Exxon's Climate Lie: 'No Corporation Has Ever Done Anything This Big or Bad'
The truth of Exxon’s complicity in global warming must to be told - how they knew about climate change decades ago but chose to help kill our planet
With Paris looming, I'm well aware that it's time to be hopeful, and I'm willing to try. Even amid the record heat and flooding of the present, there are good signs for the future in the rising climate movement and the falling cost of solar.
But before we get to past and present there's some past to be reckoned with, and before we get to hope there's some deep, blood-red anger.
In the last three weeks, two separate teams of journalists -- the Pulitzer-prize-winning reporters at the website Inside Climate News and another crew composed of Los Angeles Times veterans and up-and-comers at the Columbia Journalism School -- have begun publishing the results of a pair of independent investigations into ExxonMobil.
Though they draw on completely different archives, leaked documents, and interviews with ex-employees, they reach the same damning conclusion: Exxon knew all that there was to know about climate change decades ago, and instead of alerting the rest of us denied the science and obstructed the politics of global warming.
To be specific:
- By 1978, Exxon's senior scientists told top management that climate change was real, caused by man, and would raise global temperatures by 2-3C this century, which was pretty much spot-on.
- By the early 1980s, they'd validated these findings with shipborne measurements of CO2 (they outfitted a giant tanker with carbon sensors for a research voyage) and with computer models that showed precisely what was coming. As the head of one key lab at Exxon Research wrote to his superiors, there was "unanimous agreement in the scientific community that a temperature increase of this magnitude would bring about significant changes in the earth's climate, including rainfall distribution and alterations in the biosphere".
- By the early 1990s, their researchers were studying the possibility of new exploration in the Arctic and were well aware that human-induced climate change was melting the poles. Indeed, they used that knowledge to plan their strategy, reporting that soon the Beaufort Sea would be ice-free as much as five months a year instead of the historic two. Greenhouse gases are rising "due to the burning of fossil fuels," a key Exxon researcher told an audience of engineers at a conference in 1991. "Nobody disputes this fact."
But, of course, Exxon did dispute that fact. Not inside the company, where they used their knowledge to buy oil leases in the areas they knew would melt, but outside, where they used their political and financial might to ensure no one took climate change seriously.
They helped organise campaigns to instil doubt, borrowing tactics and personnel from the tobacco industry's similar fight. They funded "institutes" devoted to outright climate denial. And at the highest levels, they did all they could to spread their lies.
To understand the treachery - the sheer, profound, and I think unparalleled evil - of Exxon, one must remember the timing. Global warming became a public topic in 1988, thanks to NASA scientist James Hansen - it's taken a quarter-century and counting for the world to take effective action. If at any point in that journey, Exxon - the largest oil company on Earth and most profitable enterprise in human history - had said: "Our own research shows that these scientists are right and that we are in a dangerous place," the faux debate would effectively have ended. That's all it would have taken; stripped of the cover provided by doubt, humanity would have gotten to work.
Instead, knowingly, they helped organise the most consequential lie in human history, and kept that lie going past the point where we can protect the poles, prevent the acidification of the oceans, or slow sea level rise enough to save the most vulnerable regions and cultures. Businesses always misbehave, but VW is the flea to Exxon's elephant. No corporation has ever done anything this big and this bad.
I'm aware that anger at this point does little good. I'm aware that all clever people will say "of course they did" or "we all use fossil fuels", as if either claim is meaningful. I'm aware that nothing much will happen to Exxon - I doubt they'll be tried in court or their executives sent to jail.
But nonetheless it seems crucial simply to say, for the record, the truth: this company had the singular capacity to change the course of world history for the better and instead it changed that course for the infinitely worse. In its greed, Exxon helped -- more than any other institution -- to kill our planet.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
With Paris looming, I'm well aware that it's time to be hopeful, and I'm willing to try. Even amid the record heat and flooding of the present, there are good signs for the future in the rising climate movement and the falling cost of solar.
But before we get to past and present there's some past to be reckoned with, and before we get to hope there's some deep, blood-red anger.
In the last three weeks, two separate teams of journalists -- the Pulitzer-prize-winning reporters at the website Inside Climate News and another crew composed of Los Angeles Times veterans and up-and-comers at the Columbia Journalism School -- have begun publishing the results of a pair of independent investigations into ExxonMobil.
Though they draw on completely different archives, leaked documents, and interviews with ex-employees, they reach the same damning conclusion: Exxon knew all that there was to know about climate change decades ago, and instead of alerting the rest of us denied the science and obstructed the politics of global warming.
To be specific:
- By 1978, Exxon's senior scientists told top management that climate change was real, caused by man, and would raise global temperatures by 2-3C this century, which was pretty much spot-on.
- By the early 1980s, they'd validated these findings with shipborne measurements of CO2 (they outfitted a giant tanker with carbon sensors for a research voyage) and with computer models that showed precisely what was coming. As the head of one key lab at Exxon Research wrote to his superiors, there was "unanimous agreement in the scientific community that a temperature increase of this magnitude would bring about significant changes in the earth's climate, including rainfall distribution and alterations in the biosphere".
- By the early 1990s, their researchers were studying the possibility of new exploration in the Arctic and were well aware that human-induced climate change was melting the poles. Indeed, they used that knowledge to plan their strategy, reporting that soon the Beaufort Sea would be ice-free as much as five months a year instead of the historic two. Greenhouse gases are rising "due to the burning of fossil fuels," a key Exxon researcher told an audience of engineers at a conference in 1991. "Nobody disputes this fact."
But, of course, Exxon did dispute that fact. Not inside the company, where they used their knowledge to buy oil leases in the areas they knew would melt, but outside, where they used their political and financial might to ensure no one took climate change seriously.
They helped organise campaigns to instil doubt, borrowing tactics and personnel from the tobacco industry's similar fight. They funded "institutes" devoted to outright climate denial. And at the highest levels, they did all they could to spread their lies.
To understand the treachery - the sheer, profound, and I think unparalleled evil - of Exxon, one must remember the timing. Global warming became a public topic in 1988, thanks to NASA scientist James Hansen - it's taken a quarter-century and counting for the world to take effective action. If at any point in that journey, Exxon - the largest oil company on Earth and most profitable enterprise in human history - had said: "Our own research shows that these scientists are right and that we are in a dangerous place," the faux debate would effectively have ended. That's all it would have taken; stripped of the cover provided by doubt, humanity would have gotten to work.
Instead, knowingly, they helped organise the most consequential lie in human history, and kept that lie going past the point where we can protect the poles, prevent the acidification of the oceans, or slow sea level rise enough to save the most vulnerable regions and cultures. Businesses always misbehave, but VW is the flea to Exxon's elephant. No corporation has ever done anything this big and this bad.
I'm aware that anger at this point does little good. I'm aware that all clever people will say "of course they did" or "we all use fossil fuels", as if either claim is meaningful. I'm aware that nothing much will happen to Exxon - I doubt they'll be tried in court or their executives sent to jail.
But nonetheless it seems crucial simply to say, for the record, the truth: this company had the singular capacity to change the course of world history for the better and instead it changed that course for the infinitely worse. In its greed, Exxon helped -- more than any other institution -- to kill our planet.
With Paris looming, I'm well aware that it's time to be hopeful, and I'm willing to try. Even amid the record heat and flooding of the present, there are good signs for the future in the rising climate movement and the falling cost of solar.
But before we get to past and present there's some past to be reckoned with, and before we get to hope there's some deep, blood-red anger.
In the last three weeks, two separate teams of journalists -- the Pulitzer-prize-winning reporters at the website Inside Climate News and another crew composed of Los Angeles Times veterans and up-and-comers at the Columbia Journalism School -- have begun publishing the results of a pair of independent investigations into ExxonMobil.
Though they draw on completely different archives, leaked documents, and interviews with ex-employees, they reach the same damning conclusion: Exxon knew all that there was to know about climate change decades ago, and instead of alerting the rest of us denied the science and obstructed the politics of global warming.
To be specific:
- By 1978, Exxon's senior scientists told top management that climate change was real, caused by man, and would raise global temperatures by 2-3C this century, which was pretty much spot-on.
- By the early 1980s, they'd validated these findings with shipborne measurements of CO2 (they outfitted a giant tanker with carbon sensors for a research voyage) and with computer models that showed precisely what was coming. As the head of one key lab at Exxon Research wrote to his superiors, there was "unanimous agreement in the scientific community that a temperature increase of this magnitude would bring about significant changes in the earth's climate, including rainfall distribution and alterations in the biosphere".
- By the early 1990s, their researchers were studying the possibility of new exploration in the Arctic and were well aware that human-induced climate change was melting the poles. Indeed, they used that knowledge to plan their strategy, reporting that soon the Beaufort Sea would be ice-free as much as five months a year instead of the historic two. Greenhouse gases are rising "due to the burning of fossil fuels," a key Exxon researcher told an audience of engineers at a conference in 1991. "Nobody disputes this fact."
But, of course, Exxon did dispute that fact. Not inside the company, where they used their knowledge to buy oil leases in the areas they knew would melt, but outside, where they used their political and financial might to ensure no one took climate change seriously.
They helped organise campaigns to instil doubt, borrowing tactics and personnel from the tobacco industry's similar fight. They funded "institutes" devoted to outright climate denial. And at the highest levels, they did all they could to spread their lies.
To understand the treachery - the sheer, profound, and I think unparalleled evil - of Exxon, one must remember the timing. Global warming became a public topic in 1988, thanks to NASA scientist James Hansen - it's taken a quarter-century and counting for the world to take effective action. If at any point in that journey, Exxon - the largest oil company on Earth and most profitable enterprise in human history - had said: "Our own research shows that these scientists are right and that we are in a dangerous place," the faux debate would effectively have ended. That's all it would have taken; stripped of the cover provided by doubt, humanity would have gotten to work.
Instead, knowingly, they helped organise the most consequential lie in human history, and kept that lie going past the point where we can protect the poles, prevent the acidification of the oceans, or slow sea level rise enough to save the most vulnerable regions and cultures. Businesses always misbehave, but VW is the flea to Exxon's elephant. No corporation has ever done anything this big and this bad.
I'm aware that anger at this point does little good. I'm aware that all clever people will say "of course they did" or "we all use fossil fuels", as if either claim is meaningful. I'm aware that nothing much will happen to Exxon - I doubt they'll be tried in court or their executives sent to jail.
But nonetheless it seems crucial simply to say, for the record, the truth: this company had the singular capacity to change the course of world history for the better and instead it changed that course for the infinitely worse. In its greed, Exxon helped -- more than any other institution -- to kill our planet.