

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Solidifying the country's reputation as a "true petrostate," the government of Canada reportedly spent millions of taxpayer dollars on previously undisclosed tar sands lobbying activities, including a concerted push to 'educate' First Nations communities opposed to the toxic drilling projects.
According to a series of 2014 government policy documents obtained by a Greenpeace analyst through a Freedom of Information request, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's 2013 budget included $30 million to be invested over two years in a public relations campaign and domestic and international "outreach activities" to promote Alberta's tar sands.
The Guardian's Martin Lukacs reports on Wednesday that "the outreach activities, which cost $4.5 million and were never publicly disclosed, included efforts to 'advance energy literacy amongst [British Columbia] First Nations communities.'"
Further, "The documents indicate the government was funding dozens of projects between 2014 and 2015 to engage Indigenous communities and advance 'Canada's reputation as a global energy leader.'" Natural Resources Canada declined to elaborate on the specific outreach projects when asked for comment.
Previous reports by Lukacs found that the Alberta government had even promised some First Nations leaders an investor stake in oil extraction projects in exchange for their help in convincing Indigenous groups to support various pipeline proposals.
First Nations have generally fiercely opposed the tar sands industry and proposed pipelines, such as Enbridge's Northern Gateway, which would transport heavy, toxic crude from Alberta across ancestral lands to coastal Kitimat, BC. The grassroots mobilization, including several legal challenges, against these projects has successfully hampered construction thus far.
Reacting to this latest disclosure, 350.org founder Bill McKibben tweeted, "Secret documents reveal the Canadian government spent tens of millions advocating for tarsands. A true petrotic state."
The Guardian also notes that the government documents revealed outreach activities, including "research to support Canadian lobbying against a European environmental measure that would have hampered tar sands exports. Canada has succeeded in delaying the measure—the EU Fuel Quality Directive—several times."
Greenpeace climate analyst Keith Stewart, who first obtained the policy documents, said: "The Harper government gutted environmental laws and destroyed public faith in the regulatory system to fast-track pipelines, then wasted $30 million of public money on a public relations campaign doomed to fail. They seem to think that if they spend enough money, they can fool all of the people all of the time, but that kind of arrogance is a risky re-election strategy at a time of low oil prices and rising concern over climate change."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Solidifying the country's reputation as a "true petrostate," the government of Canada reportedly spent millions of taxpayer dollars on previously undisclosed tar sands lobbying activities, including a concerted push to 'educate' First Nations communities opposed to the toxic drilling projects.
According to a series of 2014 government policy documents obtained by a Greenpeace analyst through a Freedom of Information request, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's 2013 budget included $30 million to be invested over two years in a public relations campaign and domestic and international "outreach activities" to promote Alberta's tar sands.
The Guardian's Martin Lukacs reports on Wednesday that "the outreach activities, which cost $4.5 million and were never publicly disclosed, included efforts to 'advance energy literacy amongst [British Columbia] First Nations communities.'"
Further, "The documents indicate the government was funding dozens of projects between 2014 and 2015 to engage Indigenous communities and advance 'Canada's reputation as a global energy leader.'" Natural Resources Canada declined to elaborate on the specific outreach projects when asked for comment.
Previous reports by Lukacs found that the Alberta government had even promised some First Nations leaders an investor stake in oil extraction projects in exchange for their help in convincing Indigenous groups to support various pipeline proposals.
First Nations have generally fiercely opposed the tar sands industry and proposed pipelines, such as Enbridge's Northern Gateway, which would transport heavy, toxic crude from Alberta across ancestral lands to coastal Kitimat, BC. The grassroots mobilization, including several legal challenges, against these projects has successfully hampered construction thus far.
Reacting to this latest disclosure, 350.org founder Bill McKibben tweeted, "Secret documents reveal the Canadian government spent tens of millions advocating for tarsands. A true petrotic state."
The Guardian also notes that the government documents revealed outreach activities, including "research to support Canadian lobbying against a European environmental measure that would have hampered tar sands exports. Canada has succeeded in delaying the measure—the EU Fuel Quality Directive—several times."
Greenpeace climate analyst Keith Stewart, who first obtained the policy documents, said: "The Harper government gutted environmental laws and destroyed public faith in the regulatory system to fast-track pipelines, then wasted $30 million of public money on a public relations campaign doomed to fail. They seem to think that if they spend enough money, they can fool all of the people all of the time, but that kind of arrogance is a risky re-election strategy at a time of low oil prices and rising concern over climate change."
Solidifying the country's reputation as a "true petrostate," the government of Canada reportedly spent millions of taxpayer dollars on previously undisclosed tar sands lobbying activities, including a concerted push to 'educate' First Nations communities opposed to the toxic drilling projects.
According to a series of 2014 government policy documents obtained by a Greenpeace analyst through a Freedom of Information request, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's 2013 budget included $30 million to be invested over two years in a public relations campaign and domestic and international "outreach activities" to promote Alberta's tar sands.
The Guardian's Martin Lukacs reports on Wednesday that "the outreach activities, which cost $4.5 million and were never publicly disclosed, included efforts to 'advance energy literacy amongst [British Columbia] First Nations communities.'"
Further, "The documents indicate the government was funding dozens of projects between 2014 and 2015 to engage Indigenous communities and advance 'Canada's reputation as a global energy leader.'" Natural Resources Canada declined to elaborate on the specific outreach projects when asked for comment.
Previous reports by Lukacs found that the Alberta government had even promised some First Nations leaders an investor stake in oil extraction projects in exchange for their help in convincing Indigenous groups to support various pipeline proposals.
First Nations have generally fiercely opposed the tar sands industry and proposed pipelines, such as Enbridge's Northern Gateway, which would transport heavy, toxic crude from Alberta across ancestral lands to coastal Kitimat, BC. The grassroots mobilization, including several legal challenges, against these projects has successfully hampered construction thus far.
Reacting to this latest disclosure, 350.org founder Bill McKibben tweeted, "Secret documents reveal the Canadian government spent tens of millions advocating for tarsands. A true petrotic state."
The Guardian also notes that the government documents revealed outreach activities, including "research to support Canadian lobbying against a European environmental measure that would have hampered tar sands exports. Canada has succeeded in delaying the measure—the EU Fuel Quality Directive—several times."
Greenpeace climate analyst Keith Stewart, who first obtained the policy documents, said: "The Harper government gutted environmental laws and destroyed public faith in the regulatory system to fast-track pipelines, then wasted $30 million of public money on a public relations campaign doomed to fail. They seem to think that if they spend enough money, they can fool all of the people all of the time, but that kind of arrogance is a risky re-election strategy at a time of low oil prices and rising concern over climate change."