

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As older Americans face a looming "retirement crisis," presidential candidate for the Democratic nomination, Bernie Sanders, has come out swinging against undeclared GOP rival Jeb Bush, who recently suggested raising the retirement age to 68 or 70.
"I have a hard time understanding what world Gov. Bush and his billionaire backers live in," said Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.), founder of the Senate Defending Social Security Caucus. "When the average Social Security benefit is just $1,328 a month, and more than one-third of our senior citizens rely on Social Security for virtually all of their income, our job must be to expand benefits, not cut them."
"It reflects a callous insensitivity toward working Americans, a lofty patrician blindness toward the lives of the hoi polloi."
--Richard Eskow, Campaign for America's Future
The Center for Economic and Policy Research has stated that raising the retirement age would cut workers' benefits since workers would have to pay more to get the same level of benefits.
The former Florida governor, who will reportedly announce on June 15 that he is officially running for president, made the statements Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"I think it needs to be phased in over an extended period of time," Bush said of raising the retirement age. "We need to look over the horizon and begin to phase in, over an extended period of time, going from 65 to 68 or 70. ... And that, by itself, will help sustain the retirement system for anybody under the age of 40."
In keeping with the Republican Party's "anti-elderly" platform, Bush's remark indicates that he's privileged and "out of touch," wrote Campaign for America's Future senior fellow Richard Eskow on Monday. "It reflects a callous insensitivity toward working Americans, a lofty patrician blindness toward the lives of the hoi polloi. What kind of person, given vast inherited wealth and power, sets about worsening the financial circumstances of most Americans--without even bothering to learn what those circumstances are?"
In a separate piece published this week, Eskow noted that, along with Bush, most leading Republican presidential candidates are pushing cuts to Social Security, with only former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee opposing such cuts.
Sanders, who supports expanding benefits as opposed to cutting them, described Bush's plan as "just a continuation of the war that the Republicans are waging against working-class Americans to reward billionaires on Wall Street."
The senator has proposed legislation that would eliminate the cap on all taxable income above $250,000 so that millionaires and billionaires pay the same percentage of their income into Social Security as middle-class Americans.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As older Americans face a looming "retirement crisis," presidential candidate for the Democratic nomination, Bernie Sanders, has come out swinging against undeclared GOP rival Jeb Bush, who recently suggested raising the retirement age to 68 or 70.
"I have a hard time understanding what world Gov. Bush and his billionaire backers live in," said Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.), founder of the Senate Defending Social Security Caucus. "When the average Social Security benefit is just $1,328 a month, and more than one-third of our senior citizens rely on Social Security for virtually all of their income, our job must be to expand benefits, not cut them."
"It reflects a callous insensitivity toward working Americans, a lofty patrician blindness toward the lives of the hoi polloi."
--Richard Eskow, Campaign for America's Future
The Center for Economic and Policy Research has stated that raising the retirement age would cut workers' benefits since workers would have to pay more to get the same level of benefits.
The former Florida governor, who will reportedly announce on June 15 that he is officially running for president, made the statements Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"I think it needs to be phased in over an extended period of time," Bush said of raising the retirement age. "We need to look over the horizon and begin to phase in, over an extended period of time, going from 65 to 68 or 70. ... And that, by itself, will help sustain the retirement system for anybody under the age of 40."
In keeping with the Republican Party's "anti-elderly" platform, Bush's remark indicates that he's privileged and "out of touch," wrote Campaign for America's Future senior fellow Richard Eskow on Monday. "It reflects a callous insensitivity toward working Americans, a lofty patrician blindness toward the lives of the hoi polloi. What kind of person, given vast inherited wealth and power, sets about worsening the financial circumstances of most Americans--without even bothering to learn what those circumstances are?"
In a separate piece published this week, Eskow noted that, along with Bush, most leading Republican presidential candidates are pushing cuts to Social Security, with only former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee opposing such cuts.
Sanders, who supports expanding benefits as opposed to cutting them, described Bush's plan as "just a continuation of the war that the Republicans are waging against working-class Americans to reward billionaires on Wall Street."
The senator has proposed legislation that would eliminate the cap on all taxable income above $250,000 so that millionaires and billionaires pay the same percentage of their income into Social Security as middle-class Americans.
As older Americans face a looming "retirement crisis," presidential candidate for the Democratic nomination, Bernie Sanders, has come out swinging against undeclared GOP rival Jeb Bush, who recently suggested raising the retirement age to 68 or 70.
"I have a hard time understanding what world Gov. Bush and his billionaire backers live in," said Sen. Sanders (I-Vt.), founder of the Senate Defending Social Security Caucus. "When the average Social Security benefit is just $1,328 a month, and more than one-third of our senior citizens rely on Social Security for virtually all of their income, our job must be to expand benefits, not cut them."
"It reflects a callous insensitivity toward working Americans, a lofty patrician blindness toward the lives of the hoi polloi."
--Richard Eskow, Campaign for America's Future
The Center for Economic and Policy Research has stated that raising the retirement age would cut workers' benefits since workers would have to pay more to get the same level of benefits.
The former Florida governor, who will reportedly announce on June 15 that he is officially running for president, made the statements Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"I think it needs to be phased in over an extended period of time," Bush said of raising the retirement age. "We need to look over the horizon and begin to phase in, over an extended period of time, going from 65 to 68 or 70. ... And that, by itself, will help sustain the retirement system for anybody under the age of 40."
In keeping with the Republican Party's "anti-elderly" platform, Bush's remark indicates that he's privileged and "out of touch," wrote Campaign for America's Future senior fellow Richard Eskow on Monday. "It reflects a callous insensitivity toward working Americans, a lofty patrician blindness toward the lives of the hoi polloi. What kind of person, given vast inherited wealth and power, sets about worsening the financial circumstances of most Americans--without even bothering to learn what those circumstances are?"
In a separate piece published this week, Eskow noted that, along with Bush, most leading Republican presidential candidates are pushing cuts to Social Security, with only former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee opposing such cuts.
Sanders, who supports expanding benefits as opposed to cutting them, described Bush's plan as "just a continuation of the war that the Republicans are waging against working-class Americans to reward billionaires on Wall Street."
The senator has proposed legislation that would eliminate the cap on all taxable income above $250,000 so that millionaires and billionaires pay the same percentage of their income into Social Security as middle-class Americans.