SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Oil Industry Set to Ignore "Final Warning" on Climate Change
The "clock is ticking". "Little time left". The "Starkest Warning Yet".
Nov 03, 2014
The "clock is ticking". "Little time left". The "Starkest Warning Yet". The "Final Warning".
Just four of the headlines from around the world of yesterday's UN report on climate change. As the headlines suggest, the UN yesterday issued their latest and most definitive warning about climate change yet.
Let's not forget we have been here before and that the scientists have been warning for years - decades even - that we have to disinvest from fossil fuels if we have any chance of avoiding 2 degrees warming.
So far, the warnings have not been heeded. They have often been drowned out by a cacophony of noise generated by the oil industry, its lackeys in public office and its myriad of neo-liberal front groups who have received hundreds of millions of dollars to delay any meaningful action on climate.
So we have come to the "final warning" as the scientists warn that we will have to have eliminate the use of fossil fuels entirely by the end of the Century if the 2 degrees limit has any hope of being achieved.
It is worth pausing - just for a moment there - and think about the ramifications of that. We and our children's generation will have to find the ingenuity to rid ourselves of the polluting hydrocarbon age and totally re-configure, for the large part, how we generate our electricity, heat our homes, and fuel our cars.
Yes the renewable, clean energy revolution has started but it is a long, long way to go before we start realising that the end-game for fossil fuels is in sight.
And then we come to the numbers, which are the little details that don't actually make any rational sense when you look at them.
The scientists maintain that if we are going to try and keep to 2 degrees Celsius we must restrict fossil-fuel burning to about 1 trillion tons of carbon dioxide.
As the New York Times pointed out yesterday: "Yet energy companies have booked coal and petroleum reserves equal to several times that amount"
The scientists tell us we have to disinvest from fossil fuels, and yet the oil and gas industry is spending $600 billion a year to find more oil and gas, which we cannot burn.
As one co-author of the report, Dr Ottmar Edenhofer from Germany's Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research argues. ""We have much more coal, oil and gas underground compared to the amount we can release into the atmosphere in the next five decades if we want to avoid dangerous climate change".
If you think that the industry is acting irractionally, it is worth remembering these companies are not operating in isolation - they are supported by a vast carbon web of companies, governments, banks, investors and insurers who are all pouring billions of dollars into projects whose end product we should never use.
There would be ridicule if banks were funding the setting up of a global restaurant chain that after years of building could never serve food. Yet we are doing just that. Funding projects that should never start. It is financial and ecological madness.
The bottom line is that because the fossil fuel industry has so much capital already invested or lined up to be spent extracting fossil fuels, it will just carry on doing so, ignoring the desperate calls for action from the climate scientists.
The industry may turn around and say we have to carry on drilling to preserve our standards of living and the global economy. But that too is a lie. As the Financial Times points out this morning, climate change can be prevented without seriously denting global economic growth.
The message is simple: As UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon said yesterday "Leaders must act. Time is not on our side ... reduce your investments in the coal- and fossil fuel-based economy and [move] to renewable energy."
But the oil industry will not be listening . They will just carry on drilling like they have always done.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Oil Change International
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
The "clock is ticking". "Little time left". The "Starkest Warning Yet". The "Final Warning".
Just four of the headlines from around the world of yesterday's UN report on climate change. As the headlines suggest, the UN yesterday issued their latest and most definitive warning about climate change yet.
Let's not forget we have been here before and that the scientists have been warning for years - decades even - that we have to disinvest from fossil fuels if we have any chance of avoiding 2 degrees warming.
So far, the warnings have not been heeded. They have often been drowned out by a cacophony of noise generated by the oil industry, its lackeys in public office and its myriad of neo-liberal front groups who have received hundreds of millions of dollars to delay any meaningful action on climate.
So we have come to the "final warning" as the scientists warn that we will have to have eliminate the use of fossil fuels entirely by the end of the Century if the 2 degrees limit has any hope of being achieved.
It is worth pausing - just for a moment there - and think about the ramifications of that. We and our children's generation will have to find the ingenuity to rid ourselves of the polluting hydrocarbon age and totally re-configure, for the large part, how we generate our electricity, heat our homes, and fuel our cars.
Yes the renewable, clean energy revolution has started but it is a long, long way to go before we start realising that the end-game for fossil fuels is in sight.
And then we come to the numbers, which are the little details that don't actually make any rational sense when you look at them.
The scientists maintain that if we are going to try and keep to 2 degrees Celsius we must restrict fossil-fuel burning to about 1 trillion tons of carbon dioxide.
As the New York Times pointed out yesterday: "Yet energy companies have booked coal and petroleum reserves equal to several times that amount"
The scientists tell us we have to disinvest from fossil fuels, and yet the oil and gas industry is spending $600 billion a year to find more oil and gas, which we cannot burn.
As one co-author of the report, Dr Ottmar Edenhofer from Germany's Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research argues. ""We have much more coal, oil and gas underground compared to the amount we can release into the atmosphere in the next five decades if we want to avoid dangerous climate change".
If you think that the industry is acting irractionally, it is worth remembering these companies are not operating in isolation - they are supported by a vast carbon web of companies, governments, banks, investors and insurers who are all pouring billions of dollars into projects whose end product we should never use.
There would be ridicule if banks were funding the setting up of a global restaurant chain that after years of building could never serve food. Yet we are doing just that. Funding projects that should never start. It is financial and ecological madness.
The bottom line is that because the fossil fuel industry has so much capital already invested or lined up to be spent extracting fossil fuels, it will just carry on doing so, ignoring the desperate calls for action from the climate scientists.
The industry may turn around and say we have to carry on drilling to preserve our standards of living and the global economy. But that too is a lie. As the Financial Times points out this morning, climate change can be prevented without seriously denting global economic growth.
The message is simple: As UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon said yesterday "Leaders must act. Time is not on our side ... reduce your investments in the coal- and fossil fuel-based economy and [move] to renewable energy."
But the oil industry will not be listening . They will just carry on drilling like they have always done.
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
The "clock is ticking". "Little time left". The "Starkest Warning Yet". The "Final Warning".
Just four of the headlines from around the world of yesterday's UN report on climate change. As the headlines suggest, the UN yesterday issued their latest and most definitive warning about climate change yet.
Let's not forget we have been here before and that the scientists have been warning for years - decades even - that we have to disinvest from fossil fuels if we have any chance of avoiding 2 degrees warming.
So far, the warnings have not been heeded. They have often been drowned out by a cacophony of noise generated by the oil industry, its lackeys in public office and its myriad of neo-liberal front groups who have received hundreds of millions of dollars to delay any meaningful action on climate.
So we have come to the "final warning" as the scientists warn that we will have to have eliminate the use of fossil fuels entirely by the end of the Century if the 2 degrees limit has any hope of being achieved.
It is worth pausing - just for a moment there - and think about the ramifications of that. We and our children's generation will have to find the ingenuity to rid ourselves of the polluting hydrocarbon age and totally re-configure, for the large part, how we generate our electricity, heat our homes, and fuel our cars.
Yes the renewable, clean energy revolution has started but it is a long, long way to go before we start realising that the end-game for fossil fuels is in sight.
And then we come to the numbers, which are the little details that don't actually make any rational sense when you look at them.
The scientists maintain that if we are going to try and keep to 2 degrees Celsius we must restrict fossil-fuel burning to about 1 trillion tons of carbon dioxide.
As the New York Times pointed out yesterday: "Yet energy companies have booked coal and petroleum reserves equal to several times that amount"
The scientists tell us we have to disinvest from fossil fuels, and yet the oil and gas industry is spending $600 billion a year to find more oil and gas, which we cannot burn.
As one co-author of the report, Dr Ottmar Edenhofer from Germany's Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research argues. ""We have much more coal, oil and gas underground compared to the amount we can release into the atmosphere in the next five decades if we want to avoid dangerous climate change".
If you think that the industry is acting irractionally, it is worth remembering these companies are not operating in isolation - they are supported by a vast carbon web of companies, governments, banks, investors and insurers who are all pouring billions of dollars into projects whose end product we should never use.
There would be ridicule if banks were funding the setting up of a global restaurant chain that after years of building could never serve food. Yet we are doing just that. Funding projects that should never start. It is financial and ecological madness.
The bottom line is that because the fossil fuel industry has so much capital already invested or lined up to be spent extracting fossil fuels, it will just carry on doing so, ignoring the desperate calls for action from the climate scientists.
The industry may turn around and say we have to carry on drilling to preserve our standards of living and the global economy. But that too is a lie. As the Financial Times points out this morning, climate change can be prevented without seriously denting global economic growth.
The message is simple: As UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon said yesterday "Leaders must act. Time is not on our side ... reduce your investments in the coal- and fossil fuel-based economy and [move] to renewable energy."
But the oil industry will not be listening . They will just carry on drilling like they have always done.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.