

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

What the paper reported, based on information provided by a "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany," was that the U.S. spy agency--after being outed for spying on German Chancellor Angela Merkel--responded to an order to refrain from spying directly on Merkel's phone by intensifying its monitoring of other high-level officials in her government.
"We have had the order not to miss out on any information now that we are no longer able to monitor the chancellor's communication directly," the source told the newspaper.
But, as journalist Glenn Greenwald pointed out in his Monday column, the fact that the revelations are based on a "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany" means that whoever spoke to the paper "is yet another NSA source to come forward to disclose the agency's once-secret acts."
And Seth Millstein, writing at the Bustle, explains why the importance of the Bild am Sonntag reporting is two-fold:
First, if this report is true, the NSA is apparently hell-bent on spying on Germany's top officials. Tapping Merkel's phone is one thing -- a big thing, to be sure -- but to tap her aides' phones after the initial phone-tapping goes public, and after promising not to do so again, is another thing altogether. It's borderline hostile, and communicates the U.S.'s true global priorities loudly and clearly to Germany. If the report is accurate, those priorities don't include respecting Germany's privacy as a supposed U.S. ally.
But the source of this leak is important, too. Bild am Sonntag said that the information came from a high-ranking NSA employee in Germany. Edward Snowden doesn't work for the NSA anymore (duh), and by all accounts, he's currently in Russia. This means that there's another potential leaker within the agency's ranks -- or, at the very least, an NSA employee who feels comfortable coming forward to the press about the agency's most secretive, controversial activities abroad.
Whether or not the source can be trusted or if the public will hear from he or she again is not yet clear, but if there is a new NSA whistleblower ready to step forward with even a fraction of what Snowden has, it could further shatter the guarded secrecy of the agency with a global reach.
Additionally, numerous commentators have suggested that one of the reasons why the U.S. government's focus on capturing and punishing Snowden is to dissuade other would-be whistleblowers--in the NSA or other government agencies--from following his example.
What "amazes" TechDirt blogger Mike Masnick about the latest revelations regarding the NSA's ongoing surveillance program of German politicians "is the fact that it's already leaked out."
The seemingly un-authorized disclosure, writes Masnick, comes "despite all the talk of cracking down on future leaks out of the NSA, the NSA already has another leaker releasing information that is clearly politically sensitive."
It's possible, writes Millstein, "that the overall success of Snowden's dramatic reveal has inspired other NSA employees to spill the beans on aspects of U.S. surveillance with which they're uncomfortable."
And as Masnick concludes: "So many folks like to point to Snowden as if he's the only leaker the NSA ever had or ever will have. But it's increasingly looking like there are others within the NSA who are equally uncomfortable with what's become of the intelligence community."
____________________________________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

What the paper reported, based on information provided by a "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany," was that the U.S. spy agency--after being outed for spying on German Chancellor Angela Merkel--responded to an order to refrain from spying directly on Merkel's phone by intensifying its monitoring of other high-level officials in her government.
"We have had the order not to miss out on any information now that we are no longer able to monitor the chancellor's communication directly," the source told the newspaper.
But, as journalist Glenn Greenwald pointed out in his Monday column, the fact that the revelations are based on a "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany" means that whoever spoke to the paper "is yet another NSA source to come forward to disclose the agency's once-secret acts."
And Seth Millstein, writing at the Bustle, explains why the importance of the Bild am Sonntag reporting is two-fold:
First, if this report is true, the NSA is apparently hell-bent on spying on Germany's top officials. Tapping Merkel's phone is one thing -- a big thing, to be sure -- but to tap her aides' phones after the initial phone-tapping goes public, and after promising not to do so again, is another thing altogether. It's borderline hostile, and communicates the U.S.'s true global priorities loudly and clearly to Germany. If the report is accurate, those priorities don't include respecting Germany's privacy as a supposed U.S. ally.
But the source of this leak is important, too. Bild am Sonntag said that the information came from a high-ranking NSA employee in Germany. Edward Snowden doesn't work for the NSA anymore (duh), and by all accounts, he's currently in Russia. This means that there's another potential leaker within the agency's ranks -- or, at the very least, an NSA employee who feels comfortable coming forward to the press about the agency's most secretive, controversial activities abroad.
Whether or not the source can be trusted or if the public will hear from he or she again is not yet clear, but if there is a new NSA whistleblower ready to step forward with even a fraction of what Snowden has, it could further shatter the guarded secrecy of the agency with a global reach.
Additionally, numerous commentators have suggested that one of the reasons why the U.S. government's focus on capturing and punishing Snowden is to dissuade other would-be whistleblowers--in the NSA or other government agencies--from following his example.
What "amazes" TechDirt blogger Mike Masnick about the latest revelations regarding the NSA's ongoing surveillance program of German politicians "is the fact that it's already leaked out."
The seemingly un-authorized disclosure, writes Masnick, comes "despite all the talk of cracking down on future leaks out of the NSA, the NSA already has another leaker releasing information that is clearly politically sensitive."
It's possible, writes Millstein, "that the overall success of Snowden's dramatic reveal has inspired other NSA employees to spill the beans on aspects of U.S. surveillance with which they're uncomfortable."
And as Masnick concludes: "So many folks like to point to Snowden as if he's the only leaker the NSA ever had or ever will have. But it's increasingly looking like there are others within the NSA who are equally uncomfortable with what's become of the intelligence community."
____________________________________________

What the paper reported, based on information provided by a "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany," was that the U.S. spy agency--after being outed for spying on German Chancellor Angela Merkel--responded to an order to refrain from spying directly on Merkel's phone by intensifying its monitoring of other high-level officials in her government.
"We have had the order not to miss out on any information now that we are no longer able to monitor the chancellor's communication directly," the source told the newspaper.
But, as journalist Glenn Greenwald pointed out in his Monday column, the fact that the revelations are based on a "high-ranking NSA employee in Germany" means that whoever spoke to the paper "is yet another NSA source to come forward to disclose the agency's once-secret acts."
And Seth Millstein, writing at the Bustle, explains why the importance of the Bild am Sonntag reporting is two-fold:
First, if this report is true, the NSA is apparently hell-bent on spying on Germany's top officials. Tapping Merkel's phone is one thing -- a big thing, to be sure -- but to tap her aides' phones after the initial phone-tapping goes public, and after promising not to do so again, is another thing altogether. It's borderline hostile, and communicates the U.S.'s true global priorities loudly and clearly to Germany. If the report is accurate, those priorities don't include respecting Germany's privacy as a supposed U.S. ally.
But the source of this leak is important, too. Bild am Sonntag said that the information came from a high-ranking NSA employee in Germany. Edward Snowden doesn't work for the NSA anymore (duh), and by all accounts, he's currently in Russia. This means that there's another potential leaker within the agency's ranks -- or, at the very least, an NSA employee who feels comfortable coming forward to the press about the agency's most secretive, controversial activities abroad.
Whether or not the source can be trusted or if the public will hear from he or she again is not yet clear, but if there is a new NSA whistleblower ready to step forward with even a fraction of what Snowden has, it could further shatter the guarded secrecy of the agency with a global reach.
Additionally, numerous commentators have suggested that one of the reasons why the U.S. government's focus on capturing and punishing Snowden is to dissuade other would-be whistleblowers--in the NSA or other government agencies--from following his example.
What "amazes" TechDirt blogger Mike Masnick about the latest revelations regarding the NSA's ongoing surveillance program of German politicians "is the fact that it's already leaked out."
The seemingly un-authorized disclosure, writes Masnick, comes "despite all the talk of cracking down on future leaks out of the NSA, the NSA already has another leaker releasing information that is clearly politically sensitive."
It's possible, writes Millstein, "that the overall success of Snowden's dramatic reveal has inspired other NSA employees to spill the beans on aspects of U.S. surveillance with which they're uncomfortable."
And as Masnick concludes: "So many folks like to point to Snowden as if he's the only leaker the NSA ever had or ever will have. But it's increasingly looking like there are others within the NSA who are equally uncomfortable with what's become of the intelligence community."
____________________________________________