SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Right Side of History': South Dakota Governor Vetoes Anti-Transgender Bill
If approved, the bill would have forced transgender students to use bathrooms that correspond with their biological sex, rather than gender identity
Mar 01, 2016
Update:
South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard (R) on Tuesday vetoed a bill that would have forced transgender students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their biological sex, rather than their gender identity.
"Today, Governor Daugaard made a symbolic statement that South Dakota's transgender students are a valued part of the community and that our state leaders won't be swayed by out-of-state groups that don't have the interests of South Dakotans at heart," said Heather Smith, executive director of ACLU South Dakota.
"People from across the state and country took time to reach out to the governor to urge this veto--that's the true testament of democracy," Smith said. "There was no place for discrimination in South Dakota when this bill was initially proposed by a handful of legislators, and today the governor confirmed unequivocally that discrimination has no place in our future. Thank you, governor, for listening to the collective voices of South Dakotans and voting for your values."
The veto blocked the nation's first anti-transgender bathroom bill to pass state legislature. However, as ACLU-SD pointed out, 16 other states are still considering enacting similar laws.
Chase Strangio, a staff attorney with the ACLU's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Project, said the governor's decision "will place him unequivocally on the right side of history. Federal law is clear that transgender students are protected under Title IX, and the governor's veto prevents costly investigations into school districts across South Dakota."
"Hopefully this important action by Governor Daugaard will allow the state and other states across the country to continue to invest in the safety of all students instead of singling out a vulnerable few for isolation and discrimination," Strangio said.
Earlier:
South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard (R) is expected on Tuesday to make a decision, one way or another, on a controversial bill that critics say targets and stigmatizes transgender students.
Daugaard had until Tuesday to either approve or veto legislation, known as HB 1008, that would force transgender students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond to their biological sex, rather than their gender identity, or else request that the school provide them with a third "reasonable accommodation."
The governor met with Rep. Fred Deutsch, the bill's sponsor, at 4:00 p.m. CST and is expected to make an announcement shortly after that.
Deutsch previously said he introduced legislation "to protect the innocence of children." However, LGBTQI rights advocates say it does nothing but single out transgender students and creates a culture that separates them from their peers.
"We know transgender students face staggering rates of depression and anxiety, and an alarming 41% of transgender people have attempted suicide," said Heather Smith, executive director of ACLU South Dakota, in a statement in February. "H.B. 1008 would do nothing to protect students privacy, but it will do real and lasting harm to vulnerable transgender students."
The organization would consider filing a lawsuit if the legislation is approved.
Ashley Joubert-Gaddis, director of operations at the Sioux Falls-based Center for Equality, told USA Today last week, "What this amounts to is legislators saying we didn't win the gay marriage fight, so let's go after someone else."
Daugaard met with transgender rights activists last week, who said they hoped to influence him to veto the bill. The governor said the sit-down "helped me see things through their eyes a little bit and understand their perspective."
Still, he added, "I have my own set of values and in the end I'll make my own decisions."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
acluchildrencivil rightsdiscriminationeducationgender identitylgbtqsouth dakotatitle ixtransgendertransgender rights
Update:
South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard (R) on Tuesday vetoed a bill that would have forced transgender students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their biological sex, rather than their gender identity.
"Today, Governor Daugaard made a symbolic statement that South Dakota's transgender students are a valued part of the community and that our state leaders won't be swayed by out-of-state groups that don't have the interests of South Dakotans at heart," said Heather Smith, executive director of ACLU South Dakota.
"People from across the state and country took time to reach out to the governor to urge this veto--that's the true testament of democracy," Smith said. "There was no place for discrimination in South Dakota when this bill was initially proposed by a handful of legislators, and today the governor confirmed unequivocally that discrimination has no place in our future. Thank you, governor, for listening to the collective voices of South Dakotans and voting for your values."
The veto blocked the nation's first anti-transgender bathroom bill to pass state legislature. However, as ACLU-SD pointed out, 16 other states are still considering enacting similar laws.
Chase Strangio, a staff attorney with the ACLU's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Project, said the governor's decision "will place him unequivocally on the right side of history. Federal law is clear that transgender students are protected under Title IX, and the governor's veto prevents costly investigations into school districts across South Dakota."
"Hopefully this important action by Governor Daugaard will allow the state and other states across the country to continue to invest in the safety of all students instead of singling out a vulnerable few for isolation and discrimination," Strangio said.
Earlier:
South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard (R) is expected on Tuesday to make a decision, one way or another, on a controversial bill that critics say targets and stigmatizes transgender students.
Daugaard had until Tuesday to either approve or veto legislation, known as HB 1008, that would force transgender students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond to their biological sex, rather than their gender identity, or else request that the school provide them with a third "reasonable accommodation."
The governor met with Rep. Fred Deutsch, the bill's sponsor, at 4:00 p.m. CST and is expected to make an announcement shortly after that.
Deutsch previously said he introduced legislation "to protect the innocence of children." However, LGBTQI rights advocates say it does nothing but single out transgender students and creates a culture that separates them from their peers.
"We know transgender students face staggering rates of depression and anxiety, and an alarming 41% of transgender people have attempted suicide," said Heather Smith, executive director of ACLU South Dakota, in a statement in February. "H.B. 1008 would do nothing to protect students privacy, but it will do real and lasting harm to vulnerable transgender students."
The organization would consider filing a lawsuit if the legislation is approved.
Ashley Joubert-Gaddis, director of operations at the Sioux Falls-based Center for Equality, told USA Today last week, "What this amounts to is legislators saying we didn't win the gay marriage fight, so let's go after someone else."
Daugaard met with transgender rights activists last week, who said they hoped to influence him to veto the bill. The governor said the sit-down "helped me see things through their eyes a little bit and understand their perspective."
Still, he added, "I have my own set of values and in the end I'll make my own decisions."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Update:
South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard (R) on Tuesday vetoed a bill that would have forced transgender students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their biological sex, rather than their gender identity.
"Today, Governor Daugaard made a symbolic statement that South Dakota's transgender students are a valued part of the community and that our state leaders won't be swayed by out-of-state groups that don't have the interests of South Dakotans at heart," said Heather Smith, executive director of ACLU South Dakota.
"People from across the state and country took time to reach out to the governor to urge this veto--that's the true testament of democracy," Smith said. "There was no place for discrimination in South Dakota when this bill was initially proposed by a handful of legislators, and today the governor confirmed unequivocally that discrimination has no place in our future. Thank you, governor, for listening to the collective voices of South Dakotans and voting for your values."
The veto blocked the nation's first anti-transgender bathroom bill to pass state legislature. However, as ACLU-SD pointed out, 16 other states are still considering enacting similar laws.
Chase Strangio, a staff attorney with the ACLU's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Project, said the governor's decision "will place him unequivocally on the right side of history. Federal law is clear that transgender students are protected under Title IX, and the governor's veto prevents costly investigations into school districts across South Dakota."
"Hopefully this important action by Governor Daugaard will allow the state and other states across the country to continue to invest in the safety of all students instead of singling out a vulnerable few for isolation and discrimination," Strangio said.
Earlier:
South Dakota Governor Dennis Daugaard (R) is expected on Tuesday to make a decision, one way or another, on a controversial bill that critics say targets and stigmatizes transgender students.
Daugaard had until Tuesday to either approve or veto legislation, known as HB 1008, that would force transgender students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond to their biological sex, rather than their gender identity, or else request that the school provide them with a third "reasonable accommodation."
The governor met with Rep. Fred Deutsch, the bill's sponsor, at 4:00 p.m. CST and is expected to make an announcement shortly after that.
Deutsch previously said he introduced legislation "to protect the innocence of children." However, LGBTQI rights advocates say it does nothing but single out transgender students and creates a culture that separates them from their peers.
"We know transgender students face staggering rates of depression and anxiety, and an alarming 41% of transgender people have attempted suicide," said Heather Smith, executive director of ACLU South Dakota, in a statement in February. "H.B. 1008 would do nothing to protect students privacy, but it will do real and lasting harm to vulnerable transgender students."
The organization would consider filing a lawsuit if the legislation is approved.
Ashley Joubert-Gaddis, director of operations at the Sioux Falls-based Center for Equality, told USA Today last week, "What this amounts to is legislators saying we didn't win the gay marriage fight, so let's go after someone else."
Daugaard met with transgender rights activists last week, who said they hoped to influence him to veto the bill. The governor said the sit-down "helped me see things through their eyes a little bit and understand their perspective."
Still, he added, "I have my own set of values and in the end I'll make my own decisions."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.