The coal terminal at Abbot Point in Australia.
Australia Approves 'Irresponsible' Coal Port Near Great Barrier Reef
"The federal Liberal and state Labor governments are teaming up to do Adani's dirty work to turn our Great Barrier Reef into a highway for coal ships to cook the planet."
On Monday, Australian environmental minister Greg Hunt approved the expansion of a coal terminal in Abbot Point, northern Queensland. This decision prompted backlash from green groups that said the port poses a grave risk to the Great Barrier Reef.
Despite the country's pledge to reduce carbon emissions, the approval means Abbot Point is on track to become one of the world's biggest coal ports, servicing projects planned for the Galilee Basin--including the controversial $16 billion Carmichael mine proposed by Indian energy giant Adani, which in recent months was abandoned by nearly all of its financiers over climate concerns.
"It's disappointing that the Minister has approved this project within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, despite the damage it will do," said World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Australia Reef campaigner Louise Matthiessen.
Hunt approved 29 conditions, including that the 1.1 million cubic meters of waste material expected to be dredged from the site be disposed of on existing industrial land and not contaminate the surrounding marine area--but environmentalists warned that the land marked for that purpose lies just outside of wetlands that are home to thousands of migratory birds.
Moreover, Greenpeace Australia said the Queensland government is breaking a key campaign promise in approving the expansion.
"This approval to dredge is not only irresponsible for the reef, it's illogical and it's unnecessary," said Greenpeace reef campaigner Shani Tager.
Opponents said that even if the project's backers can guarantee that the dredge material will be disposed of under Hunt's conditions, the environmental impact still threatens to be devastating.
"Thousands of tonnes of seafloor will be torn up and dumped next to the internationally significant Caley Valley wetlands. Seagrasses which feed dugongs and turtles will be torn up for the coal industry," Imogen Zethoven of the Australian Marine Conservation Society told the Guardian. "Hundreds more coal ships will [plow] through the reef yearly."
Moira Williams, a community campaigner with the advocacy group 350.org, said Monday, "It's ludicrous that Hunt has [approved] a project that has no money, no social license, is universally hated, will wreck one of the greatest wonders of the natural world, and has been rejected by most of the world's largest banks."
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull pledged his support for the climate deal finalized at the COP21 summit in Paris earlier this month. At the time, Hunt said it was "the most important international environment agreement the world has ever had" and would put "very significant pressure on countries that are on track to fail with their targets."
"The Turnbull government can't seriously sign on to deals which limit climate damage to 2 degrees and then give a green light to massive coal export projects which guarantee that the 2 degree target can never be met," Williams said. "With coal prices at an all-time low, support for climate action, and protecting the Great Barrier Reef at an all-time high, the Turnbull government is treading a dangerous line in approving this climate and reef-wrecking mega coal project. Their actions will bite them at the ballot box next year."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Monday, Australian environmental minister Greg Hunt approved the expansion of a coal terminal in Abbot Point, northern Queensland. This decision prompted backlash from green groups that said the port poses a grave risk to the Great Barrier Reef.
Despite the country's pledge to reduce carbon emissions, the approval means Abbot Point is on track to become one of the world's biggest coal ports, servicing projects planned for the Galilee Basin--including the controversial $16 billion Carmichael mine proposed by Indian energy giant Adani, which in recent months was abandoned by nearly all of its financiers over climate concerns.
"It's disappointing that the Minister has approved this project within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, despite the damage it will do," said World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Australia Reef campaigner Louise Matthiessen.
Hunt approved 29 conditions, including that the 1.1 million cubic meters of waste material expected to be dredged from the site be disposed of on existing industrial land and not contaminate the surrounding marine area--but environmentalists warned that the land marked for that purpose lies just outside of wetlands that are home to thousands of migratory birds.
Moreover, Greenpeace Australia said the Queensland government is breaking a key campaign promise in approving the expansion.
"This approval to dredge is not only irresponsible for the reef, it's illogical and it's unnecessary," said Greenpeace reef campaigner Shani Tager.
Opponents said that even if the project's backers can guarantee that the dredge material will be disposed of under Hunt's conditions, the environmental impact still threatens to be devastating.
"Thousands of tonnes of seafloor will be torn up and dumped next to the internationally significant Caley Valley wetlands. Seagrasses which feed dugongs and turtles will be torn up for the coal industry," Imogen Zethoven of the Australian Marine Conservation Society told the Guardian. "Hundreds more coal ships will [plow] through the reef yearly."
Moira Williams, a community campaigner with the advocacy group 350.org, said Monday, "It's ludicrous that Hunt has [approved] a project that has no money, no social license, is universally hated, will wreck one of the greatest wonders of the natural world, and has been rejected by most of the world's largest banks."
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull pledged his support for the climate deal finalized at the COP21 summit in Paris earlier this month. At the time, Hunt said it was "the most important international environment agreement the world has ever had" and would put "very significant pressure on countries that are on track to fail with their targets."
"The Turnbull government can't seriously sign on to deals which limit climate damage to 2 degrees and then give a green light to massive coal export projects which guarantee that the 2 degree target can never be met," Williams said. "With coal prices at an all-time low, support for climate action, and protecting the Great Barrier Reef at an all-time high, the Turnbull government is treading a dangerous line in approving this climate and reef-wrecking mega coal project. Their actions will bite them at the ballot box next year."
On Monday, Australian environmental minister Greg Hunt approved the expansion of a coal terminal in Abbot Point, northern Queensland. This decision prompted backlash from green groups that said the port poses a grave risk to the Great Barrier Reef.
Despite the country's pledge to reduce carbon emissions, the approval means Abbot Point is on track to become one of the world's biggest coal ports, servicing projects planned for the Galilee Basin--including the controversial $16 billion Carmichael mine proposed by Indian energy giant Adani, which in recent months was abandoned by nearly all of its financiers over climate concerns.
"It's disappointing that the Minister has approved this project within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, despite the damage it will do," said World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Australia Reef campaigner Louise Matthiessen.
Hunt approved 29 conditions, including that the 1.1 million cubic meters of waste material expected to be dredged from the site be disposed of on existing industrial land and not contaminate the surrounding marine area--but environmentalists warned that the land marked for that purpose lies just outside of wetlands that are home to thousands of migratory birds.
Moreover, Greenpeace Australia said the Queensland government is breaking a key campaign promise in approving the expansion.
"This approval to dredge is not only irresponsible for the reef, it's illogical and it's unnecessary," said Greenpeace reef campaigner Shani Tager.
Opponents said that even if the project's backers can guarantee that the dredge material will be disposed of under Hunt's conditions, the environmental impact still threatens to be devastating.
"Thousands of tonnes of seafloor will be torn up and dumped next to the internationally significant Caley Valley wetlands. Seagrasses which feed dugongs and turtles will be torn up for the coal industry," Imogen Zethoven of the Australian Marine Conservation Society told the Guardian. "Hundreds more coal ships will [plow] through the reef yearly."
Moira Williams, a community campaigner with the advocacy group 350.org, said Monday, "It's ludicrous that Hunt has [approved] a project that has no money, no social license, is universally hated, will wreck one of the greatest wonders of the natural world, and has been rejected by most of the world's largest banks."
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull pledged his support for the climate deal finalized at the COP21 summit in Paris earlier this month. At the time, Hunt said it was "the most important international environment agreement the world has ever had" and would put "very significant pressure on countries that are on track to fail with their targets."
"The Turnbull government can't seriously sign on to deals which limit climate damage to 2 degrees and then give a green light to massive coal export projects which guarantee that the 2 degree target can never be met," Williams said. "With coal prices at an all-time low, support for climate action, and protecting the Great Barrier Reef at an all-time high, the Turnbull government is treading a dangerous line in approving this climate and reef-wrecking mega coal project. Their actions will bite them at the ballot box next year."