SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Fortunately, courts will decide whether the Civil Rights Act protects LGBT people, not an Attorney General and a White House that are hell-bent on playing politics with people's lives," said James Esseks, director of the ACLU's LGBT and HIV Project. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
'Repugnant': On Top of Trans Ban, Trump DOJ Tells Employers They Can Discriminate Against LGBTQ Workers
"In one fell swoop, Trump's DOJ has declared that lesbian, gay, and bisexual people may no longer be protected by landmark civil rights laws."
Jul 27, 2017
Just hours after President Donald Trump announced on Twitter that transgender people would no longer be permitted to serve in the armed forces, the Department of Justice on Wednesday launched what is being characterized as a separate attack on the LGBTQ community, this time by arguing in a legal brief that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not protect gay workers from discrimination.
"Attacks against the LGBTQ community at all levels of government continue to pour in from the Trump-Pence administration."
--Sarah Warbelow, Human Rights Campaign
James Esseks, director of the ACLU's LGBT and HIV Project, said in a statement that Wednesday "will go down in history as Anti-LGBT Day" and denounced the Justice Department's brief as a "gratuitous and extraordinary attack on LGBT people's civil rights."
"The Sessions-led Justice Department and the Trump administration are actively working to expose people to discrimination," Esseks added. "Fortunately, courts will decide whether the Civil Rights Act protects LGBT people, not an Attorney General and a White House that are hell-bent on playing politics with people's lives."
The Justice Department's filing was aimed specifically at a case that "kicked off in 2010 when Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor, filed suit against his employer in federal court in New York, alleging the company terminated him for his sexual orientation in violation of Title VII" of the Civil Rights Act, reports Buzzfeed's Dominic Holden.
Holden adds that the DOJ's involvement in the case is abnormal because "the department doesn't typically weigh in on private employment lawsuits." Futhermore, the department is not a party to the case.
Nonetheless, the Justice Department--headed by Trump-appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions, whose voting record on issues affecting the LGBTQ community has been described as "deeply disturbing"--issued forth its contention that sex discrimination barred by the Civil Rights Act does not extend to sexual orientation.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), an independent federal agency, previously ruled in Zarda's favor, arguing that Title VII bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
"EEOC interprets and enforces Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as forbidding any employment discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation," the agency's website states.
"The Sessions-led Justice Department and the Trump administration are actively working to expose people to discrimination."
--James Esseks, ACLU
Human Rights Campaign (HRC), which slammed Trump's transgender ban as an "all out assault on service members," said in response to the Justice Department's filing that "attacks against the LGBTQ community at all levels of government continue to pour in from the Trump-Pence administration."
"In one fell swoop, Trump's DOJ has provided a roadmap for dismantling years of federal protections and declared that lesbian, gay, and bisexual people may no longer be protected by landmark civil rights laws such as the Fair Housing Act, Title IX, or Title VII," said HRC legal director Sarah Warbelow. "Today's filing is a shameful retrenchment of an outmoded interpretation that forfeits faithful interpretation of current law to achieve a politically-driven and legally specious result."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Just hours after President Donald Trump announced on Twitter that transgender people would no longer be permitted to serve in the armed forces, the Department of Justice on Wednesday launched what is being characterized as a separate attack on the LGBTQ community, this time by arguing in a legal brief that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not protect gay workers from discrimination.
"Attacks against the LGBTQ community at all levels of government continue to pour in from the Trump-Pence administration."
--Sarah Warbelow, Human Rights Campaign
James Esseks, director of the ACLU's LGBT and HIV Project, said in a statement that Wednesday "will go down in history as Anti-LGBT Day" and denounced the Justice Department's brief as a "gratuitous and extraordinary attack on LGBT people's civil rights."
"The Sessions-led Justice Department and the Trump administration are actively working to expose people to discrimination," Esseks added. "Fortunately, courts will decide whether the Civil Rights Act protects LGBT people, not an Attorney General and a White House that are hell-bent on playing politics with people's lives."
The Justice Department's filing was aimed specifically at a case that "kicked off in 2010 when Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor, filed suit against his employer in federal court in New York, alleging the company terminated him for his sexual orientation in violation of Title VII" of the Civil Rights Act, reports Buzzfeed's Dominic Holden.
Holden adds that the DOJ's involvement in the case is abnormal because "the department doesn't typically weigh in on private employment lawsuits." Futhermore, the department is not a party to the case.
Nonetheless, the Justice Department--headed by Trump-appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions, whose voting record on issues affecting the LGBTQ community has been described as "deeply disturbing"--issued forth its contention that sex discrimination barred by the Civil Rights Act does not extend to sexual orientation.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), an independent federal agency, previously ruled in Zarda's favor, arguing that Title VII bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
"EEOC interprets and enforces Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as forbidding any employment discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation," the agency's website states.
"The Sessions-led Justice Department and the Trump administration are actively working to expose people to discrimination."
--James Esseks, ACLU
Human Rights Campaign (HRC), which slammed Trump's transgender ban as an "all out assault on service members," said in response to the Justice Department's filing that "attacks against the LGBTQ community at all levels of government continue to pour in from the Trump-Pence administration."
"In one fell swoop, Trump's DOJ has provided a roadmap for dismantling years of federal protections and declared that lesbian, gay, and bisexual people may no longer be protected by landmark civil rights laws such as the Fair Housing Act, Title IX, or Title VII," said HRC legal director Sarah Warbelow. "Today's filing is a shameful retrenchment of an outmoded interpretation that forfeits faithful interpretation of current law to achieve a politically-driven and legally specious result."
Just hours after President Donald Trump announced on Twitter that transgender people would no longer be permitted to serve in the armed forces, the Department of Justice on Wednesday launched what is being characterized as a separate attack on the LGBTQ community, this time by arguing in a legal brief that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not protect gay workers from discrimination.
"Attacks against the LGBTQ community at all levels of government continue to pour in from the Trump-Pence administration."
--Sarah Warbelow, Human Rights Campaign
James Esseks, director of the ACLU's LGBT and HIV Project, said in a statement that Wednesday "will go down in history as Anti-LGBT Day" and denounced the Justice Department's brief as a "gratuitous and extraordinary attack on LGBT people's civil rights."
"The Sessions-led Justice Department and the Trump administration are actively working to expose people to discrimination," Esseks added. "Fortunately, courts will decide whether the Civil Rights Act protects LGBT people, not an Attorney General and a White House that are hell-bent on playing politics with people's lives."
The Justice Department's filing was aimed specifically at a case that "kicked off in 2010 when Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor, filed suit against his employer in federal court in New York, alleging the company terminated him for his sexual orientation in violation of Title VII" of the Civil Rights Act, reports Buzzfeed's Dominic Holden.
Holden adds that the DOJ's involvement in the case is abnormal because "the department doesn't typically weigh in on private employment lawsuits." Futhermore, the department is not a party to the case.
Nonetheless, the Justice Department--headed by Trump-appointed Attorney General Jeff Sessions, whose voting record on issues affecting the LGBTQ community has been described as "deeply disturbing"--issued forth its contention that sex discrimination barred by the Civil Rights Act does not extend to sexual orientation.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), an independent federal agency, previously ruled in Zarda's favor, arguing that Title VII bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
"EEOC interprets and enforces Title VII's prohibition of sex discrimination as forbidding any employment discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation," the agency's website states.
"The Sessions-led Justice Department and the Trump administration are actively working to expose people to discrimination."
--James Esseks, ACLU
Human Rights Campaign (HRC), which slammed Trump's transgender ban as an "all out assault on service members," said in response to the Justice Department's filing that "attacks against the LGBTQ community at all levels of government continue to pour in from the Trump-Pence administration."
"In one fell swoop, Trump's DOJ has provided a roadmap for dismantling years of federal protections and declared that lesbian, gay, and bisexual people may no longer be protected by landmark civil rights laws such as the Fair Housing Act, Title IX, or Title VII," said HRC legal director Sarah Warbelow. "Today's filing is a shameful retrenchment of an outmoded interpretation that forfeits faithful interpretation of current law to achieve a politically-driven and legally specious result."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.