Gina Haspel, President Donald Trump's nominee for CIA Director, ran a secret prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured during the Bush administration, and was involved in destroying evidence of the torture. (Photo: @TheOnion/Twitter)
Mar 16, 2018
Journalists and civil liberties advocates are cautioning against the derailing of the debate over CIA Director nominee Gina Haspel's history of overseeing torture and her fitness to lead the agency, after ProPublica retracted portions of its reporting on her role in the Bush-era program.
According to critics, the real scandal continues to be Haspel's participation in torture and the subsequent cover-up--not the news outlet's error.
\u201cIt would probably be much easier for reporters to avoid unintentional errors when reporting on CIA torture if they didn't have to read between the lines of ridiculous government redactions meant to cover up crimes.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1521160732
In February 2017, ProPublica reported on Haspel's career at the CIA during the George W. Bush administration, when she ran a clandestine prison in Thailand, overseeing the waterboarding of detainees and pushed senior officers to destroy evidence of the torture.
The investigative news outlet incorrectly reported that she oversaw the black site when al Qaeda suspect Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded there 83 times, and that she privately mocked the prisoner.
ProPublica corrected those two details on Thursday evening and issued an apology, with editor-in-chief Stephen Engelberg writing, "Neither of these assertions is correct and we retract them. It is now clear that Haspel did not take charge of the base until after the interrogation of Zubaydah ended."
However, Haspel's participation in the CIA's torture program and her history of covering up proof of torture is not disputed, and critics are demanding that her actions disqualify her from leading the agency--and that she be held accountable for torturing detainees.
\u201cThat's a very big error. https://t.co/Bhf0tlmoji\u201d— Chris Hayes (@Chris Hayes) 1521156155
\u201c1. No, it isn\u2019t. 2. Haspel still oversaw torture. 3. She still helped destroy evidence. 4. CIA\u2019s own duplicity & secrecy is to blame here. 5. She should be thankful bc this error got her nominated to be CIA director by Trump. 6. There needs to be a truth & reconciliation project. https://t.co/1QM2ztVyHn\u201d— Stuart Schrader (@Stuart Schrader) 1521160752
\u201cOne way to avoid this sort of confusion would have been to expose and prosecute our war criminals https://t.co/HXn57DKOns\u201d— Tom Scocca (@Tom Scocca) 1521158774
\u201cThis is from the same @ProPublica correction.\nLet's not get things twisted.\nHaspel's history of torture is still on the table.\u201d— Jamil Smith \u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (@Jamil Smith \u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645) 1521159633
"Once Abu Zubaydah and [detainee] Nashiri were shipped to their next stop in a series of black sites, Haspel started her multiyear campaign to destroy the videos that showed their torture, which indisputably contradicted written authorizations and records," wrote Marcy Wheeler at the Huffington Post. "Defying the warnings of multiple Democrats, the director of national intelligence, and several judges, Haspel in November 2005, as chief of staff for the director of clandestine services, sent a cable ordering officers to stick the tapes into an industrial-strength shredder."
"America continues to suffer the consequences of those twin acts, the torture and the cover-up," she added.
Meanwhile, NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden denounced the characterization of Haspel by torture supporters including Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.) as someone who has "spent her career defending the American people" while those who criticize her are "defending terrorists." Cheney also claimed that the CIA's use of torture produced valuable intelligence that saved American lives.
\u201cNARRATOR: Actually, the US Senate's reviewed 6,300,000 classified CIA torture files, finding "the CIA's brutal interrogations of terrorism suspects produced no useful intelligence." Torture stopped no attacks, and saved no lives. https://t.co/ggSeAOQ0Kl https://t.co/3q5XCK5NG9\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1521121797
\u201cListen, you can defend torture, or you can defend the Constitution. Not both. The 8th Amendment explicitly forbids torture with all forms of cruel and unusual punishment. To defend torture is to attack the Constitution.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1521124180
At the Washington Post, former CIA counterterrorism officer John Kiriakou, who served 23 months in prison for publicly confirming the existence of the agency's torture program in 2007, wrote about the message Haspel's promotion to CIA Director would send to Americans and the international community.
"Trump's move hurts morale among CIA officers who recognize that torture is wrong. It comforts people at the agency who still believe 'enhanced interrogation' is somehow acceptable," Kiriakou wrote. "And the message it sends to our friends and allies (and the countries we criticize in the State Department's annual human rights reports) is this: We say we're a shining city on a hill, a beacon of respect for human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. But actually, that's nonsense...when push comes to shove, we do what we want, international law be damned."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Journalists and civil liberties advocates are cautioning against the derailing of the debate over CIA Director nominee Gina Haspel's history of overseeing torture and her fitness to lead the agency, after ProPublica retracted portions of its reporting on her role in the Bush-era program.
According to critics, the real scandal continues to be Haspel's participation in torture and the subsequent cover-up--not the news outlet's error.
\u201cIt would probably be much easier for reporters to avoid unintentional errors when reporting on CIA torture if they didn't have to read between the lines of ridiculous government redactions meant to cover up crimes.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1521160732
In February 2017, ProPublica reported on Haspel's career at the CIA during the George W. Bush administration, when she ran a clandestine prison in Thailand, overseeing the waterboarding of detainees and pushed senior officers to destroy evidence of the torture.
The investigative news outlet incorrectly reported that she oversaw the black site when al Qaeda suspect Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded there 83 times, and that she privately mocked the prisoner.
ProPublica corrected those two details on Thursday evening and issued an apology, with editor-in-chief Stephen Engelberg writing, "Neither of these assertions is correct and we retract them. It is now clear that Haspel did not take charge of the base until after the interrogation of Zubaydah ended."
However, Haspel's participation in the CIA's torture program and her history of covering up proof of torture is not disputed, and critics are demanding that her actions disqualify her from leading the agency--and that she be held accountable for torturing detainees.
\u201cThat's a very big error. https://t.co/Bhf0tlmoji\u201d— Chris Hayes (@Chris Hayes) 1521156155
\u201c1. No, it isn\u2019t. 2. Haspel still oversaw torture. 3. She still helped destroy evidence. 4. CIA\u2019s own duplicity & secrecy is to blame here. 5. She should be thankful bc this error got her nominated to be CIA director by Trump. 6. There needs to be a truth & reconciliation project. https://t.co/1QM2ztVyHn\u201d— Stuart Schrader (@Stuart Schrader) 1521160752
\u201cOne way to avoid this sort of confusion would have been to expose and prosecute our war criminals https://t.co/HXn57DKOns\u201d— Tom Scocca (@Tom Scocca) 1521158774
\u201cThis is from the same @ProPublica correction.\nLet's not get things twisted.\nHaspel's history of torture is still on the table.\u201d— Jamil Smith \u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (@Jamil Smith \u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645) 1521159633
"Once Abu Zubaydah and [detainee] Nashiri were shipped to their next stop in a series of black sites, Haspel started her multiyear campaign to destroy the videos that showed their torture, which indisputably contradicted written authorizations and records," wrote Marcy Wheeler at the Huffington Post. "Defying the warnings of multiple Democrats, the director of national intelligence, and several judges, Haspel in November 2005, as chief of staff for the director of clandestine services, sent a cable ordering officers to stick the tapes into an industrial-strength shredder."
"America continues to suffer the consequences of those twin acts, the torture and the cover-up," she added.
Meanwhile, NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden denounced the characterization of Haspel by torture supporters including Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.) as someone who has "spent her career defending the American people" while those who criticize her are "defending terrorists." Cheney also claimed that the CIA's use of torture produced valuable intelligence that saved American lives.
\u201cNARRATOR: Actually, the US Senate's reviewed 6,300,000 classified CIA torture files, finding "the CIA's brutal interrogations of terrorism suspects produced no useful intelligence." Torture stopped no attacks, and saved no lives. https://t.co/ggSeAOQ0Kl https://t.co/3q5XCK5NG9\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1521121797
\u201cListen, you can defend torture, or you can defend the Constitution. Not both. The 8th Amendment explicitly forbids torture with all forms of cruel and unusual punishment. To defend torture is to attack the Constitution.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1521124180
At the Washington Post, former CIA counterterrorism officer John Kiriakou, who served 23 months in prison for publicly confirming the existence of the agency's torture program in 2007, wrote about the message Haspel's promotion to CIA Director would send to Americans and the international community.
"Trump's move hurts morale among CIA officers who recognize that torture is wrong. It comforts people at the agency who still believe 'enhanced interrogation' is somehow acceptable," Kiriakou wrote. "And the message it sends to our friends and allies (and the countries we criticize in the State Department's annual human rights reports) is this: We say we're a shining city on a hill, a beacon of respect for human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. But actually, that's nonsense...when push comes to shove, we do what we want, international law be damned."
Journalists and civil liberties advocates are cautioning against the derailing of the debate over CIA Director nominee Gina Haspel's history of overseeing torture and her fitness to lead the agency, after ProPublica retracted portions of its reporting on her role in the Bush-era program.
According to critics, the real scandal continues to be Haspel's participation in torture and the subsequent cover-up--not the news outlet's error.
\u201cIt would probably be much easier for reporters to avoid unintentional errors when reporting on CIA torture if they didn't have to read between the lines of ridiculous government redactions meant to cover up crimes.\u201d— Trevor Timm (@Trevor Timm) 1521160732
In February 2017, ProPublica reported on Haspel's career at the CIA during the George W. Bush administration, when she ran a clandestine prison in Thailand, overseeing the waterboarding of detainees and pushed senior officers to destroy evidence of the torture.
The investigative news outlet incorrectly reported that she oversaw the black site when al Qaeda suspect Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded there 83 times, and that she privately mocked the prisoner.
ProPublica corrected those two details on Thursday evening and issued an apology, with editor-in-chief Stephen Engelberg writing, "Neither of these assertions is correct and we retract them. It is now clear that Haspel did not take charge of the base until after the interrogation of Zubaydah ended."
However, Haspel's participation in the CIA's torture program and her history of covering up proof of torture is not disputed, and critics are demanding that her actions disqualify her from leading the agency--and that she be held accountable for torturing detainees.
\u201cThat's a very big error. https://t.co/Bhf0tlmoji\u201d— Chris Hayes (@Chris Hayes) 1521156155
\u201c1. No, it isn\u2019t. 2. Haspel still oversaw torture. 3. She still helped destroy evidence. 4. CIA\u2019s own duplicity & secrecy is to blame here. 5. She should be thankful bc this error got her nominated to be CIA director by Trump. 6. There needs to be a truth & reconciliation project. https://t.co/1QM2ztVyHn\u201d— Stuart Schrader (@Stuart Schrader) 1521160752
\u201cOne way to avoid this sort of confusion would have been to expose and prosecute our war criminals https://t.co/HXn57DKOns\u201d— Tom Scocca (@Tom Scocca) 1521158774
\u201cThis is from the same @ProPublica correction.\nLet's not get things twisted.\nHaspel's history of torture is still on the table.\u201d— Jamil Smith \u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (@Jamil Smith \u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645) 1521159633
"Once Abu Zubaydah and [detainee] Nashiri were shipped to their next stop in a series of black sites, Haspel started her multiyear campaign to destroy the videos that showed their torture, which indisputably contradicted written authorizations and records," wrote Marcy Wheeler at the Huffington Post. "Defying the warnings of multiple Democrats, the director of national intelligence, and several judges, Haspel in November 2005, as chief of staff for the director of clandestine services, sent a cable ordering officers to stick the tapes into an industrial-strength shredder."
"America continues to suffer the consequences of those twin acts, the torture and the cover-up," she added.
Meanwhile, NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden denounced the characterization of Haspel by torture supporters including Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.) as someone who has "spent her career defending the American people" while those who criticize her are "defending terrorists." Cheney also claimed that the CIA's use of torture produced valuable intelligence that saved American lives.
\u201cNARRATOR: Actually, the US Senate's reviewed 6,300,000 classified CIA torture files, finding "the CIA's brutal interrogations of terrorism suspects produced no useful intelligence." Torture stopped no attacks, and saved no lives. https://t.co/ggSeAOQ0Kl https://t.co/3q5XCK5NG9\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1521121797
\u201cListen, you can defend torture, or you can defend the Constitution. Not both. The 8th Amendment explicitly forbids torture with all forms of cruel and unusual punishment. To defend torture is to attack the Constitution.\u201d— Edward Snowden (@Edward Snowden) 1521124180
At the Washington Post, former CIA counterterrorism officer John Kiriakou, who served 23 months in prison for publicly confirming the existence of the agency's torture program in 2007, wrote about the message Haspel's promotion to CIA Director would send to Americans and the international community.
"Trump's move hurts morale among CIA officers who recognize that torture is wrong. It comforts people at the agency who still believe 'enhanced interrogation' is somehow acceptable," Kiriakou wrote. "And the message it sends to our friends and allies (and the countries we criticize in the State Department's annual human rights reports) is this: We say we're a shining city on a hill, a beacon of respect for human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. But actually, that's nonsense...when push comes to shove, we do what we want, international law be damned."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.