SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Nuclear Option' Looms as Lawmakers Line Up Against Neil Gorsuch
Judiciary committee delays vote on Supreme Court nominee until April 3, giving resistance movement an opening to ramp up opposition
Mar 27, 2017
Amid an energetic resistance campaign, the committee vote on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has been postponed one week.
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee requested the delay, which punts the vote to April 3, "giving Republicans days to meet their goal of winning Gorsuch's confirmation by the full Senate by the end of that week," as The Hill points out. The Senate goes into a two-week recess starting April 8.
The delay, while expected, sets into motion "a major showdown over his Senate confirmation," Politico wrote--and an opening for opponents to further ramp up the pressure on lawmakers to block his nomination.
At least 14 senators--as many as 20, according to some counts--have said they'll vote against Gorsuch, though fewer have committed to a filibuster, which Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called for last week.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), for example, told VTDigger Sunday night: "I am not inclined to filibuster, even though I'm not inclined to vote for him." He clarified his position in a tweet on Monday:
NBC News reports:
With Republicans holding 52 seats, they will need at least eight Democrats to vote with them under the current rules to send the nominee forward for a final confirmation vote that would then require a simple majority.
But Republicans do have the extreme option of employing the "nuclear" option--a change of Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not yet tipped his hand on whether he is willing to do that, and it's not clear that he will have to make that decision as there are still 30 Democrats who haven't said how they will vote.
But with Democratic senators like Florida's Bill Nelson coming out against Gorsuch (and for a filibuster), the GOP's "[p]ath is getting very, very narrow already," Politico reporter Burgess Everett wrote Monday on Twitter.
Democratic Sen. Chris Coons, of Delaware, told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday that McConnell will "almost certainly" use the nuclear option--a potentially disadvantageous move because the change in the rules would become the norm for future Supreme Court nominations, regardless of what party is in charge.
"I think this is tragic," Coons said. "And on talking to friends on both sides of the aisle, we've got a lot of senators concerned about where we're headed. There's Republicans still very mad at us over the 2013 change to the filibuster rule, we're mad at them for shutting down the government, they're mad at us for Gorsuch, and we're not headed in a good direction."
Meanwhile, the resistance movement continues to pressure lawmakers to oppose Gorsuch, with call-in campaigns happening now and nationwide "People's Filibuster" events planned for April 1.
And lawmakers are being held accountable at home, too. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) got an earful on the subject at a raucous town hall meeting this weekend, as the Washington Post reported:
Graham strongly defended Gorsuch, saying that he will "enthusiastically" support Trump's Supreme Court nominee and that filibustering him would be a "huge mistake" for Democrats.
"To everybody that boos Judge Gorsuch, you're not persuading me at all. As a matter of fact, if you can't understand this is a qualified nominee, then you're not listening," Graham said, refusing to let the boos drown him out.
Follow online under the hashtags #StopGorsuch and #WeObject:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Amid an energetic resistance campaign, the committee vote on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has been postponed one week.
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee requested the delay, which punts the vote to April 3, "giving Republicans days to meet their goal of winning Gorsuch's confirmation by the full Senate by the end of that week," as The Hill points out. The Senate goes into a two-week recess starting April 8.
The delay, while expected, sets into motion "a major showdown over his Senate confirmation," Politico wrote--and an opening for opponents to further ramp up the pressure on lawmakers to block his nomination.
At least 14 senators--as many as 20, according to some counts--have said they'll vote against Gorsuch, though fewer have committed to a filibuster, which Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called for last week.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), for example, told VTDigger Sunday night: "I am not inclined to filibuster, even though I'm not inclined to vote for him." He clarified his position in a tweet on Monday:
NBC News reports:
With Republicans holding 52 seats, they will need at least eight Democrats to vote with them under the current rules to send the nominee forward for a final confirmation vote that would then require a simple majority.
But Republicans do have the extreme option of employing the "nuclear" option--a change of Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not yet tipped his hand on whether he is willing to do that, and it's not clear that he will have to make that decision as there are still 30 Democrats who haven't said how they will vote.
But with Democratic senators like Florida's Bill Nelson coming out against Gorsuch (and for a filibuster), the GOP's "[p]ath is getting very, very narrow already," Politico reporter Burgess Everett wrote Monday on Twitter.
Democratic Sen. Chris Coons, of Delaware, told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday that McConnell will "almost certainly" use the nuclear option--a potentially disadvantageous move because the change in the rules would become the norm for future Supreme Court nominations, regardless of what party is in charge.
"I think this is tragic," Coons said. "And on talking to friends on both sides of the aisle, we've got a lot of senators concerned about where we're headed. There's Republicans still very mad at us over the 2013 change to the filibuster rule, we're mad at them for shutting down the government, they're mad at us for Gorsuch, and we're not headed in a good direction."
Meanwhile, the resistance movement continues to pressure lawmakers to oppose Gorsuch, with call-in campaigns happening now and nationwide "People's Filibuster" events planned for April 1.
And lawmakers are being held accountable at home, too. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) got an earful on the subject at a raucous town hall meeting this weekend, as the Washington Post reported:
Graham strongly defended Gorsuch, saying that he will "enthusiastically" support Trump's Supreme Court nominee and that filibustering him would be a "huge mistake" for Democrats.
"To everybody that boos Judge Gorsuch, you're not persuading me at all. As a matter of fact, if you can't understand this is a qualified nominee, then you're not listening," Graham said, refusing to let the boos drown him out.
Follow online under the hashtags #StopGorsuch and #WeObject:
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Amid an energetic resistance campaign, the committee vote on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has been postponed one week.
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee requested the delay, which punts the vote to April 3, "giving Republicans days to meet their goal of winning Gorsuch's confirmation by the full Senate by the end of that week," as The Hill points out. The Senate goes into a two-week recess starting April 8.
The delay, while expected, sets into motion "a major showdown over his Senate confirmation," Politico wrote--and an opening for opponents to further ramp up the pressure on lawmakers to block his nomination.
At least 14 senators--as many as 20, according to some counts--have said they'll vote against Gorsuch, though fewer have committed to a filibuster, which Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called for last week.
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), for example, told VTDigger Sunday night: "I am not inclined to filibuster, even though I'm not inclined to vote for him." He clarified his position in a tweet on Monday:
NBC News reports:
With Republicans holding 52 seats, they will need at least eight Democrats to vote with them under the current rules to send the nominee forward for a final confirmation vote that would then require a simple majority.
But Republicans do have the extreme option of employing the "nuclear" option--a change of Senate rules to eliminate the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has not yet tipped his hand on whether he is willing to do that, and it's not clear that he will have to make that decision as there are still 30 Democrats who haven't said how they will vote.
But with Democratic senators like Florida's Bill Nelson coming out against Gorsuch (and for a filibuster), the GOP's "[p]ath is getting very, very narrow already," Politico reporter Burgess Everett wrote Monday on Twitter.
Democratic Sen. Chris Coons, of Delaware, told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Monday that McConnell will "almost certainly" use the nuclear option--a potentially disadvantageous move because the change in the rules would become the norm for future Supreme Court nominations, regardless of what party is in charge.
"I think this is tragic," Coons said. "And on talking to friends on both sides of the aisle, we've got a lot of senators concerned about where we're headed. There's Republicans still very mad at us over the 2013 change to the filibuster rule, we're mad at them for shutting down the government, they're mad at us for Gorsuch, and we're not headed in a good direction."
Meanwhile, the resistance movement continues to pressure lawmakers to oppose Gorsuch, with call-in campaigns happening now and nationwide "People's Filibuster" events planned for April 1.
And lawmakers are being held accountable at home, too. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) got an earful on the subject at a raucous town hall meeting this weekend, as the Washington Post reported:
Graham strongly defended Gorsuch, saying that he will "enthusiastically" support Trump's Supreme Court nominee and that filibustering him would be a "huge mistake" for Democrats.
"To everybody that boos Judge Gorsuch, you're not persuading me at all. As a matter of fact, if you can't understand this is a qualified nominee, then you're not listening," Graham said, refusing to let the boos drown him out.
Follow online under the hashtags #StopGorsuch and #WeObject:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.