SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Protesters march against mass deportations in May 2014.
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.
The U.S. Supreme Court reportedly appeared divided on a challenge to President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions as a 90-minute oral argument session wrapped up on Monday afternoon.
The case, brought by 26 Republican-led states and spearheaded by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, concerns two deportation protections that would shield roughly 5 million undocumented parents of American citizens and legal residents, as well as about 100,000 people brought to the U.S. as children.
Now, with only eight members sitting on the panel following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February, the court could end in a 4-4 deadlock--which would leave in place a previous ruling by a lower court that blocked the plan, without setting a Supreme Court precedent.
Immigration and workers' rights groups on Monday called on the court to uphold the programs, known as the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
"It is a monumental day for millions of immigrant families across the U.S.," said Jose P. Garza, executive director of the Texas-based Workers Defense Project/Proyecta Defensa Laboral, which held a rally on the courthouse steps in Washington, D.C. as justices heard arguments inside.
"Today, Workers Defense Project members and their families are in D.C. to send a message to our national leaders that we're tired of our families being torn apart, and that we're united and stronger than ever," Garza said. "Texas is ground zero for DAPA/DACA, and nearly 70 percent of Texans support comprehensive immigration reform. Should the Supreme Court side with immigrant families, millions of hardworking individuals will be able to live without fear of being torn from their family, come out of the shadows, and strengthen our economy."
Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Mary Kay Henry added in a statement, "Millions of American families know that President Obama's DAPA and expanded DACA stand on the right side of justice. We have faith that justice will prevail over the politics of hate and the Supreme Court will rule in favor of these programs."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan all voiced support for the administration's policy. Sotomayor noted that the government has limited resources to carry out deportations and said that the more than 4 million immigrants awaiting reprieve were "living in the shadows" and "are here whether we want them or not."
A decision is expected in June or July.