, D.C.
But perhaps it's not surprising that Ryan and establishment Republicans are so out of touch. As Philadelphia mom Tianna Gaines-Turner wrote in a powerful op-ed on Monday: "How would Congress ever know what they should do to address poverty if they don't ever speak to us?"