SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Image from People's Climate March in New York City, September 21, 2014.
In a revelation that deals a serious blow to the already-bogus claims of climate change deniers, top scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) declared this week that the so-called "hiatus" in global warming--some have called it a "Faux Pause"--was never a real thing.
"Our new analysis suggests that the apparent hiatus may have been largely the result of limitations in past datasets, and that the rate of warming over the first 15 years of this century has, in fact, been as fast or faster than that seen over the last half of the 20th century," the researchers write in a paper published Thursday in the journal Science.
"These results do not support the notion of a 'slowdown' in the increase of global surface temperature," the authors said.
The Washington Post's Chris Mooney detailed the background of the spurious claim:
Starting in at least early 2013, a number of scientific and public commentators have suggested that the rate of recent global warming has slowed or even stopped. The phenomena has been variably termed a "pause," a "slowdown," and a "hiatus." Pointing to it is a favorite technique of climate change doubters -- recently employed by none other than presidential candidate Ted Cruz -- but it certainly doesn't stop with them.
In its 2013 mega report, no less than the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change appeared to validate the idea of a global warming slowdown when it noted that "the rate of warming over the past 15 years [from 1998 to 2012], which begins with a strong El Nino, is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951." Meanwhile, a bevy of scientific studies have emerged in recent years seeking to explain the slowdown with reference to various modes of natural variability within the climate system, including volcanic eruptions and -- probably the most popular account -- the temporary burial of heat deep within the vast Pacific ocean.
According to United Press International, a major difference in NOAA's new data, aside from including the last two years--which broke previous heat records--is a series of improvements in calculations, most notably in a correction that figures in the difference between temperatures measured by buoys and ships.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a revelation that deals a serious blow to the already-bogus claims of climate change deniers, top scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) declared this week that the so-called "hiatus" in global warming--some have called it a "Faux Pause"--was never a real thing.
"Our new analysis suggests that the apparent hiatus may have been largely the result of limitations in past datasets, and that the rate of warming over the first 15 years of this century has, in fact, been as fast or faster than that seen over the last half of the 20th century," the researchers write in a paper published Thursday in the journal Science.
"These results do not support the notion of a 'slowdown' in the increase of global surface temperature," the authors said.
The Washington Post's Chris Mooney detailed the background of the spurious claim:
Starting in at least early 2013, a number of scientific and public commentators have suggested that the rate of recent global warming has slowed or even stopped. The phenomena has been variably termed a "pause," a "slowdown," and a "hiatus." Pointing to it is a favorite technique of climate change doubters -- recently employed by none other than presidential candidate Ted Cruz -- but it certainly doesn't stop with them.
In its 2013 mega report, no less than the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change appeared to validate the idea of a global warming slowdown when it noted that "the rate of warming over the past 15 years [from 1998 to 2012], which begins with a strong El Nino, is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951." Meanwhile, a bevy of scientific studies have emerged in recent years seeking to explain the slowdown with reference to various modes of natural variability within the climate system, including volcanic eruptions and -- probably the most popular account -- the temporary burial of heat deep within the vast Pacific ocean.
According to United Press International, a major difference in NOAA's new data, aside from including the last two years--which broke previous heat records--is a series of improvements in calculations, most notably in a correction that figures in the difference between temperatures measured by buoys and ships.
In a revelation that deals a serious blow to the already-bogus claims of climate change deniers, top scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) declared this week that the so-called "hiatus" in global warming--some have called it a "Faux Pause"--was never a real thing.
"Our new analysis suggests that the apparent hiatus may have been largely the result of limitations in past datasets, and that the rate of warming over the first 15 years of this century has, in fact, been as fast or faster than that seen over the last half of the 20th century," the researchers write in a paper published Thursday in the journal Science.
"These results do not support the notion of a 'slowdown' in the increase of global surface temperature," the authors said.
The Washington Post's Chris Mooney detailed the background of the spurious claim:
Starting in at least early 2013, a number of scientific and public commentators have suggested that the rate of recent global warming has slowed or even stopped. The phenomena has been variably termed a "pause," a "slowdown," and a "hiatus." Pointing to it is a favorite technique of climate change doubters -- recently employed by none other than presidential candidate Ted Cruz -- but it certainly doesn't stop with them.
In its 2013 mega report, no less than the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change appeared to validate the idea of a global warming slowdown when it noted that "the rate of warming over the past 15 years [from 1998 to 2012], which begins with a strong El Nino, is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951." Meanwhile, a bevy of scientific studies have emerged in recent years seeking to explain the slowdown with reference to various modes of natural variability within the climate system, including volcanic eruptions and -- probably the most popular account -- the temporary burial of heat deep within the vast Pacific ocean.
According to United Press International, a major difference in NOAA's new data, aside from including the last two years--which broke previous heat records--is a series of improvements in calculations, most notably in a correction that figures in the difference between temperatures measured by buoys and ships.