Jumping aboard an increasingly popular bandwagon, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton on Tuesday made her clearest statement yet against drilling for oil in the Arctic Ocean off Alaska.
The Arctic is a unique treasure. Given what we know, it's not worth the risk of drilling. -H
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 18, 2015
The tweet came one day after the administration of President Barack Obama granted Shell the final permit it needed to drill deep into the waters off the Alaskan coast—a move that stoked the outrage of green groups nationwide.
While Clinton expressed "skepticism" about Arctic drilling less than a month ago, her position appears to have evolved since then. The Hill reports: "Her clarified position is likely to bolster her standing among greens, some of whom have previously questioned her focus on environmental issues."
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
An existential threat to our democracy. A global pandemic. An unprecedented economic crisis. Our journalism has never been more needed.
Can you pitch in today and help us make our Fall Campaign goal of $80,000 by November 2nd?
Please select a donation method:
Meanwhile, one of Clinton's leading opponents on the Republican side took to Twitter to express an alternate viewpoint:
.@HillaryClinton Wrong. Being more-anti energy than Obama is extreme. We should embrace energy revolution to lower prices & create US jobs.
— Jeb Bush (@JebBush) August 18, 2015
As Reuters points out, "Arctic drilling is sure to be a contentious issue in the presidential campaign as more Arctic lease sales are scheduled for 2016 and 2017."
Clinton joins scores of scientists and climate activists who oppose drilling in the pristine northern region. On Tuesday, the online advocacy group Care2 announced that it has collected more than a quarter of a million signatures for a petition calling on Obama to reject oil and natural gas exploration and drilling in the Arctic Ocean.
Of the administration's position thus far, Care2 founder and CEO Randy Paynter said: "The current decision communicates that our coasts and wildlife are not a priority to our nation's leaders, who are seriously sacrificing our pristine Arctic environment for short-term gains."